<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<article dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov" xmlns:ns2="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ns4="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
    <front>
        <journal-meta>
            <journal-id>OENO One</journal-id>
            <issn>2494-1271</issn>
        </journal-meta>
        <article-meta>
            <title-group>
                <article-title xml:lang="en">Minimising sunburn necrosis on Vitis vinifera L. ‘Riesling’ grapes by defoliation, photo- and thermal protection</article-title>
            </title-group>
            <contrib-group>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:creator">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-692X</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Waber</surname>
                        <given-names>Jonas</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>jonas.waber@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
                        <sup>1</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>2</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
                        <sup>3</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Heilemann</surname>
                        <given-names>Kai</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>kaikonstantin.heilemann@hs-gm.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
                        <sup>4</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7068-6055</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Heilemann</surname>
                        <given-names>Kristina</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>kristina.heilemann@list.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
                        <sup>5</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Schultz</surname>
                        <given-names>Mareike</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>mareike.schultz@ivv.etat.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
                        <sup>6</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4226-8451</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Simon</surname>
                        <given-names>Christopher</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>christopher.simon@ivv.etat.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
                        <sup>6</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Buchholz</surname>
                        <given-names>Günther</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>guenther.buchholz@agroscience.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
                        <sup>7</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-654X</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Losantos</surname>
                        <given-names>Raúl</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>raul.losantosc@unirioja.es</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8">
                        <sup>8</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bermejo</surname>
                        <given-names>Iris</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>iris.bermejo@unirioja.es</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8">
                        <sup>8</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2772-6453</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sampedro</surname>
                        <given-names>Diego</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>diego.sampedro@unirioja.es</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8">
                        <sup>8</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Petgen</surname>
                        <given-names>Matthias</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>matthias.petgen@mwvlw.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
                        <sup>1</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>2</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Fischer</surname>
                        <given-names>Ulrich</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>ulrich.fischer@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
                        <sup>1</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>2</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9">
                        <sup>9</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-8932</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Winterhagen</surname>
                        <given-names>Patrick</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>patrick.winterhagen@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>2</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
                        <sup>3</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10">
                        <sup>10</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8850-0541</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Stoll</surname>
                        <given-names>Manfred</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>manfred.stoll@hs-gm.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
                        <sup>4</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Molitor</surname>
                        <given-names>Daniel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>daniel.molitor@list.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
                        <sup>5</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-5327</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Friedel</surname>
                        <given-names>Matthias</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>matthias.friedel@hs-gm.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
                        <sup>4</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>and</surname>
                        <given-names/>
                    </name>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-7113</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bogs</surname>
                        <given-names>Jochen</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>jochen.bogs@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
                        <sup>1</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
                        <sup>2</sup>
                    </xref>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff11">
                        <sup>11</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-692X</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Waber</surname>
                        <given-names>Jonas</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>jonas.waber@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Heilemann</surname>
                        <given-names>Kai Konstantin</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>kaikonstantin.heilemann@hs-gm.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7068-6055</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Heilemann</surname>
                        <given-names>Kristina</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>kristina.heilemann@list.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Schultz</surname>
                        <given-names>Mareike</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>mareike.schultz@ivv.etat.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4226-8451</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Simon</surname>
                        <given-names>Christopher</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>christopher.simon@ivv.etat.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Buchholz</surname>
                        <given-names>Günther</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>guenther.buchholz@agroscience.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-654X</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Losantos</surname>
                        <given-names>Raúl</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>raul.losantosc@unirioja.es</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bermejo</surname>
                        <given-names>Iris Alicia</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>iris.bermejo@unirioja.es</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2772-6453</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Sampedro</surname>
                        <given-names>Diego</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>diego.sampedro@unirioja.es</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Petgen</surname>
                        <given-names>Matthias</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>matthias.petgen@mwvlw.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Fischer</surname>
                        <given-names>Ulrich</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>ulrich.fischer@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7835-8932</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Winterhagen</surname>
                        <given-names>Patrick</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>patrick.winterhagen@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8850-0541</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Stoll</surname>
                        <given-names>Manfred</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>manfred.stoll@hs-gm.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <name>
                        <surname>Molitor</surname>
                        <given-names>Daniel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>daniel.molitor@list.lu</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-5327</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Friedel</surname>
                        <given-names>Matthias</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>matthias.friedel@hs-gm.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
                <contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-7113</contrib-id>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Bogs</surname>
                        <given-names>Jochen</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <email>jochen.bogs@dlr.rlp.de</email>
                    <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">
                        <sup>0</sup>
                    </xref>
                </contrib>
            </contrib-group>
            <aff id="aff0">
                <sup>0</sup>Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Environmental Sensing and Modelling Research Unit, 41, Rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg</aff>
            <aff id="aff1">
                <sup>1</sup>State Education and Research Center of Viticulture, Horticulture and Rural Development, Institute of Viticulture and Oenology, Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany/Weincampus Neustadt, Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany/University of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science, Department of Crop Physiology of Speciality Crops, Emil-Wolff-Straße 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff2">
                <sup>2</sup>Weincampus Neustadt, Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff3">
                <sup>3</sup>University of Hohenheim, Institute of Crop Science, Department of Crop Physiology of Speciality Crops, Emil-Wolff-Straße 23, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff4">
                <sup>4</sup>Hochschule Geisenheim University, Department of General and Organic Viticulture, Von-Lade-Straße 1, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff5">
                <sup>5</sup>Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Environmental Sensing and Modelling Research Unit, 41, Rue du Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg</aff>
            <aff id="aff6">
                <sup>6</sup>Institut Viti-Vinicole, Department of Viniculture, 8, Rue Nic Kieffer, 5551 Remich, Luxembourg</aff>
            <aff id="aff7">
                <sup>7</sup>RLP AgroScience, Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff8">
                <sup>8</sup>University of La Rioja, Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Institute of the University of La Rioja, Madre de Dios, 53, 26006 Logroño, Spain</aff>
            <aff id="aff9">
                <sup>9</sup>University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Department of Chemistry, Erwin-Schrödinger-Straße 52, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff10">
                <sup>10</sup>State Education and Research Center of Viticulture, Horticulture and Rural Development, Institute of Plant Protection, Breitenweg 71, 67435 Neustadt an der Weinstraße, Germany</aff>
            <aff id="aff11">
                <sup>11</sup>Bingen Technical University of Applied Sciences, Department of Life Sciences and Engineering, Berlinstraße 109, 55411 Bingen am Rhein, Germany</aff>
            <pub-date date-type="created">
                <day>5</day>
                <month>6</month>
                <year>2025</year>
            </pub-date>
            <permissions/>
            <abstract xml:lang="en">
                <p>Sunburn on grapes has emerged as an economic concern in recent decades. The phenomenon can be attributed to climatic changes, characterised by elevated air temperatures and intense solar radiation, leading to increased crop failures as well as quality losses of wines. This study aimed to evaluate comprehensively selected preventive strategies for the sunburn-sensitive, white cultivar ‘Riesling’. To this end, the impact of the timing of bunch zone defoliation on sunburn necrosis within three wine-growing regions in Central Europe, as well as the application of sunscreens onto grapes and shading by protective nets at one of these sites, were visually assessed in the contrasting growing seasons 2021 and 2022, respectively. Early defoliation between the end of flowering and fruit set decreased sunburn necrosis severity by down to 59.6 % in comparison to late defoliation at bunch closure across the two years. Furthermore, rot severity was reduced by down to 85.3 % in comparison to no defoliation across both growing seasons. The application of lime onto grapes following late defoliation diminished sunburn damage by 41.9 % across both experimental years, while kaolin showed no effect. Combining early defoliation with application of lime revealed an increased effectiveness of 79.2 % in comparison to late defoliation within one growing season. Different protective nets were able to lower sunburn damage within each growing season, but the black, small-meshed shading net with the highest shading factor investigated revealed the highest effectiveness of 63.7 % across both experimental years. However, the effectiveness of defoliation, sunscreens and protective nets depended on the meteorological conditions during each growing season. Total yield, including grapes with different levels of damage, as well as the vigour of vines, were not impacted by the viticultural measures. Malic acid and total acidity concentrations in the must were decreased by early defoliation compared to no defoliation within each year, while must weight was not influenced by any measure. In conclusion, this study compared the potential of different prevention strategies and highlighted a combined positive effect of early defoliation at two experimental sites and within each growing season: Both sunburn necrosis and rot severity were reduced in comparison to the respective maximum extent.</p>
            </abstract>
            <kwd-group>
                <kwd>climate</kwd>
                <kwd>change</kwd>
                <kwd>early</kwd>
                <kwd>defoliation</kwd>
                <kwd>heat</kwd>
                <kwd>wave</kwd>
                <kwd>rot</kwd>
                <kwd>infestation</kwd>
                <kwd>shading</kwd>
                <kwd>net</kwd>
                <kwd>sunscreen</kwd>
                <kwd>viticultural</kwd>
                <kwd>management</kwd>
                <kwd>strategy</kwd>
                <kwd>climate change</kwd>
                <kwd>early defoliation</kwd>
                <kwd>heat wave</kwd>
                <kwd>rot infestation</kwd>
                <kwd>shading net</kwd>
                <kwd>sunscreen</kwd>
                <kwd>viticultural management strategy</kwd>
            </kwd-group>
        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <body>
        <sec id="h0-introduction">
            <title>Introduction</title>
            <p>Grapevine (
                <italic>Vitis vinifera</italic> L.) is cultivated worldwide to produce table grapes, raisins, juice and wine (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Keller, 2010</xref>). According to a recent estimation, its cultivation area comprises 7,300,000 ha, attributing a non-negligible economic importance in many countries (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">International Organisation of Vine and Wine, 2021</xref>). ‘Riesling’ is among the most planted grape cultivars for wine production in both Germany and Luxembourg, accounting for 23.6 % and 12.8 % of their total viticulture area, respectively (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Deutsches Weininstitut GmbH, 2024</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Institut Viti-Vinicole, 2024</xref>). Its global cultivation comprises 63,936 ha (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Deutsches Weininstitut GmbH, 2022</xref>). However, besides ‘Bacchus’, ‘Chardonnay’, or ‘Sémillon’, ‘Riesling’ is known to be a sunburn-susceptible, white cultivar (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Webb et al., 2010</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Calderón-Orellana et al., 2018</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
            <p>Viticulture is strongly influenced by climatic and meteorological conditions. Consequently, current anthropogenic climate change threatens viticulture in several regions (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Santos et al., 2020</xref>). Global warming is leading to a substantial increase in frequency, duration and intensity of heat waves (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Perkins-Kirkpatrick &amp; Lewis, 2020</xref>), and the annual maximum daily air temperature is forecasted to rise (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2023</xref>). Climate change could increase the likelihood of sunburn events causing severe yield losses and reductions of wine quality in susceptible cultivars (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Szmania et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
