<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<article xmlns:ns1="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-title-group>
                <journal-title>OENO One</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                <article-title>Identification of grape berry indigenous epiphytic yeasts with in vitro and in vivo antagonistic activity towards pathogenic fungi</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ayogu</surname>
                        <given-names>Peter</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Teixeira</surname>
                        <given-names>António</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Martins</surname>
                        <given-names>HernâniGerós*andViviana</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
                        <sup>
                            <italic>*</italic>
                        </sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Biology</surname>
                        <given-names>CentreofMolecularandEnvironmental</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Biology</surname>
                        <given-names>Departmentof</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Minho</surname>
                        <given-names>Universityof</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Gualtar</surname>
                        <given-names>Campusde</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname></surname>
                        <given-names>Braga</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="author">
                    <name>
                        <surname></surname>
                        <given-names>Portugal</given-names>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <author-notes>
                <corresp id="cor1">
                    <sup>
                        <italic>*</italic>
                    </sup>Corresponding authors: geros@bio.uminho.pt; vmartins@bio.uminho.pt</corresp>
            </author-notes>
            <abstract>
                <sec id="ABSTRACT">
                    <title>ABSTRACT</title>
                    <p>During their lifespan, grapes are exposed to conditions that can endanger plant health, including fluctuating climate and infection by pests and insects. In particular, attacks by filamentous fungi represent huge annual losses for grape farmers. Present concerns about rising antimicrobial resistance, fungicide prohibitions and shifting consumer tastes are driving the search for less harmful ways of preventing damage to grapevine by pathogenic fungi. In this study, the antagonist activity of yeasts isolated from grape berry surface microbiota was assessed by <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> assays on an assortment of grapevine fungal pathogens, including <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> and <italic>Aspergillus niger</italic>. The results show that <italic>W. anomalus</italic>, <italic>A. pullulans</italic>, <italic>C. intermedia</italic>, <italic>R. glutinis</italic>, <italic>Z. meyerae</italic> and <italic>H. takashimae</italic> were able to inhibit by 75 to 100 % mycelia growth and sporulation of the filamentous fungi <italic>in vitro</italic>. Strains of <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> and <italic>S. bacillaris</italic> also showed 50 to 75 % efficacy in reducing mould growth. The strains were further assessed on incised leaves of 2-month-old grapevines for their ability to reduce disease incidence by the filamentous fungi. <italic>W. anomalus</italic>, <italic>A. pullulans</italic>, <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic>, <italic>C. intermedia</italic> and <italic>R. glutinis</italic> significantly reduced infection symptoms in the leaves, indicating their potential as effective biocontrol yeasts in the vineyard.</p>
                </sec>
            </abstract>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec id="Introduction">
            <title>Introduction</title>
            <p>The surface of grape berries is naturally colonised by microbes (bacteria, fungi and yeasts) whose interactions with one another and the host play important roles in plant health and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Barata <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>). However, microbes are among the major causes of damage to grapes and many other fruits, and are thus associated with significant economic costs. Of these organisms, fungal pathogens account for greater yield losses at local and global scale (Rousseaux <italic>etal</italic> ., 2014; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Cordero-Bueso <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). Fungal pathogens originating from the soil include: <italic>Aspergillus niger,</italic> responsible for the production of ochratoxin A (OTA) in grapes and wine; <italic>Botrytis cinerea,</italic> which<italic/>causes bunch rot and produces off-flavours in grape products; <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> and <italic>C. nymphaeae,</italic> which cause ripe rot and twig antrachnose; <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> and <italic>P. glabrum,</italic> which cause post-harvest fruit rot and produce volatile compounds, such as geosmin, as well as mycotoxins, such as citrinin and patulin; and the oomycete <italic>Plasmopara viticola,</italic> which causes downy mildew (Rousseaux <italic>etal</italic> ., 2014; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Guginski-Piva <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cabañas <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">González-Fernández <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). The appearance in vineyards and presence on the aerial parts of grapes of this group of filamentous fungi can negatively affect vine vigour and development, with extensive damage to postharvest fruits prior to and during storage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Scott <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>). They are naturally able to produce spores which are highly resistant to conventional pesticides and some other sanitary measures, making their eradication from the environment difficult (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cabañas <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Cortesão <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>).</p>
            <p>Pest management in vineyards largely relies on the use of fungicide treatments. Common examples of synthetic fungicides that are massively used in the control of grapevine diseases are iprodione, fludioxonil, copper compounds and sulfur-based chemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Čadež <italic>et al.</italic>, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Buonassisi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). However, the continuous application of chemical pesticides threatens the environment, leads to more fungicide-resistance strains and can also compromise the vineyard's natural defence network by damaging populations of natural predators (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Christ and Burritt, 2013</xref>). A massive application of chemical fungicides can lead to the amount of pesticide residues on grapes at harvest time exceeding the permitted level set by national and international authorities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Commission Regulation (EC) 396/2005, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Grimalt and Dehouck, 2016</xref>). High amounts of pesticide residues are a major concern in viticulture as they can influence the quality of grapes and wines and are capable of endangering consumer health. In this regard, the quest for alternative disease management strategies to those that involve the use of conventional chemicals is currently a big challenge for viticulturists all over the world.</p>
            <p>Many yeasts that occur naturally on the surface of grape berries have important roles in winemaking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Fleet, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Barata <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Khan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). Like other microbes, their abundance and composition on the grape berry can change over time to reflect the stage of ripening, pesticide application and health condition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Barata <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bokulich <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Kántor <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). Most native yeasts living in plant tissues, such as <italic>Aureobasidiumpullulans</italic>  and <italic>Metschnikowia pulcherrima,</italic> can have beneficial effects without causing disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Di Canito <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). However, the presence of some acid-tolerant vineyard native yeasts, including those that belong to the genera <italic>Dekkera</italic>/<italic>Brettanomyces,</italic> can be a source of concern in winemaking, as they can produce high amounts of acetic acid; they are thus considered as wine spoilage yeasts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Silva <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>). It has been revealed that the presence and metabolic activities of some organisms on grape berry surfaces can antagonise other species within the microbial population, and that endospheric and phylospheric yeasts secrete bioactive molecules that can potentially be used as essential agrochemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Laman Trip and Youk, 2020</xref>); this knowledge has opened up new potential avenues for farmers in terms of the prevention and management of plant disease. Thus, given the possibility for optimising formulations that are more eco-friendly than conventional fungicides, the potential of native yeasts as biocontrol agents is being increasingly explored (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Wang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cabañas <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Rodriguez Assaf <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Agarbati <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Maluleke <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>).</p>
            <p>In this study we hypothesise that the native yeast isolates of grape berries from vines in two Portuguese DOC regions, Vinhos Verdes and Douro, have biocontrol activity against six selected filamentous fungi that are relevant to viticulture, as they comprise the phytopathogenic fungi found on grapes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Kassemeyer and Berkelmann-Löhnertz, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Echeverrigaray <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). The six filamentous fungi were <italic>A. niger</italic>, <italic>B. cinerea</italic>, <italic>C. acutatum</italic>, <italic>C. nymphaea</italic>, <italic>P. expansum</italic> and <italic>P. glabrum</italic>. In our previous study, preliminary assays showed the ability of <italic>A. pullulans</italic> and <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> to inhibit the growth of <italic>A. nigerin vitro</italic>  (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Martins <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>). Extensive studies that involve a vast array of indigenous strains are thus necessary in order to be able to design an effective foliar formulation to ensure sustainable agriculture. In the light of this, we combined different approaches, involving <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> assays in detached young leaves and young grapevines infected with spoilage filamentous fungi, to determine the biocontrol activities of the yeast isolates. The novel <italic>in vivo</italic> approaches would enable us to preliminarily assess the ability of yeast isolates to protect grapevine tissues from damage caused by filamentous fungi.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Materials-and-methods">
            <title>Materials and methods</title>
            <sec id="1.-Yeast-strains-and-culture-conditions">
                <title>1. Yeast strains and culture conditions</title>
