<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://www.niso.org/standards/z39-96/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xmlns="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><journal-meta>
<journal-id>OENO One</journal-id>
<issn>2494-1271</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">Harnessing natural elicitors: enhancing post-harvest resistance in Brazilian grapes with β-D-1,6-Glucans</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="dc:creator">
<name><surname>Escher</surname>
<given-names>Jéssica</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Fontoura</surname>
<given-names>Bruno</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Camochena</surname>
<given-names>Rubia</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Rodrigues</surname>
<given-names>Michelle</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Fernandes</surname>
<given-names>João</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Hamada</surname>
<given-names>Natasha</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>and</surname>
<given-names></given-names></name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="dc:contributor">
<name><surname>Marchese</surname>
<given-names>José</given-names></name>
<email>corresponding author: abramo@utfpr.edu.br</email>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup>Agronomy Department, Federal University of Technology – Paraná, Pato Branco, PR, Brazil</aff><aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup>Agronomic Engineering Program, Federal Institute of Paraná, Palmas Campus, Palmas, PR, Brazil.</aff><pub-date date-type="created">
<day>2</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<permissions>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This study evaluated a β-D-1,6-glucan derived from the regional oomycete Lasiodiplodia theobromae, comparing its effectiveness with the traditional elicitor ASM in inducing post-harvest resistance in grapes and promoting sustainable practices. Commercial grape varieties (Bordô and Niágara Rosada) were sourced locally and treated with water (Control), β-D-1,6-glucan (200 mg L⁻¹), or ASM (Bion® 500 WG, 100 mg L⁻¹). Grapes treated with β-D-1,6-glucan consistently showed a tendency for lower AUDPC (Area Under the Disease Progress Curve) values across both varieties and injury conditions. In wounded Niágara grapes, ASM initially showed a tendency to reduce AUDPC until the 8th day, but β-D-1,6-glucan had the lowest value by day 10. β-D-1,6-glucan-treated fruits also had the highest Total Phenol Content (TPC) and pulp firmness compared to those treated with ASM or water. This study underscores β-D-1,6-glucan’s potential as a natural alternative to synthetic fungicides, enhancing grape resistance to Glomerela cingulata, extending shelf life, and reducing environmental and health impacts.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>natural elicitors</kwd>
<kwd>β</kwd>
<kwd>D</kwd>
<kwd>1</kwd>
<kwd>6</kwd>
<kwd>glucan</kwd>
<kwd>oligosaccharides</kwd>
<kwd>plant innate immunity</kwd>
<kwd>fruit storage</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="h0-introduction"><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Brazil is an important player in global fruit production, being the third largest producer in 2023, with an annual production of 45 million tons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">FAO, 2024</xref>). Grapes, a significant perennial crop, are among the top five fruits produced in the country, with the southern region being responsible for 70 % of grape production and 85 % of grapes used for processing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Macueia et al., 2024</xref>). In 2022, Brazil produced 1.45 million tons of grapes, cultivated on approximately 75,000 hectares, achieving an average productivity of 19 tons per hectare (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">IBGE, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Agricultural pathogens and pests significantly threaten productivity and food security, with susceptible crops facing losses of over 25 % (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Savary et al., 2019</xref>). <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic>, responsible for ripe grape rot, poses a serious challenge in southern Brazil, affecting grapes both pre- and post-harvest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Escher, 2020</xref>). </p>
<p>The push for sustainable practices has underscored the need for alternatives to synthetic agrochemicals, not only to improve production conditions but also to enhance post-harvest preservation of ripe fruits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Asgarian et al., 2024</xref>). Natural elicitors, which mimic pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), hold promise in enhancing plants’ innate immune responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Scariotto et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Dallacorte et al., 2023</xref>). However, their commercial use is limited due to insufficient understanding of their effects on plant metabolism. Research into immune receptors and microbial effectors is crucial in bridging this gap, supporting the use of natural elicitors for crop protection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Héloir, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Mendoza-Mendoza et al., 2023</xref>). </p>