            <p>Sunburn is caused by intense solar radiation. Thereby, all spectral components comprising ultraviolet B (UV-B; 280-315 nm), ultraviolet A (UV-A; 315-400 nm), visible (VIS; 400-780 nm) and infrared radiation (IR; ≥ 780 nm) contribute to abiotic damage to fruits (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Rabinowitch et al., 1974</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Schrader et al., 2003</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Hulands et al., 2014</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>). Sunburn symptoms can affect berry skin, pulp and grape rachis (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zschokke, 1931</xref>). Similar to apples, two types of symptoms can be distinguished in vineyards: sunburn necrosis and sunburn browning. Sunburn necrosis includes cuticula modification, epidermal as well as subepidermal cell death, accompanied by a yellow-brown to red-violet colouration and often followed by tissue collapse or shrivelling (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Zschokke, 1931</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Schrader et al., 2001</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>). Intense solar radiation can further degrade carotenoids, leading to the formation of 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (TDN), which is associated with the petrol-like off-flavour in ‘Riesling’ wines (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Simpson, 1978</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Ziegler et al., 2020</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Szmania et al., 2023</xref>). Sunburn browning comprises a sublethal damage with brown spots on berry skins, which can be attributed to the oxidation of polyphenols, resulting in more pronounced oxidised off-flavours in wines (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Schrader et al., 2001</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Rustioni et al., 2023</xref>). Besides differences in sunburn susceptibility between cultivars, the stage of berry development, water status of vines as well as its state of adaptation to elevated air temperatures and radiation intensities play a crucial role in determining the stress at which irreversible cell damage occurs (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Tarara &amp; Spayd, 2005</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Müller et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
            <p>In the last decades, defoliation of the bunch zone post-flowering has become a standard and mostly mechanical viticultural tool in many wine-growing regions due to its high potential to mitigate bunch rot (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zoecklein et al., 1992</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Diago et al., 2010</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Molitor et al., 2011</xref>). Numerous positive effects on grape health status can be attributed to an increased canopy aeration and sun exposure, which prevents germination and infection by fungal pathogens, a better application and adhesion of fungicides on berry surfaces (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zoecklein et al., 1992</xref>), a less compact grape architecture (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Molitor et al., 2011</xref>) as well as a hardening effect of berry skins and an increased accumulation of phenolic substances (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Fox, 2006</xref>). Defoliation at 
                <italic>véraison</italic> is a common practice to increase aroma compounds in white grape berries (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Yue et al., 2020</xref>) and anthocyanin contents in red cultivars (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hunter et al., 1991</xref>). The likelihood to trigger sunburn necrosis is enhanced when defoliation is conducted at this developmental stage in comparison to post-flowering (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gambetta et al., 2022</xref>), presumably due to the decrease of chlorophylls and carotenoids as well as the low content of flavonols, anthocyanins and antioxidants in grape berries (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>). However, sunburn susceptibility of ‘Riesling’ grapes can be decreased seven days after defoliation, indicating a rapid adaptation process (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Müller et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
            <p>Since grape berries receive direct solar radiation by defoliation measures, particularly suddenly exposed grapes are highly susceptible to sunburn damage (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>). Application of radiation-reflecting sunscreens such as kaolin [Al
                <sub>2</sub>Si
                <sub>2</sub>O
                <sub>5</sub>(OH)
                <sub>4</sub>] can mitigate the detrimental effects of heat and radiation in grapevine (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Dinis et al., 2020</xref>). The fruit temperature of kaolin-covered grapes can be decreased by about 1 °C, while light reflectance is enhanced. The concentration of kaolin sprayed onto fruit surfaces, as well as the number of applications conducted post-flowering to 
                <italic>véraison</italic>, are linked to its effectiveness in reducing heat damage (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>; 
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Teker, 2023</xref>). Kaolin application can reduce sunburn damage on grapes, while yield, organic acid and anthocyanin contents are increased (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Frioni et al., 2019</xref>). Furthermore, the quality of ‘Riesling’ wines could be improved by the application of kaolin and lime onto grapes, mitigating unpleasant notes caused by sun exposure and retaining fruitiness and sweetness of the wines (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Szmania et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
            <p>Alternatively, protective nets can prevent damage to grapes caused by several environmental impacts such as animals, hail or solar radiation. The purpose of each net depends on colour, mesh size and texture, revealing different shading factors (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Castellano et al., 2008</xref>). The number of shrivelled berries can be halved when vines are shaded by 23 % which leads to an increased yield (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Oliveira et al., 2014</xref>). Berry temperature can be decreased by about 3.8 °C when a net with a shading factor of 35 % is used, while no differences in fruit chemical composition are observed (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>). However, excessive shading by 70 % imbalances the carbon metabolism when vines are completely covered (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Greer et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
            <p>Further viticultural management strategies against sunburn damage consider reduced row widths and higher canopies to ensure mutual shading (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Danenberg, 2019</xref>), minimal pruning (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>) and row orientation. Sunburn occurrence can be twice as high in north-south oriented than in east-west oriented vineyards (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Webb et al., 2010</xref>). The effects of anti-transpirant products on sunburn reduction are inconsistent due to the ambivalent impact of transpiration by cooling and dehydrating of grape berries at the same time (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>). Although evaporative cooling by micro-sprinklers above or below the canopy reduces sunburn and berry dehydration by lowering the fruit surface temperature by almost 12 °C (
                <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Greenspan, 2009</xref>), its necessity should be carefully considered in regard to drought conditions.</p>
            <p>This study aimed to carry out a comprehensive agronomic evaluation of different protective strategies against sunburn necrosis on ‘Riesling’ grapes under various environmental conditions. Field experiments were conducted within three wine-growing regions in Central Europe and across two contrasting seasons to evaluate the effects of the timing of bunch zone defoliation. Investigations were extended at one experimental site to include different sunscreens as well as protective nets. Experiments aimed at gaining insights into the occurrence of sunburn and revealing how to avoid damage by comparing the effectiveness of different measures and their interactions. Furthermore, the study was combined with a crosslinking to rot infestation as well as to the impacts on total yield, must composition and vigour of vines.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="h1-materials-and-methods">
            <title>Materials and methods</title>
            <sec id="h0-1--experimental-sites-and-designs">
                <title>1. Experimental sites and designs</title>
                <p>A defoliation experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the timing of bunch zone defoliation on sunburn occurrence across the three wine-growing regions, Palatinate, Rheingau and Moselle in Central Europe. Experimental vineyards included the individual sites “Mußbacher Johannitergarten” of the “Staatsweingut mit Johannitergut Neustadt” in the district Mußbach of Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW), Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany; “Eibinger Magdalenenkreuz” of the “Hochschule Geisenheim University” in Geisenheim (GM), Hesse, Germany; and “Remich Goldberg – Berg IVV” of the “Institut Viti-Vinicole” in Remich (RM), Remich, Luxembourg. Field experiments were conducted within the growing seasons of 2021 and 2022 using 
                    <italic>V. vinifera</italic> ‘Riesling’ as a sunburn-sensitive, white cultivar. Besides the defoliation experiment at multiple sites, a sunscreen experiment as well as a protective net experiment were conducted at the site NW to investigate the application of different radiation-reflecting sunscreens and shading by various protective nets (Figure S1). The respective experiments at each site were randomised in block designs. An overview of the different cultivation and experimental conditions at each site is indicated in Table S1.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-2--defoliation-experiment">
                <title>2. Defoliation experiment</title>
                <p>The field experiment consisted of three defoliation approaches, comprising no defoliation (ND), early defoliation (ED) and late defoliation (LD) at each site. Bunch zones were manually completely defoliated on both canopy sides between the end of flowering and fruit set (BBCH stages 69-71; Lorenz et al., 1995) or at bunch closure (BBCH stages 77-79), respectively (Figure S1). For this purpose, exclusively grape-covering leaves were removed. In order to maintain the degree of defoliation, a second defoliation was conducted simultaneously at bunch closure within the ED approach. The exact times of LD were determined according to weather forecasts (
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="http://www.meteoblue.com">www.meteoblue.com</ext-link>) with maximum air temperatures of at least 30 °C and ideally cloudless skies. These conditions were expected to trigger sunburn necrosis, and defoliation measures were carried out beforehand (Table S1). For this experiment, 32 vines each in three field replicates at NW, eight vines each in three field replicates at GM, and eight vines each in four field replicates at RM were considered. Each defoliation approach was compared to ND.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-3--sunscreen-experiment">
                <title>3. Sunscreen experiment</title>
                <p>In order to investigate different sunscreens, two radiation-reflecting sunscreens were integrated into the defoliation experiment as further experimental elements at the site NW. Defoliated vines included approaches with and without application onto grapes, whereas ND vines received no application. CutiSan
                    <sup>®</sup> (Biofa AG, Münsingen, Germany) was tested as a kaolin product in a 5 % suspension and compared to fiMUM
                    <sup>®</sup>-Fruchtkalk
                    <sup>®</sup> (Schneider Verblasetechnik e. K., Kleines Wiesental-Wies, Germany) as a lime product in a 2 % suspension for their sunburn-reducing effects (Figure S1). Due to possible damage caused by high pH values, the concentration of lime had to be reduced to 2 %. The respective additives were selected due to the most proper coverage of grapes within a preliminary test (Figure S3 and Table S2). Applications were conducted from pea size (BBCH stage 75) onwards within the ED approaches when the above-mentioned weather conditions were forecasted or immediately following LD at bunch closure (Table S1). Both suspensions were prepared by providing about one-third of the final volume of water to which the respective additives and sunscreens were added successively. The suspension was homogenised and filled up with water to the final volume. To prevent sedimentation, the suspension was kept in motion until decanting into the tank of the running engine-powered backpack sprayer (STIHL SR 450, ANDREAS STIHL AG &amp; Co. KG, Waiblingen, Germany). The water expense comprised 600 L ha
                    <sup>–1</sup>. The accelerator was set to one-third of maximum performance, and the flow volume to half of the maximum to obtain a proper coverage and even spray patterns given by a sufficient suspension expense. Applications were conducted at a horizontal angle on both sides of the canopy using a cone grid and in an idle state to prevent spray traces in the neighbouring row. Following visual assessments after precipitation events in 2021, a renewed application within the ED approaches was necessary, which was simultaneously conducted with the application at bunch closure (Table S1). Similar to the defoliation experiment, 32 vines each in three field replicates were considered. Each sunscreen was compared to the respective ED or LD approach without sunscreen.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-4--protective-net-experiment">
                <title>4. Protective net experiment</title>
                <p>Three types of protective nets (P.R.P. Produzione Reti Plastiche Srl., Ostuni, Italy; distributed by Whailex, WAGNER GmbH, Ehrenkirchen-Kirchhofen, Germany) intended to shield grapes from hail (AG RG 26/3), solar radiation (GI RO 080) or the spotted wing Drosophila (SWD, 
                    <italic>Drosophila suzukii</italic> Matsumura; GI RO 101) differing in colour, mesh size and shading factor were installed and investigated within a separate experiment at the site NW (Figure S1 and Table S3). Whole vines were vertically shaded on both canopy sides from pre-flowering onwards throughout each growing season, and LD was conducted prior to the above-mentioned weather conditions, respectively (Figure S4 and Table S1). For this experiment, 20 vines each in three field replicates were considered. Each protective net was compared to the LD approach without a protective net.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-5--field-assessments--laboratory-analyses--and-data-evaluations">
                <title>5. Field assessments, laboratory analyses, and data evaluations</title>
                <p>Meteorological conditions were measured throughout the growing seasons by meteorological stations close to the experimental sites within 5 min at NW, 15 min at GM and daily intervals at RM above 2 m height, respectively. Furthermore, phenology was recorded at each site. Microclimatic conditions were measured by HOBO
                    <sup>®</sup> U23-002 Pro v2 External Temp/RH Data Logger with Solar Radiation Shield RS3-B (Onset Computer Corp., Bourne, Massachusetts, USA) within 15 min intervals installed inside the bunch zones of each field replicate at NW. Midday stem water potential was measured at NW in 2022, three days after 
                    <italic>véraison</italic> on three ND vines within each experiment with six full-grown leaves using the Scholander pressure chamber M 615 (MMM tech support GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Berlin, Germany). Leaves were equilibrated with an aluminium bag for 20 min, and measurements were conducted within 30 s after petiole cutting (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Scholander et al., 1965</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Levin, 2019</xref>).</p>
                <p>Sunburn necrosis of each approach within the experiments was visually assessed between a maximum of 9 days before and 14 days after véraison when the above-mentioned weather conditions were no longer forecasted at the respective sites. At least 60 full-grown grapes of each field replicate taken from healthy vines outside of marginal areas were equally selected from each side of the canopy, turned and assessed using a severity scale with increments of five percent. Maximum 12 days before harvest, each approach within the experiments was further visually assessed for rot infestation at each site comprising grey mould (
                    <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> Pers. Fr.), blue mould (
                    <italic>Penicillium</italic> spec. Link) and sour rot (acetic acid bacteria and wild yeasts) using at least 30 grapes of each field replicate (Table S1). The procedure of rot infestation assessments was the same as that of sunburn necrosis assessments.</p>
                <p>Total yield, including grapes with different levels of damage and pruning wood of at least ten vines of each field replicate within the approaches at NW, were weighed, whereas total yield was calculated for one hectare and pruning wood for one vine (Table S1). Furthermore, samples of 100 berries of each field replicate within the approaches were weighed at harvest, and their musts were analysed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy using WineScan
                    <sup>™</sup> Auto with the GrapeScan
