This research was conducted in Egypt in a commercial vineyard during the 2022 and 2023 seasons. Seven-year-old uniform and disease-free vines of the ‘Flame Seedless’ table grape cultivar on ‘Freedom’ rootstock were chosen for their high-quality berries. The vines are located at the Cairo-Alexandria desert road, Wadi El Natrun, Beheira governorate, Egypt (30° 19' 11" N 30° 32' 01" E). The vines were planted with a designated spacing of 2 meters between individual plants and 3 meters between adjacent rows, similar to the system reported by Ghoneem et al. (2024). A drip irrigation system was installed to provide water for the experimental plants. The system adhered to the standard agricultural methods for vineyards in the area, which include soil fertilisation, pruning, and pest control. ‘Flame Seedless’ vines were trained using the pergola system. Vine pruning occurred throughout the first week of January, leaving a load of 82 buds/vine (12 fruiting canes × 6 buds + 5 spurs × 2 eyes). The experimental vines were shielded with plastic coverings from mid-January to the end of April during both study seasons. The plastic covering used was a 100-μm-thick, 90 % light-transmitting semi-transparent polyethylene film (AL-Kuds for Plastic Products Company, Egypt).

The plastic covering was set at a height of 3.30 m above the sandy soil surface to regulate the internal climate of the vineyard rows, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. The greenhouse was closed until the interior temperature reached 35 °C, then opened to prevent overheating. Passive ventilation was maintained by lifting and lowering plastic sheet levels on the sides as needed until the vines reached the veraison stage. The plastic cover was then gradually detached until it was completely removed. Meteorological data from the Sadat City Meteorology Station were obtained to monitor the external climatic factors. Concurrently, a sophisticated data logger (TM-305U, Tenmars Electronics Co., Ltd, Taipei, Taiwan) was deployed beneath the plastic covering to measure real-time temperature and humidity, ensuring the precision and reliability of the environmental data recorded during the experiment (Table S1).

Figure 1. BR-treated ‘Flame Seedless’ table grapevines grown under plastic covering.

Figure 2. BR-treated ‘Flame Seedless’ table grapevines grown in the open field.

The trials were conducted as a factorial experiment using completely randomized blocks designed, in triplicate, with two factors: first, the effect of the plastic covering, and second, the effect of foliar treatments of differing brassinosteroid concentrations (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 00.8 ppm BRs; 10 treatments × 3 replicates × 3 vines) following the recommendations of Babalık et al. (2020). The brassinosteroid (22(S),23(S)-Homobrassinolide) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich Co., USA, and solutions were prepared by sequentially dissolving the BRs first in 500 µl ethanol and then to their designated final concentrations using tap water. To improve the absorption and distribution of the BR solution, Tween 20® (Sigma Aldrich Co., USA) was used as a surfactant (0.1 % concentration). Control plants received the same preparation without adding the BRs. On the experimental plants, five liters of the BR solutions were sprayed onto the clusters at the pea stage (berry size of approximately 4-5 mm in diameter) and then during veraison when approximately 10 % of the berries in 50 % of the clusters turned soft and start changing color (Champa et al., 2015). Spraying was carried out in the morning using a sprayer machine (Power Sprayer Machine, Honda, Tanta, Egypt) until solution runoff occurred.

The data were first assessed for normality and variance homogeneity using Shapiro-Wilk’s and Levene’s tests, respectively. A randomised block design was used with two growth conditions (open fields (uncovered) and plastic covering (covered)) × five brassinosteroid treatments × three replicates, totalling 50 plots. A combined analysis was conducted on the data from two consecutive years (Moore & Dixon, 2015). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 26 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and value differences were considered significant at a 95 % probability level (p < 0.05). Data homogeneity was confirmed, as the error mean squares (EMS) of the two years differed by less than a factor of 10. The data were therefore considered homogeneous before merging the variables. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare the means, with a significance threshold of 0.05 (Duncan, 1955).