                <p>The native yeast strains used in this study had previously been isolated from the microbiota of grape berries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Martins <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>) during two harvest seasons in two vineyards located in the DOC regions of Vinhos Verdes and Douro (Northern Portugal). Briefly, the isolation methodology consisted of platting freshly extracted grape juice in a solid Wallerstein differential medium, and isolating approximately 200 unique colonies (per vineyard) in a fresh medium after 5 days of incubation at 24 °C. Species identification was performed following Sanger sequencing of the rDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and the rDNA D1/D2 domain region applying previously optimised methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Martins <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>). The sequences were queried onto BLASTn (nucleotide BLAST – basic local alignment search tool) of NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) and strain identification was based on the result with the highest score (sequence of the best match, determined through values of query cover, percentage identity and E value). The yeast strains were preserved as glycerol stocks in the Microbial Collection of the Biology Department of University of Minho (Portugal). The isolates were freshly grown in YPD medium for 3 days at 24 °C prior to carrying out the experiments. The most abundant strains of each species isolated per vineyard were selected to be tested for their antagonistic potential in the present study: <italic>Candida intermedia</italic> AUMC 10767, <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic> LXH3, <italic>A. pullulans</italic> Y11, <italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic> CBS:2584, <italic>H. uvarum</italic> PY-11, <italic>Holtermanniella takashimae</italic> NYG26-2, <italic>H. festucosa</italic> P40D005, <italic>Metschnikowia pulcherrima</italic> CBS:2256, <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> Ipub65, <italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic> AD407, <italic>R. glutinis</italic> IFM 55305, <italic>R. babjevae</italic> CBS:6020, <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> AUMC 10229, <italic>Starmerella bacillaris</italic> IWBT-Y505, <italic>Wickerhamomyces anomalus</italic> HN1, <italic>Zygoascus meyerae</italic> 118, <italic>Curvibasidium pallidicorallinum</italic> CBS:9091, <italic>Filobasidium magnum</italic> bca-17, <italic>F. stepposum</italic> bca-379, <italic>F. wieringae</italic> CBS:8353, <italic>Rhodosporidium babjevae</italic> BD19, <italic>Sporidiobolus metaroseus</italic> AUMC 11218, <italic>Sporobolomyces roseus</italic> AUMC 11233, <italic>S. ruberrimus</italic> CBS:10230 and <italic>Vishniacozyma victoriae</italic> PYCC 6195. In addition, two strains were obtained from the Microbial Collection of the Biology Department of the University of Minho (Portugal), namely <italic>Candida stellata</italic> CBS 157 and <italic>Saccharomyces bayanus</italic> IGC 4569.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="2.-Pathogen-mould-strains-and-culture-conditions">
                <title>2. Pathogen mould strains and culture conditions</title>
                <p>The following filamentous fungi used in the present study were retrieved from the Microbial Collection of the Biology Department of the University of Minho (Portugal): <italic>Aspergillus niger</italic> (DB E), <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> (DB Pex), <italic>Penicillium glabrum</italic> (DB Pgl), <italic>Colletotrichum nymphaeae</italic> (DB Cony) and <italic>Colletotrichum acutatum</italic> (DB Coac). <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> (BC1) was kindly provided by Professor Philippe Nicot‬ (French National Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment, France). These moulds are phytopathogenic fungi found on grapes and they were selected based on the results of previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Kassemeyer and Berkelmann-Löhnertz, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Echeverrigaray <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). The moulds were cultivated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA; MP Biomedicals, USA) at 25 °C for 14 days, in an 8 h dark/16 h light (200 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) photoperiod to induce sporulation prior to carrying out the experiments.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="3.-In-vitro-antagonistic-activity">
                <title>3. In vitro antagonistic activity</title>
                <p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> antagonistic activity was determined on PDA by dual assay, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Parafati <italic>et al.</italic> (2015)</xref> with some modifications. The fungal spores were harvested from individual plates using 2 mL of 0.05 % Tween 20 solution. The conidia suspensions were filtered through 0.45 µm membranes to exclude mycelia and the spores counted with a haemocytometer (HBG Germany). Fungal conidial suspensions were adjusted to the desired concentrations (10<sup>3</sup>, 10<sup>5</sup> or 10<sup>7</sup> spores/mL) with sterile distilled water. Similarly, freshly grown yeast cultures were diluted in sterile distilled water to the desired concentrations (10<sup>4</sup>, 10<sup>6</sup> or 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL). Concentrations of yeasts and spores were selected based on previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Parafati <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Cabañas <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>).</p>
                <p>In the first assay, 5 µL of spore suspension were placed at the centre of a Petri dish containing PDA medium. Next, 5 µL of yeast cells were positioned on the periphery of the plate 25 mm from its centre. Control plates inoculated with only the mould were also prepared. Plates were incubated at 25 °C for up to 10 days prior to screening the antagonistic activity, which was evaluated by the radial growth of the mould in the presence or absence of the yeast. The assay was performed using three biological replicates for each combination of yeast and mould. The yeast strains showing antagonistic activity were selected for the second assay. It should be noted that all the yeasts grow well in PDA medium.</p>
                <p>The second assay aimed at confirming the antagonistic activity of 14 selected yeasts, by embedding the yeast cells in the PDA medium. For this purpose, 5 mL of soft PDA (7 g/L agar) containing a final concentration of 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL of yeast cells were laid onto Petri dishes containing 10 mL of solid PDA. After the medium was allowed to solidify, 5 µL of fresh mould conidial suspensions at 10<sup>5</sup> spores/mL were inoculated at the centre of the medium. The plates were incubated at 25 °C and the antagonistic activity was expressed as the inhibition rate (%), which was calculated as follows: % I = </p>
                <p>
                    <inline-formula>
                        <ns3:math>
                            <ns3:mfrac>
<ns3:mrow>
    <ns3:mfenced separators="|">
        <ns3:mrow>
            <ns3:mi>R</ns3:mi>
            <ns3:mi>C</ns3:mi>
            <ns3:mo>-</ns3:mo>
            <ns3:mi>R</ns3:mi>
            <ns3:mi>A</ns3:mi>
        </ns3:mrow>
    </ns3:mfenced>
</ns3:mrow>
<ns3:mrow>
    <ns3:mi>R</ns3:mi>
    <ns3:mi>C</ns3:mi>
</ns3:mrow>
                            </ns3:mfrac>
                            <ns3:mi>X</ns3:mi>
                            <ns3:mn>100</ns3:mn>
                        </ns3:math>
                    </inline-formula>
                </p>
                <p>, where RC represents the radial growth measurement in the control plate and RA is the radial mycelial growth of the mould in the presence of the yeast (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Singh <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="4.-Plant-culture-conditions">
                <title>4. Plant culture conditions</title>
                <p>Following the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Orsenigo <italic>et al.</italic> (2017)</xref> with modifications, grapevine seeds were germinated <italic>in vitro</italic> to obtain young grapevines (<italic>Vitis vinifera</italic> L.) for the experiment. Briefly, ripe grape berries were collected from cv. Sousão vineyards of the DOC Douro region and the seeds were separated from the pericarp by squashing the berries through metal sieves, cleaned under running water and then surface-dried on a thin layer of filter paper. The surface of the seeds was sterilised by incubating them in 70 % ethanol for 2 min and then in 50 % commercial bleach solution for 10 min. The seeds were then thoroughly washed three times with sterile distilled water in aseptic conditions. The sterilised seeds were sown in transparent re-sealable plastic boxes (17 x 12 x 10 cm) containing 1 % of distilled water agar and 10 mM of potassium nitrate (KNO<sub>3</sub>), then stratified at 4 °C for three weeks in the dark. This was followed by incubation at 24 °C with an 8 h dark/16 h light (200 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) photoperiod. The germinated seeds were placed in glass vessels for plant culture, containing 1 % (w/v) agar and ½ strength basal Murashige and Skoog medium, and the seedlings were left to grow for 2 months until they had developed three to four leaves for use in the experimental assays. </p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="5.-Antagonistic-activity-on-detached-young-grapevine-leaves">
                <title>5. Antagonistic activity on detached young grapevine leaves</title>
                <p>The effects of the yeast isolates on the mycelial growth of the tested moulds were assessed by inoculating yeast suspensions and fungal conidia successively in healthy young detached grapevine leaves, according to the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Lindsey III <italic>et al.</italic> (2017)</xref> with minor modifications. Detached sterile leaves were aseptically placed in the centre of Petri dishes containing 1 % water agar using sterile scissors and forceps. Briefly, the midrib of each leaf was gently incised on the adaxial axis with a sterile blade and 5 µL of yeast cell suspension (10<sup>6</sup> or 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL) was inoculated inside the incision. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 1 h. Afterwards, 5 µL of fresh conidial suspension (10<sup>7</sup> spores/mL) of each mould was placed on the same spot. The plates were incubated for 7 days at 25 °C, in an 8 h dark/16 h light (200 μmol photons m<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>) photoperiod, and with 80 % humidity. At least three biological replicates were performed for each yeast-mould combination. The leaves inoculated with only the mould, only the yeast or only sterile distilled water were used as controls. After incubation, the disease incidence index was determined by visual scores on a 5 interval H-B scale of 0 - 4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Horsfall and Barratt, 1945</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Xu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004</xref>), which recognises lesion size relative to infected area, whereby 0 = no visible symptoms (0-5 % leaf area infected); 1 = trace symptoms (6-25 % leaf area); 2 = slight lesions (26-50 % leaf area); 3 = pale/yellowing (51-75 % leaf area); 4 = extensive deformation/loss of integrity (&gt; 75 % leaf area).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="6.-Bioprotective-activity-on-young-grapevine-plants">
                <title>6. Bioprotective activity on young grapevine plants</title>
                <p>The <italic>in planta</italic> antagonistic activity was assessed in young healthy grapevines grown <italic>in vitro</italic>, as described in the previous sections. After gently incising the seedlings’ midribs, 5 µL of yeast cells at 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL were inoculated into the lower internodes and flasks were incubated for 1 h, as described previously. The vines were then challenge-inoculated with 5 µL of the suspension of pathogenic moulds at 10<sup>5</sup> spores/mL. The disease incidence was evaluated after incubation at 25 °C for 10 days.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="7.-Statistical-analysis">
                <title>7. Statistical analysis</title>
                <p>The data were analysed using the GraphPad Prism software, version 6.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA). The statistical differences among variables were evaluated with the Student’s <italic>t</italic>-test. In the graphs, the asterisks indicate the degree of significance when comparing the growth of the moulds in the absence of yeasts as follows: * <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.05, ** <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.01, *** <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.001, **** <italic>P</italic> ≤ 0.0001.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Results">
            <title>Results</title>
            <sec id="1.-In-vitro-antagonistic-yeast-mould-interactions">
                <title>1. In vitro antagonistic yeast-mould interactions</title>