                    <sup>™</sup> calibration (FOSS A/S, Hillerød, Denmark) at NW. For this purpose, berry samples were homogenised into must using the BagMixer
                    <sup>®</sup> 400 CC
                    <sup>®</sup> (INTERSCIENCE S.A.R.L., Saint-Nom-la-Bretêche, France) with a speed of 10 strokes s
                    <sup>–1</sup> for 30 s.</p>
                <p>To determine the reflectance of kaolin and lime, each sunscreen was sprayed as a suspension with the respective additives (Table S2) onto a WANTOUTH aluminium plate (15 cm × 15 cm × 0.5 mm; Aixin Datong Technology, Guangdong Sheng, China) using an airbrush with less than 70 kPa. The reflectance was measured at the Chemistry Research Institute of the University of La Rioja at least six times to address homogeneity across the sample surfaces. The setup used was composed of a DH-2000-BAL light source connected through a 600 µm optic fibre to an ISP-50-8-R-GT integrating sphere collecting direct as well as scattered reflectance, and was attached to the HDX00944 spectrometer with a 1,000 µm optic fibre (Ocean Optics B.V., EW Duiven, The Netherlands). For registering the spectra, 20 scans were averaged with an integration time of 4 s, using nonlinearity correction and a boxcar width of 5. The shading factors of the investigated protective nets (Table S3) were calculated based on four horizontal measurements at the highest sun position on cloudless days in June and August using the CCD Array Spectrometer BRC112E-U (B&amp;W Tek Inc., Newark, New Jersey, USA) at NW. Spectral measurements were averaged with an integration time of 100 ms for 100 times in June and 250 ms for 5 times in August, adjusted due to the respective spectrum saturations. Reflectance and shading measurements were conducted within the wavelength range of 280-810 nm and 280-850 nm, respectively.</p>
                <p>Data from each experiment were site-wise, year-wise and combined analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version: 29.0.0.0 (241); IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Firstly, each data set was evaluated for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test as well as for homogeneity of variance by the Levene test. Data were transformed by natural logarithm, square, square root or reciprocal as far as normal distribution or homogeneity of variance was not obtained. The subsequent statistical analyses were conducted using a linear model with 
                    <italic>t</italic>-tests or multifactorial ANOVA for the individual factors site, year, defoliation, sunscreen and protective net or combinations of measures at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively. LSD or Tukey-HSD were used as post-hoc tests for year-wise or complete data sets, respectively. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney-U test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used if no normal distribution or homogeneity of variance could be obtained.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="h1-results">
            <title>Results</title>
            <sec id="h0-1--meteorological-conditions-and-phenology">
                <title>1. Meteorological conditions and phenology</title>
                <p>The two growing seasons were contrasting regarding weather conditions at each experimental site. While in 2021, the maximum air temperature since LD was lower and precipitation rates between June and August were higher, the subsequent year was characterised by hotter and drier conditions. Maximum air temperatures were 31.1 ± 0.7 °C in 2021 as well as 38.7 ± 0.1 °C in 2022 across the sites and were achieved after LD, respectively. In 2022, the number of hot days with a minimum of 30 °C air temperature recorded from LD onwards increased by at least 28 days when compared to the previous year. The maximum ambient temperature within the LD bunch zones at NW was 1.0 ± 0.2 °C higher in comparison to the measurements at 2 m height across both years. Measurements of sunshine duration, solar radiation intensity, wind speed, and relative humidity on the respective hottest day since LD, did not reveal noticeable differences between the experimental sites. In 2022, precipitation rates between June and August decreased by 144.5 ± 49.0 mm across the sites when compared to 2021 (Table S5). Midday stem water potential of ND vines across the experiments measured in 2022 at NW was –1.0 ± 0.0 MPa (Table S6), and grapes were partially or completely affected by sunburn necrosis (Figure S2). Regarding the hottest day since LD of each growing season, grapes were at the phenological stage of bunch closure at each experimental site. The onset of 
                    <italic>véraison</italic> (BBCH stage 81) showed a developmental delay of 13 ± 1 days in 2021 across the sites when compared to 2022 (Table S5).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-2--defoliation">
                <title>2. Defoliation</title>
                <p>The experimental sites were compared by defoliation measures, leading to a varying extent of sunburn necrosis. In descending order, the highest sunburn severity, with 17.2 ± 0.5 % of berries affected, was recorded at RM in 2021, followed by 11.4 ± 1.5 % at NW in 2022 and 2.9 ± 0.5 % at GM in 2021 within the respective LD. The extent of damage was among the lowest at GM and among the highest at RM within each growing season (Figure 1 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>ED showed a reduction of sunburn necrosis when compared to LD within each growing season at NW and RM. The positive impact of ED was further confirmed across both experimental years for both sites. At GM, ED led exclusively in 2021 to a lower extent of sunburn necrosis compared to LD. When ND was conducted, sunburn damage was consistently reduced in comparison to LD during each and across both growing seasons at NW. However, ND at RM showed exclusively in 2021 less damage than LD, when the overall levels of sunburn necrosis were increased in comparison to 2022 (Figure 1 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>The defoliation measures conducted at each experimental site were additionally assessed in terms of their impact on rot infestation. In 2021, rot severity was higher than in the subsequent year at each site. In descending order, maximum infestation was 35.4 ± 1.4 % at GM, followed by 13.5 ± 3.0 % at NW and 9.1 ± 1.7 % at RM. Rot severities were among the lowest at RM within each experimental year (Figure 2 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>Both defoliation approaches, ED and LD, revealed a positive impact on preventing rot infestation within each and across both growing seasons at NW when compared to ND, respectively. At RM, rot severity was exclusively reduced by ED in comparison to ND within each and across both experimental years, respectively (Figure 2 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <caption/>
                        <caption>
                            <p>Bars show mean values of at least three field replicates comprising a minimum of 60 grapes each, with error bars indicating the respective standard errors. Data were site-wise and year-wise statistically analysed using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Different upper-case or lower-case letters within each experimental site indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic ns2:href="media/image1.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <caption/>
                        <caption>
                            <p>Bars show mean values of at least three field replicates comprising a minimum of 30 grapes each, with error bars indicating the respective standard errors. Data were site-wise and year-wise statistically analysed using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Data from Remich (RM) in 2022 were previously transformed by the square root. Different upper-case or lower-case letters within each experimental site indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic ns2:href="media/image2.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-3--sunscreens">
                <title>3. Sunscreens</title>
                <p>The applications of kaolin and lime onto grapes were compared in terms of their preventive effects against sunburn necrosis within the respective ED and LD approaches at NW in each experimental year. Kaolin, considered as a factor within both defoliated approaches, was able to reduce sunburn necrosis in 2021 in comparison to the defoliated approaches without sunscreen. However, no impact of kaolin was recorded when comparing the respective ED and LD approaches separately in any year. In contrast, lime could reduce sunburn damage within the LD approach in each growing season, as well as within the ED approach in 2021. Thus, combining ED and application of lime provided two consecutive protective effects in 2021 when compared to the LD approach without sunscreen. The overall extent of sunburn necrosis was higher in 2022 than in 2021 (Figure 3 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>In order to link sunburn assessments with product specifications, the reflectance of each sunscreen was measured on aluminium plates. On average, kaolin showed a slightly higher reflectance along the investigated spectrum than lime, revealing a total reflectance of 62 ± 2 % and 54 ± 5 %, respectively (Table S4). The appearance of grapes covered by the sunscreens also differed, displaying a metal-like glossy coverage with kaolin and a duller coverage with lime (Figure S3). No differences among defoliation and application measures were recorded in the maximum ambient temperatures within the bunch zones on the respective hottest day since LD of each year (Table S7).</p>
                <p>Regarding rot infestation, application of sunscreens did not show an additional prevention beyond the impact of defoliation measures (Figure 4 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <caption/>
                        <caption>
                            <p>Bars show mean values of three field replicates comprising 100 grapes each, with error bars indicating the respective standard errors. Data of ND as well as of the ED and LD approaches without sunscreen refer to the defoliation experiment. Data were year-wise statistically analysed using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Different upper-case or lower-case letters indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic ns2:href="media/image3.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <caption/>
                        <caption>
                            <p>Bars show mean values of three field replicates comprising 100 grapes each, with error bars indicating the respective standard errors. Data of ND as well as of the ED and LD approaches without sunscreen refer to the defoliation experiment. Data were year-wise statistically analysed using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Different upper-case or lower-case letters indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic ns2:href="media/image4.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-4--protective-nets">
                <title>4. Protective nets</title>
                <p>Three types of protective nets within the LD approach were investigated at NW during both growing seasons for their reducing effects on sunburn necrosis. Each of the protective nets was able to lower the damage within each year. However, the respective maximum extent of sunburn necrosis within this experiment was relatively low, comprising 4.5 ± 0.4 % in 2021 as well as 7.1 ± 2.1 % in 2022 (Figure 5 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>The shading factor of each protective net was determined by spectral measurements and confirmed the indication provided by the manufacturer. Light transmittance was reduced by 18 ± 1 % with the hail net, 26 ± 4 % with the 
                    <italic>D. suzukii</italic> net and 30 ± 3 % with the shading net (Tables S3 and S4). Consistently, the shading factors along the investigated spectrum were among the lowest with the hail net and among the highest with the shading net. While IR, VIS and UV-A radiation were filtered comparably to the total shading factor of the respective protective net, shielding of UV-B radiation was almost absent, with less than 5 % (Table S4). No differences among the shading measures could be recorded in the maximum ambient temperatures within the bunch zones on the respective hottest day since the LD of each year (Table S7).</p>
                <p>Rot infestation was not reduced by any of the protective nets in addition to the defoliation measures (Figure 6 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <caption/>
                        <caption>
                            <p>Bars show mean values of three field replicates comprising 100 grapes each, with error bars indicating the respective standard errors. Data were year-wise statistically analysed using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Data from 2022 were previously transformed by natural logarithm. Different upper-case or lower-case letters indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic ns2:href="media/image5.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
                <p>
                    <fig>
                        <caption/>
                        <caption>
                            <p>Bars show mean values of three field replicates comprising 100 grapes each, with error bars indicating the respective standard errors. Data were year-wise statistically analysed using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Different upper-case or lower-case letters indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                        </caption>
                        <graphic ns2:href="media/image6.jpeg"/>
                    </fig>
                </p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-5--effectiveness-of-viticultural-measures">
                <title>5. Effectiveness of viticultural measures</title>
                <p>The effectiveness against sunburn necrosis varied between experimental sites, growing seasons, defoliation measures, applications of sunscreens, as well as shading by protective nets (Tables 1 and S8). In contrast, the effectiveness against rot infestation was merely dependent on the site, year and timing of defoliation (Figure 2 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>ED revealed a positive impact against sunburn severity by 42.8 ± 7.3 % at RM and 59.6 ± 6.6 % at NW across both experimental years when compared to LD, respectively. At both sites, ED was on average more effective in 2022 than in 2021. In contrast, ED showed an effectiveness of 61.1 ± 2.8 % at GM in 2021, but had no influence in 2022 when the overall extent of sunburn damage was the lowest. ND prevented sunburn necrosis exclusively in 2021 at RM by 77.3 ± 2.4 %, but across both growing seasons at NW by 84.3 ± 2.4 % in comparison to the respective LD approaches. In 2022, no differences in terms of sunburn necrosis between ED and ND were observed at NW and RM, respectively (Figure 1; Tables 1 and S8). Both defoliation approaches prevented rot infestation at NW when compared to ND, comprising an effectiveness of LD by 59.5 ± 8.7 % and of ED by 68.4 ± 6.7 % across both growing seasons, respectively. ED was on average even more effective in reducing rot severity at RM, with 85.3 ± 5.5 % in comparison to ND across both years. The mean effectiveness of defoliation measures was higher in 2022 than in 2021 at both experimental sites (Figure 2 and Table S8).</p>
                <p>Lime revealed an effectiveness against sunburn damage within the LD approaches at NW by 41.9 ± 6.8 % across both experimental years, while kaolin did not show an impact. Combining ED and application of lime decreased sunburn necrosis by 79.2 ± 3.9 % in 2021. Furthermore, the combination of ED and the respective application of kaolin and lime lowered the extent of sunburn necrosis to the level of ND in 2021 (Figure 3; Tables 1 and S8).</p>
                <p>During each experimental year, the protective nets reduced sunburn necrosis at NW, but their mean effectiveness was higher in 2022 when compared to 2021. Sunburn was prevented across both growing seasons by 43.7 ± 5.9 % with the 
                    <italic>D. suzukii</italic> net, 44.4 ± 6.2 % with the hail net and 63.7 ± 6.2 % with the shading net, revealing the highest effectiveness of the shading net. Additionally, the extent of sunburn necrosis within the combinations of LD and any protective net was decreased to the level of ND in 2022 (Figure 5; Tables 1 and S8).</p>
                <table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float">
                    <label>Table 1. Effectiveness of viticultural measures against sunburn necrosis during the growing seasons at the experimental sites.</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>The effectiveness of viticultural measures was calculated in comparison to the respective late defoliation (LD) if differences were significant, exclusively. Additionally, sunscreens (*) indicate the effectiveness of the combination of early defoliation (ED) and sunscreen application in the respective second line. Data show mean values of at least three field replicates comprising a minimum of 60 grapes each, with the respective standard errors.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <table>
                        <tbody>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Viticultural measure</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Experimental site</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td colspan="3" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Effectiveness against sunburn necrosis in comparison to late defoliation (LD) (%)</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021 + 2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="3" valign="middle">
                                    <p>No defoliation (ND)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>83.5 ± 5.1</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>85.1 ± 1.4</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>84.3 ± 2.4</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Geisenheim (GM)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No data</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No data</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No data</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Remich (RM)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>77.3 ± 2.4</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="3" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Early defoliation (ED)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>49.5 ± 8.6</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>69.6 ± 6.6</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>59.6 ± 6.6</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Geisenheim (GM)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>61.1 ± 2.8</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Remich (RM)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>38.7 ± 2.1</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>46.9 ± 15.3</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>42.8 ± 7.3</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Kaolin*</p>
