<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xmlns="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><journal-meta>
<journal-id>OENO One</journal-id>
<issn>2494-1271</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">Varietal aromatic potential and volatile fingerprinting from several Portuguese grape varieties: impact of variety and year</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="dc:creator">
<name><surname>Fonseca</surname>
<given-names>Daniela</given-names></name>
<email>daniela.fonseca@uevora.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>M.Jordão</surname>
<given-names>António</given-names></name>
<email>antoniojordao@esav.ipv.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Rodrigues</surname>
<given-names>Pedro</given-names></name>
<email>prodrigues@esav.ipv.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Martins</surname>
<given-names>Nuno</given-names></name>
<email>nmartins@uevora.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Garcia</surname>
<given-names>Raquel</given-names></name>
<email>raquelg@uevora.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Pedroso</surname>
<given-names>Vanda</given-names></name>
<email>vanda.pedroso@ccdrc.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>João Cabrita</surname>
<given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
<email>mjbc@uevora.pt</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup>Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development &amp; Institute of Research and Advanced Training, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal</aff><aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup>Polytechnic University of Viseu, Agrarian School (CERNAS Research Centre), 3500-606 Viseu, Portugal</aff><aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup>Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development &amp; Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal</aff><aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup>Dão Wine Studies Center - Nelas Innovation Hub (CCDRC), 3520 Nelas, Portugal</aff><pub-date date-type="created">
<day>2</day>
<month>7</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright © 1970 Daniela Fonseca, António M.Jordão, Pedro Rodrigues, Nuno Martins, Raquel Garcia, Vanda Pedroso, Maria João Cabrita</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1970</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Daniela Fonseca, António M.Jordão, Pedro Rodrigues, Nuno Martins, Raquel Garcia, Vanda Pedroso, Maria João Cabrita</copyright-holder>
<license>
<license-p></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Studies on volatile composition consistently show that native and minority grape varieties often exhibit unique volatile profiles, supporting their use for wine differentiation, market diversification, and the valorisation of typicity. To advance knowledge of Portugal’s native grapevines, this study provides a comprehensive assessment of the volatile composition of three white (Encruzado, Malvasia Fina, and Terrantez) and red (Coração de Galo, Jaen, and Touriga Nacional) grape varieties over two consecutive years. This work helps us understand the aromatic potential of the varieties studied and the potential influence of annual climatic conditions on volatile composition. Results for the white varieties showed that the varietal aroma potential index (IPAv) was significantly modulated by year, depending on the variety, indicating differential accumulation of glycosylated aroma precursors. In contrast, for the red varieties studied, IPAv was unaffected by year, variety, or their interaction, suggesting a more stable precursor pool. Regarding individual volatile compounds, obtained by GC×GC-TOFMS, white varieties were mainly driven by varietal identity, particularly for terpenes and C13 norisoprenoids, while year effects were stronger for C6 compounds and especially benzenoids. For the red varieties studied, volatile composition reflected combined genetic and year effects, with strong year × variety interactions for terpenes and C13 norisoprenoids, while C6 compounds were largely influenced by variety. Finally, benzenoids were mainly influenced by year. Overall, both variety and year influenced the volatile compounds and aromatic potential of the traditional Portuguese grape varieties studied. This work allowed for a first approach to the study of the aromatic potential of some traditional Portuguese grape varieties grown in northern Portugal, also contributing to a first approach to how the year, and particularly climatic conditions, may influence the main groups of volatile compounds.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Portuguese</kwd>
<kwd>grape</kwd>
<kwd>varieties</kwd>
<kwd>HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS</kwd>
<kwd>volatile</kwd>
<kwd>composition</kwd>
<kwd>varietal</kwd>
<kwd>aroma</kwd>
<kwd>potential</kwd>
<kwd>index</kwd>
<kwd>climatic</kwd>
<kwd>conditions</kwd>
<kwd>volatile composition</kwd>
<kwd>varietal aroma potential index</kwd>
<kwd>Portuguese grape varieties</kwd>
<kwd>climatic conditions</kwd>
<kwd>HS</kwd>
<kwd>SPME</kwd>
<kwd>GC×GC</kwd>
<kwd>TOFMS</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="h0-introduction"><title>Introduction </title>
<p>Minority and native grape varieties are increasingly recognised for their resilience to climate change, showing significant tolerance to drought and high temperatures (Serrano Parra <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Espinosa-Roldán <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). Several studies suggest that many of these lesser-known grape varieties, often locally adapted varieties, can withstand severe water stress while maintaining quality, providing a crucial tool for adapting viticulture to warmer and drier conditions (Parker <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Ramos &amp; Martínez de Toda, 2021; Muñoz-Organero <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Espinosa-Roldán <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Portu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). In addition, several of these grapevines are also characterized to have longer ripening cycles, preventing sugars from rising too high (Koufos <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Jahnke <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Espinosa-Roldán <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024), as well as greater potential for resistance to local pests and diseases (Volynkin <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019; Sargolzaei <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Stanus <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024) and also the ability to produce wines with potential distinctive sensory profiles (Bigard <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Caldeira <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025).</p>
<p>Regarding volatile composition, several studies reported that native and minority grape varieties frequently have a unique aromatic profile that differs significantly from widely used international varieties (<italic>e.g.</italic>, Cabernet-Sauvignon and Chardonnay) (Vilanova <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012; Cebrián-Tarancón <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). Several reports on native grape varieties and resulting wines, namely from Spain (García-Carpintero <italic>et al.</italic>, 2011; Díaz-Fernández <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022), Croatia (Šikuten <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Plavša <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025), Greece (Karimali <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020), and Italy (Genovese <italic>et al.</italic>, 2005), indicate that some of these varieties show significant differentiation in terms of their aromatic profile. These differences are often attributed to the high variability of grapevine germplasm and the unique genetic, geographic, and ecological factors associated with local lesser-known varieties (Šikuten <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022). In addition, several authors also reported that the grape volatile composition can be strongly influenced by the year and particularly by the climatic conditions (Perestrelo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014; Asproudi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2016; Asproudi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Lu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022).</p>
<p>Old world regions, such as Portugal, retain a high diversity of ancestral varieties in traditional local vineyards, despite a globalising wine market in which 70–90 % of the vineyard area is planted with only 12 varieties (Wolkovich <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018). In fact, Portugal has a vast and unique genetic heritage, with approximately 230 grape varieties native to Portugal or the Iberian Peninsula. According to the national ordinance no. 380/2012 of 22 November, there are 343 different grapevine varieties suitable for wine production in Portugal. Therefore, the study of lesser-known varieties is an important priority, not only to diversify their offer and meet the needs of emerging markets, but also to identify the grape varieties best suited to withstand the abiotic stresses expected in the near future (Alifragkis <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015). This varietal richness could also be useful to promote the regional wine typicity, leading to product diversification in the markets (Antolín <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020). However, this should also be complemented with new vinification strategies that lead to the elaboration of wines with new sensory profiles to satisfy new consumer tendencies and market demands (Palliotti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014).</p>
<p>Only a few studies have been performed on the composition of the Portuguese grape varieties, and these studies were restricted to a very small number of varieties and focused particularly on the general physicochemical characteristics and phenolic composition (Jordão <italic>et al.</italic>, 1998; Mateus <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002; Cosme <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009; Costa <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015; Rouxinol <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). However, data on the varietal aromatic potential and the individual volatile composition are very scarce in the literature and are restricted to a very small number of native varieties (Rocha <italic>et al.</italic>, 2000; Oliveira <italic>et al.</italic>, 2004; Genisheva &amp; Oliveira, 2009; Cabrita <italic>et al.</italic>, 2006; Perestrelo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014; Jordão <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). This fact is even more striking in northern Portugal, where, in some wine-growing regions, such as the Dão wine region, despite the existence of a wide diversity of native varieties cultivated, there is very little knowledge of their aromatic profile. In addition, it is also important to study the potential relationship between volatile composition and the climatic conditions that occur each year.</p>
<p>In this context, the characterisation of varietal volatile composition in complex matrices such as grapes is essential to define the specific aromatic fingerprint of each variety. Given the chemical complexity of grape volatiles, advanced analytical methodologies are required to achieve a comprehensive and reliable characterisation. So, the present study employed comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with a time-of-flight mass spectrometry detector (GC×GC–TOFMS), a powerful approach that allows enhanced separation and identification of volatile compounds (Rocha <italic>et al.</italic>, 2007; Perestrelo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2010; Könen &amp; Wüst, 2020; Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). </p>
<p>Thus, this innovative study intends to achieve a deep knowledge of the volatile profile of several native Portuguese grape varieties (Encruzado, Malvasia Fina, Terrantez, Coração de Galo, Jaen, and Touriga Nacional) at harvest, during two consecutive years, taking advantage of advanced analytical techniques such as comprehensive gas chromatography. To the best of our knowledge, the study of the varietal volatile profile in these traditional grape varieties cultivated in the Dão wine region has never been explored. Thus, the present work expands the knowledge of these Portuguese grape varieties, giving more information about their aromatic potential and how the year’s climatic conditions could influence their aromatic profile.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-materials-and-methods"><title>Materials and methods </title>
<sec id="h0-1--plant-material--vineyard-location--and-grape-sampling"><title>1. Plant material, vineyard location, and grape sampling</title>
<p>The study was conducted during the 2023 and 2024 growing seasons at the Dão Viticulture and Oenology Research Centre (40°31′ N, 7°51′ W, 440 m a.s.l.), located in the Dão Demarcated Region, Portugal. The experimental plots included three white varieties: Encruzado (VIVC: 3909), Malvasia Fina (VIVC: 715), and Terrantez (VIVC: 24589); and three red varieties: Coração de Galo (VIVC: 16954), Jaen (VIVC: 798), and Touriga Nacional (VIVC: 12594). All plots were trained to a vertical shoot positioning system and bilateral Royat cordon pruning. For each grape variety, three replicate plots were established, each consisting of eight to ten plants. The studied vineyard plots are planted on soils of granitic origin, characterised by a coarse texture, high porosity and permeability, low water-holding capacity, and low organic matter content (Rodrigues <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012).</p>
<p>At harvest, grape samples of 250 berries were collected from each replicate at different positions within the clusters, ensuring that the berry skin and the pedicel attachment were not damaged.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-2--climatic-conditions"><title>2. Climatic conditions</title>
<p>Meteorological variables were measured at a weather station located at the centre of the vineyard, including air temperature and relative humidity, wind speed and direction, solar radiation, and precipitation. Daily reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>0</sub>) was determined from the average daily values of the meteorological variables using the FAO-PM equation (Allen <italic>et al.</italic>, 1998) with the values for the surface resistance (rc) and the coefficients Cn and Cd proposed by Allen <italic>et al.</italic> (2006). Based on daily records, several bioclimatic indices were calculated: the growing season average temperature (GST), the Huglin index (HI), the cool night index (CI), and the dryness index (DI). GST was calculated as the average air temperature from April to October of each year, representing the vegetative period. HI was calculated over the same period, accounting for daytime and night-time temperatures. CI was computed as the average minimum temperature during the ripening period (September), while DI was determined as a measure of water deficit during the growing season. All indices were calculated following standard viticultural procedures (Tonietto &amp; Carbonneau, 2004; Hall &amp; Jones, 2010). Based on HI, CI, and DI, the bioclimatic characterisation of each year was performed using the Multicriteria Climatic Classification System (MCCS) proposed by Tonietto and Carbonneau (2004). Additionally, the number of days with maximum temperatures exceeding 30, 35, and 40 °C, as well as total precipitation and reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>0</sub>), were determined for the period from April to September (Table 1).</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 1. Bioclimatic indices and viticultural climate classes for 2023 and 2024 in the vineyard studied.</title>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Year</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>GST (</bold>°<bold>C)</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>HI</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>CI (ºC)</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>DI (mm)</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Number of days Tmax &gt; 30 </bold>°<bold>C</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Number of days Tmax &gt; 35 </bold>°<bold>C</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Number of days Tmax &gt; 40 </bold>°<bold>C</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Precipitation (mm)</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>ET<sub>0</sub> (mm)</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Classes of viticultural climate</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>2023</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>19.5</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2563</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>14.3</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>–10.3</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>50</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>10</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>5</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>224</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>945.0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>HI+2, CI–1, DI+1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>2024</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>19.1</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2391</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>13.0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>–51.5</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>43</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>9</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>234</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>893.1</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>HI+1, CI+1, DI+1</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>In 2023, the growing season showed high thermal accumulation (GST = 19.5 °C; HI = 2563), with frequent warm and hot days (50 days with Tmax &gt; 30 °C, including 5 days &gt; 40 °C) and relatively warm night-time conditions during ripening (CI = 14.3 °C). In 2024, thermal conditions were slightly lower (GST = 19.1 °C; HI = 2391), with fewer warm and extremely hot days and cooler night-time temperatures during ripening (CI = 13.0 °C). Although 2023 showed higher reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>0</sub> = 945 mm) and a total precipitation amount from April to September similar to that of 2024, the higher dryness index (DI = −10.3 mm) was mainly attributable to substantial rainfall occurring in September, which contributed significantly to soil water recharge at the end of the growing season. In fact, the seasonal dynamics of the potential soil water balance index (W), proposed by Riou <italic>et al.</italic> (1994), differed markedly between years. In 2023, despite higher ET<sub>0</sub> and total precipitation from April to September comparable to 2024, a pronounced water deficit developed during mid to late summer (W = −45.3 mm at DOY 243). This deficit was followed by a clear recovery towards the end of the growing season (W = −10.3 mm at DOY 273), consistent with substantial rainfall occurring in September, resulting in a near-neutral dryness index (DI = −10.3 mm). In contrast, 2024 showed lower ET<sub>0</sub> (893 mm) and higher soil water availability during most of the summer, but a continuous decline in soil water balance towards the end of the season, reaching −53.3 mm at DOY 273. This led to a more negative dryness index (DI = −51.5 mm), indicating a stronger cumulative water deficit despite similar total precipitation.</p>
<p>Finally, according to MCCS, 2023<bold> </bold>was classified as warm, with temperate nights during the ripening period and moderately dry, whereas 2024 was classified as temperate warm, with cool nights and moderately dry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-3--general-physicochemical-grape-analysis"><title>3. General physicochemical grape analysis</title>
<p>At harvest, basic oenological parameters such as total soluble solids (ºBrix), pH, and titratable acidity were evaluated according to OIV methods (OIV, 2018). Malic acid and tartaric acid were determined by colorimetric analysis using a spectrophotometer model Genesys 50 UV-Vis (Thermo Scientific, Ilkirch-Graffenstaden, France) according to the methodology described by Zoecklein <italic>et al.</italic> (1995). All analyses were performed in triplicate on grape must samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-4--determination-of-varietal-aroma-potential-index"><title>4. Determination of varietal aroma potential index</title>
