The impact of plant water status on the gas exchange , berry composition and wine quality of Chasselas grapes in Switzerland

Methods and results: Adult vines of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chasselas (clone 14/33-4, grafted onto 5BB) were subjected to different water regimes (various levels of irrigation) during the growing season. Physiological indicators were used to monitor the plant water status [the predawn leaf (ΨPD) and stem (ΨSTEM) water potentials and the carbon isotope composition (δ13C) in the must]. Leaf photosynthesis (A) and transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs), vulnerability to cavitation, yield parameters, berry composition at harvest, and organoleptic quality of wines were analyzed over a period of eight consecutive years between 2009 and 2016, under the relatively dry conditions of the Canton of Wallis, Switzerland.


Introduction
Vine sensitivity to water deficit depends on a number of factors intrinsic to the vineyard site (soil characteristics, soil available water reserves, and mesoclimate) and varies according to genetic (grape variety, rootstock) and agronomical factors, including cultivation techniques (cover crop, plant density, leaffruit ratio).It has been known for many years, due to studies carried out on different "terroirs" (Seguin, 1975 ;van Leeuwen et al., 1994), that plant water status has a major influence on the physiological behavior of vines (photosynthesis, mineral supply, growth) and the quality of grapes and wines.Moreover, the capacity of a large and deep, welldeveloped root system in some vineyards enables vines to endure water scarcity.Severe water stress, however, leads to reduced gas exchange (photosynthesis and transpiration) through stomatal and hydraulic controls (probably sustained by a chemical signal, ABA), consequently decreasing early plant growth (Dry et al., 2000a,b;Chaves et al., 2010).The stomatal regulation of transpiration, together with a reduction in vessel hydraulic conductivity, tends to optimize water use efficiency, while reducing the risk of physiological disorders, such as embolism in vessels during severe drought (Lovisolo et al., 2016).By limiting water flow throughout the plant, and thus limiting canopy development (decreasing leaf area by leaf fall), the plant is able to maintain leaf water potentials above threshold values, thus avoiding the onset of cavitation (the appearance of air bubbles in vessels) under high water deficit conditions (Tyree and Sperry, 1988).
The effects of water deficit on yield components depend on the timing, the intensity and the duration of water stress (Deloire et al., 2004).Water stress early in the season leads to a smaller number of berries per cluster; severe stress developing between the fruit set and veraison period causes a reduction in berry weight (Ojeda et al., 2001) and increases the heterogeneity of berry size.No water stress, combined with high soil water availability, often develops vigorous plant growth and increases the risk of fungal diseases, altering the harvest quality (increased yield, increased competition in the sugar allocation between the vegetative and reproductive vine parts, dilution phenomena, and reduced wine color).On the other hand, a progressively increasing and moderate water stress (after fruit set) leads to a slow stop in plant growth around the veraison, promoting the production of berries richer in sugars, anthocyanins and phenol compounds, with less acids (van Leeuwen et al., 2009;Zufferey et al., 2017).For the elaboration of high-quality white wines, it is well known that vines should experience no mineral nutrient deficiencies, particularly nitrogen deficiencies (Bell and Henschke, 2005 ;Lacroux et al., 2008).For this reason, vines should not be exposed to a water deficit that is too severe (Choné et al., 2006) which may result in a loss of aromatic compounds and wine quality (Reynolds et al., 2010;Reynard et al., 2011).
In the present study, the impact of water supply to vines on plant behavior was analyzed by creating different water regimes during the growing season.The experiments included three levels of irrigation: a deficit irrigation that compensated approximately 30% of evapotranspiration potential (ETP) from flowering to the onset of ripening (veraison) ; no water supply (no irrigation, rain-fed vines) throughout the whole season ; and water stress imposed by covering the soil with a plastic, impermeable, non-reflecting sheet during the growing period (April-October).The vine water status was monitored by using physiological indicators, such as leaf and stem water potentials and carbon isotope composition in the must sugars at harvest.The influence of the water regime on the vine physiology (gas exchange, stomatal and hydraulic conductances, plant vigor, leaf and berry mineral nutrition) and agronomical behavior (yield components) and the quality of the resulting wines was observed in adult vines of the cultivar Chasselas over a period of eight consecutive years on the experimental Agroscope vineyard, which is located in a relatively dry alpine region of Switzerland (Valais).