</td>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Lime*</p>
</td>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>43.8 ± 10.8</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>40.1 ± 10.7</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>41.9 ± 6.8</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.2 ± 3.9</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>-</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Hail net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>34.8 ± 7.5</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>54.0 ± 6.7</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>44.4 ± 6.2</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Shading net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>53.6 ± 6.9</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>73.9 ± 6.1</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>63.7 ± 6.2</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <italic>Drosophila suzukii</italic> net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>33.4 ± 3.4</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>54.0 ± 7.7</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>43.7 ± 5.9</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                </table-wrap>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-6--total-yield--must-composition-and-vigour-of-vines">
                <title>6. Total yield, must composition and vigour of vines</title>
                <p>The impacts of viticultural measures on the quantity and quality of grapes and vines were investigated at NW. Total yield comprised 14.9 ± 0.4 t ha
                    <sup>–1</sup> in 2021 and 11.7 ± 0.3 t ha
                    <sup>–1</sup> in 2022, revealing an increase in both total yield and berry weight in 2021 compared to the subsequent year. Neither defoliation, sunscreen application, nor shading measures had a quantitative impact on total yield, including grapes with different levels of damage, as well as on berry weight within each growing season, respectively (Tables S9 and S10). However, the shading net showed, on average, a reduction of total yield in 2022 (Table S9).</p>
                <p>Must analyses using FTIR spectroscopy revealed that variances in must weight and tartaric acid contents within the growing seasons cannot be attributed to any viticultural measure. Malic acid concentration was lower within the ED and LD approaches compared to ND in each and across both experimental years of the sunscreen experiment. Furthermore, the content of total acidity was decreased within the ED approaches in comparison to ND in each and across both growing seasons. The levels of malic acid and total acidity were higher with the shading net within the LD approach in 2021. Considering lime as a factor within both defoliated approaches revealed an increased pH value in comparison to the defoliated approaches without sunscreen in each and across both growing seasons. Furthermore, the pH value was higher with the shading net in 2021 and with the 
                    <italic>D. suzukii net</italic> in 2022 within the LD approaches, respectively. Increases in malic acid and total acidity, as well as a lower pH value, were recorded in 2021 when compared to 2022 (Table 2).</p>
                <p>Pruning wood weights were 721.0 ± 22.7 g vine
                    <sup>–1</sup> in 2021 and 548.0 ± 18.4 g vine
                    <sup>–1</sup> in 2022, revealing a stronger growth in 2021 than in the subsequent year. Defoliation, application and shading measures did not impact the vigour of the vines in each growing season. However, hail net and shading net showed, on average, the lowest vigour in 2022 (Table S11).</p>
                <p/>
                <table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float">
                    <label>Table 2. Must compositions of viticultural measures at the site Neustadt an der Weinstraße (NW).</label>
                    <caption>
                        <p>Data show mean values of three field replicates comprising 100 berries each, with the respective standard errors. Statistical analyses were conducted for each experiment, measurement and growing season using ANOVA with LSD post-hoc tests. Data from the must weight in 2021 within the sunscreen experiment were previously square-transformed. Different upper-case or lower-case letters in the brackets within each experiment and measurement indicate significant differences between viticultural measures in each year at a significance level of α = 0.05, respectively.</p>
                    </caption>
                    <table>
                        <tbody>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Experiment</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Defoliation</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td rowspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Sunscreen or 
protective net</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td colspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Must weight [°Oe]</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td colspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Malic acid [g L
                                            <sup>–1</sup>]</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td colspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Tartaric acid [g L
                                            <sup>–1</sup>]</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td colspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>Total acidity [g L
                                            <sup>–1</sup>]</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td colspan="2" valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>pH value</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2021</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <bold>2022</bold>
                                    </p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="7" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Sunscreen experiment</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No defoliation (ND)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No sunscreen</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>82.7 ± 1.5
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>82.0 ± 0.6
(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>5.9 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.8 ± 0.5
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.8 ± 0.0
                                        <sup>
</sup>(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.4 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>10.6 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>8.8 ± 0.5
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.10 ± 0.03
(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.30 ± 0.00
(a)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="3" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Early defoliation (ED)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No sunscreen</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>83.0 ± 1.7
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>82.3 ± 1.5
(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.4 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(C)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.7 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.4 ± 0.3
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.6 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>9.7 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(CD)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.3 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(bc)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.06 ± 0.01
(BC)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.18 ± 0.04
(b)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Kaolin</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>82.7 ± 1.5
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>83.7 ± 1.2
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.5 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(C)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.7 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.4 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.0 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(d)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>9.8 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(BCD)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>5.8 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(c)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.04 ± 0.02
(BC)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.22 ± 0.01
(ab)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Lime</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>84.7 ± 1.2
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>83.7 ± 1.3
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.4 ± 0.0
                                        <sup>
</sup>(C)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.7 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.1 ± 0.1
(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.1 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(cd)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>9.2 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(D)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>5.8 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(c)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.14 ± 0.01
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.24 ± 0.01
(ab)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="3" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Late defoliation (LD)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No sunscreen</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>80.0 ± 4.0
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.3 ± 1.7
(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.9 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(BC)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.0 ± 0.3
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.5 ± 0.0
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.5 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(bc)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>10.2 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(ABC)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.6 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.06 ± 0.03
(BC)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.19 ± 0.03
(b)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Kaolin</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.0 ± 2.9
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.7 ± 0.9
(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>5.2 ± 0.3
                                        <sup>
</sup>(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.9 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.3 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.6 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>10.4 ± 0.4
                                        <sup>
</sup>(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.4 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(bc)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.03 ± 0.03
(C)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.21 ± 0.04
(b)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Lime</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>81.7 ± 0.9
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>80.3 ± 1.2
(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.9 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(BC)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.9 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.1 ± 0.2
(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.3 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(bcd)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>9.8 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(BCD)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.2 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(bc)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.10 ± 0.01
(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.25 ± 0.02
(ab)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="5" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Protective net experiment</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No defoliation (ND)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No protective net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>82.9 ± 0.7
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>77.5 ± 1.7
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>5.2 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.7 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.9 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.0 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>10.1 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.9 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.98 ± 0.02
(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.09 ± 0.01
(ab)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td rowspan="4" valign="middle">
                                    <p>Late defoliation (LD)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>No protective net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.4 ± 0.4
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>76.1 ± 0.8
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.2 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.4 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.6 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.0 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>8.8 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.6 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.99 ± 0.02
(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.08 ± 0.02
(b)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Hail net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>80.3 ± 1.4
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>77.7 ± 1.5
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.8 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.3 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.5 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.9 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>9.4 ± 0.3
                                        <sup>
</sup>(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.3 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.99 ± 0.03
(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.13 ± 0.02
(ab)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>Shading net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.1 ± 2.9
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>79.4 ± 0.7
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>5.2 ± 0.4
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.4 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>7.2 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.9 ± 0.0
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>10.1 ± 0.2
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.4 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.11 ± 0.03
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.13 ± 0.02
(ab)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                            <tr>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>
                                        <italic>Drosophila suzukii</italic> net</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>78.5 ± 0.6
(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>76.3 ± 1.0
(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>4.9 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.4 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(ab)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.5 ± 0.6
                                        <sup>
</sup>(A)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.8 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(a)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>9.6 ± 0.4
                                        <sup>
</sup>(AB)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>6.4 ± 0.1
                                        <sup>
</sup>(b)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>2.97 ± 0.03
(B)</p>
</td>
                                <td valign="middle">
                                    <p>3.14 ± 0.02
(a)</p>
</td>
                            </tr>
                        </tbody>
                    </table>
                </table-wrap>
                <p/>
                <p/>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="h1-discussion">
            <title>Discussion</title>
            <sec id="h0-1--the-severity-of-damage-is-site-specific-and-seasonal">
                <title>1. The severity of damage is site-specific and seasonal</title>
                <p>Sunburn on grapes is caused by extreme berry temperatures and light exposure, but can be modified in its extent by further stress factors or adaptation status (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Smart &amp; Sinclair, 1976</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Tarara &amp; Spayd, 2005</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Müller et al., 2023</xref>). The highest severities of sunburn necrosis within the defoliation experiment ranged from 2.9 % at GM in 2021 across 11.4 % at NW in 2022 up to 17.2 % at RM in 2021 within LD, representing a different extent between the experimental sites and years. Particularly, the level of sunburn necrosis was lowest at GM across both growing seasons, when compared to NW and RM, respectively (Figure 1 and Table S8). Row orientations in north-south direction, such as at GM and RM, are known to exhibit an increase of sunburn necrosis (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Webb et al., 2010</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Gambetta et al., 2021</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Strack &amp; Stoll, 2021</xref>), but seem to have a minor impact in this study. The site-specific differences in the occurrence of damage cannot be related to the exact meteorological conditions or the phenological stage of grapes on the respective hottest day since LD (Figure 1 and Table S5). Whether the age of the vines, the genetics of ‘Riesling’ clones, rootstocks or their interactions (Table S1) could have had an impact on sunburn susceptibility needs to be further investigated.</p>
