<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xmlns="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><journal-meta>
<journal-id>OENO One</journal-id>
<issn>2494-1271</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">The potential of endophytic yeasts of grapevine as antagonists of white rot</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="dc:creator">
<name><surname>Del Frari</surname>
<given-names>Giovanni</given-names></name>
<email>giovanni.delfrari@uniud.it</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Rudy</surname>
<given-names></given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Cignola</surname>
<given-names></given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Filippo</surname>
<given-names></given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Sanna</surname>
<given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Vernelli</surname>
<given-names>Davide</given-names></name>
<email>vernelli.davide@spes.uniud.it</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Moret</surname>
<given-names>Erica</given-names></name>
<email>erica.moret@uniud.it</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Di Francesco</surname>
<given-names>Alessandra</given-names></name>
<email>alessandra.difrancesco@uniud.it</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Cignola</surname>
<given-names>Rudy</given-names></name>
<email>rudy.cignola@uniud.it</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0"><sup>0</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Sanna</surname>
<given-names>Filippo Maria</given-names></name>
<email>filippomaria.sanna@uniud.it</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0"><sup>0</sup></xref></contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff0"><sup>0</sup>Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (DI4A), University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy</aff><aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup>Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (DI4A), University of Udine, Via delle Scienze 206, 33100 Udine, Italy</aff><pub-date date-type="created">
<day>2</day>
<month>8</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026 Giovanni Del Frari, Rudy Cignola, Filippo Maria Sanna, Davide Vernelli, Erica Moret, Alessandra Di Francesco (Author), Giovanni Del Frari, null Rudy, null Cignola, null Filippo, Maria Sanna, Davide Vernelli, Erica Moret, Alessandra Di Francesco, Rudy Cignola, Filippo Maria Sanna</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Giovanni Del Frari, Rudy Cignola, Filippo Maria Sanna, Davide Vernelli, Erica Moret, Alessandra Di Francesco (Author), Giovanni Del Frari, null Rudy, null Cignola, null Filippo, Maria Sanna, Davide Vernelli, Erica Moret, Alessandra Di Francesco, Rudy Cignola, Filippo Maria Sanna</copyright-holder>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a CC BY Creative Commons License.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Esca is one of the most damaging grapevine trunk diseases worldwide, and it is closely associated with wood decay processes. While fungi involved in esca have been extensively studied, the role of wood-inhabiting yeasts still needs investigation. In this study, we investigated the diversity and potential antagonistic functional role of endophytic yeasts isolated from asymptomatic, necrotic, and white rot tissues of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon and Sauvignon blanc. A total of 37 yeast strains belonging to four species (Aureobasidium pullulans, Papiliotrema terrestris, Rhodotorula glutinis, and Hanseniaspora uvarum) were identified, with white rot representing the main source of isolation. In vitro assays evaluated yeast strains and the effects of their metabolites (volatile and non-volatile) on Fomitiporia mediterranea mycelial growth and enzymatic activity. Results showed a strong strain-dependent inhibition of pathogen growth. Rhodotorula glutinis and P. terrestris were the most effective yeasts, with volatile compounds causing up to 83 % mycelial pathogen growth reduction. Non-volatile metabolites also significantly inhibited fungal growth, while co-cultivation altered ligninolytic enzyme activity in F. mediterranea. Overall, our findings highlight white rot as a selective niche for antagonistic yeasts and suggest that yeast-derived volatile compounds and metabolites may limit pathogen development, with potential applications in sustainable management of grapevine trunk diseases.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>grapevine</kwd>
<kwd>trunk</kwd>
<kwd>diseases</kwd>
<kwd>&lt;i&gt;Aureobasidium</kwd>
<kwd>pullulans&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
<kwd>degrading</kwd>
<kwd>enzymes</kwd>
<kwd>volatile</kwd>
<kwd>metabolites</kwd>
<kwd>plant–microbes</kwd>
<kwd>interaction</kwd>
<kwd>&lt;i&gt;Fomitiporia</kwd>
<kwd>mediterranea&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
<kwd>Grapevine trunk diseases</kwd>
<kwd>Aureobasidium pullulans</kwd>
<kwd>degrading enzymes</kwd>
<kwd>volatile metabolites</kwd>
<kwd>plant</kwd>
<kwd>microbes interaction</kwd>
<kwd>Fomitiporia mediterranea</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="h0-introduction"><title>Introduction </title>
<p>Esca is a major grapevine trunk disease (GTD) that heavily affects vineyards worldwide, with most scientific reports coming from the Northern Hemisphere (Kenfaoui <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022). Symptoms in perennial tissues of esca-affected vines typically include brown wood streaking, necrotic lesions, and white rot. The main identifier of esca disease, in comparison to other diseases affecting the grapevine trunk, is the presence of white rot (Fontaine <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025; Mondello <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018). Symptoms at the leaf level may occasionally occur in esca-affected vines, as well as in plants affected by grapevine leaf stripe disease; both diseases are included in the esca complex (Surico, 2009). Leaves in single branches, entire spurs and arms, or the whole canopy may develop yellow or red pigmentation, distinctly based on the variety, and interveinal necrosis, often leading to leaf fall, in a symptom identified as ‘tiger stripes’ (Lecomte <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012; Mugnai <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999). There are numerous fungi known to induce brown wood streaking in grapevine wood (Mondello <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018; Hrycan <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Travadon <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022), some of which are also associated with necrotic lesions. Conversely, only few basidiomycetes have been associated with white rot (Fischer &amp; Gonzalez-Garcia, 2015; Cloete <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015), and <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> is the most prevalent. No causal relationship between etiological agents and leaf symptoms has been established, although several hypotheses are under discussion (Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Bortolami <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Dell’Acqua <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Esca-related pathogens are capable of infecting fresh pruning wounds in the vineyard (Martínez-Diz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021), colonising woody tissues and leading to the above-mentioned symptoms. The development of brown wood streaking can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months, while the process of necrotic lesions and white rot can take several months to years (Mugnai <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999). In addition, recent studies have highlighted nursery material as a potential pathogen carrier, with infected rooted cuttings often reaching the market (Garcia <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025; Carbone <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022). </p>
<p>Since the late 1990s, numerous studies have examined the microbial composition of the woody tissues of healthy and esca-symptomatic grapevines. Many of these studies focused on the identification of pathogenic species (Almendros <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019), while others also identified non-pathogenic fungi (de Almeida <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Hofstetter <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012; Dekrey <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Gramaje &amp; Eichmeier, 2026) and bacteria (Haidar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021, Haidar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Among the latter, reports of yeast and yeast-like fungi are limited to ubiquitous yeast-like fungus <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans </italic>(Pinto <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018), and <italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic> (Hofstetter <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012). The recent introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled culture-independent microbial profiling of grapevine wood and sap, revealing unexpected yeast diversity (Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019a, Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Deyett &amp; Rolshausen, 2019; Adejoro <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). </p>
<p>Yeasts are well-established members of the microbiota associated with decaying wood (Lara <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014; Cadete <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017). Several yeast species have been reported to exhibit enzymatic activities such as cellulase, xylanase, and xylosidase (Lara <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014); however, their involvement in lignin degradation remains unclear. Yeast diversity tends to be high in partly de-lignified wood, where growth is mainly supported by xylose released by lignin-degrading basidiomycetes. Some yeasts may also engage in mutualistic interactions with other microorganisms, enhancing mycelial growth and wood-decay activity of white and brown rot fungi (Cadete <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017). Many of these microorganisms are widely studied as Biocontrol Agents (BCAs), with several demonstrating beneficial effects on plant health through the inhibition of fungal pathogens (Ali <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). The limited knowledge currently available regarding the presence and function of wood-inhabiting yeasts in the context of GTDs led us to conduct the present study. We set three main objectives: i) to assess the diversity of yeasts and yeast-like fungi present in the woody tissue of asymptomatic and symptomatic vines (with necrotic lesions and white rot) of two susceptible varieties: Cabernet-Sauvignon (CS) and Sauvignon blanc (SB); ii) to evaluate the interaction of all isolated yeasts against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic> by <italic>in vitro</italic> assays, including the effect of yeasts’ volatile and non-volatile metabolites on pathogen growth<italic>;</italic> iii) to assess the influence of selected yeasts on the pathogen laccase and peroxidase activities.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-materials-and-methods"><title>Materials and methods </title>
<sec id="h0-1--plant-material"><title>1. Plant Material </title>
<p>Plant material used in this study was derived from a vineyard located in Fossalon, Gorizia, Italy (45°44'56" N, 13°27'45" E). The vineyard has a density of 3831 plants/ha, and the soil is classified as silty-clayey. The field is managed under conventional agricultural practices with no irrigation system. Two varieties known for their susceptibility to esca were selected: CS and SB (Serra <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021), respectively grafted on SO4 and Kober 5BB rootstocks (<italic>V.</italic> <italic>berlandieri</italic> × <italic>V.</italic> <italic>riparia</italic>). Both varieties were cordon-trained and spur-pruned, and 13 years old at the time of sampling. In the vineyard, plants displaying tiger stripe symptoms on almost one cane per plant were removed in the same year that the symptoms first appeared. </p>
<p>In September 2023, ten grapevines of CS and nine of SB were sampled. Trunks and arms were further divided into 2 to 3 pieces; each was longitudinally bisected using a chainsaw. Trunk and arm sections were photographed, and the surface area of asymptomatic, necrotic, and white rot tissues was measured using GIMP 3.02-1. Plant material was stored at 12 °C overnight and processed the following day.</p>
<p />
</sec>
<sec id="h2-2--yeast-isolation-and-identification"><title>2. Yeast isolation and identification</title>
<p>From each grapevine, 15–20 portions of asymptomatic wood, wood affected by necrotic lesions and white rot were removed with a sterile scalpel. Each portion of asymptomatic wood and wood affected by necrotic lesions was cut into 4 mm<sup>3</sup> pieces and surface sterilised. Briefly, wood sections were disinfected by flame, followed by immersion for 1 min in a NaClO solution (0.35 % <italic>w/w</italic> as active chlorine), double-rinsed in sterile distilled water (1 min) and dried with sterile filter paper. White rot samples were not surface sterilised due to the necrotic lesions; the friable nature of the tissue compromised structure and high porosity. To prevent environmental contamination, these samples were collected from the internal section of the white rot lesions with a sterile scalpel. Four to six wood pieces per grapevine and symptoms type per three replicates, were plated on Petri dishes containing three different growth media: NYDA (Nutrient broth 8 g, Yeast extract 5 g, Dextrose 10 g, Agar technical 25 g per 1 L of distilled water, Oxoid, UK), YMM (Yeast extract 3 g, Malt extract 3 g, Peptone 5 g, Glucose 10 g, Agar technical 15 g per 1 L of distilled water, Oxoid, UK), and YEPD (Yeast Extract 10 g, Peptone 20 g, Dextrose 20 g, Agar technical 15 g per 1 L of distilled water, Oxoid, UK). Inoculated Petri dishes were incubated at 20 °C for 48 h, in the dark. Colonies of yeast and yeast-like fungi emerging from wood pieces were isolated and streaked with the aid of sterile loops on NYDA plates. Plates were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. Subsequently, single colonies were purified and stored at –80 °C until further processing. To produce yeast biomass for the gDNA extraction, a loop of cells from each isolate was inoculated into Potato Dextrose Broth (24 g per 1 L of distilled water, Oxoid, UK) in 200 mL sterile flasks for 48 hours under continuous agitation (250 rpm) at room temperature. Cell biomass was retrieved by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 15 min), washed with sterile distilled water, and subjected to further centrifugation. Cells were ground in sterile mortars with sterile pestles with liquid nitrogen, and 150 mg was used to extract DNA using the Plant Total DNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), following the manufacturer's instructions. Purified DNA was used to perform PCR, targeting the Internal Transcribed Spacer region (ITS), using primers ITS1 – ITS4<sup>56</sup>. Go Taq® Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega, USA) was used following manufacturer instructions; custom primers (ITS1-ITS4) and dNTPs were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics (Lithuania). The cycle conditions carried out in a VWR® XT96 thermocycler (Avantor Inc., USA) were 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 55 °C for 40 s, 72 °C for 60 s, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. Amplicons were sequenced by Eurofins Genomics (Germany), and the sequences were aligned to the NCBI database using BLASTn (Table S1). Species identity was established with a similarity of at least 99 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-3--microbial-in-vitro-assays-and-metabolite-characterisation"><title>3. Microbial <italic>in vitro</italic> assays and metabolite characterisation</title>
<p>A strain of <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea,</italic> named ‘Fmed-UD’ (hereafter referred to as ‘<italic>Fmed’</italic>), was obtained from the mycological collection of the University of Udine (Italy). The isolate was derived from white rot tissue of <italic>Vitis vinifera</italic> cv. Cabernet-Sauvignon, and it was used in all the assays described in the following sections. The pathogen was cultured every 10 d on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA, 39 g per L; Oxoid, UK).</p>
<sec id="h0-3-1--dual-culture-assay"><title>3.1. Dual culture assay</title>
<p>To evaluate the interaction between the 31 yeast strains isolated from symptomatic CS and SB grapevine and the pathogen, a dual culture assay was performed. On PDA plates (90 mm diameter), a mycelial plug (6 mm) of the pathogen (10 d old colony) was placed 25 mm from the edge of the plate, and a streak of each yeast strain (2 d old culture) was placed 25 mm from the other side of the plate. Plates were incubated at 25 °C. After 10 d, <italic>Fmed</italic> colony diameter was measured with a digital calliper. The sample unit for each strain consisted of three plates, and the experiment was repeated once. </p>