Materialsandmethods 1.Studysiteandplantmaterial
The experiments were conducted from 2009-2016 at the Agroscope experimental station in Leytron, Switzerland (46°10' N, 7°12' E; 485 m asl), which is located in an alpine valley.The planting material was the cultivar Chasselas (clone 14/33-4), grafted onto Vitis berlandieri x Vitis riparia cv.Kober 5BB rootstock.Vines were trained in the Guyot system (vertical shoot-positioned) with a planting density of 5500 vines ha -1 (planting distance: 1.8 x 1.0 m).Six shoots per vine were maintained.The experimental site in Leytron lies on very stony (peyrosol > 60% large elements, stones, blocks and gravel) and deep (> 2.5 m vine root depth) soil with a water-holding capacity estimated at 150 mm.Monthly rainfalls and temperatures from 2009 to 2016 (and long-term averages from 1981 to 2010) from the meteorological station in Leytron are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

2.Irrigationtreatments
Three different irrigation treatments were established.In the first treatment, 9 L/m 2 of soil (16 L/vine) was drip-fed weekly from bloom (~150 DOY) to fruit ripening (~215 DOY).This level of irrigation (deficit irrigation, DI) corresponded to an approximate weekly compensation of 30% ETP.The second treatment applied no irrigation throughout the entire growing season (plants were rain fed).The third treatment also involved no irrigation ; in addition, waterproof and non-reflecting plastic sheeting was placed on the soil from bloom (~150 DOY) to harvest (~280 DOY) to eliminate the infiltration of water from precipitation events.The trial was conducted using 40 plants per treatment, which were set out in four split-plot randomized blocks of ten vines each.

3.Measurementsofplantwaterstatusandrelative carbonisotopecomposition(δ 13 C)
Predawn leaf water (Ψ PD ) and midday stem water (Ψ STEM ) potentials were measured using a pressure chamber (Scholander et al., 1965) according to Turner (1988).Ψ PD was measured between 0400 and 0500 in the morning, in complete darkness, on eight mature, undamaged and non-senescent leaves.Midday Ψ STEM measurements were performed between 1400 and 1500, when evapotranspiration was at a maximum.Midday Ψ STEM values were determined for eight leaves bagged with a plastic sheet and covered with aluminum foil to stop transpiration at least one hour before the measurement (Fulton et al., 2001).
The stable carbon isotope compositions (δ 13 C) of the must sugars and leaf sugars (leaf carbon isotope signature) were determined at harvest at the Stable Isotopes Laboratory of the University of Lausanne by elemental analysis-isotope ratio mass spectrometry (EA-IRMS) using a Carlo Erba 1108 elemental analyzer connected to a Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen, Germany) DeltaV mass spectrometer.The stable isotope composition was reported as δ 13 C values per mille (‰), with deviations of the isotope ratio relative to known standards as follows : δ = [(R sample − R standard ) R standard ] × 1000, where R is the ratio of heavy to light isotopes ( 13 C/ 12 C).The R standard value for 13 C in Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite limestone is 0.0112372 (Deléens et al., 1994).

4.Leafgasexchangemeasurements
Leaf gas exchange [net photosynthesis (A) and transpiration (E)], stomatal conductance (gs) and mesophyll resistance (r m ) were measured on healthy, fully expanded, mature and non-senescent leaves well exposed to direct sunlight (PFD > 1800 μmol m -2 s -1 ) from June to mid-October.Eight leaves per irrigation treatment were measured in the morning (1000) on days with clear skies.Gas exchange was measured using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA).R m was calculated as r m = (C i -Γ)/A, where C i is the intercellular partial pressure of CO 2 , Γ is the CO 2 compensation point (corresponding to 50 ppm for adult leaves with a leaf temperature between 20-25°C, Schultz, 1996), and A is net photosynthesis.The intrinsic water use efficiency (WUE i , A/gs) and instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE inst , A/E) were determined from single leaf gas-exchange measurements that related the net photosynthesis rate (A) either to the stomatal conductance for water vapor (gs), termed WUE i (Osmond et al., 1980), or to the leaf transpiration rate (E), termed WUE inst .