                <p>Both experimental years varied in terms of duration and intensity of heat waves since LD at each site. In 2022, maximum air temperature was increased for a longer period of time in comparison to 2021 (Table S5), and according to 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Deloire and Rogiers (2014)</xref>, the measured midday stem water potential indicated a moderate drought stress of the vines at NW (Table S6). Drought stress is known to lead to a higher canopy porosity by reduced shading foliage, which enhances sun exposure of grapes and increases sunburn necrosis (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Tarara &amp; Spayd, 2005</xref>). However, the level of sunburn necrosis at RM was unexpectedly higher in 2021, despite the lowest maximum air temperature since LD and the highest precipitation rates (Figure 1; Tables S5 and S8). By contrast, 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gambetta et al. (2022)</xref> examined two vineyards within one growing season and observed less sunburn damage in the vineyard at a higher altitude, accompanied by lower ambient temperatures. Berry temperature is determined by the combination of air temperature and light exposure (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Smart &amp; Sinclair, 1976</xref>), which is why direct solar radiation might have contributed more intensely to sunburn necrosis on grapes than merely air temperature on the hottest day in 2021 at RM. The interplay of meteorological conditions and physiological responses seems to be highly site-specific and temporally variable, which complicates the identification of causes for sunburn necrosis and its prediction.</p>
                <p>Regarding rot severity, differences between experimental sites and years might be linked to the humidity during the maturation time, since precipitation rates during each growing season were not related to the respective damage (Figure 2; Tables S5 and S8).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-2--early-defoliation-reduces-sunburn-necrosis-and-rot-infestation">
                <title>2. Early defoliation reduces sunburn necrosis and rot infestation</title>
                <p>Even though ND prevented sunburn damage on average the most compared to LD across both growing seasons at NW (Figure 1 and Table S8), defoliation of the bunch zone post-flowering and at 
                    <italic>véraison</italic> has become widespread viticultural practice, because of phytosanitary advantages and positive effects on grape quality (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zoecklein et al., 1992</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Molitor et al., 2011</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Yue et al., 2020</xref>). However, levels of sunburn necrosis are potentially higher when defoliation is conducted at 
                    <italic>véraison</italic> than post-flowering (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gambetta et al., 2022</xref>). Simultaneous experiments at three sites and across two contrasting growing seasons highlighted the preventive impact against sunburn necrosis by ED between the end of flowering and fruit set in comparison to LD at bunch closure (Figure 1 and Table S8). Defoliation around flowering induces adaptation processes in grapes such as an increase in thickness of berry skins and higher polyphenol contents, but furthermore provokes less compact grape architectures, which all can lead to sunburn tolerance (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Smart &amp; Sinclair, 1976</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Molitor et al., 2011</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Pastore et al., 2013</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Verdenal et al., 2019</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gambetta et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
                <p>Defoliation represented an effective measure against rot severity at NW within each growing season in comparison to ND, whereas exclusively ED revealed a positive impact at RM when compared to ND during each experimental year (Figure 2 and Table S8). Defoliation post-flowering or at 
                    <italic>véraison</italic> has been shown to lead to lower rot infestation (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al., 2017</xref>), improving aeration of the bunch zone, favouring grape exposure to sun and wind, as well as enhancing drying of wet grapes after precipitations (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Zoecklein et al., 1992</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Molitor et al., 2011</xref>). Furthermore, sun-exposed berries or less compact grapes develop a thicker cuticle layer than shaded berries or compact grapes, which can diminish 
                    <italic>B. cinerea</italic> infections (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Rosenquist &amp; Morrison, 1989</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-3--protection-by-sunscreens-against-sunburn-necrosis-is-product-specific">
                <title>3. Protection by sunscreens against sunburn necrosis is product-specific</title>
                <p>Radiation-reflecting sunscreens can be applied on sun-exposed grapes as a short-term reaction prior to forecasted heat waves to reduce the extent of sunburn damage. Particularly, kaolin is known for its sunburn-preventing properties when sprayed onto grapes (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Teker, 2023</xref>). However, comparing the application of kaolin and lime onto grapes at NW in terms of sunburn reduction revealed that lime was able to reduce the damage effectively, despite the lower concentration used (Figure 3; Tables S2 and S8). The effectiveness of kaolin seems to depend on the product applied, since Nufresh
                    <sup>®</sup> and Surround
                    <sup>®</sup> WP were able to reduce sunburn necrosis (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Teker, 2023</xref>), while CutiSan
                    <sup>®</sup> was not. Within the LD approach, lime decreased the damage during each growing season. Lower maximum air temperatures since LD in 2021 compared to 2022 might have favoured an additional effectiveness of lime within the ED approach. Due to the precipitations in 2021, a minor residual coverage and the renewed application within the ED approach might have further led to a more intensive coverage of lime on the grapes and thus, contributed to the effectiveness beyond the impact of ED (Figure 3; Tables S1, S5 and S8). Since the additives differed in the respective suspension of kaolin and lime (Table S2) to ensure a proper coverage on grapes (Figure S3), the combination of the respective components might also have influenced the effectiveness against sunburn necrosis.</p>
                <p>The reflectance of UV and IR radiation by kaolin is determined by its heat-processed properties and the amounts applied (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Glenn et al., 2002</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Glenn &amp; Puterka, 2005</xref>). Since reflectance measurements were not related to the effectiveness of sunburn mitigation (Figure 3; Tables S4 and S8), reflectance of IR radiation beyond the measured spectrum might be of greater importance. However, differences between the adhesion of sunscreens on the surfaces of aluminium plates and berry cuticula have to be considered as well.</p>
                <p>Beyond the effect of defoliation, sunscreens did not reduce rot infestation (Figure 4 and Table S8). 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al. (2017)</xref> reported the potential of kaolin to lower the severity of 
                    <italic>B. cinerea</italic> on grapes, although the impact was not consistent among approaches and vintages.</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-4--different-protective-nets-decrease-sunburn-necrosis">
                <title>4. Different protective nets decrease sunburn necrosis</title>
                <p>Protective nets represent a long-term and more expensive investment regarding additional installation and maintenance costs, which have to be decided on the basis of the size and economic situation of the individual winery, as well as on further protection benefits. Despite the differences in colour, mesh size and shading factor (Table S3), each of the protective nets at NW reduced sunburn necrosis within the LD approach during each growing season, although the overall extent of damage within this experiment was low (Figure 5). White and black nets with shading factors ranging from 23 % to 35 % have been shown to decrease the level of sunburn damage effectively (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Oliveira et al., 2014</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
                <p>The shading factors of each protective net from the UV-A spectral range onwards were comparable to the total shading factor. It is important to note that the low shading of UV-B radiation across the protective nets (Table S4) might be due to measurement difficulties in the short-wave spectral range (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Aphalo, 2016</xref>).</p>
                <p>Consistent with the sunscreens investigated, none of the protective nets decreased rot severity in addition to the defoliation measures (Figure 6 and Table S8). Protective nets provide a physical barrier which can reduce damage to fruits not merely caused by solar radiation, but can also shield from pathogens (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Sharma &amp; Sanikommu, 2018</xref>).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-5--viticultural-measures-vary-in-terms-of-their-effectiveness">
                <title>5. Viticultural measures vary in terms of their effectiveness</title>
                <p>Defoliation is able to determine the level of sunburn necrosis, but also of rot infestation. When conducting ND, sunburn damage was reduced by 84.3 % in comparison to LD at NW, revealing, on average, the highest effectiveness across both growing seasons (Figure 1; Tables 1 and S8). However, ND exhibited the highest severity of rot infestation within each year. LD in turn decreased this damage by 59.5 % across both growing seasons when compared to ND (Figure 2 and Table S8), but recorded the highest levels of sunburn necrosis within each year (Figure 1 and Table S8). Both types of damage were lower than the respective maximum extent at two sites and during each growing season when ED was conducted: The effectiveness in sunburn reduction ranged between 42.8 % and 59.6 % in comparison to LD at RM and NW, respectively. ED was on average more effective during extreme heat waves in 2022 at both sites compared to 2021, respectively (Figure 1; Tables 1, S5 and S8). Additionally, rot infestation was decreased by 68.4 % to 85.3 % when compared to ND at NW and RM, respectively (Figure 2 and Table S8). A similar effectiveness of ED in the reduction of sunburn necrosis (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gambetta et al., 2022</xref>) and a lower effectiveness in the prevention of rot infestation (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Molitor et al., 2011</xref>) have been reported. ED revealed positive impacts against both types of damage, which were independent of experimental sites and growing seasons (Figures 1 and 2; Tables 1 and S8).</p>
                <p>Lime in a 2 % concentration decreased sunburn necrosis at NW across both growing seasons by 41.9 % within the LD approaches and was more effective than kaolin in a 5 % concentration (Figure 3 and Table 1), although kaolin is used as an effective sunscreen (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Lobos et al., 2015</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Teker, 2023</xref>). Combining ED and lime revealed an effectiveness in 2021 of 79.2 % in comparison to the maximum extent of sunburn damage, but not in 2022 (Figure 3 and Table 1). This effect might be attributed to the non-extreme and temporarily occurring heat waves in 2021 (Table S5). Consistently, the additional impact of a sunscreen against sunburn necrosis beyond defoliation post-flowering was not recorded within each vintage in the study of 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al. (2017)</xref>. Thus, ED and application of lime could provide a promising combination, which can be similarly effective as ND, but furthermore protect against rot infestation (Figures 3 and 4; Table 1).</p>
                <p>Although the grey, small-meshed 
                    <italic>D. suzukii</italic> net and the black, wide-meshed hail net at NW differed in terms of their mean shading factor (Tables S3 and S4), the effectiveness of sunburn prevention by 43.7 % and 44.4 % across both growing seasons was similar (Figure 5; Tables 1 and S8). Both protective nets were comparably effective to lime within the LD approach across both experimental years (Table 1). 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Oliveira et al. (2014)</xref> reported halving of shrivelled berries when a white protective net with a shading factor of 23 % was used, indicating a slightly higher effectiveness than the hail net and the 
                    <italic>D. suzukii</italic> net. The shading net was on average more effective than lime, 
                    <italic>D. suzukii</italic> net and hail net, reducing sunburn necrosis by 63.7 % across both growing seasons (Figure 5; Tables 1 and S8). The results supported colour and mesh sizes of protective nets as essential for the shading factor (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Castellano et al., 2008</xref>). Combining black and small-meshed net threads of the shading net seems to reveal both the highest mean effectiveness and shading factor of 30 % among the protective nets investigated (Tables 1, S3 and S4). This strategy was comparably effective to ED at NW across both experimental years (Figures 1 and 5; Tables 1 and S8). Overall, the mean effectiveness of the protective nets was increased in 2022, when duration and intensity of heat waves were more extreme and accompanied by drought conditions in comparison to 2021 (Figure 5; Tables 1 and S5).</p>
                <p>In conclusion, ED, lime, and protective nets revealed reliable results in terms of sunburn prevention within each experimental year. In contrast, exclusively ED was able to reduce the levels of rot infestation compared to the respective maximum extent during each growing season. The combination of ED with application of sunscreens or shading by protective nets might have a positive impact on both, an additional decrease of sunburn necrosis beyond ED and the prevention of rot infestation at once (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6; Tables 1 and S8).</p>
            </sec>
            <sec id="h2-6--no-impacts-on-the-must-weight-and-vigour-of-vines">
                <title>6. No impacts on the must weight and vigour of vines</title>
                <p>Defoliation, application of sunscreens and shading by protective nets neither influenced total yield including grapes with different levels of damage, berry weight, nor vigour of vines within each growing season at NW (Tables S9, S10, and S11). However, the damage varied between the different measures, affecting grapes in maximum by between 8.2 % to 11.4 % due to sunburn necrosis and by between 11.2 % to 27.6 % due to rot infestation across both years at NW. Reductive effects on yield could be expected if grapes had been separated by quality. While defoliation pre-flowering has been shown to reduce yield (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Pastore et al., 2013</xref>), partial or intensive defoliation post-flowering, kaolin application (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al., 2017</xref>), as well as shading nets of different colours up to a shading factor of 40 % had no influence (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Martínez-Lüscher et al., 2017</xref>). Concerning the influence of defoliation on berry weight, contradictory results have been reported (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Dookozlian, 1990</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Diago et al., 2010</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al., 2017</xref>), whereas kaolin application was even able to increase berry weight after intensive defoliation at 
                    <italic>véraison</italic> (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al., 2017</xref>). Negative effects on carbon balance can be expected if vines are shaded excessively for a longer period of time (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Greer et al., 2011</xref>). Seasonal impacts recorded a higher total yield, berry weight and vigorous growth in 2021 when compared to 2022 (Tables S9, S10, and S11), potentially due to a higher water supply of the vines (Table S5).</p>
                <p>Must weights at harvest were not affected by the viticultural measures within each year (Table 2). According to 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al. (2017)</xref>, defoliation post-flowering resulted in an increase of soluble solids compared to ND, but the effect was not consistent among the vintages for defoliation at 