<p>β-1,3-glucans are well-known plant immune triggers, while β-D-1,6-glucans have received less attention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Robinson &amp; Bostock, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Suchoronczek et al., 2018</xref>). Considering their potential as microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs), it is timely to reassess the efficacy of β-glucans in enhancing pre- and post-harvest crop resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Fesel &amp; Zuccaro, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Derived from oomycetes, β-D-1,6-glucans are glucose biopolymers with branched structures. Their biotechnological properties depend on chain size and branch types (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Queiroz et al., 2019</xref>). After extraction and purification, they induce phytoalexin biosynthesis, enhance antioxidant compounds, and modify plant cell wall composition, providing induced resistance against pathogen infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Riseh et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>This study evaluates the efficacy of β-D-1,6-glucan from oomycete <italic>Lasiodiplodia</italic> <italic>theobromae</italic> compared to a traditional elicitor in inducing post-harvest resistance in two popular grape cultivars in southwest Paraná, Brazil. The goal is to enrich the literature and support the development of low-toxicity products that extend food shelf life, reduce waste, and explore new applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-materials-and-methods"><title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>The experiments were conducted at the Plant Biochemistry and Molecular Physiology Laboratory of UTFPR (Federal University of Technology—Paraná), Pato Branco, PR, Brazil, and the Phytopathology Laboratory of IFPR (Federal Institute of Paraná), Palmas, PR, Brazil. </p>
<sec id="h0-1--analysed-samples-and-treatments"><title>1. Analysed samples and treatments</title>
<p>Commercial grape varieties (Bordô and Niágara Rosada) from conventional cultivation were purchased at local markets in Mariópolis, PR, Brazil. The Niágara Rosada and Bordô cultivars were selected due to their prevalence in the Pato Branco region. Uniform bunches were selected based on size (40–45 berries per bunch, with an average berry diameter of approximately 2.4 cm), firmness, colour, and absence of disease or damage, all at the same degree of ripeness. These bunches were placed in plastic trays to retain moisture and kept at an average temperature of 25 °C under a 12-hour photoperiod. The bunches were disinfected with 70 % alcohol and placed in plastic trays to create a humid chamber, where they were then sprayed with different treatments: control (Water), β-D-1,6-glucan (lasiodiplodian, 200 mg L⁻¹) (Figure 1), and Acibenzolar-S-Methyl (ASM, Bion® 500 WG, 100 mg L⁻¹) as a positive control. Treatments were applied under two conditions: with and without induced injury. Injuries were made at random, and the experiment was structured as a two-factorial design (treatment and injury) with samples arranged in a randomised block design and five replicates (one bunch per replicate). β-D-1,6-glucan (Figure 1) was produced following the protocol of Cunha <italic>et al</italic>. (2012), with purification conducted via dialysis using a membrane (1.3 inches, MW 11331, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C for seven days.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-2--glomerella-cingulate-infection"><title>2. <italic>Glomerella cingulate</italic> infection</title>
<p>The grape berries in the wounded treatments were punctured with an entomological pin (2 mm deep punctures on 10berries). Additionally, 12 hours after treatment application, the grapes were inoculated by spraying a suspension of <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic> conidia (10<sup>5</sup> conidia mL<sup>-1</sup>). </p>
<p>The fungus used in this experiment was obtained through indirect isolation from a symptomatic leaf of the Niagara Rosada grape cultivar, collected in a commercial vineyard in Mariópolis, Paraná, Brazil (26° 21′ 58″ S, 52° 33′ 32″ W) in February 2019. Following collection, a monospore isolation procedure was performed, and the isolate was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 25 °C in darkness. It was subsequently preserved in the phytopathology laboratory of the Instituto Federal do Paraná (IFPR), Palmas, Paraná, Brazil, until the study was conducted. The number of infected berries per bunch was monitored over 10 days. </p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-3--content-of-total-phenolic-compounds--tpc-"><title>3. Content of total phenolic compounds (TPC)</title>
<p>The total phenolic content was determined on the 10th day after elicitation, using 3 berries per bunch, including skin and pulp, were collected, rapidly immersed in liquid nitrogen (–180 °C), macerated into powder, and stored in Eppendorf tubes in an ultra-freezer (–80 °C, Coldlab, CL 800-86 V, Brazil). The extraction of phenolic compounds was carried out with 1 g of macerated fruit and 5 mL of extraction buffer (sodium borate buffer) with a final concentration of 0.2 mg mL<sup>-1</sup>.  For quantification, the Folin–Ciocalteu spectroscopic method was used at 740 nm (Shimadzu, UV-1800, Japan), and the results were expressed in mg GAE g<sup>-1</sup> (GAE: gallic acid equivalent) according to the methodology proposed by Singleton <italic>et al</italic>. (1999).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-4--fruit-firmness"><title>4. Fruit firmness</title>