</sec>
<sec id="h3-3-2--double-petri-dish-assay"><title>3.2. Double Petri dish assay</title>
<p>Among the 31 strains isolated from symptomatic grapevine, tested in the dual culture assay, nine were selected based on their effectiveness (% inhibition) and categorised as having high (&gt; 30 %), medium (15–30 %), or low (&lt; 15 %) activity against the pathogen (Table S2). The selected strains were representative of their respective inhibition categories: <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> strains 1 and 46, and <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strains 67 and 83 were in the high category; <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> strain 78 and <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strains 8 and 76 were in the medium category, and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> strain 20 and <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> strain 71 were in the low category. Volatile compounds produced by the selected strains were tested by the double Petri dish assay (Cignola <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024) to verify their effect on <italic>Fmed</italic> mycelial colony growth. For this purpose, plates containing NYDA were inoculated by spreading 100 μL of each yeast cell suspension (10<sup>8</sup> cells/mL) and incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. The lid of the plates was replaced with PDA base plates of PDA inoculated with <italic>Fmed </italic>mycelial plugs (6 mm, Ø) placed in the centre of the plates. The two plates were sealed with a double layer of Parafilm and incubated at 25 °C for 10 d. The control consisted of plates without yeast cells. The sample unit for each condition was represented by 5 plates. The pathogen colony diameter was measured by a digital calliper. The percentage (%) of inhibition of the pathogen colony growth was calculated using the equation: </p>
<p>	(Equation<inline-formula><math  xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>I</mi><mi>n</mi><mi>h</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>b</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>t</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>o</mi><mi>n</mi><mi> </mi><mi>%</mi><mi> </mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi>d</mi><mn>1</mn><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></mfrac><mo>×</mo><mn>100</mn> </math></inline-formula> 1)</p>
<p>where d1 represents the control colony diameter (mm) and d2 the treated colony diameter (mm).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h3-3-3--vocs-analyses-by-spme-gc-ms"><title>3.3. VOCs analyses by SPME-GC-MS</title>
<p>The volatile metabolites of the nine selected yeast strains (<italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> 1 and 46; <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> 71 and 78; <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 8, 67, 76, and 83; and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> 20) were analysed by SPME-GC‐MS. Sterile glass vials containing 10 mL of NYDA were inoculated with 50 μL of each selected yeast strain suspension concentrated 10<sup>8 </sup>cells/mL using a Thoma cell counting chamber (hemocytometer). Vials containing the media alone represented the control. Vials were incubated at 25 °C for 48 hours, and the VOCs were adsorbed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using a 2 cm PDMS/DVB/CAR fibre (Supelco, Milan, Italy). The fibre was exposed for 30 min, then VOCs were desorbed into the GC injector port for 5 min at 250 °C. The chromatographic separation was performed via a DB-WAX fused-silica capillary column (60 m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies). The GC oven temperature program was as follows: 40 °C for 3 min, raised from 40 to 220 at 4 °C/min, 220 °C for 1 min, raised from 220 to 250 at 10 °C/min and 250 °C for 1 min. Helium was used as the carrier gas with a constant column flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The transfer line temperature was maintained constant at 250 °C, and the ion source and quadrupole were set at 230 and 150 °C, respectively. Upon exiting the column, compounds were ionised via electron impact at 70 eV and detected with a quadrupole mass spectrometer in the range of a mass/charge ratio (<italic>m/z</italic>) from 35 to 500. Chromatograms were processed and analysed by Mass Hunter (Agilent). Compound identification was achieved by comparing the spectra with the NIST Standard Reference Database, LOTUS (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flotus.naturalproducts.net%2F&amp;data=05%7C02%7Calessandra.difrancesco%40uniud.it%7C7fafd6e85fbd4160ec9408de97dfe325%7C6e6ade15296c4224ac581c8ec2fd53a8%7C0%7C0%7C639115184998712570%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=uaCnhETAGm2wgibo99CgNUNMe7Z88iL%2FvIIkZotayGg%3D&amp;reserved=0">https://lotus.naturalproducts.net</ext-link>) (Rutz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022) and by linear retention indices (LRI) calculated under the same chromatographic conditions, injecting a C7–C30 n-alkane series (Supelco, Milan, Italy). The relative VOC content of each sample was reported as absolute peak area (Sadallah <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). These operations were performed by an automatic system (CTC Analysis AG, Zwingen, Switzerland). The sample unit was represented by five vials per yeast strain, and the experiment was conducted once.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h3-3-4--non-volatile-metabolites-assay"><title>3.4. Non-volatile metabolites assay</title>
<p>The 9 selected yeast strains (<italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> 1 and 46; <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> 71 and 78; <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 8, 67, 76, and 83; and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> 20) were tested for the production of non-volatile metabolites. Yeast cell suspension (100 μL; 10<sup>8</sup> cells/mL) was obtained from 48 h-old colonies grown on NYDA. The cell suspension aliquots were spread on a sterile cellophane layer (Safta, PC, Italy) previously positioned on PDA plates. Control plates were spread with 100 μL of sterile water. Plates were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. Subsequently, the cellophane was removed, and <italic>Fmed</italic> mycelial plugs (6 mm diameter) were inoculated in the centre of each plate. Plates were incubated for 10 d at 25 °C; afterwards, the colony diameter was measured with a digital calliper. The sample unit consisted of five plates (replicates) used for each yeast strain and the control (sterile water). The experiment was conducted twice. </p>
</sec>
<sec id="h3-3-5--laccase-and-manganese-peroxidase-enzyme-activity"><title>3.5. Laccase and manganese peroxidase enzyme activity</title>
<p>In order to better understand the interaction between the fungal pathogen and the yeasts, the activity of the <italic>Fmed</italic> enzymes was evaluated under different conditions, both in the presence and absence of four selected yeast strains that were identified as the most effective in previous <italic>in vitro</italic> assays (VOCs and non-VOCs). The selected strains were <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis </italic>strain 1 and <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strain 8, isolated from white rot tissue in CS; <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strain 76 and <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> strain 78, isolated from white rot tissue in SB (Table 1). The yeast strains were cultivated alone or together with <italic>Fmed</italic> in sterile flasks containing sterile liquid media consisting of Malt Extract Broth (MEB; 16 g/L; Oxoid, UK) amended with 2 % sawdust (0.5 mm diameter) (WB-wood broth) derived from CS or SB. The controls were represented by <italic>Fmed </italic>grown alone in both liquid media, as well as by yeasts grown alone in WB. The enzymatic activity of <italic>Fmed</italic> and each yeast strain grown on MEB and in WB was considered as a control. Three flasks were used for each treatment. After 10 d of fermentation at 25 °C, the broth was centrifuged (4000 rpm, 20 min) and subsequently the supernatant was filtered through a sterile Whatman filter paper (Cytiva, USA). Spectrophotometric determination of laccase and laccase-like multicopper oxidase activity was carried out at room temperature by evaluating the oxidation of 2 mM ABTS (2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) in 100 mM phosphate-acetate buffer, pH 4.5. The formation of cation radical ABTS<sup>• +</sup> was evaluated by absorbance measurement after 10 minutes at 420 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Infinite 200Pro, Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland) (Ghose <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). Manganese peroxidase (MnP) and MnP-like activity in the filtrates were determined using a method based on phenol red substrate. Specifically, 1 mL of the filtered supernatant of the experimental samples was mixed with the reaction mixture containing 0.5 mL of MnSO<sub>4</sub> solution (10 mM), 1 mL of sodium malonate buffer (pH 4.5) and 0.5 mL of phenol red (0.25 mM). Afterwards, 300 μL of the reaction solution was added to a microplate well, and the initial absorbance was measured at 624 nm using the microplate reader (Infinite 200Pro, Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland); then 1 μL of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> solution (30 % <italic>v/v</italic>) was added to the sample to start the reaction. The plate was incubated for 5 minutes at 30 °C, then 50 μL of NaOH solution (1 M) was added immediately to terminate the reaction. The final absorbance was measured at 624 nm. For the estimation of the enzyme activity, the following formula was used: </p>
<p>	(Equation<inline-formula><math  xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi mathvariant="normal">U</mi><mo>/</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">L</mi><mo>=</mo><mfrac><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">D</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">*</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">V</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">έ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">*</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">V</mi><mn>2</mn><mi mathvariant="normal">*</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">T</mi></mrow></mfrac> </math></inline-formula> 2)</p>
<p>where ΔOD represents the difference in absorbance between the initial and final readings. V1 denotes the total volume of the enzyme reaction mixture, while V2 is the volume of the enzyme solution. ε is the molar absorption coefficient. Δt represents the reaction time. The experiment was performed three times.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h3-3-6--statistical-analysis"><title>3.6. Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The area of symptomatic woody tissue was calculated from pictures using Adobe Photoshop CC2014. Obtained values, expressed in percentages of necrotic and white rot tissue, were arcsin square root transformed and used to run a three-way ANOVA (<italic>p</italic> = 0.05), followed by Tukey’s HSD <italic>post-hoc</italic> test. This allowed us to evaluate statistical significance based on factors Variety (CS, SB), Position (Trunk, Arm), Symptom (Necrotic lesion, White rot), and the combinations Variety*Position, Variety*Symptom, Position*Symptom, and Variety*Position*Symptom. The data obtained from the <italic>in vitro</italic> assays were subjected to a one-way ANOVA. The statistical comparisons of the means were established by using Tukey’s HSD <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (<italic>p</italic> <underline>&lt; </underline>0.05). All the analyses were conducted using Minitab 17® statistical software (Minitab, USA) and R software 4.5.1 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). To characterise the volatilome of each strain, the total amount of VOCs, the peak area, and their respective chemical classes were determined. Hierarchical clustering of both strains and compounds was performed using Euclidean distance. To evaluate the correlation between alcohol compounds and fungal colony diameter, the Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated between the absolute peak area and the inhibition of <italic>Fmed</italic> colony diameter by yeast strains (<italic>p </italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-results"><title>Results</title>
<sec id="h0-1--symptoms-in-grapevine-wood"><title>1. Symptoms in grapevine wood</title>
<p>Symptoms observed in the longitudinal sections of sampled plants consisted of brown wood streaking, necrotic lesions and white rot (Figure 1). </p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 1. Asymptomatic trunk (A) and trunk affected by brown wood streaking (red arrows; B), in Cabernet-Sauvignon. Arms affected by necrotic lesions (red arrows; C), and white rot (red arrow; D), in Sauvignon blanc. The blue squares represent 1 cm<sup>2</sup>.</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image1.png" /></fig></p>
<p>The three-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences for factors Position (Trunk, Arm; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), Symptom (Necrotic lesion, White rot; <italic>p </italic>&lt; 0.001), and the combination of Position*Symptom (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). A strong trend for statistical significance was also observed for the combination Variety*Position*Symptom (<italic>p</italic> = 0.064). The Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test results, where significantly different groups are tagged with different letters (Figure 2), showed that, for both varieties, the percentage of white rot tissue present in the trunks was lower than that in the arms, as well as lower than the percentage of necrotic lesions, in both trunks and arms. Excluding the factor ‘Variety’, the average percentage of symptomatic wood in trunks was 4 % (3.8 % necrotic lesions and 0.2 % white rot), and in arms it was 13.9 % (6.6 % necrotic lesions and 7.3 % white rot).</p>
<p><bold><fig><caption><title>Figure 2. Percentage of symptomatic area (mm<sup>2</sup>) ± standard error in trunks and arms of Cabernet-Sauvignon (CS) and Sauvignon blanc (SB) for necrotic lesions and white rot symptoms. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test, <italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.05).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image2.png" /></fig></bold></p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-2--yeast-strains-identification"><title>2. Yeast strains identification</title>
<p>YMM was the most effective growth medium for yeast isolation, yielding 59 % and 48 % of total yeasts from SB and CS, respectively. NYDA was more selective as a growth medium, with 28 % and 11 % of the yeasts isolated from the same varieties. Regarding YEPD, 13 % and 41 % of yeast isolates were obtained from SB and CS, respectively (data not shown). White rot tissue was the primary source for yeast isolation, accounting for 61 % and 54 % of the total in SB and CS, respectively (Table 1). </p>
<table-wrap orientation="portrait" position="float"><caption><title>Table 1. List of the yeast strains isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic wood of A) Cabernet-Sauvignon (CS) and B) Sauvignon blanc (SB) and identified by the ITS region</title>
</caption><table><tbody><tr>	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold> A) </bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" colspan="2" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Grapevine variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Strain</bold></p>
<p><bold>ID</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Symptomatology status</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle" rowspan="2"><p><bold>Species</bold></p>
</td>
	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>GenBank accession number on BLAST</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td valign="middle"><p><bold>ITS </bold></p>