The effects of varying concentrations of BRs on grape cluster weight and the weight of 100 individual berries under uncovered and plastic-covered conditions are illustrated in Table 1. This study revealed high variations in cluster weight between the different treatments. Under uncovered conditions, the control group (no BRs) had the lowest cluster weight (429.0 g), while the presence of a plastic cover resulted in a slightly greater average weight (439.6 g). Brassinosteroid treatments resulted in concentration-dependent yields of ‘Flame Seedless’ grape. Treatments with 0.6 and 0.8 ppm BRs resulted in the highest average (covered and uncovered) cluster weights of 619.5 g and 626.9 g, respectively. The highest BR concentration (0.8 ppm) increased the cluster weight from both uncovered and covered vines by 45.5 % and 43.0 %, respectively, when compared with their control (no BRs) counterparts. Similarly, the plastic cover slightly increased the weight of 100 berries from 329.0 g (open field) to 335.2 g (plastic cover) in control groups. Brassinosteroid treatments significantly improved the average weight of 100 berries under both covered and uncovered conditions Under open field conditions, only the highest BR concentration (0.8 ppm) resulted in a significant increase in 100 berries weight, but interestingly under the plastic cover system, all of the BR treatments, including the 0.2 ppm, significantly improved this trait (Table 1). This confirmed the significantly positive effect of BRs at 0.6 and 0.8 ppm on grape yield under both open and protected conditions.

The impact of BR treatments on berry length and diameter from covered and uncovered vines is illustrated in Table 2. Without BR treatment, the covered group had slightly, but not significantly, higher berry length (18.44 mm) than the control group (17.61 mm); berry diameter increased significantly (p < 0.05). An apparent relationship between brassinosteroid concentrations and their impact was noted.

Under both uncovered and covered conditions, only the 0.6 and 0.8 ppm BR treatments resulted in significantly increasing berry length (Table 2). While all of the BR treatments significantly increased the berry diameter under uncovered conditions, the 0.2 ppm treatment did not significantly improve berry diameter. Comparing the mean values from both covered and uncovered conditions demonstrated the significant positive effects of all BR concentrations in improving berry length and diameter (Table 2).

The control ‘Flame Seedless’ grapes and those treated with different BR concentrations from covered and uncovered systems are shown in Figure 3. The grapes harvested from the covered system had lower anthocyanin content than their uncovered counterparts. Across all treatments, the average anthocyanin concentration in the grapes from uncovered vines exceeded that of grapes from vines under plastic cover by 26 % (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). Furthermore, anthocyanin content increased in a consistent linear relationship with applied BR concentrations for both covered and uncovered grapevine berries (Figure 4B). The highest average anthocyanin content (1411.0 mg/l), measured from the berries of vines treated with 0.8 ppm BRs, was approximately 37 % higher than the no-BR controls. Under uncovered conditions, anthocyanin content was significantly higher (p < 0.05) and concentration-dependent, even at the lowest BR treatment (0.2 ppm) (Figure 4C). The vines under plastic cover also produced more anthocyanins, but the increase was significant only from 0.6 ppm BRs (Figure 4D). These results highlight the significant impact of brassinosteroid application on promoting anthocyanin formation.

To further explore the core effects of BRs on anthocyanin biosynthesis, selected genes were targeted for transcriptional analysis. The expression of three genes implicated in anthocyanin biosynthesis was investigated in ‘Flame Seedless’ berry skins after BR treatments under both uncovered and covered systems (Figure 5).

Figure 3. ‘Flame Seedless’ grape clusters from covered and uncovered systems with and without different concentrations of foliar brassinosteroid (BR) treatments at harvest time.

Figure 4. Impact of uncovered and covered (A), brassinosteroid (BR) treatments (B), and their combined effect (C & D) on the anthocyanin content of ‘Flame Seedless’ grape berries at harvest.

Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s test at p < 0.05 (n = 12-15).

As shown in Figure 6, grape berries showed notable differences in firmness and removal force both at harvest and during cold storage, depending on the covering system and BR application. The impact of BR treatment on fruit firmness and removal force varied between covered and uncovered systems, as well as with BR concentrations. The plastic covering significantly improved fruit firmness and removal force of berries simultaneously treated with 0.8 ppm BRs. Grapes treated with the highest concentration of BR (0.8 ppm) showed a significant increase in firmness and removal force compared to those of the control groups (uncovered and 0 ppm BRs). The slope of decrease in fruit firmness was less linear in berries from the covered system paired with higher BR treatments. After 40 days of storage, 0.8 ppm BR-treated plants produced berries with considerably higher firmness (Figure 6A) and removal force (Figure 6B) compared to the controls of both covered and uncovered berries.

Figure 6. Impact of brassinosteroid treatments (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 ppm) on fruit firmness (A) and removal force (B) of covered and uncovered ‘Flame Seedless’ grapevines at harvest and during cold storage at 1 ± 1 °C (n = 12-15).