<p>For the determination of the grapes’ varietal aroma potential index (IPAv), a commercial IPAv kit (Teknokroma S.A., Barcelona, Spain) was used, following the procedure based on the method described by Salinas <italic>et al.</italic> (2012) and modified to enable the spectrophotometric determination of the glucose released from the glycosylated aroma precursors by acid hydrolysis. Thus, the glycosyl aroma precursor fraction was subjected to an acidic hydrolysis (pH 1, 100 °C, 1 h), where equimolar proportions of glucose (glucose GG) were released from their respective aglycones. For this, a spectrophotometer model Genesys 50 UV-Vis (Thermo Scientific, Ilkirch-Graffenstaden, France) was used. All measurements were performed in triplicate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-5--hs-spme-gc-gc-tofms-analysis"><title>5. HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS analysis</title>
<p>The methodology, HS-SPME-GC×GC-TOFMS, was carried out according to the method proposed by Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic> (2024). Each grape sample consisted of 250 berries, randomly collected from different positions within the grape clusters. The berries were subsequently homogenised using an Ultra Turrax T25 basic homogeniser (IKA Labortechnik, Germany). Then, 4 g of grapes, 2 g of sodium chloride, and 2 mL of ultrapure water were transferred into a 20.0 mL SPME vial. The vial was sealed with a Teflon-lined rubber septum and a magnetic screw cap. Before extraction, the sample was equilibrated at 60 °C for 5 minutes, followed by fibre exposure for 40 minutes under the same temperature conditions. Desorption of analytes was achieved thermally by inserting the fibre into the injector at 260 °C for 3 minutes in splitless mode. A carboxen/divinylbenzene/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/DVB/PDMS) fibre (1 cm length, 50/30 µm film thickness; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was employed. Blank fibre runs were periodically conducted to verify the absence of contamination or carryover, one before the first grape sample and then after every three subsequent injections. </p>
<p>A GC×GC-TOFMS system composed of an Agilent 8890 GC (Shanghai, China) coupled with a BenchTOF-Select detector (Markes International, Bridgend, UK) and a CTC PAL-System autosampler (SepSolve Analytical, Zwingen, Switzerland) for automatic sample injection was used. Data acquisition and processing were completed using ChromSpace software (Markes International, Bridgend, UK). Chromatographic separation was achieved using an INSIGH<sup>TM</sup> flow modulator (SepSolve Analytical, Waterloo, Canada) equipped with a 50 µL loop. The system employed a BPX5 column (20 m × 0.18 mm i.d., 0.18 µm film thickness; SGE GC Column, Trajan, Australia) for the first dimension (1D) and a BPX50 column (5 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.1 µm film thickness; SepSolve Analytical, Australia) for the second dimension (2D). The modulation period was set to 5 s, with a flush time of 200 ms (Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2026). The oven temperature program began at 40 °C (held for 3 min), then increased at 3 °C/min to 150 °C, followed by 4 °C/min to 200 °C, and finally 10 °C/min to 260 °C, where it was held for 5 min. Helium served as the carrier gas, flowing at 0.5 mL/min in the first dimension and 20 mL/min in the second. The MS transfer line and ion source were both maintained at 270 °C. Mass spectra were acquired under electron ionisation (EI, 70 eV) in full-scan mode (<italic>m/z</italic> 30–400), with a data acquisition rate of 50 Hz. Linear retention indices (LRIs) were determined using a commercial C<sub>8</sub>–C<sub>20</sub> n-alkane mixture (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) under identical chromatographic conditions. To assist in terpene identification, a terpene standard mixture (MegaMix #1, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was also analysed. Volatile compounds were identified by comparing their mass spectra with reference spectra from the NIST Mass Spectral Library (NIST MS Search Program, Version 2020), considering molecular structure and weight, and by comparing calculated LRI values with literature data. The relative peak area of each compound was expressed as the percentage of its peak area relative to the total chromatographic peak area. All analyses were performed in triplicate. </p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-6--statistical-analysis"><title>6. Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were performed using NCSS 11 Statistical Software (2016) (NCSS, LLC, Kaysville, Utah, USA). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess differences among grape varieties within each studied year. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to determine the statistical significance of the factors “year”, “variety”, and their interaction (“year × variety”). Group differences were assessed using the Tukey–Kramer test at significance levels of <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, and <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001. The polar heatmaps were carried out using OriginPro 2023b SR1 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-results-and-discussion"><title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="h0-1--general-grape-must-physicochemical-characteristics"><title>1. General grape must physicochemical characteristics </title>
<p>Despite the influence of annual climatic variability, differences among varieties for some parameters appear to reflect their intrinsic oenological characteristics. Among the white grape varieties and during the two years considered, Terrantez consistently showed lower sugar concentration, higher total acidity, lower pH, and higher malic acid concentration (Table 2). For the red grape varieties, total acidity was consistently higher in Coração de Galo in both years, while Jaen grape variety systematically exhibited lower acidity and higher pH values. In addition, Touriga Nacional consistently showed the lowest sugar concentration for both years studied (Table 3).</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 2. General physicochemical characteristics of white grape varieties studied.</title>
<p>The mean values (n = 3) are presented along with their standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the basic oenological parameters for each variety for each year under study. Different letters represent statistically significant differences among different varieties for each year according to the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Basic oenological parameters  </bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2023</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2024</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Encruzado</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Malvasia Fina</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Terrantez</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Encruzado</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Malvasia Fina</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Terrantez</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Total soluble solids (°Brix)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>22.2 ± 0.53a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>25.2 ± 0.96b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>21.3 ± 1.20a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>24.5 ± 0.83b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>24.2 ± 0.54b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>20.7 ± 0.57a</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Total acidity (g L<sup>–1</sup> tartaric acid)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>4.8 ± 0.32a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>5.0 ± 0.25a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>6.6 ± 0.21b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>5.4 ± 0.31b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>4.3 ± 0.26a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>7.7 ± 0.74c</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>pH</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.5 ± 0.03b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.5 ± 0.09ab</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.3 ± 0.03a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.2 ± 0.04ab</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.4 ± 0.09b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.9 ± 0.12a</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Malic acid (g L<sup>–1</sup>)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.5 ± 0.10b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.9 ± 0.10a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.7 ± 0.30c</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.9 ± 0.15a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.8 ±0.14a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.5 ± 0.11b</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Tartaric acid (g L<sup>–1</sup>)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.3 ± 0.20a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>4.6 ± 0.40b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>4.9 ± 0.70b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.9 ± 0.72a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.7 ± 0.28a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.4 ± 0.39a</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p />
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 3. General physicochemical characteristics of red grape varieties studied.</title>
<p>The mean values (n = 3) are presented along with their standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the basic oenological parameters for each variety for each year under study. Different letters represent statistically significant differences among different varieties for each year according to the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Basic oenological parameters</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2023</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2024</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Coração de Galo</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Jaen</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Touriga Nacional</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Coração de Galo</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Jaen</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Touriga Nacional</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Total soluble solids(ºBrix)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>22.5 ± 0.19b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>22.3 ± 0.31b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>21.6 ± 0.06a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>25.0 ± 0.16b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>25.3 ± 0.25b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>22.7 ± 0.27a</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Total acidity (g L<sup>–1</sup> tartaric acid)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>6.7 ± 0.36c</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.9 ± 0.13a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>5.5 ± 0.16b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>7.5 ± 0.10c</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.4 ± 0.08a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>5.4 ± 0.17b</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>pH</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.3 ± 0.03a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.7 ± 0.01b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.2 ± 0.01a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.2 ± 0.03b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.7 ± 0.02c</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.2 ± 0.01a</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Malic acid (g L<sup>–1</sup>)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.6 ± 0.37a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.5 ± 0.47b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.1 ± 0.05a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.2 ± 0.19a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.80± 0.14a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.3 ± 0.23a</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Tartaric acid (g L<sup>–1</sup>)</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.1 ± 0.22b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.2 ± 0.10b</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.1 ± 0.15a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.3 ± 0.04a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.3 ± 0.24a</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.4 ± 0.35a</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>Although the analysis of variance presented in Table 4 indicates that year, variety, and their interaction affected the oenological parameters analysed, some common trends can nevertheless be identified. In both white and red varieties studied, the effect of variety on sugar concentration, total acidity, and pH was highly significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), suggesting that these parameters are at least partly associated with genetic characteristics of the grape varieties studied. This interpretation is supported by previous studies indicating that several ripening- and acidity-related traits are strongly variety-dependent. In particular, varietal differences have been reported in malic acid degradation, tartaric acid balance, pH dynamics, sugar concentration, and total acidity during ripening. In addition, studies on minority Portuguese varieties have shown clear differences in the chemical, volatile, and sensory profiles of the wines produced, further highlighting the importance of varietal identity in shaping oenological typicity (Piras <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Rodrigues <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021; Brazão <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). In contrast, year did not show a significant effect on total acidity in either group, despite both years studied being considered warm and moderately dry according to the bioclimatic indices obtained for the vineyard where the grapes were collected (Table 1). For all parameters analysed, the significance of the interaction between factors indicates that the effect of variety may be modulated by interannual environmental variability.</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 4. Significance of the effects of year, variety, and their interaction on the basic oenological parameters for the white and red grape varieties studied.</title>
<p>A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to determine the statistical significance of the factors “year”, “variety”, and their interaction (“year × variety”),  as this approach allows the simultaneous assessment of multiple correlated response variables. Statistical significance levels: * <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05, ** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, *** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, and NS, not significant.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Basic oenological</bold></p>
<p><bold>parameters</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>White</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>Red</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Year</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Year × Variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Year</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Year × Variety</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Total soluble solids</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Total acidity</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>**</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>**</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>pH</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>**</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>**</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Malic acid</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Tartaric acid</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>**</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>***</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap></sec>
<sec id="h2-2--varietal-aroma-potential-index"><title>2. Varietal aroma potential index</title>
<p>The IPAv parameter estimates the total content of glycosylated aroma precursors in grapes, primarily linked to volatile aglycones including phenols, terpenes, C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids, and alcohols. Consequently, high IPAv values indicate a larger pool of bound precursors that can be hydrolysed during winemaking, potentially increasing the aromatic complexity of wines produced (Pardo-García <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014; Campayo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Cebrián-Tarancón <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Jordão <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). The data in Figure 1 show the IPAv values for white and red grape varieties studied in 2023 and 2024, with red varieties showing higher values (IPAv values between 13.17 and 18.28) than white varieties (IPAv values between 4.59 and 6.77).</p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 1. Varietal aroma potential index values for the white (a) and red (b) grape varieties studied in 2023 and 2024. </title>
<p>One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the IPAv for each variety for each year under study. When significant effects were detected, means were compared using the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among varieties within the same year. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to determine the statistical significance of the factors “year”, “variety”, and their interaction (“year × variety”), as this approach allows the simultaneous assessment of multiple correlated response variables. Statistical significance levels: * <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05, ** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, *** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, and NS, not significant.</p>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image1.png"><alt-text>Une image contenant texte, capture d’écran, diagramme, Tracé Le contenu généré par l’IA peut être incorrect.</alt-text></graphic></fig></p>
<p>For the white grape varieties (Figure 1a), IPAv increased in 2024 relative to 2023 among all varieties. On the other hand, among the white varieties studied, Encruzado showed the highest IPAv values (from 5.44 to 6.77) in both years, showing the greatest annual increase, indicating that this variety contained higher levels of glycosylated aroma precursors. Red varieties (Figure 1b) showed some numerical variation between years; however, no statistically significant differences were observed in IPAv values.</p>
<p>The significant effects observed in the white varieties indicate that climatic conditions influence the accumulation of glycosylated aroma precursors, and that this response differs among varieties, reflecting varietal characteristics. In contrast, for the red varieties, IPAv values were not significantly affected by year, variety, or their interaction, indicating greater stability across years and varieties. Jordão <italic>et al.</italic> (2024) reported lower aromatic potential index values for three red varieties grown on Pico Island (Azores), namely Merlot (IPAv = 9.99), Syrah (IPAv = 10.93), and Saborinho (IPAv = 7.90), which are markedly below the range observed for the red varieties analysed. Cebrián-Tarancón <italic>et al.</italic> (2024) showed that IPAv varies substantially among varieties in both white and red recovered minority grape varieties from Spain, and that the water regime can modulate aromatic potential, with a clearer increase under irrigation conditions in the white varieties. These authors reported IPAv values ranging from 4.38 to 18.37 for red grape varieties and from 5.76 to 17.61 for white grape varieties, both under a rainfed regime.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-3--individual-volatile-composition"><title>3. Individual volatile composition</title>