<p>Fruit firmness (pulp and fruit) was measured using 3 berries per bunch, chosen at random, on the 10th day after elicitation, using a benchtop digital texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, TA.XT plusC, UK) with an 8 gauge probe. mm, the results were expressed in N/m².</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-5--disease-severity"><title>5. Disease severity</title>
<p>Disease severity was assessed daily after the first symptoms appeared by counting the number of infected berries per bunch over ten days to calculate the Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC). The AUDPC quantifies disease intensity over time by averaging disease severity at consecutive time points and multiplying it by the time intervals between observations. This final value reflects accumulated disease throughout the study, allowing for comparison across conditions, such as locations or treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">APS, 2007</xref>). The AUDPC was calculated using the equation from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Campbell and Madden (1990)</xref>:</p>
<p> <inline-formula><math  xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>A</mi><mi>U</mi><mi>D</mi><mi>P</mi><mi>C</mi><mo>=</mo><mi> </mi><mrow><munderover><mo stretchy="false">∑</mo><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></munderover><mrow><mo>[</mo><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>Y</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub><mtext>+</mtext><msub><mrow><mi>Y</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mtext>)/2]*[(</mtext><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow><mo>-</mo><msub><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>]</mo><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mi> </mi><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo> </math></inline-formula></p>
<p>where:</p>
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><bold><italic>n</italic></bold> is the number of observations, </list-item><list-item><bold><italic>Y<sub>i</sub></italic> </bold>is the disease severity at the <italic>i</italic>-th observation, </list-item><list-item><bold><italic>T<sub>i</sub></italic></bold> is the time in days at the <italic>i</italic>-th observation.</list-item></sec>
<sec id="h2-6--physical-chemical-analysis" /><title>6. Physical-chemical analysis</title>
<p>The colour of the berries was measured using a Konica Minolta Chroma Meter CR-400 (Japan), which provided the L*, a*, and b* coordinates. ºBrix measurements were corrected to 25 °C. The pH was determined using a digital pH meter. </p>
</sec>
<sec id="h2-7--statistical-data-analysis"><title>7. Statistical data analysis</title>
<p>We conducted ANOVA (analysis of variance) and Tukey’s mean comparison test at a significance level of 5 %. The Gene software (version 1990.2023.45) was employed for the analyses, while the OriginPro software (version 10.1.0.178) was used for graph construction.</p>
<p><fig><label>Figure 1. Micrographs (SEM) of native Lasiodiplodan (β-D-1,6-glucan) at 329× magnification. Grape bunches of the varieties Bordô and Niagara, treated with β-D-1,6-glucans and without (water), were challenged by <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic>. NW = no injury. </label><graphic xlink:href="media/image1.jpg" /></fig></p>
<p />
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-results-and-discussion"><title>Results and discussion</title>
<p>In general, the AUDPC values showed a tendency to be lower for fruits treated with β-D-1,6-Glucan, regardless of the variety (Bordô or Niagara Rosada) and whether the fruits were wounded or not (Figure 2A, 2C, and 2D). For wounded Niagara fruits, ASM showed a tendency for lower AUDPC values up to the 8th day of evaluation (Figure 2B); however, by the 10th day, β-D-1,6-Glucan exhibited the lowest AUDPC value (Figure 2B). These AUDPC values align with the visual symptoms observed in Figure 1, where both varieties treated with water show more pronounced disease symptoms compared to those treated with β-D-1,6-Glucan. American cultivars Bordô and Niágara Rosada resist <italic>G. cingulata</italic>, which harms fruit and vegetable quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Bueno Júnior et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Wang et al., 2015</xref>). However, extensive cultivation has increased disease incidence. Natural compounds, an alternative to synthetic fungicides, form a biofilm on fruits that stimulates defence compound production, inhibiting fungi and pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Matrose et al., 2021</xref>). β-D-1,6-Glucan has immunomodulatory and antioxidant properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Kagimura et al., 2015</xref>), stimulating enzymes like phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) involved in phenolic and flavonoid biosynthesis, which protect against storage-related fungal stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Chen et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Kong et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p />
<p><fig><label>Figure 2. Area Under the Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) in grape fruits treated by Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), β-D-1,6-Glucan, and Water, and challenged by <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic>: Niagara grapes without wounds (A) and with wounds (B); Bordô grapes without wounds (C) and with wounds (D). </label><graphic xlink:href="media/image2.jpeg" /></fig></p>
<p />