Brassinosteroids treatment significantly affected the soluble solids concentration (SSC %) and titratable acidity levels (TA %) in grapes (Figures 7A and 7B). At harvest and during cold storage, the uncovered group consistently exhibited higher SSC % values than the covered group (Figure 7A). After 40 days of storage, the uncovered group treated with the highest concentration of BRs (0.8 ppm) exhibited the highest SSC (21.05 %), slightly higher than that of the covered group (18.6 %), suggesting BRs have a regulatory effect on grape soluble solid content.

The data revealed distinct variations in TA % between the two growing conditions and in response to BR treatments (Figure 7B). The administration of BRs caused a decrease in the acidity of grapes from the covered system more consistently than in the uncovered groups. Berry acidity decreased during the storage period and reached lower levels in both covered and uncovered berries.

BRs’ influence on berry decay and shatter was observed between the uncovered and covered groups. Berry decay rate comparisons between the uncovered and covered groups revealed that BRs exhibit a regulatory effect on this important trait (Figure 7C). Under uncovered conditions, without BRs treatment, the berry decay rate increased to 3.24 % after 40 days of storage, higher than that of grapes from the covered system (2.68 %). Treatment with 0.8 ppm BRs had the most pronounced effect on reducing berry decay after 40 days of cold storage in both covered and uncovered berries. Brassinosteroid treatments at 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 ppm had the greatest impact on reducing fruit decay rate during storage, especially in berries from the covered system.

The covered group showed a significantly lower (approximately 50 %) berry shatter rate after 40 days of cold storage (Figure 7D). BR treatments resulted in significantly decreasing berry shatter in a concentration-dependent manner under both uncovered and covered conditions (Figure 7D). Across the BR concentrations applied, 0.8 ppm BRs produced the most significant reduction in berry shatter rate.

‘Flame Seedless’ grapes treated with 0.6 and 0.8 ppm of BRs showed the lowest rate of weight loss after 40 days of cold storage at 1 ± 1 °C and 90 % relative humidity (RH) in both uncovered and covered conditions (Figure 7E). At 10, 20, and 30 days of cold storage, grapes progressively increased weight loss percentage, as typically expected.

When grapes were stored for four days at 22 ± 2 °C and 40-45 % RH, berries from the 0.8 ppm treatment paired with the covered system demonstrated the lowest rate of weight loss. (Figure 7F). Similar to the cold storage group, increasing weight loss was also observed after four days of shelf life.

Figure 7. Impact of brassinosteroid (BR) treatments on uncovered and covered ‘Flame Seedless’ grapevines on A: soluble solid content (SSC %), B: titratable acidity (TA %), C: fruit decay (%), D: berry shatter rate (%), E: weight loss during 40 days of cold storage (%), and F: weight loss during four days of shelf life. n = 12-15.

Climate change is likely to cause more extreme weather events, which most of Egypt is preparing for. These actual and anticipated events should be the primary considerations of the grape industry as it seeks to adapt to climate change. Consequently, it is of the utmost importance to develop efficient methods to mitigate the negative effects of climate change-induced temperature fluctuations.

One short-term adaptation method is to implement coverings; this strategy aims to reduce risks and maximise benefits in response to actual and expected consequences of regional climate change (Hewer & Brunette, 2020). Although covering systems for grapevine cultivation have been widely studied and implemented in several viticultural regions, it remains relatively underutilised in Egypt, where it could represent a potentially lucrative vineyard management method. This technique promotes grape maturation and quality (Alonso et al., 2021), thereby improving the likelihood of exporting grapes to European markets in a more timely manner (Mohamed El-Saeed et al., 2015; Salem et al., 2021). Our findings show a consistent pattern over the experimental timeframe, which aligns with previous results on improved harvest times and berry quality (Alonso et al., 2021; Mohamed El-Saeed et al., 2015; Salem et al., 2021). Our research indicates that using plastic as a protective covering for vines leads to accelerated ripening and harvest times by approximately 10 and 12 days in both seasons, respectively, compared to leaving them uncovered. Using this idea, Mohamed El-Saeed et al. (2015) demonstrated that employing plastic coverings in grape cultivation establishes a microenvironment characterised by diminished solar radiation, elevated maximum temperatures, and heightened saturation deficit levels, leading to earlier grape maturation and enhanced prospects for exporting to the European market. Salem et al. (2021) showed that plastic coverings improve grapevine growth and development at every stage. Coverings elevate January temperatures under the plastic sheets, leading to more precocious budbreak.