                <p>Examples of the results of the <italic>in vitro</italic> plate antagonistic yeast-mould interactions are shown in Figure S1. <italic>W. anomalus</italic> inhibited the mycelia growth of <italic>A. niger</italic>, <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>C. nymphaeae</italic>, while <italic>C. intermedia</italic> and <italic>R. glutinis</italic> showed inhibition of <italic>P. expansum</italic>. Detailed results of all the combinations of yeast-mould interactions are shown in Table 1. Overall, <italic>A. pullulans</italic> LHX3, <italic>C. intermedia</italic> AUMC 10767, <italic>W.anomalus </italic> HN1, <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> CBS:2256 and <italic>R. glutinis</italic> AD407 showed large spectrum inhibition, even at 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL, of the moulds at 10<sup>5</sup> spores/mL. In turn, <italic>H. takashimae</italic> NYG26-2, <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic> AUMC 10229 and <italic>H. uvarum</italic> PY-11 showed inhibition of specific moulds, essentially at 10<sup>6</sup> or 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL. Conversely, 8 yeasts (<italic>F. magnum</italic> bca-17, <italic>F. stepposum</italic> bca-379, <italic>F. wieringae</italic> CBS:8353, <italic>H. festucosa</italic> P40D005, <italic>Rhodosporidium babjevae</italic> BD19, <italic>R. babjevae</italic> CB S:6020, <italic>S. metaroseus</italic> AUMC 11218 and <italic>S. roseus</italic> AUMC 11233) were unable to inhibit mycelia growth of the tested moulds even at 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL<italic>.</italic> For the yeasts that were capable of inhibiting mould growth, a significant increase in the antagonistic activity was observed as the range of yeast concentrations increasing from 10<sup>4</sup> to 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL. In addition, <italic>A. niger</italic> and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> seemed to be more resistant to yeast activity than the remaining filamentous fungi, while <italic>P. glabrum</italic> was the most sensitive. Detailed interactions of yeast isolates with <italic>A. niger</italic> at different concentrations are graphically presented in Figure S2. The results showed that, in general, the antagonistic activity of the yeasts at 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL increased as the concentration of fungal conidia suspension decreased. However, the moulds (10<sup>4</sup>, 10<sup>6</sup> and 10<sup>8</sup> spores/mL) completely outcompeted the yeast isolates (10<sup>4</sup>, 10<sup>6</sup> and 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL) during co-inoculation at equal strengths (data not shown).</p>
                <p>
                    <table-wrap position="float" orientation="portait">
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Table 1. In vitro antagonistic profile of yeast isolates at different concentrations against moulds (105 spores/mL), after 10 days of co-incubation in PDA medium, at 25 °C. </title>
                        </caption>
                        <alternatives>
                            <table style="table table-bordered table-striped affichage-tableau">
<col width="33%"/>
<col width="33%"/>
<col width="33%"/>
<col width="33%"/>
<col width="33%"/>
<col width="33%"/>
<col width="33%"/>
<thead>
    <tr>
        <td xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xsi:type="xs:string">titre du tableau </td>
    </tr>
</thead>
<tr>
    <th>DOC region</th>
    <th>Yeast species and strains</th>
    <th>Moulds (10<sup>5 </sup>spores/mL)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>A. niger</italic>
    </th>
    <th>
        <italic>B. cinerea</italic>
    </th>
    <th>
        <italic>C. acutatum</italic>
    </th>
    <th>
        <italic>C. nymphaeae</italic>
    </th>
    <th>
        <italic>P. expansum</italic>
    </th>
    <th>
        <italic>P. glabrum</italic>
    </th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>yeast concentration (CFU/mL) -&gt;</th>
    <th>10<sup>4</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>6</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>8</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>4</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>6</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>8</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>4</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>6</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>8</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>4</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>6</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>8</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>4</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>6</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>8</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>4</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>6</sup>
    </th>
    <th>10<sup>8</sup>
    </th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th>Vinhos Verdes</th>
    <th>
        <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic> LHX3</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Candida intermedia </italic>AUMC 10767</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Candida stellata</italic> CBS 157</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum </italic>CBS:2584</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Metschnikowia pulcherrima </italic>CBS:2256</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Rhodotorula glutinis </italic>AD407</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Starmerella bacillaris </italic>IWBT-Y505</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Saccharomyces bayanus </italic>IGC 4569</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae </italic>AUMC 10229</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Wickerhamomyces anomalus </italic>HN1</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Zygoascus meyerae </italic>118</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th>Douro</th>
    <th>
        <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans </italic>Y11</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Curvibasidium pallidicorallinum </italic>CBS:9091</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Filobasidium magnum </italic>bca-17</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Filobasidium stepposum </italic>bca-379</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Filobasidium wieringae </italic>CBS:8353</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum </italic>PY-11</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Holtermanniella festucosa</italic> P40D005</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Holtermanniella takashimae</italic> NYG26-2</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Metschnikowia pulcherrima </italic>Ipub65</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Rhodosporidium babjevae </italic>BD19</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Rhodotorula babjevae</italic> CBS:6020</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Rhodotorula glutinis </italic>IFM 55305</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Sporidiobolus metaroseus </italic>AUMC 11218</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Sporobolomyces roseus </italic>AUMC 11233</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Sporobolomyces ruberrimus </italic>CBS:10230</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th/>
    <th>
        <italic>Vishniacozyma victoriae </italic>PYCC 6195</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>+</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
    <th>-</th>
</tr>
                            </table>
                        </alternatives>
                        <table-wrap-foot>
                            <fn>
<p/>
                            </fn>
                        </table-wrap-foot>
                    </table-wrap>
                </p>
                <p>A second <italic>in vitro</italic> assay was performed with a group of 14 yeast strains that had been selected based on the results of the initial screening. This assay involved a test on yeast-embedded solid media with a drop of mould conidial suspensions in the centre of the Petri dish. Examples of representative interactions are shown in Figure 1. <italic>R. glutinis</italic> AD407 (10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL) completely inhibited the growth and sporulation of <italic>A. niger</italic> (10<sup>5</sup> spores/mL), in contrast to its relative, <italic>R. glutinis</italic> IFM 55305. <italic>W. anomalus</italic> HN1 completely inhibited the mycelial growth of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>C. nymphaeae</italic>, while <italic>C. intermedia</italic> AUMC 10767 caused complete inhibition of<italic> C acutatum</italic> growth<italic>. M. pulcherrima</italic> CBS:2256 only partially inhibited the radial growth of <italic>P. glabrum, </italic>while the lowest antagonistic activity was observed in the interaction between <italic>S. cerevisiae </italic>AUMC 10229 and <italic>P.expansum</italic>.</p>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 1. Interaction of yeasts embedded in PDA medium at 106 CFU/mL, with moulds inoculated at the centre of the plate at 105 spores/mL, after 10 days of incubation at 25 °C.</title>
                            <p>Images show examples of the most representative antagonistic activities, and arrows indicate the radius of mould growth in the absence (RC) or presence of yeasts (RA), that was used to calculate the percentage of inhibition, as detailed in Material and Methods.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image1.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 1. Interaction of yeasts embedded in PDA medium at 106 CFU/mL, with moulds inoculated at the centre of the plate at 105 spores/mL, after 10 days of incubation at 25 °C.</title>
                        <p>Images show examples of the most representative antagonistic activities, and arrows indicate the radius of mould growth in the absence (RC) or presence of yeasts (RA), that was used to calculate the percentage of inhibition, as detailed in Material and Methods.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image1.jpeg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
                <p>The heatmap of Figure 2 shows the overall interactions of all the selected yeast strains with the filamentous fungi in growth experiments performed in triplicate. <italic>W. anomalus</italic> completely inhibited the growth of all the tested moulds. It was followed by <italic>C. intermedia</italic> AUMC10767, which was less effective in inhibiting <italic>A. niger</italic>. Furthermore, high inhibitive activity (≥ 75 %) was observed in <italic>A. pullulans </italic>LHX3, <italic>A. pullulans </italic>Y11,<italic> R. glutinis</italic> AD4087, <italic>R. glutinis</italic> IFM55305, <italic>C. intermedia</italic> AUMC 10767, <italic>Z. meyerae</italic> 118 and <italic>H. takashimae</italic> NYG26-2. In addition, the strains of <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> and <italic>S. bacillaris</italic> showed moderate inhibitive activity (50-75 %), whereas the least inhibitive activity was observed in <italic>H. uvarum</italic> PY-11 and <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic> AUMC 10229 (Figure 2 and Table S1).</p>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 2. Heatmap of the interactions of selected yeast strains (106 CFU/mL) with the moulds (105 spores/mL), in vitro.</title>
                            <p>Values represent the average percentage inhibition observed in 3<bold/>independent trials in PDA medium, after 10<bold/>days of incubation at 25<bold/>°C. Values were centred and scaled in the row direction to form virtual colours as presented in the colour key. Statistically significant growth inhibitions following Student’s<italic> t</italic>-test are detailed in Table<bold/>S1.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image2.jpg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 2. Heatmap of the interactions of selected yeast strains (106 CFU/mL) with the moulds (105 spores/mL), in vitro.</title>
                        <p>Values represent the average percentage inhibition observed in 3<bold/>independent trials in PDA medium, after 10<bold/>days of incubation at 25<bold/>°C. Values were centred and scaled in the row direction to form virtual colours as presented in the colour key. Statistically significant growth inhibitions following Student’s<italic> t</italic>-test are detailed in Table<bold/>S1.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image2.jpg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
            </sec>
            <sec id="2.-Antagonistic-activity-of-native-yeasts-in-detached-young-grapevine-leaves-and-young-grapevine-plants">
                <title>2. Antagonistic activity of native yeasts in detached young grapevine leaves and young grapevine plants</title>