<p>As shown in Figure 3, the highest Total Phenol Content (TPC) values were also found for the elicitor β-D-1,6-Glucan. Niagara fruits treated with β-D-1,6-Glucan exhibited the greatest pulp firmness compared to those treated with ASM and water (Figure 4). Lignin deposition strengthens tissues against microbes. In studies by our group, applying elicitors (Harpin and ASM) to strawberries enhanced post-harvest defences by boosting PAL enzyme activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Scariotto et al., 2021</xref>), crucial for phenol production. This elevated PAL activity induced defence responses, leading to increased pulp firmness via lignin deposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Danner et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alamino et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Tomazeli et al., 2016</xref>). Natural elicitors like β-D-1,6-Glucan, a pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), enhance plant immunity. Our group also found β-D-1,6-Glucan reduced disease severity, elevated antioxidant enzyme activity (e.g., superoxide dismutase), and promoted phenol accumulation in grapes and apples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Suchoronczek et al., 2018</xref>). The physicochemical analysis showed no statistically significant differences among treatments. The overall averages were: Brix 12.6, pH 3.4, and colour coordinates L* 17.54, a* –0.44, and b* 3.1.</p>
<p />
<p><fig><label>Figure 3. Total Phenol Content (TPC) in grape fruits treated by Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), β-D-1,6-Glucan, and Water, and challenged by <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic>. Histograms show Niagara grapes without wounds (A) and with wounds (B), and Bordô grapes without wounds (C) and with wounds (D). Means followed by different letters differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at the 5 % significance level. *ns = not significant.</label><graphic xlink:href="media/image3.png" /></fig></p>
<p />
<p><fig><label>Figure 4. Pulp Firmness (averages of wound and not wound) in grape fruits of Bordô and Niagara varieties treated by Acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM), β-D-1,6-Glucan and Water, and challenged by <italic>Glomerella cingulata</italic>. Means followed by different letters differ significantly according to Tukey’s test at the 5 % significance level. *ns = not significant.</label><graphic xlink:href="media/image4.jpeg" /></fig></p>
<p />
</sec>
<sec id="h1-conclusion"><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Fruits treated with β-D-1,6-Glucan consistently showed a tendency for lower AACPD values across all conditions (Bordô and Niágara Rosada, both wounded and unwounded). For wounded Niágara grapes, ASM initially showed a tendency to reduce AACPD until the 8th day, but β-D-1,6-Glucan had the lowest values by the 10th day. β-D-1,6-Glucan also produced the highest TPC values, regardless of variety or injury, leading to greater pulp firmness compared to ASM and water in Niágara grapes. This study highlights β-D-1,6-Glucan's potential as a natural alternative to synthetic fungicides for enhancing grape resistance to <italic>G. cingulata</italic>, extending shelf life, and minimising environmental and health impacts. Future studies should explore its role in stimulating plant immunity, as our results suggest β-D-1,6-Glucan may provide effective, low-impact fungal disease resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="h1-acknowledgements"><title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>We extend our sincere gratitude to the funding agencies for their financial support: the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), the Araucária Foundation for the Support of Scientific and Technological Development of Paraná (FUNDAÇÃO ARAUCÁRIA) / SETI / NAPI Sudoeste (#282/2022 PDI), and the Federal University of Technology—Paraná (UTFPR). We also wish to thank Syngenta Crop Protection for generously providing ASM.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group /><ref-list><ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>D.a</surname><given-names>Alamino</given-names></name><name><surname>V.b</surname><given-names>Cabral</given-names></name><name><surname>M.a</surname><given-names>Danner</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><year>2013</year><article-title>Induction of resistance to bitter rot in apples by the use of elicitors in the postharvest.</article-title><source>Pesq Agropec Bras,</source><volume>48</volume><page-range>249–254</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000300002">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000300002</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation><name><surname /><given-names>Aps</given-names></name><year>2007</year><article-title>Calculating the area under the disease progress curve to quantify disease progress.</article-title></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Z. S.</surname><given-names>Asgarian</given-names></name><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Karimi</given-names></name><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Palou</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Pre-Harvest Foliar Spraying of Calcium and Zinc Preserves Berries Quality and Mitigates Chilling Injury of Grape during Cold Storage.</article-title><source>Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam),</source><volume>338</volume><issue>July</issue><page-range>113557</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113557">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113557</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>C.