Regarding brassinosteroids, Zheng et al. (2020) reported that natural brassinosteroid levels increase in table grapes from the onset of ripening, indicating these phytohormones play a positive role in berry growth and ripening. Furthermore, Champa et al. (2015) discovered that external BRs may enhance skin colour and sugar accumulation, facilitating the ripening process. This study’s results demonstrated that BRs can enhance fruit ripening, accelerate harvest dates while simultaneously maintaining fruit quality, and delay fruit decay during storage. In both climacteric fruits, such as pears (Ji et al., 2021) and non-climacteric fruits such as grapes (Xu et al., 2015) and litchi (Ma et al., 2021). BRs were shown to regulate fruit ripening in similar ways (Xu et al., 2015; Champa et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023a). Another possible ripening benefit of BRs is on monosaccharide synthesis, which hastens the breakdown of cell wall components, the primary cause of fruit softening (Pei et al., 2023).

Our experiments on ‘Flame Seedless’ berries showed that plastic covering and BR treatment have positive effects on berry traits, cluster weights, and 100 berry weight (Tables 1 and 2). This indicates a positive regulatory effect of BRs on cluster development, which was particularly pronounced under the protective environment of the plastic cover, which creates a conducive microenvironment (Alonso et al., 2021). The observed increase in cluster weights and 100 berry weight also suggests BRs play a regulatory role in grapevine reproductive development (Babalık et al., 2020; Li et al., 2023a). Sweetman et al. (2014), however, reported that the decrease in berry weight in high-temperature conditions may be attributed to an increased deficit in vapour pressure in environments with elevated temperatures and lower humidity levels. After performing a comparative analysis, it was shown that the use of plastic coverings resulted in increased berry lengths and diameters compared to those in open field conditions. Application of varying BR concentrations both to the open field and plastic cover setups resulted in longer berries. However, this effect became more noticeable with increased concentrations of BRs. This suggests a synergistic association of plastic coverings and BRs, augmenting berry size, which agrees with the findings of both Bedrech et al. (2022) and Salem et al. (2021). The parallel trends observed between the open-field and plastic cover groups highlight the regulatory influence of BRs on the morphology of grapevine berries, in particular on berry length and diameter. Plastic cover, which acts to create a protected and modulated environment (Mohamed El-Saeed et al., 2015), appears to amplify the positive effects of BRs on berry development. These observations may be attributed to the amplifying effect of BR-induced berry size enlargement combined with a plastic cover (Li et al., 2023b).

As mentioned previously, our findings are also in line with those of Tadayon and Moafpourian (2019), Champa et al. (2015), and Belal (2019). All of which demonstrated that compared to the control group, berries sprayed with a high concentration of BRs had greater cluster weight, berry weight, and berry length. Additionally, BRs also promote plant growth and development, as described by Nolan et al. (2020), who reported that these hormones increase cell elongation by controlling cell growth, and Oh et al. (2020) who similarly found that BRs are essential for cell growth and elongation. Another study by Li et al. (2023c) revealed that BRs affect cell wall composition and characteristics by cleaving and restitching xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase, essential for cell expansion and elongation.

Understanding how BRs may affect anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway gene expression is of high interest for viticulture. A comparative analysis of the open field and plastic cover systems indicated that the open field environment often increased anthocyanin levels (Figure 3A). The average anthocyanin content of grapes from the open field system was approximately 19.22 % greater than those under the plastic cover. This disparity indicates that environmental elements linked to the open field, such as light exposure and temperature variations, may promote anthocyanin synthesis in grapes. These results agree with those of Chorti et al. (2010), who reported that reduced sunlight over the period from veraison to harvest led to a decrease in anthocyanin production in Nebbiolo grapes and that shading had an observable effect on anthocyanin composition and acylation levels. This led to a decrease in anthocyanins with a 3'-hydroxyl group and an increase in anthocyanins with a 3',5'-hydroxyl group and 3-coumaroyl-glucosides (Chorti et al., 2010).

Multiple research studies have shown that there is a negative relationship between shading and the development of phenolic compounds in berries of different grape cultivars, even when exposed to different environmental conditions (Pallotti et al., 2023). Shading had a negative effect on phenolic and anthocyanin concentrations in Pinot noir grapes (Ranjitha et al., 2015), as well as on total anthocyanin levels in Touriga Nacional grapes (Oliveira et al., 2014) and total extractable flavonols in Chardonnay grapevines (Ghiglieno et al., 2020). Furthermore, environmental temperature is critical in regulating the formation of anthocyanins in grape berries (Mori et al., 2007). Light manipulation and hormone therapies were used to increase key gene activity in the anthocyanin synthesis pathway, resulting in increased red pigment production in table grapes (Afifi et al., 2023).