5.Xylemembolismassessment
Xylem embolism, induced by the presence of air bubbles in vessels, was measured using the method introduced by Sperry and Pockman (1993) and established by Cochard et al. (2000).The principle of the XYL'EM device (Xylem Embolism Meter, Bronkhorst Instructec, Montigny-les-Cormeilles, France) is to accurately measure the water flow (F; mmol s -1 ) entering the petiole of a cut leaf exposed to hydrostatic pressure (P; MPa) using a high-resolution liquid mass flow meter.For the measurement, shoots were cut at the base under water and were held under water for approximately 20 min to promote xylem tension relaxation ; then, the petioles of the apical zone of these shoots were excised under water and connected to the XYL'EM apparatus.The initial hydraulic conductance (K init ) was determined with a hydrostatic pressure gradient of approximately 3 to 4 kPa.Distilled and degassed water was used as the perfusion liquid for all measurements.To measure the maximum conductance (K max ), the petioles were then flushed twice over a period of 2 min with water pressurized at 0.15 MPa.The percentage loss of conductivity (PLC), known as the vulnerability to cavitation or embolism, was calculated as 1 -(K init / K max ).The shoot Ψ STEM was monitored at regular intervals throughout the day and immediately before petiole sampling.The XYL'EM was interfaced with a computer to automatically log the data.PLC figures were constructed using the average values obtained from four petioles and as many measurements representing Ψ STEM .PLC versus Ψ STEM curves were used to determine vulnerability to cavitation, expressed as Ψ PLC50 , and the xylem water potential inducing a 50% loss in hydraulic conductivity.Ψ PLC50 was estimated by fitting a sigmoid PLC curve to the Ψ STEM data as follows: PLC = 100/[1+ exp (a (Ψ stem -Ψ PLC50 ))], where "a" represents the slope of the curve at the point of inflection.

6.Leafandberrymineralnutrition,pruning weightmeasurements
A foliar analysis was performed to determine the levels of leaf nitrogen (Kjeldahl method), potassium, phosphorous, calcium and magnesium.The samples consisted of 25 leaves gathered in the cluster zone at veraison.Leaves with petioles were washed, overdried, ground and analyzed.The leaf chlorophyll index was measured using an N-tester apparatus (Yara, Nanterre, France) on adult leaves situated at the middle of shoots.Yeast available nitrogen (YAN) was estimated by NIR spectroscopy (WineScan®, FOSS NIRSystems, USA).This method quantifies the N-compounds of juice available to yeasts during fermentation.YAN corresponds to the concentration of ammonium ions and primary amino acids, excluding proline.In winter, the total weight of the pruned vine shoots was recorded (six shoots per vine), representing ten plants per replicate and 40 plants per treatment.

7.Yieldcomponents,berrycompositionandwine analyticsandtesting
Bud fertility (number of clusters per shoot) was observed each year shortly before flowering.At harvest, 50 berries per replica were randomly selected and weighed to determine the berry weight.The yield per plant (kg/vine) divided by the number of clusters per plant enabled the average weight of the clusters at harvest to be estimated.The fruit composition parameters at harvest included soluble solids content (g/L), pH, titratable acidity (g tartrate/L) expressed as tartaric acid (g/L), and malic acid (g/L).Microvinification (60 kg of grape) was conducted in an identical fashion for all irrigation treatments by the same winemaker.Wine composition was assessed at bottling by using infrared spectroscopy.A sensory analysis was conducted two months after bottling by a panel of 12 experienced tasters.The panelists rated the intensities with 16 sensory attributes, including wine appearance, bouquet and palate.Wines were evaluated on an unstructured line scale from 1 (no perception) to 7 (very intense perception).

8.Statisticalanalysis
The significance of each treatment was evaluated with analysis of variance (P < 0.05) followed by a single-comparison Newman-Keuls test using XLSTAT 2011.2.04 (Addinsoft, Paris, France).The linear and non-linear regressions of Ψ PD and Ψ STEM and the different physiological parameters were determined using SigmaPlot software (version 13.0) and were statistically analyzed using the SigmaStat program package.

Resultsanddiscussion 1.Climaticconditions
There were large fluctuations in annual average rainfall and temperature throughout the study period from 2009 to 2016 (Tables 1, 2).Generally, the annual precipitation rates were slightly below the long-term average   lowest rainfall measurements were noted for the years 2010, 2011 and 2015, when annual rainfall was 100 to 130 mm lower than the 30-year mean.In addition, relatively dry periods in the months of August and September were observed in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2015 and 2016.The year 2014 was marked by unusually high summer rainfall levels.The annual temperatures were 0.6 to 1.6°C higher than the 30year average, with the exception of the years 2010 and 2013, when the annual temperatures were identical to those recorded for the period of 1981-2010.The summer temperatures (July-September) were particularly hot in 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015 and 2016, relative to the long-term values.