</surname><given-names>Bueno Júnior</given-names></name><name><surname>M. M.</surname><given-names>Terra</given-names></name><name><surname>E. J. P.</surname><given-names>Pires</given-names></name><name><surname>R. V.</surname><given-names>Botelho</given-names></name><name><surname>M. F.</surname><given-names>Moura</given-names></name><name><surname>M. A.</surname><given-names>Tecchio</given-names></name><name><surname>J. M. E</surname><given-names>Carvalho Sofia</given-names></name><year>2022</year><article-title>Doenças e Pragas Em Videiras.</article-title><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31368/2594-6080b33002022">https://doi.org/10.31368/2594-6080b33002022</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>C. D.</surname><given-names>Campbell</given-names></name><name><surname>L. V</surname><given-names>Madden</given-names></name><year>1990</year><article-title>Introduction to plant disease epidemiology.</article-title><edition>New York: J.</edition></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>J. Y.</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><name><surname>P. F.</surname><given-names>Wen</given-names></name><name><surname>W. F.</surname><given-names>Kong</given-names></name><name><surname>Q. H.</surname><given-names>Pan</given-names></name><name><surname>J. C.</surname><given-names>Zhan</given-names></name><name><surname>J. M.</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><name><surname>S. B.</surname><given-names>Wan</given-names></name><name><surname>W. D</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name><year>2006</year><article-title>Effect of Salicylic Acid on Phenylpropanoids and Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase in Harvested Grape Berries.</article-title><source>Postharvest Biol. Technol. 40 (1),</source><volume>64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.12.017</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>M.a</surname><given-names>Cunha</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Turmina</given-names></name><name><surname>R.c</surname><given-names>Ivanov</given-names></name><name><surname>R.r</surname><given-names>Barroso</given-names></name><name><surname>P.t</surname><given-names>Marques</given-names></name><name><surname>E.a</surname><given-names>Fonseca</given-names></name><name><surname>Z.b</surname><given-names>Fortes</given-names></name><name><surname>R.f</surname><given-names>Dekker</given-names></name><name><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Khaper</given-names></name><name><surname>A.m</surname><given-names>Barbosa</given-names></name><year>2012</year><article-title>Lasiodiplodan, an exocellular (1→6)-β-D-glucan from Lasiodiplodia theobromae MMPI: production on glucose, fermentation kinetics, rheology and anti-proliferative activity.</article-title><source>Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology,</source><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><page-range>1179–1188</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1112-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-012-1112-2</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>L.v</surname><given-names>Dallacorte</given-names></name><name><surname>M.a</surname><given-names>Bosse</given-names></name><name><surname>D.</surname><given-names>Capelin</given-names></name><name><surname>M.v</surname><given-names>Paladini</given-names></name><name><surname>F.</surname><given-names>Cattani</given-names></name><name><surname>M.b</surname><given-names>Remor</given-names></name><name><surname>J.d</surname><given-names>Lima</given-names></name><name><surname>A.t</surname><given-names>Perboni</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Economic versus technical efficiency in using ASM combined with fungicides to elicit wheat varieties with different disease susceptibilities.</article-title><source>Heliyon, 9 (6).</source><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17012</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>M.a</surname><given-names>Danner</given-names></name><name><surname>S.a</surname><given-names>Sasso</given-names></name><name><surname>J.g</surname><given-names>Medeiros</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><name><surname>Sm</surname><given-names>Mazaro</given-names></name><year>2008</year><article-title>Induction of resistance to brown-rot on peaches by elicitors use in post-harvest.</article-title><source>Pesq Agropec Bras,</source><volume>43</volume><page-range>793–799</page-range></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Escher</given-names></name><year>2020</year><article-title>Aplicação de eliciadores em pós colheita de uva cultivares “Bordô” e “Niágara Rosada” para redução dos danos causados por Glomerella cingulata.</article-title></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation><name><surname /><given-names>Fao</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Production: Crops and livestock products.</article-title><edition>In: FAOSTAT.</edition></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>P. H.</surname><given-names>Fesel</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Zuccaro</given-names></name><year>2016</year><article-title>β-Glucan: Crucial Component of the Fungal Cell Wall and Elusive MAMP in Plants.</article-title><source>Fungal Genet. Biol. 90,</source><volume>53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2015.12.004.