Using plastic covers over grapevines to maintain a higher temperature throughout the night was already a common practice. Research conducted by Ryu et al. (2021) investigated the influence of night temperatures during veraison on berry skin colour in ‘Kyoho’ grapevines. Night temperatures greater than 24 °C were shown to inhibit colour development of berry skins and alter anthocyanins levels and types, in addition to reducing the ABA/GA ratio and soluble solids content in the fruit. Another study by Yan et al. (2020) explored the effects of various temperature conditions on anthocyanin and flavonol concentrations in Merlot grapes. They found that higher day temperatures had a more pronounced effect on anthocyanin and flavonol levels than cooler night temperatures. In addition, higher diurnal temperatures led to an increase in the fraction of methoxylated and acylated anthocyanin species. A 25 °C differential between diurnal and noctural temperatures was necessary to influence anthocyanin levels, and genes associated to anthocyanin and flavonol biosynthesis, including flavonoid 3'5'-hydroxylase (VviF3'5'Hf), flavonol synthase (VviFLS5), VviUFGT, anthocyanin MATE transporter (VviAM3), and VviMybA, showed increased expression levels at night compared to daytime. This investigation assessed the impact of two different temperature conditions on berry maturation from veraison to harvest. High temperatures at the start of verasion increase sugar accumulation but significantly decrease anthocyanin and flavonol levels (Pastore et al., 2017).

Another study by Afifi et al. (2023) found that using white ground cover to regulate light quality increased the expression of UFGT, a key gene implicated in anthocyanin biosynthesis in grapes, as determined by real-time PCR data. Specifically, UFGT gene expression increased by approximately 27-fold when ethylene treatment was combined with white ground cover and silicon. Alternatively, we observed relatively higher anthocyanin biosynthesis gene expression but lower anthocyanin content in covered grapes. The same observation was previously reported by Mori et al. (2007) and is believed to be influenced by elevated temperatures, which may degrade or chemically modify these compounds.

Our results show that brassinosteroids have a significant influence on increasing CHS, F3H, and UFGT gene expression in grape berries. Higher concentrations of BRs resulted in greater increases in gene expression under plastic cover conditions than under open field conditions.

Red table grape varieties face challenges in warmer climates due to a lack of skin pigmentation. (Pinillos et al., 2020). Heat stress decreases the expression of genes involved in metabolic activity and cell wall formation. According to Goda et al. (2002), BRs can upregulate genes that encode proteins that modify cell walls, and genes that encode enzymes involved in cell elongation. BRs can also mitigate heat stress via various pathways, potentially enhancing protective protein expression and restoring developmental protein synthesis inhibited by heat stress.

Vergara et al. (2018) reported that BRs can enhance colour, soluble solids concentration, and anthocyanin levels in “Red Globe” grape berries. BR analogues and their commercial formulations promote dihydroxylated anthocyanin synthesis, which is believed to be responsible for red and pink berry colouration, leading to hue intensification. Differential anthocyanin accumulation regulates toward 2-OH anthocyanins, which contribute to pink and red colours, and are predominant in “Red Globe” grape berries. 2-OH:3-OH anthocyanin ratios in treated berries were significantly different from those in control berries, indicating a selective increase in 2-OH anthocyanins. In red grapes, a significant correlation was found between the colour index and total anthocyanin concentration. (Vergara et al., 2018).

Further evidence supporting the role of BRs in enhancing fruit colour development was shown in a study by Zhou et al. (2018), which demonstrated that BRs enhance grape pericarp pigmentation at the molecular level. In general, applying external BRs increased total anthocyanin accumulation in “Cabernet-Sauvignon” grape berries in bright light conditions compared to dark. Additionally, in bright light conditions, BRs enhanced berry outer layer color through increased expression of genes involved in anthocyanin production, such as chalcone isomerase1 (VvCHI1), chalcone synthase3 (VvCHS3), flavonoid-3', 5'-hydroxylase (VvF3',5'-H), dihydroflavonol reductase (VvDFR), and VvUFGT, by approximately 1.2-3 times. These findings support the present study on open-field assessments of anthocyanin levels in plants treated with BRs. The pattern parallelism observed between the open-field and plastic cover groups suggests a fundamental correlation between BR signalling and the activation of genes encoding CHS, F3H, and UFGT transcripts.