                <p>The biocontrol potential of selected yeast strains displaying antagonistic activity in the previous<italic> in vitro</italic> tests was assessed on detached young healthy grape leaves inoculated with the pathogenic moulds. Thus, 11 yeast strains were selected for this assay. Figure 3 shows the representative results of disease incidence reduction of the young leaves inoculated with combinations of selected yeasts and moulds. The results show that the moulds were able to infect the young leaves, producing various effects. In the leaf inoculated with <italic>A. niger </italic>only, sporulation and growth occurred all over the leaf surface, followed by an extensive breakdown of leaf integrity. Inoculation with only the yeast did not show any leaf damage. When <italic>W. anomalus</italic> HN1 was co-inoculated with <italic>A. niger</italic>, neither sporulation nor loss of leaf integrity occurred. The spores of<italic> B. cinerea</italic> germinated on the leaf and caused damage to the midrib zone, resulting in the partial collapse of the leaf tissues. The damage was however reduced in the challenge-inoculation with <italic>A. pullulans</italic> LXH3. <italic>C. acutatum</italic> caused bleaching of the leaf, with sporulation occurring only in the zone of infection. The disease incidence was significantly reduced when the leaf was co-inoculated with <italic>A. pullulans</italic> LXH3. <italic>C. nymphaeae</italic> infection was marked by a profuse bleaching of the entire leaf. However, the challenge-inoculation with <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> CBS:2256 provided moderate protection against the damage. <italic>P. expansum</italic> infection was associated with the growth of spores in the midrib area, partial bleaching and loss of leaf integrity. Co-inoculation with <italic>R. glutinis</italic> AD407 showed a reduction in disease incidence. In the case of <italic>P. glabrum</italic>, sporulation at the site of the infection was observed, and leaf symptoms included bleaching and the partial collapse of the leaf. The results show that co-inoculation with <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic> AUMC 10229 was not effective in preventing sporulation and damage to the leaf.</p>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 3. Disease incidence in wounded young grapevine leaves after challenge inoculation with yeasts and moulds, and incubation at 25 °C for 7 days.</title>
                            <p>For each interaction, images show a non-inoculated control leaf (C), a leaf inoculated with only the mould (M), a leaf inoculated with only the yeast (Y) and a leaf inoculated with both yeast and mould (Y+M). Yeasts were inoculated at 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL, except <italic>W. anomalus</italic> (10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL) and moulds were inoculated at 10<sup>7</sup> spores/mL.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image3.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 3. Disease incidence in wounded young grapevine leaves after challenge inoculation with yeasts and moulds, and incubation at 25 °C for 7 days.</title>
                        <p>For each interaction, images show a non-inoculated control leaf (C), a leaf inoculated with only the mould (M), a leaf inoculated with only the yeast (Y) and a leaf inoculated with both yeast and mould (Y+M). Yeasts were inoculated at 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL, except <italic>W. anomalus</italic> (10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL) and moulds were inoculated at 10<sup>7</sup> spores/mL.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image3.jpeg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
                <p>Figure 4 shows details of the disease incidence of the leaves inoculated with each mould in the presence of the yeasts at 10<sup>6</sup> or 10<sup>8 </sup>CFU/mL. The results show that <italic>W.anomalus</italic>  HN1 provided the highest protection from infection by all the moulds, followed by <italic>A.pullulans</italic>  LXH3, <italic>M.pulcherrima</italic>  CBS:2256, <italic>C.intermedia</italic>  AUMC10767 and <italic>R.glutinis</italic>  AD407. In particular, <italic>R.glutinis</italic>  AD407 and <italic>C.intermedia</italic>  AUMC 10767 provided less protection from infection by <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>C.acutatum</italic> . In turn, <italic>S.cerevisiae</italic>  AUMC 10229 and <italic>H.takashimae</italic>  NYG26-2 were the least effective in protecting the leaves from all the moulds. In general, at the concentration of 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL, a lower antagonistic yeast activity was observed, while no protection was observed at 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL (data not shown). It is worth noting that most of the yeast strains<italic/>that provided greater protection in the leaf assay were amongst the strains observed to be highly antagonistic in the confirmatory <italic>in vitro </italic>assay (Figure 1), namely <italic>W.anomalus</italic>  HN1, <italic>C.intermedia</italic>  AUMC10767, <italic>A.pullulans</italic>  LXH3, <italic>A.pullulans</italic>  Y11, <italic>R.glutinis</italic>  AD407 and <italic>R.glutinis</italic>  IFM 55305. </p>
                <p/>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <label>Table</label>
                        <caption>
                            <title>Figure 4. Heatmap of the disease incidence in young grapevine leaves after co-inoculation with yeasts (106 or 108 CFU/mL) and moulds (107 spores/mL).</title>
                            <p>Values represent the average disease incidence observed in at least 3 independent trials, after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C. Values were centred and scaled in the row direction to form virtual colours, as presented in the colour key, and indicate the disease incidence index, as follows: 0 = no visible symptoms (0-5 % leaf area infected); 1 = trace symptoms (6-25 % leaf area); 2 = slight lesions (26-50 % leaf area); 3 = pale/yellowing (51-75 % leaf area); 4 = extensive deformation/loss of integrity (&gt;75 % leaf area).</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image4.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <fig>
                    <label>Table</label>
                    <caption>
                        <title>Figure 4. Heatmap of the disease incidence in young grapevine leaves after co-inoculation with yeasts (106 or 108 CFU/mL) and moulds (107 spores/mL).</title>
                        <p>Values represent the average disease incidence observed in at least 3 independent trials, after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C. Values were centred and scaled in the row direction to form virtual colours, as presented in the colour key, and indicate the disease incidence index, as follows: 0 = no visible symptoms (0-5 % leaf area infected); 1 = trace symptoms (6-25 % leaf area); 2 = slight lesions (26-50 % leaf area); 3 = pale/yellowing (51-75 % leaf area); 4 = extensive deformation/loss of integrity (&gt;75 % leaf area).</p>
                    </caption>
                    <graphic mimetype="image" ns1:type="simple" ns1:href="image4.jpeg"/>
                </fig>
                <p/>
                <p>Given the positive results obtained for the detached leaves, the assay was extended to young grapevine plants. The results show that six out of the 11 yeast strains (<italic>C. intermedia</italic>, <italic>W. anomalus</italic>, <italic>A. pullulans</italic>, <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic>, <italic>R. glutinis</italic> and <italic>H. takashimae</italic>) are able to protect the vines infected with the 105 spores/mL suspension of the fungal pathogens. Figure S3 shows a representative result of a positive bioprotective effect of <italic>C. intermedia</italic> on <italic>P. expansum</italic>. <italic>H. uvarum</italic> was used as a negative control, providing no protection from infection by <italic>C. nymphaeae</italic>.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Discussion">
            <title>Discussion</title>
            <p>The present study evaluated the biocontrol activity of grape berry native yeast against fungi pathogens <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic>. As expected, some of the selected yeast strains were able to inhibit the growth of the selected moulds <italic>in vitro</italic>. In general, various yeast isolates, namely <italic>W. anomalus</italic> HN1<italic>, A. pullulans</italic> (strains<italic/>LHX3 and<italic/>Y11)<italic>, C. intermedia</italic> AUMC 10767, <italic>R. glutinis</italic> (strains<italic/>AD407 and IFM 55305), <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> CBS:2256, <italic>Zygoascus meyerae</italic> 118 and <italic>Starmerella bacillaris</italic> IWBT-Y505, demonstrated high potential biocontrol activity against <italic>A. niger, B. cinerea, C. acutatum, C. nymphaeae, P. expansum</italic> and <italic>P. glabrum</italic>.<italic/>The earlier discovery of certain yeast species and specific strains retaining high biocontrol potential against several microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Türkel <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>) seems to have spurred an increasing demand for its exploration in the management of plant diseases. Some microorganisms can produce plant hormones, including auxins, gibberellins, cytokins and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), as well as vitamins, antifungal and antibiotic compounds; some can also solubilise minerals, like phosphorus and other nutrients, and fixate nitrogen and degrade toxic chemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Nutaratat <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Pérez-Montaño <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>). The yeast-like fungi <italic>A. pullulans</italic> YA05 and the yeast <italic>R. mucilaginosa</italic> YR07 have been found to produce plant growth enhancement compounds, especially IAA, and were subsequently considered for inclusion into commercial plant-growth-promoting fertilisers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Ignatova <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>).</p>
            <p>The yeast-like <italic>A. pullulans</italic> demonstrated great biocontrol potential and its <italic>in vitro</italic> antagonistic activity increased with higher concentrations of the yeast cell suspension, but it decreased slightly as the fungal conidial suspension increased. Although previous studies have found <italic>A. pullulans</italic> strains FZ02a, Y1 and W32 to be highly inhibitory of the hyphal growth of <italic>P. expansum,A. niger</italic>  and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Cordero-Bueso <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Sukmawati <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Maluleke <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>), in our more expansive dual <italic>in vitro</italic> assays, <italic>A. pullulans</italic> (strains<italic/>LHX3 and<italic/>Y11) was also found to be highly inhibitory for <italic>C. acutatum, C. nymphaeae</italic> and <italic>P. glabrum</italic>. The yeast also significantly reduced the severity of disease on grape leaves caused by all the tested moulds, being highly efficient against <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>C. acutatum</italic>. Similar observations were made of the yeast regarding the protection it provided for young grapevine plants under controlled laboratory conditions. <italic>A. pullulans</italic> is among the predominant yeast-like fungal species found on the surface of grape berries at all stages of maturity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Renouf <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Martins <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>), and previous studies have shown that the L1 and L8 <italic>A. pullulans</italic> strains are involved in the biocontrol of <italic>B. cinerea,C. acutatum</italic>  and <italic>P. expansum</italic> in grapes and other fruits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Mari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Agirman and Erten, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Galli <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Moura <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). In these strains, it has been shown that antagonistic activity is largely due to competition for nutrient and space and host defence induction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>). Notably, the yeast-like fungi <italic>A. pullulans</italic> is also a microorganism with great biotechnological relevance given its capacity to produce enzymes, sugars and metabolites such as pullulan (poly-α-1,6-maltotriose), which underlies its biocontrol activity; this makes it a good candidate for its use in the production of edible films in food processing and pharmaceutical industries and for improving animal health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Mehta <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Trinetta, 2017</xref>). </p>