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>M. C.</surname><given-names>Héloir</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Adrian</given-names></name><name><surname>D.</surname><given-names>Brulé</given-names></name><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Claverie</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Cordelier</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Daire</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Dorey</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Gauthier</given-names></name><name><surname>C.</surname><given-names>Lemaître-Guillier</given-names></name><name><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Negrel</given-names></name><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Trdá</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Trouvelot</given-names></name><name><surname>E.</surname><given-names>Vandelle</given-names></name><name><surname>B.</surname><given-names>Poinssot</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Recognition of Elicitors in Grapevine: From MAMP and DAMP Perception to Induced Resistance.</article-title><source>Front. Plant Sci.,</source><volume>10</volume><issue>September</issue><page-range>1–17</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01117">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01117</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation><name><surname /><given-names>Ibge</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Produção de uva.</article-title><edition>In: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.</edition></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>F. Y.</surname><given-names>Kagimura</given-names></name><name><surname>M. A. A.</surname><given-names>Da Cunha</given-names></name><name><surname>T. V.</surname><given-names>Theis</given-names></name><name><surname>C. R. M.</surname><given-names>Malfatti</given-names></name><name><surname>R. F. H.</surname><given-names>Dekker</given-names></name><name><surname>A. M.</surname><given-names>Barbosa</given-names></name><name><surname>S. D.</surname><given-names>Teixeira</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Salomé</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Carboxymethylation of (1→6)-β-Glucan (Lasiodiplodan): Preparation, Characterization and Antioxidant Evaluation.</article-title><source>Carbohydr. Polym. 127,</source><volume>390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.045</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>Q.</surname><given-names>Kong</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><name><surname>Q.</surname><given-names>Gao</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Xiong</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><name><surname>D.</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Zheng</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Ren</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Ultraviolet C Irradiation Enhances the Resistance of Grape against Postharvest Black Rot (Aspergillus Carbonarius) by Regulating the Synthesis of Phenolic Compounds.</article-title><source>Food Chem. 460 (P2),</source><volume>140509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140509</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>F. B. E. D.</surname><given-names>Macueia</given-names></name><name><surname>H. C. Dos S.</surname><given-names>Hackbart</given-names></name><name><surname>A. De B.</surname><given-names>Leal</given-names></name><name><surname>R. L.</surname><given-names>Crizel</given-names></name><name><surname>C. G.</surname><given-names>Gomes</given-names></name><name><surname>C. V</surname><given-names>Rombaldi</given-names></name><year>2024</year><article-title>Grape (Vitis Labrusca L.</article-title><source>) Juices, Cv.</source><volume>Bordô, from Vineyards in Organic Production Systems and Conventional Production: Similarities and Differences. Sci. Hortic.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>N. A.</surname><given-names>Matrose</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Obikeze</given-names></name><name><surname>Z. A.</surname><given-names>Belay</given-names></name><name><surname>O. J</surname><given-names>Caleb</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Plant Extracts and Other Natural Compounds as Alternatives for Post-Harvest Management of Fruit Fungal Pathogens: A Review.</article-title><source>Food Biosci. 41 (May 2020),</source><volume>100840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100840.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Mendoza-Mendoza</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Serrano</given-names></name><name><surname>K.r</surname><given-names>Schwan-Estrada</given-names></name><name><surname>J.f</surname><given-names>Ferreira</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>Editorial: Eliciting plant defense responses: From basic to Applied science for sustainable agriculture.</article-title><source>Front. Plant Sci.,</source><volume>14</volume><page-range>1129305</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1129305">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1129305</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>V. A.</surname><given-names>Queiroz</given-names></name><name><surname>A. M.</surname><given-names>Barbosa-Dekker</given-names></name><name><surname>C.</surname><given-names>Busso</given-names></name><name><surname>R. F. H.</surname><given-names>Dekker</given-names></name><name><surname>M. A.