<p>A total of fifty-seven free volatile compounds were identified in the white grape varieties under study. The volatile compounds were grouped into families, including four C<sub>6</sub> compounds, three benzenoids, five C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids, and forty-five terpenes. The compounds were classified according to their biosynthetic origin. C<sub>6</sub> compounds are primarily formed through the lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway, whereas benzenoids are derived mainly from the shikimate pathway. C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids result from the oxidative degradation of carotenoids, while terpenes are biosynthesised through the mevalonate (MVA) and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways. All free volatile compounds found in white varieties are shown in Table 5. The distribution of these volatile families revealed marked effects of both variety and year, highlighting the strong influence of genetic and environmental factors on grape secondary metabolism during the two years considered.</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 5. Free varietal volatile compounds found in samples of Terrantez, Encruzado, and Malvasia Fina grape varieties in 2023 and 2024.</title>
<p>The mean values (n = 3) are presented along with their standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the total of each family of compounds. When significant effects were detected, means were compared using the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among varieties within the same year. nd: not detected; TDN: 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene; <sup>* </sup>Compounds confirmed by MegaMix #1. <sup>1 </sup>LRI calc: The linear retention index values were calculated through analysis of the commercial hydrocarbon mixture (C<sub>8</sub>–C<sub>20</sub>); <sup>2</sup> LRI lit: The linear retention index values from the literature for a 5 % phenyl polysilphenylene-siloxane column.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Compounds</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold><sup>1</sup>LRI calc</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold><sup>2</sup>LRI lit</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2023</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2024</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Terrantez</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Encruzado</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Malvasia Fina</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Terrantez</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Encruzado</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Malvasia Fina</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>C<sub>6</sub> Compounds</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>5-Hexen-2-ol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>732</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.55 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.32 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Hexanal</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>801</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>27.96 ± 1.63</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>34.40 ± 0.94</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>48.97 ± 1.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>75.17 ± 0.26</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>54.61 ± 1.21</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>70.97 ± 0.30</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>2-Hexenal isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>846</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>15.79 ± 1.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>31.45 ± 0.81</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>38.17 ± 0.61</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>12.51 ± 0.18</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>14.26 ± 0.37</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>10.46 ± 0.48</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Hexanol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>863</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>36.93 ± 2.60</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>19.05 ± 1.31</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>6.64 ± 0.50</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>6.45 ± 0.28</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>19.07 ± 0.52</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>12.27 ± 0.36</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>81.23 ± 5.28a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>84.90 ± 3.06b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>94.10 ± 2.14c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>94.28 ± 0.73b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>88.11 ± 2.11a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>93.80 ± 1.15b</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Benzenoids</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Benzaldehyde</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>952</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>6.09 ± 0.31</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>4.83 ± 0.29</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.30 ± 0.08</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.08 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.05 ± 0.11</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.10 ± 0.07</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Benzene methanol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1030</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1026</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.07 ± 0.18</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.31 ± 0.13</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.10 ± 0.11</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.21 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.26 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.58 ± 0.06</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Benzene ethanol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1119</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1107</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.50 ± 0.13</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.43 ± 0.13</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.27 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.29 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.72 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>9.65 ± 0.62c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>7.58 ± 0.55b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>3.67 ± 0.20a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>1.57 ± 0.06a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>3.03 ± 0.14c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>1.88 ± 0.15b</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle" colspan="2"><p><bold>C<sub>13 </sub>Norisoprenoids</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Cyclocitral</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1233</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1217</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.37 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.58 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.23 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.51 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.39 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Vitispirane</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1293</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1286</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.33 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.17 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>TDN</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1372</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1354</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Damascenone</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1390</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1383</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Ionone</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1490</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1487</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.18 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.92 ± 0.07c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.83 ± 0.03b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.42 ± 0.02a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.77 ± 0.04c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.61 ± 0.03b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.39 ± 0.02a</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Terpenes</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Myrcene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>988</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.23 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Terpinene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>998</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1014</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><italic>p</italic>-Cymene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1009</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1022</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.48 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.19 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.19 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.22 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Limonene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1013</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1024</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.20 ± 0.07</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.68 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.33 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.50 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.12 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.75 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Eucalyptol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1018</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1026</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.33 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.38 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.34 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Ocimene isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1030</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1032</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Terpinolene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1078</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1086</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><italic>p</italic>-Cymenene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1089</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1089</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.29 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.18 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Linalool<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1093</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1095</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.49 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.78 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.23 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.28 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.74 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.52 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Hotrienol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1098</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1101</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Allocimene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1124</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1128</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Nerol oxide</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1153</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1154</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Linalool oxide isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1176</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1170</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Borneol isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1184</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1165</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Menthol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1186</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1167</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>4-Terpineol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1189</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1174</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.12 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Terpineol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1207</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1186</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.62 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.21 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Myrtenol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1209</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1194</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Nerol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1231</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1227</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.34 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.48 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.53 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.30 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><italic>Z</italic>-Citral</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1249</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1235</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Geraniol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1258</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1249</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.44 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.86 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.19 ± 0.06</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.34 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>δ-Elemene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1342</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1335</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Cubebene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1354</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1345</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Ylangene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1379</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1373</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Copaene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1386</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1374</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Gurjunene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1418</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1409</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Cedrene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1432</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1410</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Caryophyllene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1434</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1417</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.18 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Thujopsene isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1438</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1429</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Copaene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1441</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1430</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Guaiene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1443</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1437</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Aromadendrene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1462</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1439</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Humulene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1470</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1452</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.23 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.18 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Alloaromadendrene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1487</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1458</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.18 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Amorphene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1490</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1483</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>δ-Selinene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1497</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1492</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Valencene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1505</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1496</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Muurolene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1515</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1500</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>δ-Cadinene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1528</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1522</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.40 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.33 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.25 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.50 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Calamenene isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1535</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1528</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.51 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.36 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.22 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.28 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Cadinene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1549</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1537</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Calacorene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1558</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1544</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Corocalene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1633</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1622</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Cubenol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1646</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1645</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Cadalene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1693</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1675</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>8.20 ± 0.51c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>6.70 ± 0.32b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>1.81 ± 0.09a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>3.38 ± 0.19a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>8.25 ± 0.35c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>3.92 ± 0.22b</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>In 2023, 5-hexen-2-ol was detected in all white grape varieties studied, except for Encruzado. The compounds β-myrcene, hotrienol, and linalool oxide isomer were detected exclusively in 2023 and, as expected, interannual differences were evident. The compounds borneol isomer, myrtenol, δ-elemene, and α-gurjunene were present in all varieties in 2023 but were detected only in the Terrantez and Encruzado varieties in 2024. Conversely, α-guaiene and δ-selinene appeared in all varieties in 2024, while in 2023 they were only found in Terrantez and Encruzado varieties. In addition, nerol oxide was only found in the Encruzado variety in 2024. The compounds α-muurolene and α-cadinene were absent from the Malvasia Fina variety in both years, which may eventually be a specific characteristic of this variety. The repeated absence of α-muurolene and α-cadinene in Malvasia Fina across both vintages suggests that this pattern may reflect a variety-related volatile trait rather than a purely seasonal effect. Similar cases have been reported in other grape studies, where certain volatile compounds were found exclusively in some cultivars and consistently absent in others, supporting the idea that presence/absence patterns may contribute to varietal discrimination (Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Zhan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Thujopsene isomer and cubenol were not found in Malvasia Fina in 2023 and in Encruzado in 2024, while β-copaene was detected only in the Encruzado variety in 2023.</p>