                    <italic>véraison</italic>. While kaolin did not impact sugar concentration in the studies of 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Ferrari et al. (2017)</xref> and 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Teker (2023)</xref>, shading of vines by 75 % using a black net showed a delay in maturation (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Lu et al., 2021</xref>). The decrease of total acidity within the ED approaches in each growing season was likely the result of malic acid degradation when compared to ND, respectively (Table 2), due to the longer exposure to solar radiation accompanied by increasing berry temperatures (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Lakso &amp; Kliewer, 1975</xref>). Application of lime increased the pH value in comparison to both defoliated approaches without sunscreen in each year (Table 2) and might contribute to a negative impact on preferred must characteristics. Overall, the higher levels of malic acid and total acidity, as well as the lower pH value in 2021 compared to 2022 (Table 2), can be attributed to lower air temperatures (Table S5; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Lakso &amp; Kliewer, 1975</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Ganichot, 2002</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">De Orduña, 2010</xref>). Sunburn and rot damage on grapes are able to affect the quality of wines (
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Ribéreau-Gayon, 1983</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Diago et al., 2010</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Rustioni et al., 2023</xref>; 
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Szmania et al., 2023</xref>), but this issue was not addressed in the present study.</p>
            </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="h1-conclusion">
            <title>Conclusion</title>
            <p>Regarding various phytosanitary benefits and quality improvements of grapes, defoliation is an effective and low-cost viticultural tool. However, grapes are more sensitive to sunburn damage when defoliation is timed incorrectly. The field experiments of this study showed that early defoliation between the end of flowering and fruit set leads to both less severe sunburn necrosis and rot infestation on ‘Riesling’ grapes in comparison to the respective maximum extent at two experimental sites and within each growing season. Application of lime onto grapes and shading by protective nets were able to decrease sunburn damage after late defoliation at bunch closure within each experimental year. The combined effect of early defoliation and application of lime against sunburn necrosis was exclusively recorded within one growing season and needs to be further investigated. Future studies have to evaluate possible effects of viticultural measures on wine quality across several vintages.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="h1-acknowledgements">
            <title>Acknowledgements</title>
            <p>The authors would like to thank AlzChem Trostberg GmbH for providing BREAK-THRU
                <sup>®</sup> S 301 and BREAK-THRU
                <sup>®</sup> SP 133, as well as WAGNER GmbH for supplying the protective nets free of charge for research purposes. Providing the experimental vineyard by the “Staatsweingut mit Johannitergut Neustadt”, assistance and support in experimental procedure by the viticulture group, FTIR spectroscopy measurements by the wine chemistry analysis laboratory, introduction and provision of the spectrometer by Christian Staffa, as well as laboratory assistance by Thorsten Manthey at NW are highly appreciated. Field experiments were conducted within the framework of the research projects “Sensory and substantial characterisation of climate-induced off-flavours in white wine and minimisation of sunburn damage on grapes by use of clays and shading” (“Climate-induced off-flavours in white wine”; AIF 21095 N) coordinated by the “Research Association of the Food Industry” and funded by the “German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action” at NW, “Sunburn risk on grapes: Occurrence, causes and instruction for action” (“Sonntag”; 6005-0023#2020/0002-0801 8503.0002) coordinated by the “Research Association of German Viticulture” and funded by the “Rhineland-Palatinate Ministry for Economic Affairs, Transport, Agriculture and Viticulture” at GM as well as “Viticultural management in the ‘Appellation d’origine protégée – Moselle Luxembourgeoise’ under changing climatic conditions” (“VinoManAOP2”) funded by the “Luxembourgish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Viticulture” and “High-resolution climate change projections for Luxembourg” co-funded by the “Luxembourgish Ministry of the Environment, Climate and Biodiversity” at RM. Reflectance measurements at the University of La Rioja were conducted within research projects (PID2021-126075NB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and PDC2021-121410-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) coordinated by the “Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation” as well as the “Spanish State Research Agency” and funded by the “European Regional Development Fund” as well as the “Recovery and Resilience Facility” within the “NextGenerationEU” of the European Union, respectively.</p>
        </sec>
    </body>
    <back>
        <fn-group/>
        <ref-list>
            <ref id="ref1">
                <label>1</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P. J</surname>
                        <given-names>Aphalo</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2016</year>
                    <article-title>Measuring solar UV-B: Why is it so difficult?</article-title>
                    <source>UV4Plants Bulletin,</source>
                    <volume>2016</volume>
                    <issue>1</issue>
                    <page-range>21-27</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.19232/uv4pb.2016.1.14">https://doi.org/10.19232/uv4pb.2016.1.14</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref2">
                <label>2</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Calderón-Orellana</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>I.</surname>
                        <given-names>Serra Stepke</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Puentes Jimenez</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2018</year>
                    <article-title>Golpe de sol en uva para vino en el Valle del Itata: Más de lo esperado.</article-title>
                    <source>Boletín Vinos Del Sur,</source>
                    <volume>2</volume>
                    <page-range>3-4</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.plataformaextension.cl/archivos/2020/07/Golpe-de-sol-en-uva-para-vino-en-el-Valle-del-Itata_N%C2%B02.pdf">https://www.plataformaextension.cl/archivos/2020/07/Golpe-de-sol-en-uva-para-vino-en-el-Valle-del-Itata_N%C2%B02.pdf</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref3">
                <label>3</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Castellano</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Scarascia Mugnozza</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Russo</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Briassoulis</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Mistriotis</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Hemming</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Waaijenberg</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2008</year>
                    <article-title>Plastic nets in agriculture: A general review of types and applications.</article-title>
                    <source>Applied Engineering in Agriculture,</source>
                    <volume>24</volume>
                    <issue>6</issue>
                    <page-range>799-808</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25368">https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25368</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref4">
                <label>4</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Danenberg</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2019</year>
                    <article-title>Grapegrowing: Climate change: How is climate change affecting Australian vineyards and what are growers doing to respond?</article-title>
                    <source>Australian and New Zealand Grapegrower and Winemaker,</source>
                    <volume>661</volume>
                    <page-range>18-21</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.315871833585593">https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.315871833585593</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref5">
                <label>5</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Deloire</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Rogiers</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <article-title>Monitoring vine water status.</article-title>
                    <source>Part 2: A detailed example using the pressure chamber. Grapevine Management Guide,</source>
                    <volume>15</volume>
                    <page-range>16-19</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1182183/Monitoring-vine-water-status-part-2.pdf">https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/1182183/Monitoring-vine-water-status-part-2.pdf</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref6">
                <label>6</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R. M</surname>
                        <given-names>De Orduña</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <article-title>Climate change associated effects on grape and wine quality and production.</article-title>
                    <source>Food Research International,</source>
                    <volume>43</volume>
                    <issue>7</issue>
                    <page-range>1844-1855</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.05.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2010.05.001</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref7">
                <label>7</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname/>
                        <given-names>Deutsches Weininstitut Gmbh</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2022</year>
                    <article-title>’22/’23 Deutscher Wein Statistik.</article-title>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.deutscheweine.de/fileadmin/DWI/News_Medien/Publikationen/Deutscher_Wein_Statistik/Statistik_2022-2023.pdf">https://www.deutscheweine.de/fileadmin/DWI/News_Medien/Publikationen/Deutscher_Wein_Statistik/Statistik_2022-2023.pdf</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref8">
                <label>8</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname/>
                        <given-names>Deutsches Weininstitut Gmbh</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2024</year>
                    <article-title>’23/’24 Deutscher Wein Statistik.</article-title>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.deutscheweine.de/fileadmin/DWI/News_Medien/Publikationen/Deutscher_Wein_Statistik/Statistik_2023_2024-V1.pdf">https://www.deutscheweine.de/fileadmin/DWI/News_Medien/Publikationen/Deutscher_Wein_Statistik/Statistik_2023_2024-V1.pdf</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref9">
                <label>9</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M. P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Diago</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Vilanova</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Tardaguila</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <article-title>Effects of timing of manual and mechanical early defoliation on the aroma of Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>Tempranillo wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,</source>
                    <volume>61</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>382-391</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.61.3.382">https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.61.3.382</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref10">
                <label>10</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.-T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Dinis</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Bernado</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Matos</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Malheiro</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R.</surname>
                        <given-names>Flores</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Alves</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Costa</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Rocha</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Correia</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Luzio</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Moutinho-Pereira</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2020</year>
                    <article-title>Overview of kaolin outcomes from vine to wine: Cereal white variety case study.</article-title>
                    <source>Agronomy,</source>
                    <volume>10</volume>
                    <issue>9</issue>
                    <page-range>1422</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091422">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091422</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref11">
                <label>11</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>N. K</surname>
                        <given-names>Dookozlian</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1990</year>
                    <article-title>Light quantity and light quality within Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>grapevine canopies and the relative influence in berry growth and composition. Doctoral dissertation,</source>
                    <volume>University of California, Davis.</volume>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref12">
                <label>12</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>V.</surname>
                        <given-names>Ferrari</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Disegna</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Dellacassa</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Coniberti</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2017</year>
                    <article-title>Influence of timing and intensity of fruit zone leaf removal and kaolin applications on bunch rot control and quality improvement of Sauvignon blanc grapes, and wines, in a temperate humid climate.</article-title>
                    <source>Scientia Horticulturae,</source>
                    <volume>223</volume>
                    <page-range>62-71</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.034">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.034</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref13">
                <label>13</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fox</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2006</year>
                    <article-title>Physiologische Aspekte der Traubenzonen-Entlaubung.</article-title>
                    <source>Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Obst- und Weinbau,</source>
                    <volume>142</volume>
                    <issue>7</issue>
                    <page-range>6-8</page-range>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref14">
                <label>14</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Frioni</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Tombesi</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Luciani</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Sabbatini</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Berrios</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Palliotti</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2019</year>
                    <article-title>Kaolin treatments on Pinot noir grapevines for the control of heat stress damages.</article-title>
                    <source>BIO Web of Conferences,</source>
                    <volume>13</volume>
                    <page-range>04004</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191304004">https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191304004</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref15">
                <label>15</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Gambetta</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>B. P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Holzapfel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Stoll</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Friedel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2021</year>
                    <article-title>Sunburn in grapes: A review.</article-title>
                    <source>Frontiers in Plant Science,</source>
                    <volume>11</volume>
                    <page-range>604691</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.604691">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.604691</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref16">
                <label>16</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Gambetta</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>V.</surname>
                        <given-names>Romat</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Schmidtke</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>B. P</surname>
                        <given-names>Holzapfel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2022</year>
                    <article-title>Secondary metabolites coordinately protect grapes from excessive light and sunburn damage during development.</article-title>
                    <source>Biomolecules,</source>
                    <volume>12</volume>
                    <issue>1</issue>
                    <page-range>42</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12010042">https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12010042</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref17">
                <label>17</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>B.</surname>
                        <given-names>Ganichot</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2002</year>
                    <article-title>Evolution de la date des vendanges dans les Côtes du Rhône méridionales.</article-title>
                    <source>Actes des 6èmes Rencontres Rhodaniennes,</source>
                    <volume>Institut Rhodanien</volume>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref18">
                <label>18</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Glenn</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Prado</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Erez</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Mcferson</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G. J</surname>