</surname><given-names>Alves Da Cunha</given-names></name><name><surname>G. C</surname><given-names>Calegari</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>Sulfonated (1→6)-β-d-Glucan (Lasiodiplodan).</article-title><source>Food Technol. Biotechnol. 57 (4),</source><volume>490–502. https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.57.04.19.6264.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>R. S.</surname><given-names>Riseh</given-names></name><name><surname>M. G.</surname><given-names>Vazvani</given-names></name><name><surname>J. F</surname><given-names>Kennedy</given-names></name><year>2023</year><article-title>β–Glucan-Induced Disease Resistance in Plants: A Review.</article-title><source>Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 253 (P4),</source><volume>127043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127043.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>S. M.</surname><given-names>Robinson</given-names></name><name><surname>R. M</surname><given-names>Bostock</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>β-glucans and eicosapolyenoic acids as MAMPs in plant-oomycete interactions: past and present.</article-title><source>Front. Plant Sci.,</source><volume>5</volume><page-range>797</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00797">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00797</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Savary</given-names></name><name><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Willocquet</given-names></name><name><surname>S.j</surname><given-names>Pethybridge</given-names></name><year>2019</year><article-title>The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops.</article-title><source>Nat Ecol Evol. 3,</source><volume>430–439.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Scariotto</given-names></name><name><surname>V. N.</surname><given-names>Tomazeli</given-names></name><name><surname>M. V.</surname><given-names>Paladini</given-names></name><name><surname>C.</surname><given-names>De Oliveira Bolina</given-names></name><name><surname>R. L.</surname><given-names>Sobrinho</given-names></name><name><surname>E. P.</surname><given-names>Da Silva</given-names></name><name><surname>L. V.</surname><given-names>Dallacorte</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>De Cássia Oliveira</given-names></name><name><surname>I. Dos</surname><given-names>Santos</given-names></name><name><surname>J. A</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><year>2021</year><article-title>Plant Innate Immunity in Strawberry Induced by Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern Harpin and Acibenzolar-S-Methyl.</article-title><source>Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 33(4),</source><volume>357–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-021-00218-w.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>V. L.</surname><given-names>Singleton</given-names></name><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Orthofer</given-names></name><name><surname>R. M</surname><given-names>Lamuela-Raventós</given-names></name><year>1999</year><article-title>Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent.</article-title><source>In Lipids, Vol.</source><volume>3</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Suchoronczek</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><year>2018</year><article-title>Potential use of (1→6)-β-d-glucan produced by native fungi as a potential inductor of resistance in plants to pathogens.</article-title><source>In: II Simpósio Latino-Americano sobre Bioestimulantes na Agricultura e a IX Reunião Brasileira sobre Indução de Resistência em Plantas a Patógenos. Anais... Florianópolis,</source><volume>Brazil.</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>V.n</surname><given-names>Tomazeli</given-names></name><name><surname>J.a</surname><given-names>Marchese</given-names></name><name><surname>M.a</surname><given-names>Danner</given-names></name><name><surname>A.t</surname><given-names>Perboni</given-names></name><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Finatto</given-names></name><name><surname>C.h</surname><given-names>Crisosto</given-names></name><year>2016</year><article-title>Improved resistance to disease and mites in strawberry, through the use of acibenzolar-S-methyl and harpin to enhance photosynthesis and phenolic metabolism.</article-title><source>Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol,</source><volume>28</volume><page-range>287–296</page-range><ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-016-0068-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-016-0068-4</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Takahashi</given-names></name><name><surname>T.</surname><given-names>Saito</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Okawa</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Ohara</given-names></name><name><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Shishido</given-names></name><name><surname>H.</surname><given-names>Ikeura</given-names></name><name><surname>S.</surname><given-names>Kondo</given-names></name><year>2015</year><article-title>Jasmonate Application Influences Endogenous Abscisic Acid, Jasmonic Acid and Aroma Volatiles in Grapes Infected by a Pathogen (Glomerella Cingulata).</article-title><source>Sci. Hortic. (Amsterdam). 192,</source><volume>166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.06.001</volume></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>