<p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>55</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>KY103558.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>10</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MZ575155.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>51</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>KY103554.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>56</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MK729660.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>61</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>KY103558.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>30</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>1</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>5</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>8</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>11</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>15</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>16</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>19</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>26</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>31</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>32</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>35</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>46</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>PQ453748.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>50</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>3</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Necrosis</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MK267568.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>20</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Necrosis</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>LC413754.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>36</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Necrosis</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>40</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Necrosis</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p><italic>CS</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>43</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Necrosis</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="3"><p />
</td>
	<td><p />
</td>
	<td><p />
</td>
	<td><p />
</td>
	<td><p />
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2" rowspan="2"><p><bold>B)</bold></p>
</td>
	<td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Grapevine variety</bold></p>
</td>
	<td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Strain</bold></p>
<p><bold>ID</bold></p>
</td>
	<td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Grape trunk symptom</bold></p>
</td>
	<td rowspan="2"><p><bold>Strain species</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>GenBank accession number on BLAST</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td><p><bold>ITS</bold></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>62</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MT573468.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>63</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MT573468.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>65</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MT573468.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>74</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Asymptomatic</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MN077446.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>66</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>69</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MT573468.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>71</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MT573468.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>75</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Rhodotorula glutinis</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>KY512218.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>76</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>77</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>OR810368.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>78</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MT573468.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>83</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>White Rot</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>	<td colspan="2"><p />
</td>
	<td><p><italic>SB</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p><bold>67</bold></p>
</td>
	<td><p>Necrosis</p>
</td>
	<td><p><italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic></p>
</td>
	<td><p>MH201180.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap><p>Asymptomatic wood accounted for 31 % of the isolates in SB and 25 % in CS, while necrotic lesions yielded 8 % and 21 % of the strains, respectively (Table 1). Sauvignon blanc accounted for 35 % of the total yeast isolates (n = 13; 3 species), while CS accounted for 65 % (n = 24; 3 species). Among the 37 strains, four species were identified: <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic>, <italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic>, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic>, and <italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum.</italic> <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic> was found exclusively in SB, whereas <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> was isolated only from CS asymptomatic tissues or necrotic lesions. Conversely, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> was not found in necrotic tissue (Table 1). All the strains isolated from SB asymptomatic tissue belong to <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> species. Most of the strains (35 %) belong to <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris </italic>species, followed by <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis </italic>(24 %), <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> (22 %), and finally <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum.</italic> This was the least represented species (19 %).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-3--dual-culture-assay"><title>3. Dual culture assay</title>
<p>The results obtained from the dual culture assay after 10 days of incubation highlighted the strains with the highest inhibitory activity compared to the strains with medium and low activity (Figure 3). </p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 3. Inhibition percentage of <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> mycelial colony growth (% ± standard deviation) by the yeasts isolated from Cabernet-Sauvignon (CS) and Sauvignon blanc (SB) grapevines, in the dual culture assay. Different letters indicate significant differences within each grapevine cultivar group (Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test, P ≤ 0.05).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image3.png" /></fig></p>
<p><italic>Rodothorula glutinis</italic> strains 1 and 46 (CS) and <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 83 (SB) were the most effective yeasts in inhibiting <italic>Fmed </italic>growth, on average by 39.1 %. On the other hand, <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strains 67, 76, and 8 derived from CS showed, on average, an inhibition against the white rot agent of 27.7 %. <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic> isolates 62, 63, and 69, from SB, as well as two isolates of <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> (16 and 35) from CS, displayed no reduction in the pathogen's mycelial growth. Over the course of the ten-day incubation period, the pathogen grew by an average of 2.3 mm per day. Conversely, the yeast strains displayed pronounced growth starting from two days after inoculation.</p>
<p>Nine strains from both CS and SB grapevines were selected for further analysis. Strains displaying high (1, 46, and 83), medium (8, 67, 76), and low inhibition (20, 71, and 78) were subsequently analysed to compare their metabolite production and effects on <italic>Fmed</italic> growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-4--effect-of-yeasts--non-vocs-on-fomitiporia-mediterranea-mycelial-colony-growth"><title>4. Effect of yeasts’ non-VOCs on <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> mycelial colony growth</title>
<p>The pathogen <italic>Fmed </italic>was strongly inhibited when grown in the presence of the non-volatile metabolites produced by <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> strain 20, <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strains 8, 67, 76, 83, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> strains 1, 46, and <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> strains 71, 78. All the strains isolated from CS, as well as those from SB, led to a similar growth inhibition, with no significant differences among examined isolates (Figure 4). The highest colony growth inhibition was achieved by the metabolites produced by the strains <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 67, <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> 71 and 78, with an average inhibition of 63.1 % compared to the control.</p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 4. Colony diameter (mm ± standard deviation) of <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> grown in the presence of non-volatile metabolites released by different yeast strains in PDA medium. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences within each grapevine cultivar group (Cabernet Sauvignon, CS; Sauvignon Blanc, SB) (Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test, P ≤ 0.05).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image4.png" /></fig></p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-5--effect-of-yeasts--vocs-on-fomitiporia-mediterranea-mycelial-colony-growth"><title>5. Effect of yeasts’ VOCs on <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> mycelial colony growth</title>
<p>Exposure to VOCs produced by the selected strains heavily influenced <italic>Fmed </italic>mycelial growth (Figure 5), particularly the volatilome of<italic> R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> strain 1, which caused 83 % inhibition of the pathogen. <italic>Papilotrema terrestris</italic> strains 67 and 76, and <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> strain 78 were the most effective strains isolated from SB, inhibiting <italic>Fmed </italic>growth by 63 % on average. All the other strain volatilomes produced, on average, a reduction of 46.4 % with respect to the control.</p>
<p><bold><fig><caption><title>Figure 5. <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> colony diameter (mm ± standard deviation) when exposed to the VOCs produced by the yeasts isolated from Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Sauvignon Blanc (SB) grapevines. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences within each grapevine cultivar group (Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test, P ≤ 0.05).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image5.png" /></fig></bold></p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-6--volatile-compounds-characterisation"><title>6. Volatile compounds characterisation</title>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 6. Heatmap of VOC profiles across yeast strains with hierarchical clustering values corresponding to the log10-transformed peak areas. Colour intensity reflects the relative abundance of each compound.</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image6.png" /></fig></p>
<p>Thirty volatile metabolites produced by the selected strains were identified using SPME-GC‐MS. The volatile compounds have been characterised via the LOTUS database, with literature references supporting their biological origins and potential role in ecological systems. The heatmap (Figure 6) shows all the detected compounds produced by all the tested strains isolated from different cultivars (SB, CS). </p>
<p>The intensity of the colour is proportional to the logarithm of the absolute peak area. The hierarchical clusterisation of the heatmap did not reveal any clustering patterns associated with yeast species. Instead, VOC profiles appeared largely strain-specific, indicating substantial intra-species variability in volatile production. Isoamyl alcohol and 2-phenylethanol were the most abundant volatile compounds produced by the analysed yeasts. <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic> 78 and <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> 46 displayed the most distinctive VOC profiles: the former was characterised by the unique production of several esters and alcohols, including ethyl acetate, ethyl propionate, and 1-propanol; the latter was the only strain to produce isovaleric acid and 2-ethylfuran acid at detectable levels. Differences in the volatilome composition are reported in Figure 7, where the colour intensity in the palette reflects the relative abundance of molecules belonging to different chemical classes. </p>
<p><fig><caption><title>Figure 7. Composition of yeast strains' volatilome. Bars represent the absolute area of detected VOCs for each examined yeast strain. Different colours indicate different compounds' chemical classes. Yeast strains are grouped by grapevine cultivar (Cabernet Sauvignon, CS; Sauvignon Blanc, SB).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image7.png" /></fig></p>
<p>Alcohols were the most represented class, with percentages ranging from 43 % to 89 % depending on the yeast strain, followed by carboxylic acids, phenylpropanoids, and aldehydes. Large differences were also observed in the total amount of VOCs absolute area for each strain.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-7--influence-of-grapevine-endophytic-yeasts-on-fomitiporia-mediterranea-enzymatic-activity"><title>7. Influence of grapevine endophytic yeasts on <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> enzymatic activity</title>
<p>From the enzymatic assays, <italic>Fmed</italic> showed a higher Mn peroxidase-like activity with respect to laccase (Figure 8a and b). The presence of CS wood dust (WB) stimulated <italic>Fmed</italic> enzyme activity to a greater extent when compared to SB wood dust. All tested yeast strains demonstrated both Mn peroxidase-like and laccase activities similar to or lower than that of <italic>Fmed</italic>. Mn peroxidase-like enzymatic activity was heavily altered by the co-culturing of <italic>Fmed</italic> and selected yeasts. Specifically, the presence of <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> strain 8 significantly stimulated (~7-fold increase) <italic>Fmed</italic> enzymatic activity when compared to the control (<italic>Fmed</italic> + WB; Figure 8a). Significant, albeit weaker, stimulating effects were recorded for <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> 1 and <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 76. No alteration in Mn peroxidase-like activity was recorded when <italic>Fmed</italic> was co-cultured with <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> 78. The laccase enzymatic activity was also significantly affected by co-culturing <italic>Fmed</italic> with two yeasts (Figure 8b), namely <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 8 and <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> 78. The former led to a stimulation of the enzymatic activity (~7.5-fold increase), while the latter led to a reduction of 90 % with respect to the control <italic>Fmed</italic> + WB.</p>
<p><bold><fig><caption><title>Figure 8. Mn peroxidase-like (a) and laccase-like (b) activity (U/L) ± standard deviation of <italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> (<italic>F. med</italic>) and endophytic yeasts grown in different media (MEB: Malt Extract Broth; WB: Wood Broth), alone or in co-culture. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences within each grapevine cultivar group (Cabernet-Sauvignon, CS; Sauvignon blanc, SB) (Tukey <italic>post hoc</italic> test, <italic>p</italic> ≤ 0.05).</title>
</caption><graphic xlink:href="media/image8.png"><alt-text>Une image contenant texte, capture d’écran, reçu Le contenu généré par l’IA peut être incorrect.</alt-text></graphic></fig></bold></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-discussion"><title>Discussion </title>
