Screening of epiphytic rhizosphere-associated bacteria in Argentinian Malbec and Cabernet-Sauvignon vineyards for potential use as biological fertilisers and pathogen-control agents
Abstract
The rhizosphere-associated microbiome has diverse functions that support plant growth and health, varying among plant species, vegetation growth stages and environmental habitats. This microbiome includes a group of bacteria denominated plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) which can colonize plant roots. Certain PGPR isolates improve the ability of plants to adapt to a stressful environment. In this study, we collected and characterised the rhizosphere-associated bacteria, or epiphytic rhizobacteria, from Malbec and Cabernet-Sauvignon vineyards from the main wine-producing provinces of Argentina to analyse their potential use as biologic fertilisers and/or as pathogen-control agents. A total of 170 bacterial isolates were obtained, distributed into eleven different genera and classified into three phyla, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. The in vitro analysis for plant-growth-promoting (PGP) activities demonstrated that a significant number of bacterial isolates had one or more of these traits. The Pseudomonas was the genus with the highest number of isolates and PGP activities, followed by the Arthrobacter, Serratia, Bacillus andPantoea. We observed that bacterial isolates identified as Bacillus exhibited a remarkable production of hydrolytic enzymes related to biocontrol activities. Biocontrol trials from the Bacillus collection revealed that at least five isolates were able to inhibit the fungal growth of Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria alternata. The results obtained suggest the biological potential of each isolate and the relevance of proceeding to greenhouse and field assays to obtain long-term environmentally compatible bio-products for vineyard management.
Introduction
Associations of microorganisms with plants range from mutually beneficial to commensalistic or pathogenic (Kogel et al., 2006; Newton et al., 2010). The soil zone adhered directly to the plant root system has a high diversity of these microorganisms also known as rhizospheric microorganisms. These plant-microorganism associations play a key role in soil quality, productivity and plant health, through direct or indirect mechanisms, such as mineralisation of soil organic matter, activation of plant defence mechanisms and production of antibiotics against phytopathogens (Bacon and White, 2016; Compant et al., 2005; Lugtenberg and Kamilova, 2009). The rhizosphere, defined as the area of the soil immediately surrounding the plant root, is considered a hotspot of microbial activity and represents one of the most complex ecosystems. Root exudates include a range of organic acids, amino acids, sugars and other small molecules that act as strong chemo-attractants of the soil microbiota (Compant et al., 2019). The rhizosphere microbiome of grapevines (as other plants) is impacted by hierarchically structured relationships between geographic location, plant genotype and edaphic factors including land-use history (Burns et al., 2016; Griggs et al., 2021; Zarraonaindia et al., 2015). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) include a wide variety of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria which not only benefit from the nutrients secreted by the plant root but also beneficially influence the plant directly or indirectly, resulting in a stimulation of its growth (Bloemberg and Lugtenberg, 2001; Compant et al., 2005). Rhizobacteria isolated from grapevines have been demonstrated to possess different beneficial effects. These effects have been attributed to nutrient acquisition (Baldan et al., 2015), secondary metabolites (Ait Barka et al., 2006; Rolli et al., 2015) and the ability to induce and/or increase the plant tolerance against different abiotic and biotic stresses (Calvo-Garrido et al., 2018). An investigation undertaken in Argentina by Salomon et al. (2016) demonstrated that plant bacterisation with rhizobacteria isolated from grapevine cv. Malbec shows a delayed water loss by inducing abscisic acid (ABA) synthesis and triggers the accumulation of terpenes that protect cells against reactive oxygen species. In addition, strains with multiple in vitro plant growth-promoting (PGP) activities, such as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity, exopolysaccharide production, phosphate solubilisation, siderophore production, potential nitrogen fixation, protease and ammonia production, were able to improve grapevine growth in the field, even if they originate from different grapevine cultivars (Rolli et al., 2016; Sabir et al., 2012). In concordance with this, a stimulating effect of the nitrogen-fixing strain Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 on nursery propagation of rootstocks and during the vegetative development of young grapevine plants was observed in the field (Bartolini et al., 2017).