                        <given-names>Puterka</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2002</year>
                    <article-title>A reflective, processed-kaolin particle film affects fruit temperature, radiation reflection, and solar injury in apple.</article-title>
                    <source>Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,</source>
                    <volume>127</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <page-range>188-193</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.127.2.188">https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.127.2.188</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref19">
                <label>19</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Glenn</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G. J</surname>
                        <given-names>Puterka</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2005</year>
                    <article-title>Particle films: A new technology for agriculture.</article-title>
                    <source>Horticultural Reviews,</source>
                    <volume>31</volume>
                    <page-range>1-44</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650882.ch1">https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650882.ch1</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref20">
                <label>20</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M. D</surname>
                        <given-names>Greenspan</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2009</year>
                    <article-title>Investigating low-volume approaches to vineyard cooling.</article-title>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref21">
                <label>21</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D. H.</surname>
                        <given-names>Greer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Weedon</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Weston</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2011</year>
                    <article-title>Reductions in biomass accumulation, photosynthesis in situ and net carbon balance are the costs of protecting Vitis vinifera ‘Semillon’ grapevines from heat stress with shade covering.</article-title>
                    <source>AoB Plants,</source>
                    <volume>2011</volume>
                    <page-range>plr023</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr023">https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plr023</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref22">
                <label>22</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Hulands</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D. H.</surname>
                        <given-names>Greer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. D. I</surname>
                        <given-names>Harper</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <article-title>The interactive effects of temperature and light intensity on Vitis vinifera cv.</article-title>
                    <source>‘Semillon’ grapevines. II. Berry ripening and susceptibility to sunburn at harvest. European Journal of Horticultural Science,</source>
                    <volume>79</volume>
                    <issue>1</issue>
                    <page-range>1-7</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1079/ejhs.2014/4222611">https://doi.org/10.1079/ejhs.2014/4222611</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref23">
                <label>23</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Hunter</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>O. T.</surname>
                        <given-names>De Villiers</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. E</surname>
                        <given-names>Watts</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1991</year>
                    <article-title>The effect of partial defoliation on quality characteristics of Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. II. Skin color,</source>
                    <volume>skin sugar, and wine quality.</volume>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref24">
                <label>24</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname/>
                        <given-names>Institut Viti-Vinicole</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2024</year>
                    <article-title>Das Weinjahr 2022 und seine Ernteergebnisse.</article-title>
                    <source>Publication of the Institute of Viticulture, Department of Viticulture in Remich.</source>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://agriculture.public.lu/dam-assets/veroeffentlichungen/berichte/weinbau/weinjahr/weinjahr-2022.pdf">https://agriculture.public.lu/dam-assets/veroeffentlichungen/berichte/weinbau/weinjahr/weinjahr-2022.pdf</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref25">
                <label>25</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname/>
                        <given-names>Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2023</year>
                    <article-title>Climate change 2023: AR6 synthesis report.</article-title>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647">https://doi.org/10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref26">
                <label>26</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>and Wine</surname>
                        <given-names>International Organisation Of Vine</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2021</year>
                    <article-title>State of the world vitivinicultural sector in 2020.</article-title>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/7909/oiv-state-of-the-world-vitivinicultural-sector-in-2020.pdf">https://www.oiv.int/public/medias/7909/oiv-state-of-the-world-vitivinicultural-sector-in-2020.pdf</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref27">
                <label>27</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Keller</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <article-title>Managing grapevines to optimise fruit development in a challenging environment: A climate change primer for viticulturists.</article-title>
                    <source>Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research,</source>
                    <volume>16</volume>
                    <issue>s1</issue>
                    <page-range>56-69</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00077.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2009.00077.x</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref28">
                <label>28</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A. N.</surname>
                        <given-names>Lakso</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>W. M</surname>
                        <given-names>Kliewer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1975</year>
                    <article-title>The influence of temperature on malic acid metabolism in grape berries: I.</article-title>
                    <source>Enzyme responses. Plant Physiology,</source>
                    <volume>56</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>370-372</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.56.3.370">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.56.3.370</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref29">
                <label>29</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A. D</surname>
                        <given-names>Levin</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2019</year>
                    <article-title>Re-evaluating pressure chamber methods of water status determination in field-grown grapevine (Vitis spp.</article-title>
                    <source>). Agricultural Water Management,</source>
                    <volume>221</volume>
                    <page-range>422-429</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.026</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref30">
                <label>30</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G. A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Lobos</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Acevedo-Opazo</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Guajardo-Moreno</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H.</surname>
                        <given-names>Valdés-Gómez</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Taylor</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>V. F</surname>
                        <given-names>Laurie</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2015</year>
                    <article-title>Effects of kaolin-based particle film and fruit zone netting on Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine physiology and fruit quality.</article-title>
                    <source>Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin,</source>
                    <volume>49</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <page-range>137-144</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2015.49.2.86">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2015.49.2.86</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref31">
                <label>31</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D. H.</surname>
                        <given-names>Lorenz</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>K. W.</surname>
                        <given-names>Eichhorn</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H.</surname>
                        <given-names>Bleiholder</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R.</surname>
                        <given-names>Klose</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>U.</surname>
                        <given-names>Meier</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Weber</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1995</year>
                    <article-title>Growth stages of the grapevine: Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>ssp. vinifera) – Codes and descriptions according to the extended BBCH scale. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research,</source>
                    <volume>1</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <page-range>100-103</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00085.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.1995.tb00085.x</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref32">
                <label>32</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H.-C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Lu</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>W.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wei</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Y.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.-Q.</surname>
                        <given-names>Duan</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>W.</surname>
                        <given-names>Chen</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.-D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Li</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2021</year>
                    <article-title>Effects of sunlight exclusion on leaf gas exchange, berry composition, and wine flavour profile of Cabernet-Sauvignon from the foot of the north side of Mount Tianshan and a semi-arid continental climate.</article-title>
                    <source>OENO One,</source>
                    <volume>55</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <page-range>267-283</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.2.4545">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.2.4545</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref33">
                <label>33</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Martínez-Lüscher</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C. C. L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Chen</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Brillante</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S. K</surname>
                        <given-names>Kurtural</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2017</year>
                    <article-title>Partial solar radiation exclusion with color shade nets reduces the degradation of organic acids and flavonoids of grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,</source>
                    <volume>65</volume>
                    <issue>49</issue>
                    <page-range>10693-10702</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04163">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04163</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref34">
                <label>34</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Molitor</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Behr</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fischer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Hoffmann</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Evers</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2011</year>
                    <article-title>Timing of cluster-zone leaf removal and its impact on canopy morphology, cluster structure and bunch rot susceptibility of grapes.</article-title>
                    <source>Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin,</source>
                    <volume>45</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>149-159</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2011.45.3.1495">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2011.45.3.1495</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref35">
                <label>35</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>K.</surname>
                        <given-names>Müller</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Keller</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Stoll</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Friedel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2023</year>
                    <article-title>Wind speed, sun exposure and water status alter sunburn susceptibility of grape berries.</article-title>
                    <source>Frontiers in Plant Science,</source>
                    <volume>14</volume>
                    <page-range>1145274</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1145274">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1145274</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref36">
                <label>36</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Oliveira</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Teles</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Barbosa</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>F.</surname>
                        <given-names>Olazabal</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Queiroz</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2014</year>
                    <article-title>Shading of the fruit zone to reduce grape yield and quality losses caused by sunburn.</article-title>
                    <source>Journal International des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin,</source>
                    <volume>48</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>179-187</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2014.48.3.1579">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2014.48.3.1579</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref37">
                <label>37</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Pastore</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zenoni</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fasoli</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Pezzotti</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G. B.</surname>
                        <given-names>Tornielli</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>I.</surname>
                        <given-names>Filippetti</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2013</year>
                    <article-title>Selective defoliation affects plant growth, fruit transcriptional ripening program and flavonoid metabolism in grapevine.</article-title>
                    <source>BMC Plant Biology,</source>
                    <volume>13</volume>
                    <page-range>30</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-30">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-30</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref38">
                <label>38</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S. E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Perkins-Kirkpatrick</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S. C</surname>
                        <given-names>Lewis</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2020</year>
                    <article-title>Increasing trends in regional heatwaves.</article-title>
                    <source>Nature Communications, 11(3357).</source>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16970-7">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16970-7</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref39">
                <label>39</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H. D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Rabinowitch</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>N.</surname>
                        <given-names>Kedar</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Budowski</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1974</year>
                    <article-title>Induction of sunscald damage in tomatoes under natural and controlled conditions.</article-title>
                    <source>Scientia Horticulturae,</source>
                    <volume>2</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>265-272</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(74)90035-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(74)90035-1</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref40">
                <label>40</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Ribéreau-Gayon</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1983</year>
                    <article-title>Alterations of wine quality caused by Botrytis damages.</article-title>
                    <source>Vignevini,</source>
                    <volume>10</volume>
                    <page-range>48-52</page-range>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref41">