<p>The appearance of ‘tiger stripes’ on leaves is a distinctive feature of grapevines affected by esca (Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Foliar symptoms are generally associated with wood alterations such as necrotic lesions and frequently white rot (Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021; Gastou <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Evidence supporting the involvement of white rot and associated fungi in leaf symptom development is increasing (Puca <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). White rot removal via trunk surgery or similar techniques (Sanna <italic>et al.</italic>, , 2026; Lecomte <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022), and the use of sodium arsenite, which accumulates in white rot (Larignon <italic>et al.</italic>, 2008) and heavily affects <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic> abundance (Bruez <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021), can prevent symptom reappearance for several years after treatment. However, the causal mechanisms that link white rot to foliar symptoms remain unresolved. One hypothesis is that white rot may act as a source of metabolites such as fungal toxins or wood degradation byproducts, which, once translocated to the leaves, could trigger a hypersensitive-like response leading to tiger stripe formation (Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Gastou <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). In this study, grapevines exhibiting leaf symptoms for the first time consistently showed both necrotic lesions and white rot, supporting the correlation between white rot and foliar symptomatology. Wood symptoms were predominantly localised in grapevine arms, with white rot frequently detected in and below the spurs, suggesting that infections likely originated from pruning wounds. Our findings indicate that first-time leaf symptom expression does not require extensive wood symptomatology (&lt; 5 % in trunks, &lt; 15 % in arms; Figure 1), but may depend on localised affected tissue, particularly within and below spurs, in correspondence with pruning wounds (Mugnai <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999). Yeasts and yeast-like fungi are common components of the wood microbiome in many perennial plant species, where these microorganisms occupy both early and advanced stages of decay and can use xylose and other sugars released from hemicellulose and cellulose degradation (Cadete <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017). In grapevine, NGS-based studies indicate that yeasts are more prevalent than previously recognised, suggesting potential ecological roles as endophytes and within GTD pathosystems (Bekris <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021; Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019a). In the present study, 31 yeast strains, belonging to four species, were isolated from grapevine woody tissues (Table 1). <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic>, a ubiquitous yeast-like fungus frequently detected in grapevine wood of both esca symptomatic and asymptomatic plants (Pinto <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018; Karacsony <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Cobos <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022), is a well-known BCA in multiple pathosystems (Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Tulukoglu-Kunt <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024; Lucci <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025; Cignola <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024), although evidence of its efficacy against GTD pathogens remains limited. Interestingly, it has been associated with increased leaf symptom severity, consistent with observations from leaf mycobiome studies (Karacsony <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). In this study, <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> was isolated exclusively from the SB cultivar, in asymptomatic and white rot tissues. <italic>Papiliotrema terrestris</italic> has been reported as an epiphyte in the grapevine carposphere or as a soil microorganism (Bekris <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025; Bougreau <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019), and the genus <italic>Papiliotrema</italic> has recently been detected in grapevine wood through culture-independent approaches (Aleynova <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). In the present study, the first culture-based evidence of its presence in wood was obtained through its isolation from asymptomatic, necrotic, and white rot tissues of both examined cultivars. The genus <italic>Rhodotorula</italic> has been detected in grapevine wood (Adejoro <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023) and is known from diverse plant-associated niches, including the leaf endosphere of <italic>Vitis labrusca </italic>and berries of <italic>V.</italic> <italic>vinifera</italic> ssp. <italic>sylvestris</italic> (de Lima <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013; Cordero-Bueso <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022). However, its isolation from grapevine wood remains rare, with only two reports to date (Hofstetter <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012; Kirchmair <italic>et al.</italic>, 2010). Here, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> was consistently isolated from white rot tissue in both cultivars, reinforcing its association with this niche. <italic>Hanseniaspora uvarum</italic>, commonly associated with the grapevine phyllosphere and berries (Mezzasalma <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017), has not previously been reported in grapevine wood; thus, this study represents its first isolation from asymptomatic and necrotic woody tissues of CS. From a biocontrol perspective, both <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> have demonstrated antagonistic activity against multiple plant pathogens (Palmieri <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Lopes <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025), with the latter reported to inhibit <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> in grapevine. In contrast, although some evidence of biocontrol activity against <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> exists for <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> (Ibrahim &amp; Hassan, 2023), its potential in grapevine remains entirely unexplored. In the present study, we demonstrate that white rot constitutes a previously underexplored niche for yeasts and yeast-like fungi in grapevine, albeit with low species diversity. While their presence in white rot has been reported in other woody perennials (Cadete <italic>et al.</italic>, 2017), in grapevine it had previously only been inferred from NGS-based mycobiome studies that included white rot tissue (Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019a; Bekris <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021). Given that these yeasts coexist with key esca pathogens, particularly <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic>, we investigated potential antagonistic interactions primarily through direct contact between microorganisms and through the production of metabolites, such as volatile and non-volatile compounds, and their role in the production of oxidative enzymes by the fungal pathogen. The dual-culture assay is a standard method for screening antagonistic interactions between BCA and pathogens, enabling a rapid evaluation of competition for space and resources, potential parasitism, and production of diffusible (non-VOC) or volatile metabolites. To date, different fungal genera have been tested against esca pathogens, with most studies focusing on <italic>Trichoderma</italic> spp.; some of these were tested specifically against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea </italic>(Mannerucci <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Riedle-Bauer <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Mesguida <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). Moreover, different bacteria such as <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic>, and <italic>Serratia plymuthica</italic> were tested against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea, </italic>displaying high fungal growth inhibition (Vaghari Souran <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). Among yeasts, only <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> has been evaluated against an esca pathogen, <italic>P.</italic> <italic>chlamydospora</italic> (Karacsony <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023), and none against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic>. The preliminary screening conducted in this study revealed a variable inhibition of <italic>Fmed</italic> growth (0–40 %), with substantial differences among strains belonging to the same species. In the dual culture assay, <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> strains were the least effective, whereas <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> and <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> achieved the strongest inhibition of <italic>Fmed</italic> mycelial growth. The most effective strains in the assay were <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> 1 and 46, and <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 67 and 83, which reduced fungal colony growth by ~35–40 % (Figure 3), percentages similar to those reported for other fungal BCAs (Mannerucci <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023; Del Frari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019b).</p>
<p>Nine yeast strains were chosen for further evaluation based on their performance in the dual culture assay. This evaluation looked at their non-volatile and volatile metabolites’ ability to inhibit <italic>Fmed</italic> mycelium growth. Metabolites of all nine yeast strains diffused in the medium (non-VOCs) significantly reduced <italic>Fmed</italic> growth by approximately 50 %, with <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> 78 showing the strongest inhibition (~75 %; Figure 4). <italic>Aureobasidium pullulans</italic> is well known for its production of the polysaccharide pullulan and its biocontrol use in agriculture (Cignola <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). This yeast is also recognised for the production of a large spectrum of extracellular enzymes and antifungal peptides such as aureobasidin A that could justify its higher antagonism with respect to the other strains (Takesako <italic>et al.</italic>, 1991). The metabolite profiles of <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> have been investigated in several studies, whereas little is known about that of <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic>. Li <italic>et al.</italic> (2024) reported that some strains of <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> and <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> exhibited extracellular lytic enzyme activity, including chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase. In addition, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> displays peroxidase activity, and the metabolite profiling of <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum</italic> revealed several compounds with known or potential antifungal activity (Ibrahim &amp; Hassan, 2023). These, along with other potentially unknown metabolites, may contribute to the observed <italic>Fmed</italic> growth reduction. </p>
<p>The volatilome of all endophytic yeasts evaluated in the <italic>in vitro</italic> assay significantly inhibited <italic>Fmed</italic> colony growth (Figure 5), underscoring the role of VOCs in pathogen suppression. Previous studies have attributed the biocontrol activity of several yeasts to their production of bioactive volatiles (Oztekin <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). For example, VOCs from <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> effectively control postharvest pathogens of citrus fruit, apple, tomato, and table grape (Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2015; Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020), while <italic>H.</italic> <italic>uvarum, P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic>, and<italic> R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> volatiles significantly inhibit <italic>B.</italic> <italic>cinerea</italic>, as well as <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> (Li <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). In this study, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> strain 1 showed the highest efficacy among the tested isolates. Although yeasts are widely recognised as BCAs, most evidence relates to postharvest diseases, and their application against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea </italic>remains unexplored. The hierarchical clustering of the heatmap did not reveal patterns associated with yeast species (Figure 6). Indeed, the biochemical diversity of yeast VOCs does not necessarily reflect their phylogenetic relationships (Guo <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021). This confirms that VOC production is not strictly species-specific, but may vary at finer taxonomic levels, such as among strains. Chemical classification of the detected compounds revealed that alcohols represented the dominant class within the volatilome (Figure 7). This is consistent with the literature, as numerous volatile compounds produced by fungi belong to this chemical class (Morath <italic>et al.</italic>, 2012). This is especially true for yeasts, where 3-methyl-1-butanol (isoamyl alcohol) and phenylethyl alcohol have been reported as prevalent compounds (Ling <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024). Specifically, <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans </italic>is known to be a strong producer of ethanol, 3-methyl-1-butanol, and 2-methyl-1-propanol (Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020). In the present research, the percentage of alcohols relative to the total peak area was found to be higher with respect to the other compound classes, in particular the isoamyl alcohol. This compound can inhibit fungal growth by damaging cell membranes, increasing permeability and inducing oxidative stress, while also impairing the fungi’s antioxidant system (Zhai <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Furthermore, Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic> (2020) reported an EC<sub>50</sub> value of 0.09 mL L<sup>–1</sup> for 3-methyl-1-butanol against <italic>B.</italic> <italic>cinerea</italic>, confirming its strong antifungal potential (Di Francesco <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020). Among the VOCs identified in this study, several compounds, such as 2-phenylethanol, 2-heptanone, isobutyric acid, and propionic acid, have demonstrated antifungal activity (Liu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014; Yun &amp; Lee, 2016; Stulanovic <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025; Li <italic>et al.</italic>, 2024), and their role against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea </italic>should be further explored. </p>
<p><italic>Fomitiporia mediterranea</italic> is a white-rot fungus possessing both enzymatic and non-enzymatic wood-degrading systems, including well-characterised laccases and MnPs, and enzyme activity varies significantly among strains (Pacetti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2022; Moretti <italic>et al.</italic>, 2023). MnP enzymes are generally absent in yeasts, although MnP-like activity has been reported in several species (Hofrichter, 2002; Mattila, 2022). In the absence of MnP genes, Mn<sup>2+</sup>-oxidising activity in yeasts is likely mediated by alternative systems, such as DyP-type peroxidases, unspecific heme peroxidases, or indirect oxidation via laccases or reactive oxygen species (Mattila, 2022; Ali <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021). No confirmed MnP enzymes have been reported for <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic>, <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic>, or <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic>, and evidence for MnP-like activity in these species remains limited. Laccases and laccase-like multicopper oxidases are widespread in fungi, including some yeasts (Reiss <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013; Janusz <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020). <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> shows strain-dependent laccase production, with some strains producing multiple isoforms and others lacking detectable activity (Rich <italic>et al.</italic>, 2013). Laccase activity has not been clearly reported for <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> or <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic>, although it is well documented in <italic>Cryptococcus</italic> spp., which are phylogenetically related to <italic>Papiliotrema</italic> (Ikeda <italic>et al.</italic>, 2002). As expected, the <italic>Fmed</italic> strain used in this study exhibited both MnP and laccase-like activities. All tested yeast strains also showed MnP-like and laccase-like activities, generally at levels comparable to or lower than those of <italic>Fmed</italic>, with <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> showing the lowest activity (Figure 8a). These results confirm the limited oxidative potential of <italic>A.</italic> <italic>pullulans</italic> and, to our knowledge, provide the first evidence of MnP-like and laccase-like activities in <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> and <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic>. Interestingly, the co-cultivation with yeasts markedly affected MnP-like activity in <italic>Fmed</italic>. In particular, <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic> 1 and both <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> isolates significantly increased MnP activity, with up to a 7-fold increase observed for <italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris</italic> 8. This strain also induced a significant increase in laccase activity (Figure 8b). Induction of MnP and laccase during fungal interactions is well documented, whereas evidence for interactions between white-rot fungi and yeasts remains limited (Zhang <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020; Kumar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2019). These findings support the view that ligninolytic enzymes are not solely involved in lignin degradation but are also upregulated during interspecific interactions, suggesting a role in competition and antagonism (Hiscox <italic>et al.