<p>For the C<sub>6</sub> compound family, considering the relative area, it was observed that in 2023, the Malvasia Fina variety showed the highest total relative area, while the Terrantez variety showed the lowest values. However, in 2024, Encruzado exhibited the lowest total relative area. C<sub>6</sub> compounds are associated with green aromas typically found in grapes with lower °Brix values (Kalua &amp; Boss, 2010; Robinson <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014). However, this was not observed in the present study, as the Malvasia Fina variety showed the highest °Brix values while exhibiting the greatest abundance of C<sub>6</sub> compounds in 2023. According to the literature, changes in the microclimate can inhibit or stimulate the activity of the lipoxygenase/hydroperoxide lyase pathway, thereby affecting the enzymatic activity involved in the synthesis of C<sub>6</sub> compounds. It is also important to note that the abundance of C<sub>6</sub> compounds in grapes is affected by grape germplasm, variety, climatic conditions, and viticultural practices (Deluc <italic>et al.</italic>, 2009; Kalua &amp; Boss, 2010; Qian <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017). Šikuten <italic>et al.</italic> (2022) studied 50 red wine varieties and found that aldehydes and alcohols were the most abundant volatile compounds, including hexanal, (<italic>E</italic>)-2-hexenal, (<italic>E</italic>)-2-hexen-1-ol, and 1-hexanol, which vary markedly among varieties and can contribute to varietal discrimination. Their accumulation is also climate-sensitive, since several C<sub>6</sub> compounds have been reported to respond to temperature, humidity, and seasonal conditions during ripening (Xie <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018). </p>
<p>For the benzenoid and terpene families, in 2023, the Terrantez variety displayed the highest total relative area, while Malvasia Fina showed the lowest values. This greater contribution of volatile compounds in Terrantez was mainly driven by the high abundance of benzaldehyde, the most predominant benzenoid, typically associated with almond and sweet notes. Several dominant terpenes such as <italic>p</italic>-cymene (citrus and herbaceous), limonene (fresh citrus), α-terpineol (floral and lilac), and calamenene (woody and spicy) were also present in higher levels in other grape varieties, such as Castelão, Tinta Barroca, Trincadeira, and Moscatel (Fenoll <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012; Wu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019; Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Hutchings <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). However, in 2024, the Encruzado variety had the highest total relative area, and Terrantez had the lowest. This is due to the high abundance of volatile compounds such as benzenoid, benzaldehyde, and terpenes, including limonene, linalool (citrus and flowery), α-terpineol, nerol (sweet and citrus), geraniol (fruity and rose), valencene (citrus), and δ-cadinene (woody and resinous), collectively contributing to the aromatic richness of Encruzado variety (Vilanova <italic>et al.</italic>, 2010; Hutchings <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025), with several of these compounds being commonly reported as influential to the aroma of white wines (Vilanova <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013; Luo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019; Chigo-Hernandez &amp; Tomasino, 2023). According to Rocha <italic>et al.</italic> (2021), in a white wine made from the Encruzado grape variety, contact with chitosan–genipin films during storage modulated the volatile profile by promoting the retention of some long-chain compounds and the formation of compounds such as furfural, 3-methylbutanal and phenylacetaldehyde, without compromising the wine’s varietal notes. </p>
<p>Regarding the C<sub>13 </sub>norisoprenoid family, both in 2023 and 2024, the Terrantez variety showed the highest total relative area, whereas Malvasia Fina exhibited the lowest. This enhanced contribution in the Terrantez variety was mainly associated with the higher abundance of key C<sub>13 </sub>norisoprenoids, particularly β-cyclocitral and β-ionone, contributing smoky and fruity nuances as well as floral notes reminiscent of rose and violet, respectively (Mosaferi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020). Perestrelo <italic>et al.</italic> (2014) investigated the varietal volatile profile of grape varieties traditionally used in Madeira wine production, including Terrantez, and reported that this variety exhibited a varietal profile similar to that of Sercial, a noble grape variety widely recognised for its use in high-quality Madeira wines. In contrast, Rocha <italic>et al.</italic> (2007) investigated the monoterpene composition of <italic>Vitis</italic> <italic>vinifera</italic> L. cv. Fernão Pires, a Portuguese white variety, and reported that this variety was characterised by a high content of several monoterpenes, particularly from the main families (monoterpene hydrocarbons, monoterpene oxides, monoterpenols, and monoterpene aldehydes).</p>
<p>The results of the analysis of variance presented in Table 6 show that the effects of year, variety, and their interaction varied among the different families of free volatile compounds for the white varieties studied. For C<sub>6</sub> compounds, both the effect of year (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) and variety (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01) were significant, indicating that these compounds are influenced by climatic or environmental differences between years, as well as by genetic differences among grape varieties. However, the year × variety interaction was not significant, suggesting that the behaviour of each variety remained consistent across the two years studied. This result is particularly interesting because, according to the bioclimatic data obtained for 2023, where there were more days with very high maximum temperatures and low precipitation compared to 2024 (Table 1), these differences do not seem to have influenced the biosynthesis of C<sub>6</sub> compounds.</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 6. Significance of the effects of year, variety, and their interaction on the main volatile compound families for the white grape varieties studied.</title>
<p>A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to determine the statistical significance of the factors “year”, “variety”, and their interaction (“year × variety”), as this approach allows the simultaneous assessment of multiple correlated response variables. Statistical significance levels: * <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05, ** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, *** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, and NS, not significant.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Family’s</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>Year</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>Variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>Year × Variety</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>C<sub>6</sub> Compounds</p>
</td>
	<td><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td><p>**</p>
</td>
	<td><p>NS</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>Benzenoids </p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>**</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>NS</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>C<sub>13 </sub>Norisoprenoids</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>*</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>Terpenes</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>**</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>For benzenoids, the effect of year was significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01), indicating a strong influence of seasonal factors on their formation, whereas the effects of variety and the year × variety interaction were not significant. This implies that the observed differences in benzenoid concentrations are mainly due to year conditions rather than varietal differences. For this group of compounds, it appears that the climatic conditions, and particularly the high temperatures experienced in 2023 and the lower rainfall, did not affect the biosynthesis of these compounds, since that was the year in which the values were highest for the three white grape varieties studied.</p>
<p>Regarding the C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids, both year and variety effects were highly significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and the interaction was also significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). This pattern indicates that the concentration of these compounds varies with year, grape variety, and the specific response of each variety to annual conditions, which is expected since C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids are varietal volatile compounds. Lastly, within the terpene family, the variety effect was statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and the interaction was also significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01), while the year effect was not. This demonstrates that terpenes are primarily determined by varietal characteristics, showing lower sensitivity to year effects. These results highlight the strong influence of grape variety on the aromatic potential of white varieties, particularly in the case of terpenes and C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids, whereas year, affected by climatic conditions, appears to play a more important role in shaping the composition of C<sub>6</sub> compounds and benzenoids.</p>
<p>The differences observed between white varieties and years were further explored using multivariate analysis to assess overall similarities among volatile compounds (Figure 2). Thus, the polar heatmap combined with cluster analysis confirmed the strong year modulation previously discussed, while also revealing a consistent grouping of Encruzado and Terrantez varieties across both years, indicating a closer global similarity in their volatile composition independent of the climatic conditions of the year. In both years, C<sub>6</sub> compounds formed a distinct cluster (green), highlighting their common metabolic origin and their strong association with ripening-related processes, in agreement with the trends observed in their relative abundance across varieties. For the remaining volatile groups, no clear differentiation was detected.</p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 2. Polar heatmaps of the white varieties studied for 2023 (a) and 2024 (b).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image2.png" /></fig></p>
<p />
<p>As far as red varieties, a total of forty-eight free volatile compounds were detected in the analysed samples and were also grouped into different families, including C<sub>6</sub> compounds, benzenoids, C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids, and terpenes (Table 7).</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 7. Free varietal volatile compounds found in samples of Touriga Nacional, Jaen, and Coração de Galo grape varieties in 2023 and 2024.</title>
<p>The mean values (n = 3) are presented along with their standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for the total of each family of compounds. When significant effects were detected, means were compared using the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among varieties within the same year. nd: not detected; TDN: 1,1,6-trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene; <sup>* </sup>Compounds confirmed by MegaMix #1. <sup>1 </sup>LRI calc: The linear retention index values were calculated through analysis of the commercial hydrocarbon mixture (C<sub>8</sub>–C<sub>20</sub>); <sup>2</sup> LRI lit: The linear retention index values from the literature for a 5 % phenyl polysilphenylene-siloxane column.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Compounds</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold><sup>1</sup>LRI calc</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold><sup>2</sup>LRI lit</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2023</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="3"><p><bold>2024</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Touriga Nacional</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Jean</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Coração de Galo</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Touriga Nacional</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Jean</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Coração de Galo</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>C<sub>6</sub> compounds</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Hexanal</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>801</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>12.43 ± 0.61</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>39.81 ± 3.12</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>27.84 ± 1.32</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>33.55 ± 1.58</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>20.45 ± 0.49</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>37.69 ± 0.75</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>2-Hexenal isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>846</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>11.73 ± 0.65</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>16.25 ± 1.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>15.09 ± 0.45</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>7.09 ± 0.71</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>5.85 ± 0.45</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>4.13 ± 0.27</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Hexanol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>863</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>54.66 ± 0.80</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>34.74 ± 2.23</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>36.99 ± 0.88</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>46.51 ± 2.23</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>55.58 ± 0.48</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>43.65 ± 0.35</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>78.82 ± 2.06a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>90.80 ± 6.36b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>79.92 ± 2.65a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>87.15 ± 4.52c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>81.88 ± 1.42a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>85.47 ± 1.37b</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Benzenoids</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Benzaldehyde</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>952</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.82 ± 0.16</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.14 ± 0.19</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.11 ± 0.27</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.06 ± 0.08</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.68 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.26 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Benzene methanol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1030</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1026</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.07 ± 0.06</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.51 ± 0.09</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.84 ± 0.38</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.25 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.67 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.30 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Benzene ethanol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1119</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1107</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.83 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.01 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.63 ± 0.10</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.26 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.95 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.34 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>8.72 ± 0.27b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>4.65 ± 0.32a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>8.58 ± 0.75b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>1.57 ± 0.11a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>4.30 ± 0.07c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>2.90 ± 0.08b</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle" colspan="2"><p><bold>C<sub>13 </sub>Norisoprenoids</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Cyclocitral</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1233</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1217</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.45 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.27 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.60 ± 0.06</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.26 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.42 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.27 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Vitispirane</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1293</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1286</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.40 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>TDN</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1372</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1354</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Damascenone</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1390</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1383</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.12 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Ionone</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1490</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1487</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.17 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.65 ± 0.05b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.45 ± 0.03a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>1.13 ± 0.09c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.39 ± 0.03a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.68 ± 0.04c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>0.46 ± 0.01b</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Terpenes</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Myrcene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>--</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>988</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.51 ± 0.07</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.14 ± 0.08</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.40 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.34 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Terpinene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>998</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1014</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.17 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><italic>p</italic>-Cymene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1009</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1022</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.50 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.48 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.23 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.42 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.49 ± 0.07</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Limonene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1013</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1024</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.31 ± 0.09</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.66 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.61 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.46 