            <p>In the present study, native strains of <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> showed moderate antagonistic activity <italic>in vitro,</italic> but effective protection against infection <italic>in vivo¸</italic> especially for infection by <italic>A. niger, C. nymphaeae</italic> and <italic>P. expansum</italic>. Accordingly, previous studies have reported that <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> UMY15 showed significant inhibition of <italic>P. expansum</italic>, but that it was less effective against <italic>A. niger</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Türkel <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>). In another study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Parafati <italic>et al.</italic> (2015)</xref> showed that <italic>M. pulcherrima</italic> MPR3 was highly active in the control of <italic>B. cinerea</italic>. It has been shown that its antagonistic activity largely depends on its iron immobilising pigment pulcherrimin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Sipiczki, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Türkel and Ener, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Kántor <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>).</p>
            <p>In the <italic>in vitro</italic> assays of the present study, <italic>R. glutinis</italic> AD40s7 showed more efficient antagonistic activity than <italic>R. glutinis</italic> IFM 55305. The antagonistic activity of <italic>R. glutinis</italic> AD407 was also significant in the grape plant assay in the present study. Previous studies have shown that <italic>R. glutinis</italic> significantly inhibited the growth of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>P. expansumin vitro</italic>  and <italic>in vivo</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008</xref>, 2010). The biocontrol performance of <italic>R. glutinis</italic> against various post-harvest diseases in some fruits has also been found to be positive, and its biocontrol activity is thought to rely on the ability to attach to hyphae or conidia of phytopathogenic fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Li <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>), which is likely strain-dependent. However, the mechanisms involved in its biocontrol activity are not yet fully understood. In a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Zhang <italic>et al.</italic> (2010)</xref>, high antagonistic activity of <italic>R. glutinis</italic> towards <italic>B. cinerea</italic> was observed when salicylic acid was added, suggesting a lower yeast performance in the absence of this metabolite. As well as the production of high amounts of pigment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Hernández-Almanza <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>), it is also speculated that the ability of the yeast to secrete phenolic compounds, such as gallic acid, benzoic acid, catechin, caffeic acid and ferulic acid, in the presence of NaCl (1–5 %) or H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (1–5 mM) could promote its biocontrol activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Salar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013</xref>).</p>
            <p>In other interactions, <italic>W. anomalus</italic> HN1 and <italic>C. intermedia</italic> AUMC 10767 were also highly antagonistic towards the six selected filamentous fungi. In particular, while <italic>W. anomalus</italic> was found to completely inhibit the growth of all filamentous fungi <italic>in vitro</italic>, it was observed that <italic>C. intermedia</italic> did not completely inhibit the growth of <italic>A. niger</italic> in the same conditions. The results of the <italic>in vivo</italic> assays show that <italic>W. anomalus</italic> was the most active in reducing the severity of the disease caused by the moulds on the young leaves, while <italic>C. intermedia</italic> was not as effective. Previous studies have shown that <italic>C. intermedia</italic> C410 and <italic>W. anomalus</italic> Y934 were able to antagonise <italic>B. cinerea</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Huang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Maluleke <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>); our dual <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> approaches have shown these yeasts to have broader biocontrol activity against several other moulds.</p>
            <p>Though <italic>S. bacillaris</italic> IWBT-Y505 significantly outcompeted <italic>A. niger, C. acutatum, C. nymphaeae, P. expansum</italic> and <italic>P. glabrum in vitro</italic>, the yeast isolate did not inhibit the mycelia growth of <italic>B. cinerea</italic>. However, a previous study has shown that other strains of this species can be highly antagonistic towards <italic>B. cinerea</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Lemos Junior <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016</xref>). Conversely, though <italic>H. uvarum</italic> strains CBS:2584 and PY-11 did not significantly inhibit mould mycelia growth in our study, the strain<italic/>CAMB9A was found to be up to 50 % effective against <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>P. expansumin vitro</italic>  (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Cordero-Bueso <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017</xref>)<italic>.</italic>
            </p>
            <p>In a concerted effort to work beyond <italic>in vitro</italic> approaches to prevent the postharvest damage of grape in storage conditions, the biocontrol activity of some local microbial strains have been evaluated <italic>in vivo</italic> using table grapes as substrate, with measurable success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Nally <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Parafati <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Wang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>). The results of the present study confirm that detached young grape leaves and grapevine plants can be used for an initial evaluation of the ability of yeast isolates to protect grapevine tissues from damage caused by filamentous fungi.</p>
            <p>The results of the present study support the increasing research on emerging strategies for growing crops with reduced use of agrochemicals. In particular, the high biocontrol activity of native strains of <italic>W. anomalus</italic> and <italic>A. pullulans</italic> was demonstrated. However, the mechanisms of the antagonistic effects of yeasts towards phytopathogens is still a subject for exploration, because it is not always possible to translate encouraging <italic>in vitro</italic> results into <italic>in vivo</italic>, especially field conditions. Although yeasts are not known to produce any toxic metabolites, thus making them biologically safe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Kowalska <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022</xref>), further knowledge of their biocontrol mechanisms would be necessary in order for them to be considered by regulatory agencies as valuable tools for addressing the challenge. The inhibitory activity of the yeast isolates - which could be due to their ability to secrete compounds that are toxic to the pathogens in these models - indicates their biocontrol and plant growth-promoting potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021</xref>). Furthermore, for grape growers, the foliar application of yeast cells or their formulations could potentially boost grapevine productivity and contribute to sustainable agriculture and the production of high-quality wine. </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Conclusion">
            <title>Conclusion</title>
            <p>Despite being a species of high adaptability, the grapevine is still vulnerable to substantial infestation by fungal pathogens, leading to losses of tons of grapes and thus affecting both farmers and consumers. Preventive methods include using pest-resistant rootstocks and other <italic>Vitis</italic> species, or applying large quantities of broad-spectrum pesticides, but these have yet to attain full consumer acceptance due to safety concerns. The most recent alternative approach relies on the use of biological control agents, which could protect grapevines from pathogens without causing damage to the crops, the environment or the consumer. In the present study, we explored the antimicrobial activity and plant protective potential of vineyard native yeasts. Further studies addressing the inhibition mechanisms underlying yeast antagonistic activity will be a step forward to the application of these microorganisms in the field. </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="Acknowledgements">
            <title>Acknowledgements</title>
            <p>The authors thank Professor Philippe Nicot‬ (French National Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment, France) for providing the <italic>B. cinerea </italic>strain used in this study. This work was supported by the “Contrato-Programa” UIDB/04050/2020 funded by Portuguese national funds through the FCT I.P. The work was also supported by FCT, CCDR-N (Norte Portugal Regional Coordination and Development Commission) and European Funds (FEDER/POCI/COMPETE2020) through the projects GrapeMicrobiota (PTDC/BAA-AGR/2691/2020) and AgriFood XXI (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000041). This work benefited from the networking activities within the CoLAB VINES &amp; WINES and the project Fleurs locales (SOE4/P5/F1011).</p>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <ref-list>
            <ref id="ref1">
                <label>1</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Agarbati</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Canonico</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pecci</surname>
                        <given-names>T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Romanazzi</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ciani</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Comitini</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol of Non-Saccharomyces yeasts in vineyard against the gray mold disease agent Botrytis cinerea</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms, 10(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020200</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref2">
                <label>2</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Agirman</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Erten</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol ability and action mechanisms of Aureobasidium pullulans GE17 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii KL3 against Penicillium digitatum DSM2750 and Penicillium expansum DSM62841 causing postharvest diseases</article-title>. <source>Yeast, 37(9-10), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3501</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref3">
                <label>3</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Barata</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Malfeito-Ferreira</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Loureiro</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>The microbial ecology of wine grape berries</article-title>. <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology, 153, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.11.025</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref4">
                <label>4</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bokulich</surname>
                        <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Thorngate</surname>
                        <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Richardson</surname>
                        <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mills</surname>
                        <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate</article-title>. <source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(1), E139-E148. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317377110</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref5">
                <label>5</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Buonassisi</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Perazzolli</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Peressotti</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tadiello</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Musetti</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Velasco</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cantù</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vezzulli</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Grapevine downy mildew dual epidemics: a leaf and inflorescence transcriptomics study</article-title>. <source>Acta Horticulturae, 1188, 265-270. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1188.34</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref6">
                <label>6</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Cabañas</surname>
                        <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hernández</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Martínez</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tejero</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vázquez-Hernández</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Martín</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ruiz-Moyano</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Control of Penicillium glabrum by indigenous antagonistic yeast from vineyards</article-title>. <source>Foods, 9(12), 1864. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121864</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref7">