</italic>, 2010). Overall, the evidence provided in this study suggests that certain yeast strains may act as <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic> antagonists, using multiple strategies for fungal inhibition. Among these, VOCs have been the least explored in the literature. To our knowledge, in the context of GTDs, only VOCs of bacterial origin have been tested against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic>, demonstrating a strong inhibitory effect (Haidar <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021; Mesguida <italic>et al.</italic>, 2025). Our results expand on this knowledge, showing that yeasts inhabiting white rot are capable of synthesising numerous VOCs with proven antifungal activity. VOCs may accumulate in white rot, woody tissue with a spongy consistency that has the potential to retain large amounts of gases (Mugnai <italic>et al.</italic>, 1999), and create a selective niche for different microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi (Fukasawa, 2021). In addition, numerous VOCs of fungal origin have demonstrated phytotoxic activity (Macías-Rubalcava &amp; Garrido-Santos, 2022), including 2-phenylethanol (Tena <italic>et al.</italic>, 2021), a compound frequently found among our tested strains. Further research should focus on soluble VOCs to determine whether they can reach and dissolve in the xylem sap and be translocated to green tissues (<italic>e.g.</italic>, shoots and leaves), contributing to the series of events that lead to the tiger stripe symptom. </p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-conclusions"><title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study confirms that yeasts and yeast-like fungi are common components of the grapevine wood microbiome, especially present in white rot tissue and in this case of CS and SB cultivars. The functional role of these microorganisms remains largely unresolved; however, several strains isolated in this study exhibited clear antagonistic activity against <italic>F.</italic> <italic>mediterranea</italic>, indicating their potential relevance in the esca pathosystem. In particular, the production of metabolites, such as VOCs (<italic>e.g.</italic>, isoamyl alcohol and 2-phenylethanol), appears to play an important role in influencing pathogen growth. The presence of some of the studied yeast strains (<italic>P.</italic> <italic>terrestris </italic>and <italic>R.</italic> <italic>glutinis</italic>) was also found to influence the pathogen’s enzyme activities notably. These findings open new perspectives on the ecological role of yeasts in wood and their possible application as BCAs. Further research is required to elucidate their interactions within the wood microbiome and their impact on disease development.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-acknowledgements"><title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The authors want to thank Alessandro Boato, Davide Scolari, Giuseppe Fratantonio, Enrico Daniso and Francesca Scanferla for the technical support in the laboratory analyses, as well as Nicola Vecchiato and Mario Del Frari for technical support during grapevine sampling and processing. This work was supported by the Regional Programme ESF+ 2021–2027 of the Autonomous Region of Friuli Venezia Giulia, PPO 2023, Specific Programme No. 22/23 – Support for higher education in the regional university system, Line A (CUP G23C23001130008) and partially funded by the European Union under a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship, project WildWoodMicrobes (GA 101064232).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-conflict-of-interest"><title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-data-availability"><title>Data availability</title>
<p>These findings are supported by data that are available from the authors upon request.</p>
<p>
</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group /><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Adejoro</surname><given-names>D.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>E.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ridgway</surname><given-names>H.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mundy</surname><given-names>D.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vanga</surname><given-names>B.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bulman</surname><given-names>S.R.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Grapevines escaping trunk diseases in New Zealand vineyards have a distinct microbiome structure</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology 14</source><volume>1231832</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1231832">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1231832</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Aleynova</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nityagovsky</surname><given-names>N. N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suprun</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ananev</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubrovina</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kiselev</surname><given-names>K. V.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>The diversity of fungal endophytes from wild grape Vitis amurensis Rupr</article-title><source>Plants 11 (21)</source><volume>2897</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212897">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212897</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rizwan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chong</surname><given-names>K. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>J</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>W</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>H</surname><given-names /></name><year>2024</year><article-title>A review on mechanisms and prospects of endophytic bacteria in biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi and their plant growth-promoting activities</article-title><publisher-name> Heliyon 10(11)</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31573">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31573</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Tohamy</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Koutra</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kornaros</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khalil</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elsamahy</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Shetehy</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Coupling azo dye degradation and biodiesel production by manganese-dependent peroxidase producing oleaginous yeasts isolated from wood-feeding termite gut symbionts</article-title><source>Biotechnol Biofuels 14(1)</source><volume>61</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01906-0">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-01906-0</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Almendros</surname><given-names>V. M. T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lerma</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castillo</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salinas</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Armengol</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muñoz</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Characterization of the fungi involved with Grapevine Trunk Diseases in Castilla-La Mancha Region, Spain</article-title><source> Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 9</source><volume>329-337</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2019.06.001">https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6256/2019.06.001</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Bekris</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Papadopoulou</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasileiadis</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karapetsas</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Theocharis</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alexandridis</surname><given-names>T. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karpouzas</surname><given-names>D. G.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Vintage and terroir are the strongest determinants of grapevine carposphere microbiome in the viticultural zone of Drama, Greece</article-title><publisher-name> FEMS Microbiology Ecology 101(2)</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaf008">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaf008</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Bekris</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasileiadis</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Papadopoulou</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Samaras</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Testempasis</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gkizi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karpouzas</surname><given-names>D. G.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Grapevine wood microbiome analysis identifies key fungal pathogens and potential interactions with the bacterial community implicated in grapevine trunk disease appearance</article-title><source> Environmental Microbiome 16(1)</source><volume>23</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-021-00390-1">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-021-00390-1</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Bortolami</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrer</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baumgartner</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delzon</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gramaje</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lamarque</surname><given-names>L.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romanazzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gambetta</surname><given-names>G.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delmas</surname><given-names>C.E.L.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Esca grapevine disease involves leaf hydraulic failure and represents a unique premature senescence process</article-title><source>Tree Physiology 43(3)</source><volume>441-451</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpac133">https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpac133</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Bougreau</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ascencio</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bugarel</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nightingale</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Loneragan</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Yeast species isolated from Texas High Plains vineyards and dynamics during spontaneous fermentations of Tempranillo grapes</article-title><source>PLoS One 14</source><volume>1–15</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216246">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216246</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Bruez</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Larignon</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertsch</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Robert-Siegwald</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lebrun</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rey</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Impacts of sodium arsenite on wood microbiota of esca-diseased grapevines</article-title><source> Journal of Fungi 7(7)</source><volume>498</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070498">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7070498</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cadete</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>C. A.</given-names></name><year>2017</year><article-title>Yeasts in Natural ecosystems: diversity</article-title><publisher-name>yeasts in natural ecosystems: diversity (pp</publisher-name><comment>265-292). Cham: Springer International Publishing</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62683-3_9">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62683-3_9</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Carbone</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moreira</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mondino</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alaniz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Grapevine nursery propagation material as source of fungal trunk disease pathogens in Uruguay</article-title><source>Frontiers in Fungal Biology 3</source><volume>1–13</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.958466">https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.958466</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cignola</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Firrao</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Freschi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Aureobasidium pullulans formulations: evaluation of the effectiveness against grey mould of table grape</article-title><source>Journal of Plant Pathology 106</source><volume>1259–1268 </volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01671-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-024-01671-7</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cignola</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Palou</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perez-Gago</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lovison</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Foggia</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Basso</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Exploring the biochemical, technical and applicative characteristics of pullulan produced by different strains of Aureobasidium pullulans</article-title><source> Postharvest Biology and Technology 230</source><volume>113779</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113779">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113779</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cloete</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mostert</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Halleen</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Hymenochaetales associated with esca related wood rots on grapevine with a special emphasis on the status of esca in South African vineyards</article-title><source>Phytopathologia Mediterranea 54</source><volume>299–312</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16364">https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16364</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cobos</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibañez</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Diez-Galán</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calvo-Peña</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghoreshizadeh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coque</surname><given-names>J. J. R.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>The Grapevine microbiome to the rescue: implications for the biocontrol of trunk diseases</article-title><source> Plants 11(7)</source><volume>840</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070840">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070840</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Cordero-Bueso</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vigentini</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Foschino</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maghradze</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruiz-Muñoz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Benitez-Trujillo</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantoral</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Culturable yeast diversity of grape berries from Vitis vinifera ssp</article-title><source> sylvestris (Gmelin) Hegi. Journal of Fungi 8(4)</source><page-range>410</page-range><publisher-name>https://doi</publisher-name><comment>org/10.3390/jof8040410</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>De Almeida</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Concas</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Campos</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Materatski</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Varanda</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Patanita</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murolo</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Romanazzi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>M. D. R.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Endophytic fungi as potential biological control agents against Grapevine Trunk Diseases in Alentejo Region</article-title><source> Biology 9(12)</source><volume>420</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9120420">https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9120420</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Dekrey</surname><given-names>D. H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klodd</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>M. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Blanchette</surname><given-names>R. A.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Grapevine trunk diseases of cold-hardy varieties grown in Northern Midwest vineyards coincide with canker fungi and winter injury</article-title><publisher-name>PLoS One 1–25</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269555">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269555</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Del Frari</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aggerbeck</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobbi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ingrà</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Volpi</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrandino</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Pruning wound protection products induce alterations in the wood mycobiome profile of grapevines</article-title><publisher-name>Journal of Fungi 9 (4)</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040488">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040488</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Del Frari</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabral</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>R. B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><year>2019b</year><article-title>Epicoccum layuense a potential biological control agent of esca-associated fungi in grapevine</article-title><source>PLoS One 14</source><volume>e0213273</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213273">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213273</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Del Frari</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Calzarano</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boavida</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Understanding the control strategies effective against the esca leaf stripe symptom: the edge hypothesis</article-title><source>Phytopathologia Mediterranea 61</source><volume>153–164</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-13295">https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-13295</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Del Frari</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobbi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aggerbeck</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><year>2019a</year><article-title>Characterization of the wood mycobiome of Vitis vinifera in a vineyard affected by esca</article-title><source>spatial distribution of fungal communities and their putative relation with leaf symptoms. Frontiers in Plant Science 10</source><volume>910</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00910">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00910</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Del Frari</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ingrà</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aggerbeck</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobbi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cabral</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrandino</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>R.B.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Fungal community dynamics and anthocyanin profiling of grapevine leaves in a vineyard affected by esca</article-title><source>Plant Stress 15</source><volume>100793</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2025.100793">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2025.100793</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Del Frari</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>R. B.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>White Rot Fungi (Hymenochaetales) and Esca of Grapevine : Insights from Recent Microbiome Studies</article-title><source>Journal of Fungi 7</source><volume>770</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090770">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7090770</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>De Lima</surname><given-names>T. E. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>De Oliveira</surname><given-names>R. J. V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Neves</surname><given-names>R. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bezerra</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavalcanti</surname><given-names>M. A. De Q.</given-names></name><year>2013</year><article-title>Endophytic yeasts of Coffea arabica and Vitis labrusca cv</article-title><source>Isabel from Pernambuco</source><volume>Brazil</volume><comment>Nov Hedwigia 96, 463–469</comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0080">https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0080</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Dell'acqua</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gambetta</surname><given-names>G.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Comont</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrer</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rochepeau</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pétriacq</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delmas</surname><given-names>C.E.L.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Nitrogen nutrition impacts grapevine esca leaf symptom incidence, physiology, and metabolism</article-title><source>Journal of Experimental Botany 76(11)</source><volume>3225-3242</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf172">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf172</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Deyett</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rolshausen</surname><given-names>P. E.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Temporal dynamics of the sap microbiome of grapevine under high Pierce’s disease pressure</article-title><source>Frontiers Plant Science 10</source><volume>1–15</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01246">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01246</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Foggia</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baraldi</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Aureobasidium pullulans volatile organic compounds as alternative postharvest method to control brown rot of stone fruits</article-title><source>Food Microbiology 87</source><volume>103395</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103395">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103395</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moret</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cignola</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garagozzo</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Torelli</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Foggia</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Yeasts volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as potential growth enhancers and molds biocontrol agents of mushrooms mycelia</article-title><source> Fungal Biology 128(4)</source><volume>1859-1867</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2024.05.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2024.05.007</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ugolini</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lazzeri</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mari</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Production of volatile organic compounds by Aureobasidium pullulans as a potential mechanism of action against postharvest fruit pathogens</article-title><source>Biological Control 81</source><volume>8–14</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.10.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.10.004</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zajc</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gunde-Cimerman</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aprea</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gasperi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Placì</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baraldi</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Bioactivity of volatile organic compounds by Aureobasidium species against gray mold of tomato and table grape</article-title><source> World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 36(11)</source><volume>171</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02947-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02947-7</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>González García</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>An annotated checklist of European basidiomycetes related to white rot of grapevine (Vitis vinifera)</article-title><source>Phytopathologia Mediterranea 54</source><volume>281–298</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fontaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Trouillas</surname><given-names>F. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Armengol</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eskalen</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Fungal trunk diseases: A global threat to grapevines</article-title><source> Annual Review of Phytopathology</source><volume> 63</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-phyto-121323-022259">https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-phyto-121323-022259</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Fukasawa</surname><given-names>y</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Ecological impacts of fungal wood decay types: A review of current knowledge and future research directions</article-title><source> Ecological Research 36(6)</source><page-range>910–931</page-range><publisher-name> https://doi</publisher-name><comment>org/10.1111/1440-1703.12260</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Garcia</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Todd</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rolshausen</surname><given-names>P. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cantu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Nursery origin and propagation stage influence the endophytic fungal communities inhabiting grapevine planting stocks</article-title><publisher-name>Phytobiomes 1–61</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-24-0090-R">https://doi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-09-24-0090-R</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Gastou</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Destrac Irvine</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arcens</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Courchinoux</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>This</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Leeuwen</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Delmas</surname><given-names>C. E.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Large gradient of susceptibility to esca disease revealed by long-term monitoring of 46 grapevine cultivars in a common garden vineyard</article-title><publisher-name> BioRxiv 2024-03</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.8043">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.8043</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ghose</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gupta</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nuzelu</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rangan</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mitra</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Optimization of laccase enzyme extraction from spent mushroom waste of Pleurotus florida through ANN-PSO modeling: An ecofriendly and economical approach</article-title><source>Environmental Research 222</source><volume>115345</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115345">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115345</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Gramaje</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eichmeier</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2026</year><article-title>Beyond Koch's postulates: the pathobiome paradigm in grapevine esca disease</article-title><publisher-name> FEMS Microbiology Ecology 102(4)</publisher-name><comment>doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiag028</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jud</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Weikl</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghirardo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Junker</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Polle</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenkranz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Volatile organic compound patterns predict fungal trophic mode and lifestyle</article-title><source> Communications biology 4(1)</source><volume>673</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02198-8">https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02198-8</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Haidar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yacoub</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mesguida</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guyoneaud</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Attard</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rey</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>The structural and functional diversities of bacteria inhabiting plant woody tissues and their interactions with fungi</article-title><source> Journal of Fungi 11(9)</source><volume>652</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090652">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof11090652</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Haidar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yacoub</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vallance</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Compant</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Antonielli</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Saad</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Habenstein</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Set</surname><given-names /></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Bacteria associated with wood tissues of esca-diseased grapevines: functional diversity and synergy with Fomitiporia mediterranea to degrade wood components</article-title><publisher-name>Environmental Microbiology 23, 6104–21</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15676">https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15676</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Hiscox</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baldrian</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>H. J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boddy</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><year>2010</year><article-title>Changes in oxidative enzyme activity during interspecific mycelial interactions involving the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor</article-title><source>Fungal Genetic Biology 47</source><volume>562–571</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2010.03.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2010.03.007</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Hofrichter</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2002</year><article-title>Review: Lignin conversion by manganese peroxidase (MnP)</article-title><source>Enzyme Microbiological Technology 30</source><volume>454–466 https://doi</volume><comment>org/10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00528-2</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Hofstetter</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Buyck</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Croll</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>What if esca disease of grapevine were not a fungal disease?</article-title><source>Fungal Diversity 54</source><volume>51–67</volume><issue>2012</issue><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0171-z27">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0171-z27</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Hrycan</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hart</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowen</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Forge</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Urbez-Torres</surname><given-names>J. R.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Grapevine trunk disease fungi : their roles as latent pathogens and stress factors that favour disease development and symptom expression</article-title><source>Phytopathologia Mediterranea 59</source><volume>395–424</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>Y. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Evaluation of the Rhodotorula glutinis in controlling the gray rot disease caused by the pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea pre and post strawberry harvesting</article-title><source>Earth Environmental Science</source><volume>1214</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1214/1/012038">https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1214/1/012038</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ikeda</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sugita</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobson</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shinoda</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><year>2002</year><article-title>Laccase and melanization in clinically important Cryptococcus species other than Cryptococcus neoformans</article-title><source>Journal of Clinical Microbiology 40</source><volume>1214–1218</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.4.1214-1218.2002">https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.40.4.1214-1218.2002</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Janusz</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pawlik</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Świderska-Burek</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Polak</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sulej</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jarosz-Wilkołazka</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paszczyński</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Laccase properties, physiological functions, and evolution</article-title><source> International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(3)</source><volume>966</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030966">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030966</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Karácsony</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mondello</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Váczy</surname><given-names>K. Z.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>The potential role of Aureobasidium pullulans in the development of foliar symptoms of Esca disease in grapevine</article-title><source>OENO One 57</source><volume>189–203</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.7463">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.3.7463</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Kenfaoui</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Radouane</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mennani</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tahiri</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>El Ghadraoui</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belabess</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>El Hamss</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amiri</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lahlali</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barka</surname><given-names>E.A.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>A panoramic view on grapevine trunk diseases threats: case of Eutypa Dieback, Botryosphaeria Dieback, and Esca Disease</article-title><source>Journal of Fungi 8</source><volume>595</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060595">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060595</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Kirchmair</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Trenkwalder</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huber</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Neuhauser</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2010</year><article-title>Endophytes from healthy and esca diseased vines</article-title><publisher-name>Phytopathologia Mediterranea 103–133</publisher-name></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arora</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jain</surname><given-names>K. K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharma</surname><given-names>K. K.</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Metabolic coupling in the co-cultured fungal-yeast suite of Trametes ljubarskyi and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa leads to hypersecretion of laccase isozymes</article-title><source> Fungal biology 123(12)</source><volume>913-926</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2019.09.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2019.09.013</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Lara</surname><given-names>C. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>R. O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cadete</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marques</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Girio</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fonseca</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><year>2014</year><article-title>Identification and characterisation of xylanolytic yeasts isolated from decaying wood and sugarcane bagasse in Brazil</article-title><source> Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105(6)</source><volume>1107-1119</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0172-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0172-x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Larignon</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Darné</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ménard</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Desaché</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dubos</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><year>2008</year><article-title>Comment agissait l ’ arsénite de sodium sur l ’ esca de la vigne ?</article-title><source>How did the sodium arsenite act against the esca of the grapevine ? Le Progrès Agriculture Viticulture 125</source><volume>642–651</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Lecomte</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cholet</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruez</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martignon</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Giudici</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Simonit</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rey</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Recovery after curettage of grapevines with esca leaf symptoms</article-title><source> Phytopathologia Mediterranea 61(3)</source><volume>473–489</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-13357">https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-13357</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Lecomte</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Darrieutort</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liminana</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Comont</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muruamendiaraz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Legorburu</surname><given-names>F.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Choueiri</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jreijiri</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>El Amil</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fermaud</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>New Insights into Esca of Grapevine: the development of foliar symptoms and their association with xylem discoloration</article-title><source>Plant Disease 96(7)</source><volume>924-934</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0776-RE6">https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-11-0776-RE6</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lv</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Inhibitory effect and potential antagonistic mechanism of isolated epiphytic yeasts against Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria alternata in postharvest blueberry fruits</article-title><source>Foods</source><volume>13</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13091334">https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13091334</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>H. N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mu</surname><given-names>T. H.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Exploring the potential in postharvest preservation of sweet potato: 2-methylbutanoic acid, isobutyric acid, perillaldehyde and salicylaldehyde, to control Rhizopus stolonifer</article-title><source>Postharvest Biology and Technology 210</source><volume>112785</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112785">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112785</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Ling</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Endophytic fungi volatile organic compounds as crucial biocontrol agents used for controlling fruit and vegetable postharvest diseases</article-title><source> Journal of Fungi 10(5)</source><volume>332</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050332">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10050332</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><year>2014</year><article-title>Mechanisms of action for 2-phenylethanol isolated from Kloeckera apiculata in control of Penicillium molds of citrus fruits</article-title><source>BMC Microbiology 14</source><volume>242</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0242-2">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0242-2</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>L. A. M. N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Da Silva</surname><given-names>A. P. V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dos Santos</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name><name><surname>De Oliveira Costa</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Junior</surname><given-names>G. A. L.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Potential use of Hanseniaspora uvarum in the control of anthracnose in Phaseolus lunatus caused by Colletotrichum truncatum</article-title><source> Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection 132(6)</source><volume>1-19</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-025-01162-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-025-01162-6</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Lucci</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khomutovska</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Firrao</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Strains of Aureobasidium pullulans from Extreme Environments: New Potential Biocontrol Agents?</article-title><source>Microorganisms 13</source><volume>2596</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112596">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112596</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Macías-Rubalcava</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garrido-Santos</surname><given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Phytotoxic compounds from endophytic fungi</article-title><source>Applied Microbiological Biotechnology 106</source><volume>931–950</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-11773-w">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-022-11773-w</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mannerucci</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>D’ambrosio</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Regina</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schiavone</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruno</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>New potential biological limiters of the main esca-associated fungi in grapevine</article-title><source> Microorganisms 11(8)</source><volume>2099</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11082099">https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11082099</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Martínez-Diz</surname><given-names>M. Del P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Díaz-Losada</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Díaz-Fernandez</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bouzas-Cid</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gramaje</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Diplodia seriata by commercial biological and chemical methods</article-title><source>Crop Protection</source><volume>143</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105465">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105465</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mattila</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Basidiomycota Fungi and ROS: Genomic perspective on key enzymes involved in generation and mitigation of reactive oxygen species</article-title><publisher-name>Frontiers Fungal Biology 3</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.837605">https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.837605</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mesguida</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Compant</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wallner</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Antonielli</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lobinski</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Godin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Bechec</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Terrasse</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Taibi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dreux-Zigha</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berthon</surname><given-names>J.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guyoneaud</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rey</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Attard</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Genomic and metabolomic insights into the modes-of-action of bacterial strains to control the grapevine wood pathogen, Fomitiporia mediterranea</article-title><source>Microbiological Research 293</source><volume>128085</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2025.128085">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2025.128085</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mesguida</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Haidar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yacoub</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dreux-Zigha</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berthon</surname><given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guyoneaud</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Attard</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rey</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Microbial biological control of fungi associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Strain diversity, modes of action, and advantages and limits of current strategies</article-title><source>Journal of Fungi 9(6)</source><volume>638</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060638">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9060638</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mezzasalma</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sandionigi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruni</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bruno</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lovicu</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Casiraghi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Labra</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2017</year><article-title>Grape microbiome as a reliable and persistent signature of field origin and environmental conditions in Cannonau wine production</article-title><source>PLoS One 12(9)</source><volume>e0184615</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184615">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184615</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mondello</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Songy</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Battiston</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coppin</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Trotel-Aziz</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Clément</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mugnai</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2018</year><article-title>Grapevine trunk diseases: a review of fifteen years of trials for their control with chemicals and biocontrol agents</article-title><source>Plant Disease 102</source><volume>1189-1217</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-08-17-1181-fe">https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-08-17-1181-fe</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Morath</surname><given-names>S. U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hung</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bennett</surname><given-names>J. W.