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.23 ± 0.19</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.74 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Eucalyptol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1018</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1026</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.27 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.37 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.53 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.87 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.58 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Ocimene isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1030</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1032</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.28 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.26 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.21 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.21 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Terpinolene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1078</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1086</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><italic>p</italic>-Cymenene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1089</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1089</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.25 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.29 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.40 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.21 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Linalool<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1093</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1095</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.79 ± 0.13</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.31 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>2.39 ± 0.12</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.24 ± 0.15</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.62 ± 0.06</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>3.44 ± 0.06</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Hotrienol</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1098</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1101</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.37 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.45 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.17 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Allocimene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1124</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1128</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.17 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Nerol Oxide</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1153</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1154</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.12 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Linalool oxide isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1176</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1170</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Borneol isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1184</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1165</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Menthol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1186</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1167</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.16 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>4-Terpineol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1189</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1174</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.17 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.71 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Terpineol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1207</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1186</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.82 ± 0.07</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.08 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.99 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.46 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.51 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Nerol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1231</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1227</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.72 ± 0.05</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.27 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.55 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.36 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.90 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.19 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><italic>Z</italic>-Citral</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1249</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1235</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Geraniol<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1258</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1249</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.36 ± 0.10</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.44 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.28 ± 0.04</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.48 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1.28 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.64 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Cubebene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1354</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1345</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Ylangene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1379</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1373</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.51 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Copaene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1386</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1374</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.15 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Caryophyllene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1434</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1417</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.21 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.38 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.19 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>β-Copaene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1441</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1430</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.13 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Guaiene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1443</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1437</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Aromadendrene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1462</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1439</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.31 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Humulene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1470</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1452</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.33 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.24 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Alloaromadendrene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1487</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1458</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.14 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Amorphene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1490</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1483</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>δ-Selinene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1497</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1492</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.05 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Valencene<sup>*</sup></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1505</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1496</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.47 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>δ-Cadinene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1528</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1522</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.22 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.06 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.20 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.73 ± 0.02</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.12 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Calamenene isomer</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1535</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1528</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.31 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.09 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.10 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.19 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.40 ± 0.03</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.12 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Calacorene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1558</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1544</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.11 ± 0.01</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>α-Corocalene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1633</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1622</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.01 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p>Cadalene</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1693</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>1675</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.04 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.03 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.02 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>0.07 ± 0</p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p>nd</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Total</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p />
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>11.76 ± 0.77c</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>4.09 ± 0.23a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>10.32 ± 0.40b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>10.80 ± 0.45a</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>12.67 ± 0.59b</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>11.17 ± 0.27a</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>The compounds vitispirane, TDN, α-terpinene, and borneol isomer were found in all varieties exclusively in 2023. The compounds α-guaiene and aromadendrene were detected in all varieties in 2024, while in 2023 they were detected only in the Jaen and Touriga Nacional varieties. The compounds α-amorphene and δ-selinene were not found in the Coração de Galo variety in both<bold> </bold>years. In addition, β-copaene was detected in all the varieties studied only in 2024, while eucalyptol and α-cubebene were found in all varieties in 2024, but in 2023 they were absent from Jaen variety. Cadalene was detected in all varieties in 2023, while in 2024 it was found only in Jaen and Touriga Nacional varieties.<bold> </bold>β-Myrcene was found in all varieties in 2023, but in 2024 only in Touriga Nacional. Similarly, hotrienol was present in all varieties in 2023, but in 2024 only in the Coração de Galo variety. In addition, nerol oxide was detected in all varieties in 2023, but in 2024 it was absent from Jaen variety. The compound linalool oxide isomer was found in all varieties in 2023, but in 2024 it was detected only in Jaen variety.<bold> </bold>Alloaromadendrene was found exclusively in Touriga Nacional in 2023, while in 2024 it was detected in both Jaen and Touriga Nacional varieties. Finally, α-corocalene was found only in Touriga Nacional and Jaen varieties in 2023, but in 2024 it was detected exclusively in Jaen. </p>
<p>For the C<sub>6</sub> compound family, based on relative area, it was observed that in 2023, Jaen recorded the highest total relative area. In 2024, the Touriga Nacional variety exhibited the highest total relative area, while the Jaen variety showed the lowest. Regarding the benzenoid and terpene families, in 2023, the Touriga Nacional variety displayed the highest total relative area, whereas Jaen showed the lowest. However, in 2024, this trend was reversed: the Jaen variety had the highest total relative area, while Touriga Nacional showed the lowest. For the C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoid family, in 2023, the Coração de Galo variety exhibited the highest total relative area, while Jaen showed the lowest. Meanwhile, in 2024, Jaen recorded the highest total relative area for the terpene family, and the Touriga Nacional variety showed the lowest. This trend therefore demonstrates a high interannual variability of this group of volatile compounds among the grape varieties studied. In addition, it is important to note that terpenes and C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids are the main families of compounds responsible for the volatile composition of each variety. This composition is strongly influenced by basic oenological parameters, among which the balance between sugars and total acidity plays a decisive role (van Leeuwen <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023).</p>
<p>In general, the volatile varietal composition of the varieties under study is defined mainly by the compounds β-cyclocitral, vitispirane, β-myrcene, <italic>p</italic>-cymene, limonene, eucalyptol, linalool, α-terpineol, nerol, geraniol, α-ylangene, and δ-cadinene, identified as the major constituents. Interestingly, these compounds are predominantly associated with floral and fruity aromatic descriptors (Coelho <italic>et al.</italic>, 2006; González-Barreiro <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015; D’Onofrio <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017; Ferreira &amp; Lopez, 2019; Rubio-Bretón <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019). In the literature, these varietal compounds have previously been identified in other <italic>Vitis</italic> <italic>vinifera</italic> varieties such as Trincadeira, Cabernet-Sauvignon, Syrah, Castelão, and Tinta Barroca (Fonseca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). Könen and Wüst (2019) investigated the sesquiterpene profile of red grape berries from the Lemberger variety and identified several sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (including α-cubebene, α-ylangene, α-copaene, β-caryophyllene, β-copaene, α-guaiene, α-humulene, δ-selinene, valencene, δ-cadinene, calamenene isomer, α-calacorene, α-corocalene, and cadalene), some of them also detected in the three Portuguese red grape varieties studied. Slaghenaufi <italic>et al.</italic> (2022) investigated monoterpenoids and norisoprenoids in red wines and also found marked varietal differences. For example, Montepulciano and Cannonau wines exhibited the highest concentrations of nerol, terpinolene, β-damascenone, and α-ionone, whereas Aglianico, Corvina, Nebbiolo, and Primitivo were characterised by comparatively high levels of linear monoterpene alcohols, such as linalool and geraniol.</p>
<p>Table 8 summarises the significance of the effects of year, variety, and their interaction on the main families of volatile compounds found in the red grapes studied. For C<sub>6</sub> compounds, the effect of year was not significant, suggesting that their formation remained relatively stable across years and independently of the climatic conditions that occurred during the two years analysed. However, the effect of variety was significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05), indicating that the concentration of these compounds depends on varietal factors. Šikuten <italic>et al.</italic> (2022) demonstrated that red grapevine varieties can be discriminated according to their volatile composition, with (<italic>E</italic>)-2-hexenal, hexenal, (<italic>E</italic>)-2-hexen-1-ol, and 1-hexanol identified among the main compounds responsible for this differentiation. In addition, the year × variety interaction was highly significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), implying that the varietal response in terms of C<sub>6</sub> compound production varied according to the conditions of each year. In the benzenoid family, a significant effect of year (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) was observed, reflecting the influence of climatic conditions on their biosynthesis. Asproudi <italic>et al.</italic> (2023), in Grignolino, a red grape variety, showed that meteorological differences over four years significantly influenced the concentration of aroma precursors and reported that high temperatures (&gt; 30 °C) and low rainfall before veraison led to higher benzenoid levels.</p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 8. Significance of the effects of year, variety, and their interaction on the main volatile compound families for the red grape varieties studied.</title>
<p>A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to determine the statistical significance of the factors “year”, “variety”, and their interaction (“year × variety”),  as this approach allows the simultaneous assessment of multiple correlated response variables. Statistical significance levels: * <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05, ** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01, *** <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001, and NS, not significant.</p>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>Family’s</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>Year</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>Variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>Year × Variety</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>C<sub>6</sub> Compounds</p>
</td>
	<td><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td><p>***</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>Benzenoids </p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>*</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>NS</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>*</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>C<sub>13 </sub>Norisoprenoids</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p>Terpenes</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
	<td valign="bottom"><p>***</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>The effect of variety was not significant, indicating that benzenoid production was relatively similar among cultivars. However, the year × variety interaction was significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05), showing that the impact of year differed depending on the year and the grape variety. For the C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoid and terpene families, the effects of year, variety, and their interaction were all highly significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). These results demonstrate that genetic, environmental, and interactive factors strongly influence the accumulation of these aromatic compounds, indicating that each cultivar responds differently to the environmental conditions of each year. Šikuten <italic>et al.</italic> (2025) indicated that grape volatile compounds are influenced by variety, climate, and viticultural practices, while Deis <italic>et al.</italic> (2024) reported that in Cabernet-Sauvignon, contrasting climatic conditions associated with vineyard location significantly altered several volatile families, including C<sub>6</sub> compounds, aldehydes, esters, and terpenes.</p>
<p>To assess the similarity and correlation between the aromatic profiles of the grape varieties under study, a polar heatmap with cluster analysis was performed for the red varieties studied (Figure 3). The shorter the distance between two clusters in the dendrogram, the more similar the varieties belonging to these groups are, indicating a greater proximity in terms of volatile composition. </p>