                <label>7</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Čadež</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zupan</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Raspor</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2010</year>. <article-title>The effect of fungicides on yeast communities associated with grape berries</article-title>. <source>FEMS Yeast Research, 10, 5, 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00635.x</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref8">
                <label>8</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Christ</surname>
                        <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Burritt</surname>
                        <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Critical environmental concerns in wine production: an integrative review</article-title>. <source>Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.007</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref9">
                <label>9</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Commission Regulation (EC) 396/2005</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Maximum residue levels of pesticides in or on food and feed of plant and animal origin</article-title>. <source>Official Journal of the European Union, L70/1</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref10">
                <label>10</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Cordero-Bueso</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mangieri</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Maghradze</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Foschino</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Valdetara</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cantoral</surname>
                        <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vigentini</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Wild grape-associated yeasts as promising biocontrol agents against Vitis vinifera fungal pathogens</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02025</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref11">
                <label>11</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Cortesão</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>de Haas</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Unterbusch</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fujimori</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Schütze</surname>
                        <given-names>T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Meyer</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Moeller</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Aspergillus niger spores are highly resistant to space radiation</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00560</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref12">
                <label>12</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Di Canito</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mateo-Vargas</surname>
                        <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mazzieri</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cantoral</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Foschino</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cordero-Bueso</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vigentini</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>The role of yeasts as biocontrol agents for pathogenic fungi on postharvest grapes: A review</article-title>. <source>Foods, 10(7):1650. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071650</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref13">
                <label>13</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Di Francesco</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ugolini</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>D'Aquino</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pagnotta</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mari</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol of Monilinia laxa by Aureobasidium pullulans strains: Insights on competition for nutrients and space</article-title>. <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology, 248, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.02.007</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref14">
                <label>14</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Di Francesco</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Di Foggia</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Corbetta</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Baldo</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ratti</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Baraldi</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol activity and plant growth promotion exerted by Aureobasidium pullulans strains</article-title>. <source>Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 40, 1233–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10184-3</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref15">
                <label>15</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Echeverrigaray</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Scariot</surname>
                        <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fontanella</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Favaron</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Sella</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Santos</surname>
                        <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>...</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname></surname>
                        <given-names>&amp; Delamare</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>A. P. L.</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Colletotrichum species causing grape ripe rot disease in Vitis labrusca and V</article-title>. <source>vinifera varieties in the highlands of southern Brazil. Plant Pathology, 69(8), 1504-1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13240</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref16">
                <label>16</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Fleet</surname>
                        <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2003</year>. <article-title>Yeast interactions and wine flavour</article-title>. <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology, 86(1-2), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00245-9</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref17">
                <label>17</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Galli</surname>
                        <given-names>V</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Romboli Y</surname>
                        <given-names>Barbato D</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mari E</surname>
                        <given-names>Venturi M</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guerrini S.</surname>
                        <given-names>&amp; Granchi L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Indigenous Aureobasidium pullulans strains as biocontrol agents of Botrytis cinerea on grape berries</article-title>. <source>Sustainability, 13(16):9389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169389</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref18">
                <label>18</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>González-Fernández</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Piña-Rey</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fernández-González</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Aira</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Rodríguez-Rajo</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Identification and evaluation of the main risk periods of Botrytis cinerea infection on grapevine based on phenology, weather conditions and airborne conidia</article-title>. <source>The Journal of Agricultural Science, 158(1-2), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000362</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref19">
                <label>19</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Grimalt</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dehouck</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Review of analytical methods for the determination of pesticide residues in grapes</article-title>. <source>Journal of Chromatography A, 1433, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.12.076</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref20">
                <label>20</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Guginski-Piva</surname>
                        <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bogo</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Gomes</surname>
                        <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Menon</surname>
                        <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Nodari</surname>
                        <given-names>R. O.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Welter</surname>
                        <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Morphological and molecular characterization of Colletotrichum nymphaeae and C</article-title>. <source>fructicola associated with anthracnose symptoms of grape in Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 125,125, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-018-0176-2</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref21">
                <label>21</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Hernández-Almanza</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Montanez</surname>
                        <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Aguilar-González</surname>
                        <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Martínez-Ávila</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Rodríguez-Herrera</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Aguilar</surname>
                        <given-names>C. N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Rhodotorula glutinis as source of pigments and metabolites for food industry</article-title>. <source>Food Bioscience, 5, 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2013.11.007</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref22">
                <label>22</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Horsfall</surname>
                        <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Barratt</surname>
                        <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>1945</year>. <article-title>An improved grading system for measuring plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology, 35: 655. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595842</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref23">
                <label>23</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Huang</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Li</surname>
                        <given-names>G. Q.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Yang</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Che</surname>
                        <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jiang</surname>
                        <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Huang</surname>
                        <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2011</year>. <article-title>Control of postharvest Botrytis fruit rot of strawberry by volatile organic compounds of Candida intermedia</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology, 101(7), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-10-0255</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref24">
                <label>24</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Ignatova</surname>
                        <given-names>L. V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Brazhnikova</surname>
                        <given-names>Y. V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Berzhanova</surname>
                        <given-names>R. Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mukasheva</surname>
                        <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Plant growth-promoting and antifungal activity of yeasts from dark chestnut soil</article-title>. <source>Microbiological Research, 175, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.03.008</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref25">
                <label>25</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kántor</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hutková</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Petrová</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hleba</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kačániová</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Antimicrobial activity of pulcherrimin pigment produced by Metschnikowia pulcherrima against various yeast species</article-title>. <source>Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, 5(3), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.15414/jmbfs.2015/16.5.3.282-285</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref26">