Similarly, Salama et al. (2023) showed that genes responsible for anthocyanin biosynthesis, such as CHS, F3H, and UFGT, play a crucial role in regulating anthocyanin formation in plants. The expression levels of these genes are strongly associated with anthocyanin accumulation in plant tissue.

At harvest, there is an inverse relationship between total soluble solids concentration and total acids in ripe fruits. A study conducted by Bedrech et al. (2022) revealed that vines grown under plastic cover exhibit higher values for reproductive growth parameters, including bud break, sprouting, and all chemical parameters. Furthermore, the findings corroborate those of Salem et al. (2021), who demonstrated that grapes harvested from covered vines have higher overall quality.

BR treatments considerably improved berry quality indicators (SSC % and TA), which is in line with the results of Champa et al. (2015) and Ghorbani et al. (2017), who also reported improved grape berry quality after concentrated BR treatments. This observation aligns with the findings of Pakkish et al. (2019) and Vergara et al. (2018), who similarly noted a rise in sugar levels and soluble solids in grape berries after BR application. Research by Li et al. (2023c) revealed that BRs might promote CH₄ production for enhancing cell wall flexibility. Furthermore, BRs may also regulate sugar and carbohydrate metabolism in grape berries during veraison. A study by Xu et al. (2015) revealed that external administration of BRs increased soluble sugar concentration in grape berries, stimulating invertase and sucrose synthase gene expression, thus influencing sucrose metabolism and transport.

The experimental findings corroborated another study that examined ‘Thompson Seedless’ grapes (Asghari & Rezaei-Rad, 2018). The results indicated that applying BRs resulted in significantly increasing soluble solids concentration, phenolics, and total organic and ascorbic acids, as well as antioxidants.

In this study, SSC % fluctuated during the storage period, but trended upwards. Simultaneously, fruit acidity also changed significantly across preharvest treatments, then decreased during the storage period due to the gradual increase of free sugars and the respiratory oxidation of organic acids. (Khaliq et al., 2015; Parven et al., 2020). During ripening, organic acids are consumed as an energy source to support increased metabolic activity of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, resulting in a decrease in acidity (Batista-Silva et al., 2018).

These findings also indicate that higher BR concentrations (0.6 and 0.8 ppm) under both open and covered conditions increase SSC % during the storage period. However, the covering system on SSC % had a more pronounced effect than the BRs. These results were inconsistent with those of Sen et al. (2016), who reported that during storage, the soluble solids concentration of uncovered grapes was greater than that of covered grapes. Nevertheless, in applying 0.8 ppm BRs, TA levels were significantly reduced under covered conditions compared to those under uncovered. Furthermore, it has been shown that BRs influence fruit ripening and ethylene production. According to Zhu et al. (2010), BR-treated climacteric fruits, such as jujube (Ziziphus jujuba), produced far less ethylene during storage.

In addition, Ji et al. (2021) examined how BRs delay ripening in apple and pear fruits by inhibiting ethylene production. According to Ma et al. (2021), BRs protect litchi fruitlets from falling off by decreasing ethylene production and blocking expression of LcACS1/4 and LcACO2/3, two genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis in the fruitlet abscission zone.

Furthermore, Zhu et al. (2015) also indicated that BR treatments may reduce postharvest disease occurrence in citrus fruit by activating stress-related genes, thus stimulating the accumulation of H₂O₂ and stress-related protective compounds such as osmolites.

BR application increased berry firmness and removal force of our ‘Flame Seedless’ grapes. According to Peng et al. (2004), BRs increase cell wall Ca²⁺, protopectin and pectin, improving fruit structural integrity.Overall, elevating BR concentrations under a plastic cover increased firmness and removal force, and decreased shatter percentage, berry decay, and weight reduction. This finding agrees with that of Sen et al. (2016), who reported that the use of a covering during storage increases grape quality during storage. Our study highlights the potential of brassinosteroids, particularly at elevated concentrations, in reducing fruit weight loss during grape storage. The results agreed with those obtained by Pakkish et al. (2019), who indicated that BR treatments preserve the grape quality and shelf life of the grape. Possible causes for this include antioxidant enzyme activation, which protects cell membranes from oxidative damage. Additionally, lipid peroxidation and H₂O₂ levels decreased in the grape berries. The significant reduction in fruit weight can be attributed to elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations, which indicates cell membrane damage from lipid peroxidation (Elmenofy et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2021). Grape quality assessment and adaptation are complex issues that are constantly affected by environmental and genetic factors, which are comprehensively addressed by Poni et al. (2018).