2.Plantwaterstatus
The seasonal courses of Ψ PD , recorded in the growing seasons from 2009 to 2016, highlighted the variations in the vine water regime as a function of year and irrigation level (irrigated and non-irrigated vines, Figure 1).No water stress was observed in the vines that had been watered from bloom to veraison, for which values of Ψ PD oscillated between -0.05 and -0.25 MPa.The non-irrigated vines showed Ψ PD values that became increasingly negative from the end of July (DOY 2010).These values reached -0.3 to -0.5 MPa during the fruit-ripening period, reflecting the presence of moderate water stress.Only in 2014, when there was heavy summer rainfall, was no water stress recorded.In the non-irrigated vines with soil covered by a plastic waterproof sheet, severe water stress (values of Ψ PD < -0.5 MPa) was observed at the end of the growing season, especially during the hot, dry summers of 2009, 2011, 2015 and 2016.The water stress remained moderate in 2010, 2013 and 2014, due to cooler summer temperatures and the occasional heavy rainfall event (Tables 1, 2), which resulted in lower ETP values and less depletion of soil water resources.
The Ψ PD and Ψ STEM values recorded between veraison and harvest correlated well (R 2 = 0.92, P < 0.01 and R 2 = 0.90, P < 0.01, respectively) with the δ 13 C values in the musts at harvest (Figure 2).The δ 13 C values varied from -22.5 ‰ (high water stress) in the non-irrigated vines to -27.0 ‰ (no water stress) in the irrigated vines.A correlation between Ψ PD and Ψ STEM (R 2 = 0.90, P < 0.01) recorded at solar midday was also found, with a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) of approximately 2.5 to 3.5 kPa during the eight-year study period (results not presented).
The different physiological indicators used in this study (Ψ PD , Ψ STEM and δ 13 C) gave a good picture of the vine water regime during the growing season, as has been previously shown in earlier studies (Choné et al., 2001 ;van Leeuwen et al., 2009).These indicators often correlate well among each other (van Leeuwen et al., 2001a, b).The Ψ PD and the Ψ STEM data enable the evolution of the plant water status to be followed throughout the growing season.On the other hand, δ 13 C, which is analyzed in must sugars at harvest, presents an integrative approach to the water regime that prevailed during the sugar-accumulating phase in berries, that is, from the onset of fruit ripening (veraison) to harvest (Gaudillère et al., 2002).The 13 C values in must sugars can be used as an indicator of soil water availability in the vineyard (de Souza et al., 2005a, b).
In the summer, the transpiration rates of the nonirrigated vines dropped sharply in response to moderate to severe water stress, decreasing from 6 to 1.5 mmol H 2 O m -2 s -1 at the end of the season.The leaf senescence observed in September also partly explains the progressive reduction in gas exchange (A et E) during fruit ripening.The leaf stomatal conductance and gas exchange values had a good correlation with the plant water status (Ψ PD values) in the period from bloom to the mid-ripening of the berries; correlation coefficients up to 0.88 (P < 0.01) for A, 0.90 (P < 0.01) for E and 0.92 (P < 0.01) for gs were recorded (results not presented in the present article).
The stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration in periods of progressively developing water stress has been widely documented by various studies (Chaves et al., 2007 ;2010).The gradual closure of stomata indeed offers a rapid and effective response to soil water deficits and to increases in VPD, where the latter coincides with the drying of the soil.Stomatal regulation constitutes a short-term adaptation, enabling plants to save water by reducing leaf transpiration and simultaneously limiting the risk of vessel embolism phenomena and the rupture/failure of the hydraulic conductivity in the plant's vascular system (Lovisolo et al., 2002).
The instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE inst ), which expresses the ratio between photosynthesis A and transpiration E, tended to increase during the growing season and was identical in both the irrigated and non-irrigated vines (Figure 3 E).Intrinsic water use efficiency (WUE i ), on the other hand, which is calculated by the A/gs ratio, was higher in the nonirrigated vines than in the irrigated vines (Figure 3 F).
Under the conditions of the present study, as water stress increased, a greater decrease in gs than in photosynthesis was observed, leading to a higher WUE i in the non-irrigated vines than in the irrigated vines.Some studies, however, have shown that, in very severe drought situations, WUE i can decrease (Prieto et al., 2010), suggesting an increase in mesophyll limitations (increase in r m ), which, in turn, lowers the rates of photosynthesis (Flexas et al., 2007).Furthermore, a correlation between the WUE i and δ 13 C in the berry sugars was observed over the eight-year study period (Figure 4), thus confirming previous observations (Medrano et al., 2005 ;Zufferey et al., 2017).The increase in WUE i was linked to that of δ 13 C in the must sugars.Nonirrigated vines presented higher δ 13 C values (less negative), probably associated with a weaker discrimination against 13 C and 13 C enrichment in must sugars.The latter has been correlated with a rise in the WUE i of non-irrigated vines compared to wellwatered vines.In addition, differences in leaf and fruit isotope signatures were observed (results not presented) under conditions of water stress (Bchir et al., 2016): the δ 13 C in leaves reflects not only the leaf ratio of Ci/Ca and the WUE of the current growing season but also the C assimilated in the previous year and its allocation during spring growth.There is generally an enrichment of 13 C in berries compared to leaves due to the import of carbon assimilates from the leaves after the onset of ripening, when water stress is high (stomata closed), thus supplying carbon assimilates enriched in 13 C. Lastly, a recent study (Spangenberg et al., 2017) showed that the analysis of carbon isotopes, undertaken in the solid residues and volatile organic components of wine, constitutes a very effective tool for estimating variations in the water status of plants and soils in different vineyards.
Among all treatments, the mesophyll resistance (r m ) was greatest at the end of the season in the nonirrigated vines with sheet-protected soils (Figure 3G).Water stress increases the resistance to the transfer of CO 2 from leaf substomatal cavities to the chloroplasts, where CO 2 fixation sites and photosynthetic enzymes are situated (Flexas et al., 2002).The rise in r m associated with the decrease in gs under water stress lowers the availability of CO 2 in the chloroplasts and, consequently, the rate of photosynthesis in the leaves, as observed in the present study.