<p>For the red varieties studied, regardless of the year, the clustering of Jaen and Touriga Nacional varieties can be distinguished, as well as three clearly defined clusters. In 2023 (Figure 3a), the first cluster (red) includes the C<sub>6</sub> volatile compounds. The second cluster (blue) comprises the benzenoid compounds and several terpenes, including limonene, geraniol, β-copaene, linalool, β-myrcene, and eucalyptol. Finally, a third cluster (green) contains the remaining volatile compounds. According to Figure 3b, the results obtained for 2024 demonstrated that the first cluster (red) includes hexanal and hexanol, while the second cluster (blue) comprises volatile compounds such as 2-hexenal isomer, linalool, benzaldehyde, vitispirane, TDN, α-terpinene, borneol isomer, geraniol, eucalyptol, benzene ethanol, β-myrcene, <italic>p</italic>-cymene, limonene, benzene methanol, hotrienol, and nerol. Finally, the third cluster (green) includes the remaining volatile compounds.</p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 3. Polar heatmaps of red grape varieties studied for 2023 (a) and 2024 (b).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image3.png" /></fig><p />
</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-conclusions"><title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The volatile composition of the Portuguese <italic>Vitis</italic> <italic>vinifera</italic> varieties studied was predominantly associated with grape variety, with year contributing to variations in specific volatile families depending on the variety. White varieties demonstrated notable inter‑annual variability in their varietal aroma potential index, reflecting differential accumulation of glycosylated precursors under contrasting climatic conditions. In contrast, red varieties displayed a more stable precursor pool across years.</p>
<p>Individual volatile composition in white varieties was mainly driven by inherent varietal traits, particularly for terpenes and C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids, while year effects were more evident for C<sub>6</sub> compounds and benzenoids. However, for the red grape varieties studied, the interplay between genetics and climate was more pronounced, with strong year × variety interactions shaping terpenes and C<sub>13</sub> norisoprenoids. Distinctive varietal signatures were observed for C<sub>6</sub> compounds, and benzenoids displayed changes predominantly linked to year.</p>
<p>All these findings reinforce the distinctive aromatic potential of Portuguese traditional grape varieties and highlight their potential value as genetic resources for viticulture in the context of future climatic challenges. The differential sensitivity of volatile families and precursor pools to year conditions underscores the need to consider both genetic identity and inter‑annual climatic variability when optimising vineyard management and valorising typicity in wines produced, particularly in the Dão wine region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-acknowledgements"><title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>This research received support from the project "Vine&amp;Wine – Driving Sustainable Growth Through Smart Innovation" (no. C644866286-011, sub-project BioGrapeSustain), within the scope of the Mobilising Agendas for Business Innovation program under the Recovery and Resilience Plan. The authors acknowledge the R&amp;D unit MED – Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development (https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/05183/2025) and the Associate Laboratory CHANGE – Global Change and Sustainability Institute (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0121/2020">https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0121/2020</ext-link>). Furthermore, we would like to thank the CERNAS Research Centre and the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu for their support.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group><fn id="1" /></fn-group><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Alifragkis</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cunha</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fevereiro</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eiras Dias</surname><given-names>J. E. J.</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Identity, synonymies and homonymies of minor grapevine cultivars maintained in the Portuguese ampelographic collection</article-title><source>Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola</source><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>43–52</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20153001043">https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20153001043</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>R. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raes</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eds</surname><given-names /></name><year>1998</year><article-title>Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements</article-title><edition>repr</edition><publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</publisher-name></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>R. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pruitt</surname><given-names>W. O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>T. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ventura</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Snyder</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Itenfisu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Steduto</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berengena</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yrisarry</surname><given-names>J. B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>L. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raes</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrier</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alves</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Walter</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elliott</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><year>2006</year><article-title>A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>81</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>1–22</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Antolín</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toledo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pascual</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Irigoyen</surname><given-names>J. J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goicoechea</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>The Exploitation of Local Vitis vinifera L</article-title><source>Biodiversity as a Valuable Tool to Cope with Climate Change Maintaining Berry Quality. Plants</source><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010071">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010071</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Asproudi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bonello</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ragkousi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gianotti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrozziello</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Aroma precursors of Grignolino grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and their modulation by vintage in a climate change scenario</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>14</volume><page-range>1179111</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1179111">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1179111</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Asproudi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrozziello</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavalletto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guidoni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2016</year><article-title>Grape aroma precursors in cv</article-title><source>Nebbiolo as affected by vine microclimate. Food Chemistry</source><volume>211</volume><page-range>947–956</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.070">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.070</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Bigard</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romieu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ojeda</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Torregrosa</surname><given-names>L. J.-M.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>The sugarless grape trait characterised by single berry phenotyping</article-title><source>OENO One</source><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>89–102</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.3.5495">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.3.5495</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Brazão</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caldeira</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baeta</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amaral</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eiras-Dias</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>WINES CARACTERISATION OF EIGHT MINORITY PORTUGUESE GRAPEVINE VARIETIES</article-title><source>Ciencia e Tecnica Vitivinicola</source><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>21–34</page-range><comment>Scopus</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20233801021">https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/ctv20233801021</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cabrita</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa Freitas</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laureano</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Stefano</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><year>2006</year><article-title>Glycosidic aroma compounds of some Portuguese grape cultivars</article-title><source>Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture</source><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><page-range>922–931</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2439">https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2439</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Caldeira</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Roque</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anjos</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lourenço</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>De Deus</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Damásio</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silvestre</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Potential of Different Eighteen Grapevine Genotypes to Produce Wines in a Hot Region: First Insights into Volatile and Sensory Profiles</article-title><source>Beverages</source><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>68</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages11030068">https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages11030068</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Campayo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoz</surname><given-names>K. S. De La</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Martínez</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salinas</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Spraying Ozonated Water on Bobal Grapevines: Effect on Wine Quality</article-title><source>Biomolecules</source><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>213</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020213">https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020213</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cebrián-Tarancón</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Serrano</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chacón-Vozmediano</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez-Gascueña</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Volatile Characterization of Recovery Minority Grape Varieties from Castilla-La Mancha Region</article-title><edition>Spain</edition><source>Plants</source><volume>13</volume><issue>11</issue><comment>Article 11</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111507">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111507</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Chigo-Hernandez</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomasino</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Aroma Perception of Limonene, Linalool and α-Terpineol Combinations in Pinot Gris Wine</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><page-range>2389</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122389">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12122389</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Coelho</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delgadillo</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coimbra</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><year>2006</year><article-title>Headspace-SPME applied to varietal volatile components evolution during Vitis vinifera L</article-title><source>cv. ‘Baga’ ripening. Analytica Chimica Acta</source><volume>563</volume><issue>1–2</issue><page-range>204–214</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.018</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cosme</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricardo-Da-Silva</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laureano</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><year>2009</year><article-title>Effect of Various Proteins on Different Molecular Weight Proanthocyanidin Fractions of Red Wine during Wine Fining</article-title><source>American Journal of Enology and Viticulture</source><volume>60</volume><page-range>74–81</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2009.60.1.74">https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2009.60.1.74</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Da Silva</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cosme</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jordão</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Adaptability of some French red grape varieties cultivated at two different Portuguese terroirs: Comparative analysis with two Portuguese red grape varieties using physicochemical and phenolic parameters</article-title><source>Food Research International</source><volume>78</volume><page-range>302–312</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.029">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.029</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Deis</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>B. S. Da</given-names></name><name><surname>Vilanova</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>The Influence of Climatic Conditions Associated with Altitude on the Volatile Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Wines from Argentina, Spain and Portugal</article-title><source>Horticulturae</source><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><page-range>870</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080870">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10080870</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Deluc</surname><given-names>L. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Quilici</surname><given-names>D. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Decendit</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimplet</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wheatley</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schlauch</surname><given-names>K. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mérillon</surname><given-names>J.-M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cushman</surname><given-names>J. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cramer</surname><given-names>G. R.</given-names></name><year>2009</year><article-title>Water deficit alters differentially metabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay</article-title><source>BMC Genomics</source><volume>10</volume><page-range>212</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-212">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-212</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Díaz-Fernández</surname><given-names>Á.</given-names></name><name><surname>Díaz-Losada</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cortés-Diéguez</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Diversity among Traditional Minority Red Grape Varieties According to Their Aromatic Profile</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><page-range>1799</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081799">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081799</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>D’onofrio</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Matarese</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cuzzola</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2017</year><article-title>Study of the terpene profile at harvest and during berry development of Vitis vinifera L</article-title><source>aromatic varieties Aleatico, Brachetto, Malvasia di Candia aromatica and Moscato bianco. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture</source><volume>97</volume><issue>9</issue><page-range>2898–2907</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8126">https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8126</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Espinosa-Roldán</surname><given-names>F. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>García-Díaz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raboso</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Crespo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabello</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toda</surname><given-names>F. M. De</given-names></name><name><surname>Muñoz-Organero</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Phenological Evaluation of Minority Grape Varieties in the Wine Region of Madrid as a Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change</article-title><source>Horticulturae</source><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><page-range>353</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040353">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040353</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fenoll</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez</surname><given-names>M.-C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hellín</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Flores</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>Changes of free and glycosidically bound monoterpenes and aromatic alcohols in Moscatuel and Ruby Seedless table grapes during development</article-title><source>OENO One</source><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>41</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2012.46.1.1505">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2012.46.1.1505</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopez</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>The Actual and Potential Aroma of Winemaking Grapes</article-title><source>Biomolecules</source><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><page-range>818</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9120818">https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9120818</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fonseca</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabrita</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography with a TOF MS Detector—An Effective Tool to Trace the Signature of Grape Varieties</article-title><source>Molecules</source><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><page-range>1989</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29091989">https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29091989</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fonseca</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabrita</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>The potential of enzymatic hydrolysis with HS-SPME-GC×GC-ToFMS for the study of volatile signature of grapes</article-title><source>LWT</source><volume>215</volume><page-range>117314</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117314">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117314</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fonseca</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabrita</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name><year>2026</year><article-title>GC×GC–TOFMS with flow modulation for fingerprinting volatile compounds in Portuguese grape varieties</article-title><source>Microchemical Journal</source><volume>227</volume><page-range>118754</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2026.118754">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2026.118754</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>García-Carpintero</surname><given-names>E. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sánchez-Palomo</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gallego</surname><given-names>M. A. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>González-Viñas</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><year>2011</year><article-title>Volatile and sensory characterization of red wines from cv</article-title><source>Moravia Agria minority grape variety cultivated in La Mancha region over five consecutive vintages. Food Research International</source><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><page-range>1549–1560</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.022">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.022</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Genisheva</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><year>2009</year><article-title>Monoterpenic Characterization of White Cultivars from Vinhos Verdes Appellation of Origin (North Portugal)</article-title><source>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</source><volume>115</volume><issue>4</issue><page-range>308–317</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2009.tb00386.x">https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2009.tb00386.x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Genovese</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piombino</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lisanti</surname><given-names>M. T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moio</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><year>2005</year><article-title>Occurrence of Furaneol (4-Hydroxy-2,5-Dimethyl-3(2H)-Furanone) in Some Wines from Italian Native Grapes</article-title><source>Annali Di Chimica</source><volume>95</volume><page-range>415–419</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/adic.200590048">https://doi.org/10.1002/adic.200590048</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>González-Barreiro</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rial-Otero</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cancho-Grande</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Simal-Gándara</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Wine aroma compounds in grapes: A critical review</article-title><source>Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition</source><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>202–218</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.650336">https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.650336</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>G. V.</given-names></name><year>2010</year><article-title>Spatial analysis of climate in winegrape-growing regions in Australia: Climate in winegrape growing regions in Australia</article-title><source>Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research</source><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>389–404</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00100.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00100.x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Hutchings</surname><given-names>S. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deb</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>S</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>Subbaraj</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guerrero</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Torrico</surname><given-names>D. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ham</surname><given-names>E. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Realini</surname><given-names>C. E.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Characterizing the odor of New Zealand native plants using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry</article-title><source>Journal of Food Science</source><volume>90</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>e70050</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70050">https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.70050</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Jahnke</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Szőke</surname><given-names>B. Á.</given-names></name><name><surname>Steckl</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Szövényi</surname><given-names>Á. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Szigeti</surname><given-names>G. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Németh</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jenei</surname><given-names>B. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sárdy</surname><given-names>D. Á. N.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Delay in the Ripening of Wine Grapes: Effects of Specific Phytotechnical Methods on Harvest Parameters</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><page-range>1963</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13081963">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13081963</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Jordão</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricardo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricardo-Da-Silva</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Laureano</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><year>1998</year><article-title>Evolution of anthocyanins during grape maturation of two varieties (Vitis vinifera L.), Castelão Frances and Touriga Francesa</article-title><source>Vitis</source><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>93–94</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031850211&amp;partnerID=MN8TOARS">http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031850211&amp;partnerID=MN8TOARS</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Jordão</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Correia</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romão</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>General Physicochemical Parameters, Phenolic Composition, and Varietal Aromatic Potential of Three Red Vitis vinifera Varieties (“Merlot”, Syrah”, and “Saborinho”) Cultivated on Pico Island—Azores Archipelago</article-title><source>International Journal of Plant Biology</source><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><page-range>1369–1390</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15040095">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15040095</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Kalua</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boss</surname><given-names>P. K.</given-names></name><year>2010</year><article-title>Comparison of major volatile compounds from Riesling and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) from fruitset to harvest: Volatile compounds cultivar comparison</article-title><source>Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research</source><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>337–348</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00096.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00096.x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Karimali</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kosma</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Badeka</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Varietal classification of red wine samples from four native Greek grape varieties based on volatile compound analysis, color parameters and phenolic composition</article-title><source>European Food Research and Technology</source><volume>246</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>41–53</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03398-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03398-7</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Könen</surname><given-names>P. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wüst</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Analysis of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons in grape berry exocarp (Vitis vinifera L.) using in vivo-labeling and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC×GC–MS)</article-title><source>Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry</source><volume>15</volume><page-range>1945–1961</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.190">https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.190</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Könen</surname><given-names>P. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wüst</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Dissecting Sesquiterpene Profiles of Lemberger Red Wines Using Ex Vivo Tissue Deuterium-Labeling and Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography–Time-of-Flight–Mass Spectrometry</article-title><source>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</source><volume>68</volume><issue>33</issue><page-range>8936–8941</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03273">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03273</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Koufos</surname><given-names>G. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mavromatis</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Koundouras</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>G. V.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Adaptive capacity of winegrape varieties cultivated in Greece to climate change: Current trends and future projections</article-title><source>OENO One</source><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><page-range>1201–1219</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3129">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3129</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>W.-K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>X.-J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>C.-Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Effect of the Seasonal Climatic Variations on the Accumulation of Fruit Volatiles in Four Grape Varieties Under the Double Cropping System</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>12</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.809558">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.809558</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brotchie</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marriott</surname><given-names>P. J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Dataset of concentrations of free terpenes at different phenological stages in Vitis vinifera L</article-title><source>Shiraz, Cabernet Sauvignon, Riesling, Chardonnay and Pinot Gris. Data in Brief</source><volume>27</volume><page-range>104595</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104595">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104595</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mateus</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Machado</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>De Freitas</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><year>2002</year><article-title>Development changes of anthocyanins in Vitis vinifera grapes grown in the Douro Valley and concentration in respective wines</article-title><source>Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture</source><volume>82</volume><issue>14</issue><page-range>1689–1695</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1237">https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1237</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mosaferi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jelley</surname><given-names>R. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fedrizzi</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barker</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Scalable synthesis of the aroma compounds d6-β-ionone and d6-β-cyclocitral for use as internal standards in stable isotope dilution assays</article-title><source>Tetrahedron Letters</source><volume>61</volume><issue>51</issue><page-range>152642</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2020.152642">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2020.152642</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Muñoz-Organero</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Espinosa</surname><given-names>F. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabello</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zamorano</surname><given-names>J. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Urbanos</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Puertas</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lara</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Domingo</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Puig-Pujol</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Valdés</surname><given-names>M. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreno</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diaz-Losada</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santiago</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cibriain</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Raboso</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernández-Pastor</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Phenological Study of 53 Spanish Minority Grape Varieties to Search for Adaptation of Vitiviniculture to Climate Change Conditions</article-title><source>Horticulturae</source><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><page-range>984</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110984">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8110984</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>OIV</surname><given-names /></name><year>2018</year><article-title>Compendium of International Methods of Analysis of Wines and Musts</article-title><publisher-name>OIV</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.oiv.int/en/normes-etdocumentstechniques/methodes-danalyse/recueil-des-methodesinternationales-danalyse-des-vins-et-des-mouts-2-vol">http://www.oiv.int/en/normes-etdocumentstechniques/methodes-danalyse/recueil-des-methodesinternationales-danalyse-des-vins-et-des-mouts-2-vol</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Araújo</surname><given-names>I. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>Ó. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maia</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amaral</surname><given-names>A. J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Odete Maia</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2004</year><article-title>Characterization and differentiation of five “Vinhos Verdes" grape varieties on the basis of monoterpenic compounds</article-title><source>Analytica Chimica Acta</source><volume>Papers Presented at the 3rd Symposium In Vino Analytica Scientia Aveiro</volume><comment>Portugal, 10-12 July 2003, 513(1), 269–275</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.020</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Palliotti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tombesi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silvestroni</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanari</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gatti</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Poni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2014</year><article-title>Changes in vineyard establishment and canopy management urged by earlier climate-related grape ripening: A review</article-title><source>Scientia Horticulturae</source><volume>178</volume><page-range>43–54</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.039">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.039</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Pardo-García</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name><name><surname>De La Hoz</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zalacain</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salinas</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><year>2014</year><article-title>Effect of vine foliar treatments on the varietal aroma of Monastrell wines</article-title><source>Food Chemistry</source><volume>163</volume><page-range>258–266</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.100">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.04.100</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Parker</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cortázar-Atauri</surname><given-names>I. G. De</given-names></name><name><surname>Trought</surname><given-names>M. C. T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Destrac</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agnew</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sturman</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leeuwen</surname><given-names>C. Van</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Adaptation to climate change by determining grapevine cultivar differences using temperature-based phenology models: This article is published in cooperation with the XIIIth International Terroir Congress November 17-18 2020, Adelaide, Australia</article-title><source>Guest editors: Cassandra Collins and Roberta De Bei. OENO One</source><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><page-range>955–974</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3861">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2020.54.4.3861</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Perestrelo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barros</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Câmara</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name><year>2014</year><article-title>Establishment of the varietal profile of Vitis vinifera L</article-title><source>grape varieties from different geographical regions based on HS-SPME/GC–qMS combined with chemometric tools. Microchemical Journal</source><volume>116</volume><page-range>107–117</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2014.04.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2014.04.010</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Perestrelo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Petronilho</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Câmara</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name><year>2010</year><article-title>Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry combined with solid phase microextraction as a powerful tool for quantification of ethyl carbamate in fortified wines</article-title><source>The case study of Madeira wine. Journal of Chromatography. A</source><volume>1217</volume><issue>20</issue><page-range>3441–3445</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.03.027">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.03.027</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Piras</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brazão</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricardo-Da-Silva</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anjos</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caldeira</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Volatile and sensory characterization of white wines from three minority Portuguese grapevine varieties</article-title><source>Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola</source><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>49–62</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20203501049">https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20203501049</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Plavša</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bubola</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeromel</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomaz</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Krapac</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Exploring the Potential of Indigenous Grape Varieties for Sparkling Wine Production in the Hrvatska Istra Subregion (Croatia)</article-title><source>Beverages</source><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>78</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages11030078">https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages11030078</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Portu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baroja</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivacoba</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibáñez</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tello</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Exploring the intra-varietal diversity in ‘Graciano’, a minority grapevine cultivar with adaptive capacity to climate change</article-title><source>Journal of Agriculture and Food Research</source><volume>22</volume><page-range>102147</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102147">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102147</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>X.-Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>B.-Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>H.-Y.</given-names></name><year>2017</year><article-title>Differential Expression of VvLOXA Diversifies C6 Volatile Profiles in Some Vitis vinifera Table Grape Cultivars</article-title><source>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</source><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><page-range>2705</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122705">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122705</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ramos</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martínez De Toda</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Interannual and spatial variability of grape composition in the Rioja DOCa show better resilience of cv</article-title><source>Graciano than cv. Tempranillo under a warming scenario. OENO One</source><volume>55</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>85–100</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.3.4695">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2021.55.3.4695</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Riou</surname><given-names>Ch</given-names></name><name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sotes Ruiz</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomez Miguel</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carbonneau</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panagiotou</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costacurta</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castro De</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carneiro</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Climaco</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>1994</year><article-title>Le déterminisme climatique de la maturation du raisin: Application au zonage de la teneur em sucre dans la communauté européenne</article-title><comment content-type="report-number">p. 322</comment><publisher-name>Office des Publications Officielles des Communautés Européennes</publisher-name></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Robinson</surname><given-names>A. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boss</surname><given-names>P. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Solomon</surname><given-names>P. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Trengove</surname><given-names>R. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Heymann</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ebeler</surname><given-names>S. E.</given-names></name><year>2014</year><article-title>Origins of Grape and Wine Aroma</article-title><source>Part 1. Chemical Components and Viticultural Impacts. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture</source><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>1–24</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2013.12070">https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2013.12070</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>M. A. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coimbra</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Impact of Chitosan-Genipin Films on Volatile Profile of Wine along Storage</article-title><source>Applied Sciences</source><volume>11</volume><issue>14</issue><page-range>6294</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146294">https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146294</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coutinho</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barros</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coimbra</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delgadillo</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dias Cardoso</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2000</year><article-title>Aroma Potential of Two Bairrada White Grape Varieties: Maria Gomes and Bical</article-title><source>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</source><volume>48</volume><issue>10</issue><page-range>4802–4807</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000175s">https://doi.org/10.1021/jf000175s</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coelho</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zrostlíková</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delgadillo</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coimbra</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><year>2007</year><article-title>Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry of monoterpenoids as a powerful tool for grape origin traceability</article-title><source>Journal of Chromatography. A</source><volume>1161</volume><issue>1–2</issue><page-range>292–299</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.093">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.093</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedroso</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonçalves</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Reis</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>J. A.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Temperature-Based Grapevine Ripeness Modeling for cv</article-title><source>Touriga Nacional and Encruzado in the Dão Wine Region, Portugal. Agronomy</source><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><page-range>1777</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091777">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091777</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rodrigues</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedroso</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouveia</surname><given-names>J. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alves</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>Influence of soil water content and atmospheric conditions on leaf water potential in cv</article-title><source>“Touriga Nacional” deep-rooted vineyards. Irrigation Science</source><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><page-range>407–417</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-012-0350-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-012-0350-4</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rouxinol</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martins</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salgueiro</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>M. J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barroso</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rato</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Climate Effect on Morphological Traits and Polyphenolic Composition of Red Wine Grapes of Vitis vinifera</article-title><source>Beverages</source><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><comment>Article 1</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9010008">https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9010008</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rubio-Bretón</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salinas</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nevares</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pérez-Álvarez</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Álamo-Sanza</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marín-San Román</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garde-Cerdán</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Recent Advances in the Study of Grape and Wine Volatile Composition: Varietal, Fermentative, and Aging Aroma Compounds</article-title><source>In M. Bordiga &amp; L. M. L. Nollet</source><volume>Food Aroma Evolution</volume><issue>1st ed., pp. 439–463</issue><comment>CRC Press</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429441837-22">https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429441837-22</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Salinas</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>De La Hoz</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zalacain</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lara</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garde-Cerdán</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>Analysis of red grape glycosidic aroma precursors by glycosyl glucose quantification</article-title><source>Talanta</source><volume>89</volume><page-range>396–400</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.12.050">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2011.12.050</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Sargolzaei</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maddalena</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bitsadze</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maghradze</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bianco</surname><given-names>P. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Failla</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toffolatti</surname><given-names>S. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>De Lorenzis</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Rpv29, Rpv30 and Rpv31: Three Novel Genomic Loci Associated With Resistance to Plasmopara viticola in Vitis vinifera</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>11</volume><page-range>562432</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.562432">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.562432</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Serrano Parra</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gascueña</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alonso</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tarancón</surname><given-names>C. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morales</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vozmediano</surname><given-names>J. L. C.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Exploring intra-specific variability as an adaptive strategy to climate change: Response of 21 grapevine cultivars grown under drought conditions</article-title><source>OENO One</source><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>8123</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.3.8123">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.3.8123</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Šikuten</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Štambuk</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marković</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomaz</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Preiner</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Grape volatile organic compounds: Analysis, biosynthesis, and profiling</article-title><source>Journal of Experimental Botany</source><volume>76</volume><issue>11</issue><page-range>3016–3037</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf082">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf082</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Šikuten</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Štambuk</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tomaz</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marchal</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kontić</surname><given-names>J. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lacombe</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maletić</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Preiner</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Discrimination of genetic and geographical groups of grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) based on their volatile organic compounds</article-title><source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source><volume>13</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.942148">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.942148</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Slaghenaufi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanzo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luzzini</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arapitsas</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marangon</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Curioni</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mattivi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piombino</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moio</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Versari</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ricci</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rio Segade</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rolle</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ugliano</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Monoterpenoids and norisoprenoids in Italian red wines: This article is published in cooperation with Macrowine 2021, 23-30 June 2021</article-title><source>OENO One</source><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><page-range>185–193</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.3.5387">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2022.56.3.5387</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Stanus</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobrei</surname><given-names>A. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nistor</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cristea</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tac</surname><given-names>A. I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobrei</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>The local grapevine varieties – a source of typicity, authenticity, and adaptability, within the framework of sustainable viticultural technologies</article-title><source>Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture</source><volume>LXVIII</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>361–372</page-range></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Tonietto</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carbonneau</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2004</year><article-title>A multicriteria climatic classification system for grape-growing regions worldwide</article-title><source>Agricultural and Forest Meteorology</source><volume>124</volume><issue>1–2</issue><page-range>81–97</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.06.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.06.001</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Van Leeuwen</surname><given-names>C. Van</given-names></name><name><surname>Destrac-Irvine</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gowdy</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farris</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pieri</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marolleau</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gambetta</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>An operational model for capturing grape ripening dynamics to support harvest decisions: This article is published in cooperation with the 22nd GiESCO International Meeting, hosted by Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, July 17-21, 2023</article-title><source>OENO One</source><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>505–522</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.2.7399">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.2.7399</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Vilanova</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Campo</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Escudero</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Graña</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Masa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cacho</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>Volatile composition and sensory properties of Vitis vinifera red cultivars from North West Spain: Correlation between sensory and instrumental analysis</article-title><source>Analytica Chimica Acta</source><volume>720</volume><page-range>104–111</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.01.026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2012.01.026</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Vilanova</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Genisheva</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Masa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><year>2010</year><article-title>Correlation between volatile composition and sensory properties in Spanish Albariño wines</article-title><source>Microchemical Journal</source><volume>95</volume><issue>2</issue><page-range>240–246</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.12.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.12.007</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Vilanova</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Genisheva</surname><given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Graña</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><year>2013</year><article-title>Determination of odorants in varietal wines from international grape cultivars (Vitis vinifera) grown in NW Spain</article-title><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://hdl.handle.net/1822/32118">https://hdl.handle.net/1822/32118</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Volynkin</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Polulyakh</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Levchenko</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasylyk</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Likhovskoi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Autochthonous grape species, varieties and cultivars of Crimea</article-title><source>Acta Horticulturae</source><volume>91–98</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1259.16">https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1259.16</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Wolkovich</surname><given-names>E. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>García De Cortázar-Atauri</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morales-Castilla</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicholas</surname><given-names>K. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lacombe</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><year>2018</year><article-title>From Pinot to Xinomavro in the world’s future wine-growing regions</article-title><source>Nature Climate Change</source><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><page-range>29–37</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0016-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0016-6</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Study on the volatile composition of table grapes of three aroma types</article-title><source>LWT</source><volume>115</volume><page-range>108450</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108450">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108450</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2018</year><article-title>Influence of natural variation in berry size on the volatile profiles of Vitis vinifera L</article-title><source>cv. Merlot and Cabernet Gernischt grapes. PLOS ONE</source><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><page-range>e0201374</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201374">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201374</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Comprehensive metabolomic profiling of aroma-related volatiles in table grape cultivars across developmental stages</article-title><source>Food Quality and Safety</source><volume>9</volume><comment>fyaf013</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyaf013">https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyaf013</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Zoecklein</surname><given-names>W. B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fugelsang</surname><given-names>K. C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gump</surname><given-names>H. B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nury</surname><given-names>S. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eds</surname><given-names /></name><year>1995</year><article-title>Wine analysis and production</article-title><publisher-name>The Chapman &amp; Hall</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6978-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6978-4</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>