</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>Fungal volatile organic compounds: A review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential</article-title><source>Fungal Biology Review 26</source><volume>73–83</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2012.07.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2012.07.001</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Moretti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goddard</surname><given-names>M.-L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Puca</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lalevée</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Marco</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mugnai</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gelhaye</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodell</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertsch</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farine</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>First Description of non-enzymatic radical-generating mechanisms adopted by Fomitiporia mediterranea: An unexplored pathway of the white rot agent of the esca complex of diseases</article-title><source> Journal of Fungi 9(4)</source><volume>498</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040498">https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9040498</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Mugnai</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Graniti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Surico</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>1999</year><article-title>Esca (black measles) and brown wood-streaking: two old and elusive diseases of grapevines</article-title><source>Plant Disease 83</source><volume>404–418</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.1999.83.5.404">https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.1999.83.5.404</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Oztekin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dikmetas</surname><given-names>D. N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devecioglu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Acar</surname><given-names>E. G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karbancioglu-Guler</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Recent insights into the use of antagonistic yeasts for sustainable biomanagement of postharvest pathogenic and mycotoxigenic fungi in fruits with their prevention strategies against mycotoxins</article-title><source>Journal Agriculture and Food Chemestry 71</source><volume>9923–9950</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00315">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00315</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Pacetti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moretti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrin</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gelhaye</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bieler</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kassemeyer</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mugnai</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farine</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertsch</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Grapevine wood-degrading activity of Fomitiporia mediterranea M</article-title><source>Fisch.: a focus on the enzymatic pathway regulation. Frontiers Microbiology 13</source><volume>844264</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.844264">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.844264</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Palmieri</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Miccoli</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Notardonato</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Avino</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>De Curtis</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castoria</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Modulation of extracellular Penicillium expansum-driven acidification by Papiliotrema terrestris affects biosynthesis of patulin and has a possible role in biocontrol activity</article-title><source> Frontiers in Microbiology 13</source><volume>973670</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.973670">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.973670</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Custódio</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Songy</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rabenoelina</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Courteaux</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Clément</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomes</surname><given-names>A.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fontaine</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2018</year><article-title>Understand the Potential Role of Aureobasidium pullulans, a resident microorganism from grapevine, to prevent the infection caused by Diplodia seriata</article-title><source>Frontiers in Microbiology 9</source><volume>3047</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03047">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03047</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Puca</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moretti</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goddard</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lalevée</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kassemeyer</surname><given-names>H.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farine</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mugnai</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertsch</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Around the world in eight white rot species: assessment of enzymatic and non-enzymatic wood decay pathways of worldwide Esca Complex of Diseases (ECD) associated basidiomycetes</article-title><source>Fungal Biology 129(7)</source><volume>101661</volume><comment>doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2025.101661</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Reiss</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ihssen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eichhorn</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schilling</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thöny-Meyer</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><year>2013</year><article-title>Laccase versus laccase-like multi-copper oxidase: a comparative study of similar enzymes with diverse substrate spectra</article-title><source>PLoS One 8(6)</source><volume>e65633</volume><comment>doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065633. </comment><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065633">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065633</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rich</surname><given-names>J. O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Leathers</surname><given-names>T. D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bischoff</surname><given-names>K. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manitchotpisit</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><year>2013</year><article-title>Laccases from Aureobasidium pullulans</article-title><source>Enzyme Microbiological Technology  53</source><volume>33–37</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.03.015">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.03.015</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Riedle-Bauer</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bandian</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Madercic</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gorfer</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Activity of biocontrol agents against the grapevine pathogen Fomitiporia mediterranea</article-title><source>PhytopathologiaMediterranea 62</source><volume>213–226</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-14302">https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-14302</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Rutz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorokina</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Galgonek</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mietchen</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Willighagen</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaudry</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Allard</surname><given-names>P. M.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>The LOTUS initiative for open knowledge management in natural products research</article-title><source> elife</source><volume> 11</volume><page-range>e70780</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.70780">https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.70780</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Sadallah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aprea</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cignola</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Caratti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cordero</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Angeli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Propolis hydroalcoholic extracts: biochemical characterization and antifungal efficacy</article-title><source> Horticulturae 11(2)</source><volume>122</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11020122">https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11020122</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Sanna</surname><given-names>F. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sivilotti</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rancan</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalla Pozza</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Merlo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><year>2026</year><article-title>Evaluation of the efficacy of curettage and over-grafting in the control of esca disease complex</article-title><publisher-name> OENO One 60(1)</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2026.60.1.9459">https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2026.60.1.9459</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Serra</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ligios</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schianchi</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Prota</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deidda</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scanu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Incidence of Grapevine Trunk Diseases on four cultivars in Sardinia, Southern Italy</article-title><source> Vitis 60 (1)</source><volume>35-42</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.2021.60.35-42">https://doi.org/10.5073/vitis.2021.60.35-42</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Stulanovic</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bensaada</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belde</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adam</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanikenne</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Focant</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stefanuto</surname><given-names>P. H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rigali</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>Antifungal and other bioactive properties of the volatilome of Streptomyces scabiei</article-title><source>Applied Environmental Microbiology 91(10)</source><volume>e0086325</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00863-25">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00863-25</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Surico</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>2009</year><article-title>Towards a redefinition of the diseases within the esca complex of grapevine</article-title><source>Phytopathologia Mediterranea 48</source><volume>5–10</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Takesako</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ikai</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Haruna</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Endo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimanaka</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sono</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamaguchi</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><year>1991</year><article-title>Aureobasidins, new antifungal antibiotics taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, and properties</article-title><source> The Journal of antibiotics  44(9)</source><volume>919-924</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.44.919">https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.44.919</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Tena</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Santiago</surname><given-names>A. Del R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Osuna</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sosa</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Phytotoxic Activity of p-Cresol, 2-Phenylethanol and 3-Phenyl-1-Propanol, Phenolic compounds present in Cistus ladanifer L</article-title><source>Plants 10</source><volume>1136</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061136">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061136</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Travadon</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lawrence</surname><given-names>D. P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moyer</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fujiyoshi</surname><given-names>P. T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baumgartner</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Fungal species associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Washington wine grapes and California table grapes , with novelties in the genera and Sporocadus</article-title><source>Frontiers in Fungal Biology</source><volume>3</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.1018140">https://doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2022.1018140</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Tulukoglu</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>K</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>S</surname><given-names /></name><name><surname>Moret</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khomutovska</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Stenberg</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Francesco</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Efficacy of volatile organic compounds by Aureobasidium pullulans immobilized on hydrogel spheres against strawberry fungal pathogens</article-title><publisher-name>Journal of Science Food Agriculture 104, 8380–8386</publisher-name><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13651">https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13651</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Vaghari Souran</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shekariesfahlan</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashrafi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title> Isolation and identification of grapevine endophytic bacteria with antagonistic potential against Fomitiporia mediterranea, a pathogen involved in grapevine trunk disease</article-title><source> Journal of Plant Disease Protection 130</source><volume>1371–1384</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-023-00788-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-023-00788-8</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Yun</surname><given-names>J. E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>D. G.</given-names></name><year>2016</year><article-title>A novel fungal killing mechanism of propionic acid</article-title><source>FEMS Yeast Research 16</source><volume>1–8</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fow089">https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fow089</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Zhai</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><year>2025</year><article-title>3-Methyl-1-butanol inhibited gray mold of red grape by damaging cell membrane integrity and the antioxidant capacity of Botrytis cinerea under oxidative stress</article-title><source> LWT</source><volume>118328</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118328">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2025.118328</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Comparative transcriptomics and transcriptional regulation analysis of enhanced laccase production induced by co-culture of Pleurotus eryngii var</article-title><source>ferulae with Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Applied Microbiol Biotechnology 104(1)</source><volume>241-255</volume><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10228-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10228-z</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>