B. Cavitation vulnerability
A curve representing cavitation vulnerability in leaf petioles was established by relating the PLC with Ψ STEM (Figure 5).PLC increased progressively with water stress, reaching approximately 30%, with a Ψ STEM value of -1.0 MPa.The 50% threshold of PLC was observed at Ψ STEM values of -1.25 MPa.In nonirrigated vines with plastic-covered soils, values close to 70-80% PLC were noted when water stress levels were very high (Ψ STEM < -1.5 MPa).In the watered  vines, with Ψ STEM values remaining above -0.8MPa (weak water stress), no cavitation or very low cavitation values (below 10%) were recorded.The rain-fed vines presented an intermediary situation.An earlier study (Zufferey et al., 2011) demonstrated the sensitivity of cv.Chasselas to embolism under very high water stress conditions during the growing season, as was the case for the non-irrigated vines in the present work.The progressive stomatal control of transpiration, followed by the reduction of hydraulic conductivity in protective « fuse » organs, such as petioles, allows the Ψ leaf value to remain above a critical threshold, which, up to a certain point, prevents hydraulic rupture and embolism.The petiole hydraulic conductivity in the non-irrigated vines indeed decreased progressively as water stress intensified over the season (results not presented).
The hypothesis that hydraulic and chemical signals significantly contribute to differences in preservation or water stress behaviors among vine varieties appears increasingly likely, especially in isohydric and anisohydric plants (Tardieu and Simonneau, 1998;Pantin et al., 2013).In particular, the stomatal and hydraulic conductances of the Chasselas cultivar seem to be sensitive to soil water availability and, therefore, to Ψ PD , compared to the Pinot noir vine grown in the same experimental plot in Leytron (Switzerland); the latter appears to be more sensitive to VPD variations (Spring, 1997 ;Zufferey et al., 2017).Based on the perception of water stress by leaves and roots, different grapevine varieties react differently to water deficits.Some recent studies have attempted to better comprehend the relationships between the stomatal regulation of gas exchange, hydraulic conductivity in roots and shoots, aquaporin expression levels and hormonal signals (mainly ABA, Stoll et al., 2000) under water stress conditions (Coupel-Ledru et al., 2017).Hydraulic segmentation, whereby the risk of hydraulic rupture is shared among plant organs, may also play an important part in the sensitivity of plants to embolism phenomena during drought.The greater hydraulic resistance measured in shoots than in petioles (Lovisolo et al., 2007) and the anatomical characteristics of vessels (Pagay et al., 2016) may, in addition, contribute to preventing the spread of embolism by reducing cavitation vulnerability in the perennial structure of plants.
Plant vigor, estimated by pruning weight, was influenced by the water supply to vines (Table 4).Pruning weights were found to be lower in the nonirrigated vines with plastic-covered soils suffering drought in hot summers (years 2011, 2015, 2016) than in the irrigated vines.An intermediate situation was observed for the rain-fed vines.Compared with the irrigated vines, a pruning weight decrease of nearly 20% was observed in the non-irrigated vines with plastic-covered soils, and a decrease of 2% was observed in the non-irrigated vines (rain fed).