                <label>26</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kántor</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mareček</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ivanišová</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Terentjeva</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kačániová</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Microorganisms of grape berries</article-title>. <source>Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, Section B, Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences, 71(6) 502-508. https://doi.org/10.1515/prolas-2017-0087</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref27">
                <label>27</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kassemeyer</surname>
                        <given-names>H-H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Berkelmann-Löhnertz</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Fungi of grapes</article-title>. <source>In: König, H., Unden, G., &amp; Fröhlich, J. (eds.). Biology of Microorganisms on Grapes, in Must and in Wine. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60021-5_4</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref28">
                <label>28</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Khan</surname>
                        <given-names>N.A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fahad</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Naushad</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Faisal</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Grape production critical review in the world</article-title>. <source>Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal, 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595842</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref29">
                <label>29</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Kowalska</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Krzymińska</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tyburski</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>Yeasts as a potential biological agent in plant disease protection and yield improvement - A short review</article-title>. <source>Agriculture, 12(9):1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12091404</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref30">
                <label>30</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Laman Trip</surname>
                        <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Youk</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Yeasts collectively extend the limits of habitable temperatures by secreting glutathione</article-title>. <source>Nature Microbiology, 5, 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0704-2</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref31">
                <label>31</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Lemos Junior</surname>
                        <given-names>W. J. F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bovo</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Nadai</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Crosato</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Carlot</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Favaron</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Giacomini</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Corich</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) isolated from wine musts against gray mold disease agent Botrytis cinerea on grape and their effects on alcoholic fermentation</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in Microbiology, 7:1249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01249</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref32">
                <label>32</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Li</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Peng</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Tian</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2016</year>. <article-title>Attachment capability of antagonistic yeast Rhodotorula glutinis to Botrytis cinerea contributes to biocontrol efficacy</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00601</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref33">
                <label>33</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Lindsey III</surname>
                        <given-names>B. E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Rivero</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Calhoun</surname>
                        <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Grotewold</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Brkljacic</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Standardized method for high-throughput sterilization of Arabidopsis seeds</article-title>. <source>Journal of Visualized Experiments, (128), e56587. https://doi.org/10.3791/56587</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref34">
                <label>34</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Maluleke</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jolly</surname>
                        <given-names>N. P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Patterton</surname>
                        <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Setati</surname>
                        <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>Antifungal activity of non-conventional yeasts against Botrytis cinerea and non-Botrytis grape bunch rot fungi</article-title>. <source>Frontiers in Microbiology, 13:986229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.986229</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref35">
                <label>35</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Mari</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Martini</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Spadoni</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Rouissi</surname>
                        <given-names>W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bertolini</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol of apple postharvest decay by Aureobasidium pullulans</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biology and Technology, 73, 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.05.014</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref36">
                <label>36</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Martins</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Costa</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Soares</surname>
                        <given-names>R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ayogu</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Teixeira</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Gerós</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>A catalogue of cultivable yeasts from the microbiota of grape berries cv</article-title>. <source>Vinhão and Loureiro. OENO One, 56(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.3.5462</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref37">
                <label>37</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Martins</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Szakiel</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pączkowski</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Teixeira</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Gerós</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>The restructuring of grape berry waxes by calcium changes the surface microbiota</article-title>. <source>Food Research International, 150, 110812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110812</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref38">
                <label>38</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Mehta</surname>
                        <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Johns</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Stark</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Fierer</surname>
                        <given-names>J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Successful treatment of Aureobasidium pullulans central catheter-related fungemia and septic pulmonary emboli</article-title>. <source>IDCases, 10, 65-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idcr.2017.08.017</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref39">
                <label>39</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Moura</surname>
                        <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pollettini</surname>
                        <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ferraz</surname>
                        <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mazzi</surname>
                        <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kupper</surname>
                        <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Purification of a killer toxin from Aureobasidium pullulans for the biocontrol of phytopathogens</article-title>. <source>Journal of Basic Microbiology, 61,2: 77– 87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202000164</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref40">
                <label>40</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Nally</surname>
                        <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pesce</surname>
                        <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Maturano</surname>
                        <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Munoz</surname>
                        <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Combina</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Toro</surname>
                        <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Castellanosde Figueroa</surname>
                        <given-names>L. I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vazquez</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2012</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea in table grapes by non-pathogenic indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts isolated from viticultural environments in Argentina</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biology and Technology, 64, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.09.009</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref41">
                <label>41</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Nutaratat</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Srisuk</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Arunrattiyakorn</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Limtong</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Plant growth-promoting traits of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts isolated from rice and sugar cane leaves in Thailand</article-title>. <source>Fungal Biology, 118(8), 683-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2014.04.010</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref42">
                <label>42</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Orsenigo</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ardenghi</surname>
                        <given-names>N. M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vagge</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cauzzi</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Müller</surname>
                        <given-names>J. V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mondoni</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Comparative seed germination study across alien grapes (Vitis, Vitaceae) in Europe</article-title>. <source>Weed Research, 57, 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12268</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref43">
                <label>43</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Parafati</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vitale</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Restuccia</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cirvilleri</surname>
                        <given-names>G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2015</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of food-isolated yeast strains against Botrytis cinerea causing post-harvest bunch rot of table grape</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiology, 47, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.013</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref44">
                <label>44</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Pérez-Montaño</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Alías-Villegas</surname>