                <label>41</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. K.</surname>
                        <given-names>Rosenquist</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. C</surname>
                        <given-names>Morrison</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1989</year>
                    <article-title>Some factors affecting cuticle and wax accumulation on grape berries.</article-title>
                    <source>American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,</source>
                    <volume>40</volume>
                    <issue>4</issue>
                    <page-range>241-244</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1989.40.4.241">https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1989.40.4.241</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref42">
                <label>42</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Rustioni</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Altomare</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Shanshiashvili</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>F.</surname>
                        <given-names>Greco</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R.</surname>
                        <given-names>Buccolieri</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>I.</surname>
                        <given-names>Blanco</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Cola</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fracassetti</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2023</year>
                    <article-title>Microclimate of grape bunch and sunburn of white grape berries: Effect on wine quality.</article-title>
                    <source>Foods,</source>
                    <volume>12</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>621</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030621">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030621</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref43">
                <label>43</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Santos</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fraga</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A. C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Malheiro</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Moutinho-Pereira</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.-T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Dinis</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Correia</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Moriondo</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Leolini</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Dibari</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Costafreda-Aumedes</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Kartschall</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Menz</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Molitor</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Junk</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Beyer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H. R</surname>
                        <given-names>Schultz</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2020</year>
                    <article-title>A review of the potential climate change impacts and adaptation options for European viticulture.</article-title>
                    <source>Applied Sciences,</source>
                    <volume>10</volume>
                    <issue>9</issue>
                    <page-range>3092</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093092">https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093092</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref44">
                <label>44</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P. F.</surname>
                        <given-names>Scholander</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E. D.</surname>
                        <given-names>Bradstreet</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E. A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Hemmingsen</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H. T</surname>
                        <given-names>Hammel</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1965</year>
                    <article-title>Sap pressure in vascular plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants.</article-title>
                    <source>Science,</source>
                    <volume>148</volume>
                    <issue>3668</issue>
                    <page-range>339-346</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref45">
                <label>45</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L. E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Schrader</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zhang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>W. K</surname>
                        <given-names>Duplaga</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2001</year>
                    <article-title>Two types of sunburn in apple caused by high fruit surface (peel) temperature.</article-title>
                    <source>Plant Health Progress, 2(1).</source>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2001-1004-01-rs">https://doi.org/10.1094/php-2001-1004-01-rs</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref46">
                <label>46</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Schrader</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zhang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Sun</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2003</year>
                    <article-title>Environmental stresses that cause sunburn of apple.</article-title>
                    <source>Acta Horticulturae,</source>
                    <volume>618</volume>
                    <page-range>397-405</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2003.618.47">https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2003.618.47</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref47">
                <label>47</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R. R.</surname>
                        <given-names>Sharma</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>V. R</surname>
                        <given-names>Sanikommu</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2018</year>
                    <article-title>Preharvest fruit bagging for better protection and postharvest quality of horticultural produce.</article-title>
                    <source>In: M. W. Siddiqui (Ed.),</source>
                    <volume>Preharvest Modulation of Postharvest Fruit and Vegetable Quality</volume>
                    <page-range>455-489</page-range>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref48">
                <label>48</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R. F</surname>
                        <given-names>Simpson</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1978</year>
                    <article-title>1,1,6-Trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene: An important contributor to the bottle aged bouquet of wine.</article-title>
                    <source>Chemistry &amp; Industry,</source>
                    <volume>1</volume>
                    <page-range>37</page-range>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref49">
                <label>49</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R. E.</surname>
                        <given-names>Smart</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T. R</surname>
                        <given-names>Sinclair</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1976</year>
                    <article-title>Solar heating of grape berries and other spherical fruits.</article-title>
                    <source>Agricultural Meteorology,</source>
                    <volume>17</volume>
                    <issue>4</issue>
                    <page-range>241-259</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(76)90029-7">https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(76)90029-7</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref50">
                <label>50</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Strack</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Stoll</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2021</year>
                    <article-title>Implication of row orientation changes on fruit parameters of Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>cv. Riesling in steep slope vineyards. Foods,</source>
                    <volume>10</volume>
                    <issue>11</issue>
                    <page-range>2682</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112682">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112682</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref51">
                <label>51</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>C.</surname>
                        <given-names>Szmania</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Waber</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Bogs</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>U.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fischer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2023</year>
                    <article-title>Sensory and aroma impact of mitigation strategies against sunburn in Riesling.</article-title>
                    <source>OENO One,</source>
                    <volume>57</volume>
                    <issue>3</issue>
                    <page-range>127-140</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.7287">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.7287</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref52">
                <label>52</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Tarara</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Spayd</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2005</year>
                    <article-title>Tackling ‘sunburn’ in red wine grapes through temperature and sunlight exposure.</article-title>
                    <source>The Good Fruit Grower,</source>
                    <volume>56</volume>
                    <page-range>40-41</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.goodfruit.com/26170">https://www.goodfruit.com/26170</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref53">
                <label>53</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Teker</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2023</year>
                    <article-title>A study of kaolin effects on grapevine physiology and its ability to protect grape clusters from sunburn damage.</article-title>
                    <source>Scientia Horticulturae,</source>
                    <volume>311</volume>
                    <page-range>111824</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111824">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111824</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref54">
                <label>54</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Verdenal</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>V.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zufferey</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Dienes-Nagy</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Bourdin</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>K.</surname>
                        <given-names>Gindro</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>O.</surname>
                        <given-names>Viret</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Spring</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname/>
                        <given-names>L</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2019</year>
                    <article-title>Timing and intensity of grapevine defoliation: An extensive overview on five cultivars in Switzerland.</article-title>
                    <source>American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,</source>
                    <volume>70</volume>
                    <issue>4</issue>
                    <page-range>427-434</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2019.19002">https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2019.19002</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref55">
                <label>55</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>L.</surname>
                        <given-names>Webb</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J.</surname>
                        <given-names>Whiting</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Watt</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T.</surname>
                        <given-names>Hill</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>F.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wigg</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Dunn</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>S.</surname>
                        <given-names>Needs</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>E. W. R</surname>
                        <given-names>Barlow</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2010</year>
                    <article-title>Managing grapevines through severe heat: A survey of growers after the 2009 summer heatwave in South-Eastern Australia.</article-title>
                    <source>Journal of Wine Research,</source>
                    <volume>21</volume>
                    <issue>2-3</issue>
                    <page-range>147-165</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2010.530106">https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2010.530106</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref56">
                <label>56</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>X.</surname>
                        <given-names>Yue</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>X.</surname>
                        <given-names>Ma</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Y.</surname>
                        <given-names>Tang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Y.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>B.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wu</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>X.</surname>
                        <given-names>Jiao</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Z.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zhang</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>Y.</surname>
                        <given-names>Ju</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2020</year>
                    <article-title>Effect of cluster zone leaf removal on monoterpene profiles of Sauvignon Blanc grapes and wines.</article-title>
                    <source>Food Research International,</source>
                    <volume>131</volume>
                    <page-range>109028</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109028">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109028</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref57">
                <label>57</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Ziegler</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wegmann-Herr</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>H.-G.</surname>
                        <given-names>Schmarr</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>R.</surname>
                        <given-names>Gök</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>P.</surname>
                        <given-names>Winterhalter</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>U.</surname>
                        <given-names>Fischer</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>2020</year>
                    <article-title>Impact of rootstock, clonal selection, and berry size of Vitis vinifera sp.</article-title>
                    <source>Riesling on the formation of TDN,</source>
                    <volume>vitispiranes, and other volatile compounds.</volume>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref58">
                <label>58</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>B. W.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zoecklein</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>T. K.</surname>
                        <given-names>Wolf</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>N. W.</surname>
                        <given-names>Duncan</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>J. M.</surname>
                        <given-names>Judge</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <name>
                        <surname>M. K</surname>
                        <given-names>Cook</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1992</year>
                    <article-title>Effects of fruit zone leaf removal on yield, fruit composition, and fruit rot incidence of Chardonnay and White Riesling (Vitis vinifera L.</article-title>
                    <source>) grapes. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture,</source>
                    <volume>43</volume>
                    <issue>2</issue>
                    <page-range>139-148</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" ns2:href="https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1992.43.2.139">https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1992.43.2.139</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
            <ref id="ref59">
                <label>59</label>
                <mixed-citation>
                    <name>
                        <surname>A.</surname>
                        <given-names>Zschokke</given-names>
                    </name>
                    <year>1931</year>
                    <article-title>Beschädigung von Weinreben durch Sonnenbrand und Austrocknen.</article-title>
                    <source>Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten (Pflanzenpathologie) und Pflanzenschutz,</source>
                    <volume>41</volume>
                    <issue>5</issue>
                    <page-range>240-251</page-range>
                    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" ns2:href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/43525981">https://www.jstor.org/stable/43525981</ext-link>
                </mixed-citation>
            </ref>
        </ref-list>
    </back>
</article>