d. Yield components and must characteristics at harvest
Table 5 outlines the results of bud fertility, berry weight, cluster weight, cluster removal and yield observations.No significant differences were found between the yield components studied.Berry and cluster weights only had slightly lower values (significant difference at P = 0.10) in the nonirrigated vines with plastic-covered soils that had suffered drought.Any differences in yields were limited by maintaining the same number of clusters per vine (removal of seven clusters per vine) in both the irrigated and non-irrigated vines.A reduction of approximately 10% in yield was observed in the vines that experienced the greatest water stress, compared with the irrigated and rain-fed vines.Moreover, in most of the dry years, water stress appeared after the onset of fruit ripening (veraison), often towards the end of the ripening period ; the impact of water stress on yield occurring late during the season is generally less important than that of water stress occurring early in the season (  variety under the same study conditions (Zufferey et al., 2017).The leaf chlorophyll !%&# index remained similar in all irrigation treatments.YAN levels decreased as water stress !%'# increased, particularly in non-irrigated vines with plastic-covered soil (Table 3, al., 2001 ;Ollat et al., 2002).Bud fertility was not influenced by the vine water status over the eightyear study period: this result leads us to believe that the carbon and nitrogen reserves in both the irrigated and non-irrigated vines were well reconstituted (restored) from year to year (Zufferey et al., 2015).
The must sugar content increased with water deficits (Table 6).The highest sugar levels were observed in the non-irrigated, plastic-covered vines under moderate to high water stress.It has been well documented that a moderate, progressive restriction of the water supply beginning at the ripening period increases sugar accumulation in berries (van Leeuwen et al., 2009) by preventing vegetative growth in secondary shoots.As the water deficit suppresses growth, carbon synthesized in the leaves is reallocated to the berries, probably due to the direct effect of ABA signaling the end of berry ripening (Deluc et al., 2009).In the present study, the total acidity and malic acid contents were lower in the must from non-irrigated vines than in the must from well-watered vines.The decrease in total acidity and the malic acid degradation appear to be linked to the berry microclimate (berries exposed to direct sunlight) in non-irrigated, water-stressed plants, due to the leaf fall in the cluster zone.No significant differences were noted for pH and tartaric acid as a function of plant water status, which is in agreement with other observations (McCarthy, 2000).In wines, values of pH, total acidity and tartaric acid were very similar among the different irrigation treatments, and no significant differences were observed (results not presented).

4.Winetasting
Figure 7 presents the results of the wine tasting, which occurred several weeks after bottling, for major wine characteristics: wine bouquet (sharpness and quality of aromas), wine structure, wine bitterness, and global appreciation of the wine.Globally, the vine water regime had little influence on the quality and organoleptic characteristics of the Chasselas wines, with the exception of the hot, dry year in 2009, when the quality of wine from the irrigated vines, which had not experienced water stress, was more appreciated.Bitterness was generally more noticeable in wine from non-irrigated vines that had experienced drought than in wine from well-watered vines.No significant difference was recorded for the bouquet and wine structure during the study period, whether from irrigated or nonirrigated vines.Concerning the global appreciation of wines (hedonic impression), those obtained from the irrigated vines were appreciated slightly more than those obtained from the non-irrigated vines.This was due to the perception of less bitterness in the wines from well-watered vineyards than in the wines from non-irrigated vineyards.Progressive and moderate water stress, beginning at fruit ripening, favors the enrichment of sugars, anthocyanins and phenol compounds in the berries of red cultivars (Kennedy et al., 2002;van Leeuwen et al., 2009;Zufferey et al., 2017).On the other hand, in white cultivars, a low to slightly moderate water stress benefits the development of aromatic components (Reynolds et al., 2010).A severe or sometimes even moderate water stress can have a negative impact on white wine quality, particularly affecting the sharpness of aromas and the perception of bitterness (van Leeuwen and Vivin, 2008 ;Spring and Zufferey, 2011).Furthermore, high water stress is often accompanied by a reduction in the available nitrogen content of must.According to the vineyard, year, vintage, and grape variety, this reduction may impair the aromatic expression (Tominaga et al., 2000), the quality and the characteristics of white wines (Peyrot des Gachons et al., 2005;Reynard et al., 2011).
Ojeda et