                        <given-names>C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Bellogín</surname>
                        <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>del Cerro</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Espuny</surname>
                        <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: from microorganism capacities to crop production</article-title>. <source>Microbiological Research, 169 (5-6), 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref45">
                <label>45</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Renouf</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Claisse</surname>
                        <given-names>O.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lonvaud-Funel</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2005</year>. <article-title>Understanding the microbial ecosystem on the grape berry surface through numeration and identification of yeast and bacteria</article-title>. <source>Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 11(3), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00031.x</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref46">
                <label>46</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Rodriguez Assaf</surname>
                        <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pedrozo</surname>
                        <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Nally</surname>
                        <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Pesce</surname>
                        <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Toro</surname>
                        <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Castellanos de Figueroa</surname>
                        <given-names>L. I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Vazquez,F.</surname>
                        <given-names></given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2020</year>. <article-title>Use of yeasts from different environments for the control of Penicillium expansum on table grapes at storage temperature</article-title>. <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology, 320:108520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108520</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref47">
                <label>47</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Rousseaux</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Diguta</surname>
                        <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Radoï-Matei</surname>
                        <given-names>F.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Alexandre</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Guilloux-Bénatier</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Non-Botrytis grape-rotting fungi responsible for earthy and moldy off-flavors and mycotoxins</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiology, 38, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.08.013</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref48">
                <label>48</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Salar</surname>
                        <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Certik</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Brezova</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Brlejova</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hanusova</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Breierová</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2013</year>. <article-title>Stress influenced increase in phenolic content and radical scavening capacity of Rhodotorula glutinis CCY 20-2-26.2</article-title>. <source>Biotechnology, 3(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-012-0069-1</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref49">
                <label>49</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Scott</surname>
                        <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dambergs</surname>
                        <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Stummer</surname>
                        <given-names>B. E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Petrovic</surname>
                        <given-names>T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2022</year>. <article-title>Fungal contaminants in the vineyard and wine quality and safety</article-title>. <source>In: Andrew G. Reynolds. Editor(s). Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. Managing Wine Quality (Second Edition). Woodhead Publishing (pp 587-623). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102067-8.00006-3</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref50">
                <label>50</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Silva</surname>
                        <given-names>P.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Cardoso</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Gerós</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Studies on the wine spoilage capacity of Brettanomyces/Dekkera spp</article-title>. <source>American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 55(1), 65-72.</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref51">
                <label>51</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Singh</surname>
                        <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kumar</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kumar</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kumar</surname>
                        <given-names>A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Mehta</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>Inhibitory effect of botanicals on growth and sporulation of Fusarium oxysporum inciting wilt of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)</article-title>. <source>Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(5), 2199-2204. E-ISSN: 2278-4136</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref52">
                <label>52</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sipiczki</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2006</year>. <article-title>Metschnikowia strains isolated from botrytized grapes antagonize fungal and bacterial growth by iron depletion</article-title>. <source>Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(10):6716–6724. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01275-06</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref53">
                <label>53</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sukmawati</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Family</surname>
                        <given-names>N.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hidayat</surname>
                        <given-names>I.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Sayyed</surname>
                        <given-names>R. Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Elsayed</surname>
                        <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dailin</surname>
                        <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Hanapi</surname>
                        <given-names>S. Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wadaan</surname>
                        <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Enshasy</surname>
                        <given-names>H. E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2021</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol activity of Aureubasidium pullulans and Candida orthopsilosis isolated from Tectona grandis L</article-title>. <source>phylloplane against Aspergillus sp. in post-harvested citrus fruit. Sustainability, 13(13):7479. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137479</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref54">
                <label>54</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Trinetta</surname>
                        <given-names>V.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2017</year>. <article-title>The application of edible and active pullulan coatings on foods</article-title>. <source>Reference Module in Food Science, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21129-3</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref55">
                <label>55</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Türkel</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Korukluoğlu</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Yavuz</surname>
                        <given-names>M.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2014</year>. <article-title>Biocontrol activity of the local strain of Metschnikowia pulcherrima on different postharvest pathogens</article-title>. <source>Biotechnology Research International, 397167, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/397167</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref56">
                <label>56</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Türkel</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ener</surname>
                        <given-names>B.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2009</year>. <article-title>Isolation and characterization of new Metschnikowia pulcherrima strains as producers of the antimicrobial pigment pulcherrimin</article-title>. <source>Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, 64(5-6), 405-410. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2009-5-618</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref57">
                <label>57</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Wang</surname>
                        <given-names>X.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Glawe</surname>
                        <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kramer</surname>
                        <given-names>E.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Weller</surname>
                        <given-names>D.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Okubara</surname>
                        <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2018</year>. <article-title>Biological control of Botrytis cinerea: Interactions with native vineyard yeasts from Washington State</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology, 108(6),691–701. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-17-0306-R</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref58">
                <label>58</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Xu</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Kang</surname>
                        <given-names>D.W.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Shi</surname>
                        <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Shen</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wehner</surname>
                        <given-names>T.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2004</year>. <article-title>Inheritance of resistance to zucchini yellow mosaic virus and watermelon mosaic virus in watermelon</article-title>. <source>The Journal of Heredity, 95(6), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esh076</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref59">
                <label>59</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Wang</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Dong</surname>
                        <given-names>Y.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jiang</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zheng</surname>
                        <given-names>X.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2008</year>. <article-title>Control of postharvest pear diseases using Rhodotorula glutinis and its effects on postharvest quality parameters</article-title>. <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology, 126(1-2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.05.018</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref60">
                <label>60</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ma</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Jiang</surname>
                        <given-names>S.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Lin</surname>
                        <given-names>H.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Zhang</surname>
                        <given-names>X.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Ge</surname>
                        <given-names>L.</given-names>
                    </name>, <name>
                        <surname>Xu</surname>
                        <given-names>Z.</given-names>
                    </name>, <year>2010</year>. <article-title>Enhancement of biocontrol efficacy of Rhodotorula glutinis by salicyclic acid against gray mold spoilage of strawberries</article-title>. <source>International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141(1-2), 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.04.022</source>.</mixed-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
</article>