Biological control including the use of PGPR, or their natural compounds has received remarkable attention as a promising method that can contribute to overcoming the ecological issue associated with pesticides overuse in agriculture. They reinforce plant resistance against pathogens and consequently reduce the significant loss of plant productivity through diverse mechanisms. The mechanisms include root colonisation and competition with other microbes present in the environment (Santoyo et al., 2021), the production of antimicrobial metabolites (Cawoy et al., 2014) and the induction of plant-mediated resistance responses (Aziz et al., 2015; Calvo-Garrido et al., 2018). Among the main grapevine diseases, grey mould and bunch rot have been reported to affect grapevine cultivation in Argentina and some regions around the world. Botrytis cinerea is responsible for the first disease and is also one of the most important causal agents of the second one (together with Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp.) (Fillinger and Elad, 2015; Muñoz and Moret, 2010). These pathogens cause severe losses in the quality and volume of grapes harvested for wine production or fruit market. Different strains belonging to Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Bacillus and Burkholderia genera were used in biocontrol studies against necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea (Aziz et al., 2015; Calvo-Garrido et al., 2018).
Today, the wine industry faces challenges that include good grapevine productivity and sustainability through the application of processes that help to obtain quality products, safe for the consumer and workers in the sector. On a global scale, the effects of continuous non-sustainable agricultural practices, such as chemical fertilisation, can cause serious damage to the environment (Mateo-Sagasta et al., 2018). Microbial inoculations are a major and preferred sustainable practice in agriculture because that approach encompasses an alternative use to toxic chemicals, where living microorganisms establish associations with plants and promote their growth using multiple beneficial factors. The combination of different sustainable agricultural methods for the production of crops has involved researching and applying new technologies, which study the adequate use of bacterial isolates and identifying their PGP traits, relying on their efficiency to survive and thrive under laboratory conditions as well as in field cultivation experiments (Souza et al., 2015). The favourable response to soil or plant inoculation with PGPR varies considerably depending on the bacteria employed, the plant and soil type and the environmental conditions (Dries et al., 2021; Fedele et al., 2020; Santoyo et al., 2021). These aspects imply that the biogeographical origin and environmental conditions constitute relevant considerations in the search for new bacterial isolates. Therefore, this study aimed to obtain a collection of cultured rhizobacteria isolated from the epiphytic microbial communities of Malbec and Cabernet-Sauvignon cultivars, located in the four main wine-producing provinces of Argentina and to characterise their PGP potential in vitro. Some of these isolates are proposed as potential PGPR for reaching a more sustainable development of pesticide-reduced viticulture.
Materials and methods
1. Sampling of grapevine roots and rhizospheric soil
Grapevine roots samples were collected from eleven vineyards located along four wine-producing provinces of Argentina during 2016, one week prior to the harvest period (Table 1). Information of each site (vineyard), age of grapevine plants, type of cultivation (organic, conventional), inter-row-management (bare ground or presence of other plants) are described in Table S1. Rhizosphere soil and roots samples were taken at 30 cm depth and 20–30 cm distance from the vine trunk into the vineyard rows, following the scheme implemented by Oyuela Aguilar et al. (2020). The study included nine vines sampled per plot, covering a 49 m2 area, placed at least 7 m away from the plot edge. Samples were later stored in sterile bags at 4 °C until processed. The nine samples were pooled in one for bacterial isolation.
Table 1. Sampling sites of rhizosphere-associated bacterial isolates.
Province |
Site |
Varietal |
Location |
masl* |
Name |
No. of isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Río Negro |
Mainqué |
Malbec |
39° 02.190’ S 67° 19.757’ W |
600 |
NMr |
16 |
Mendoza |
Agrelo |
Malbec |
33° 09.437’ S 68° 53.700’ W |
930 |
Tms |
19 |
Mendoza |
Agrelo |
Cabernet-Sauvignon |
33° 09.416’ S 68° 53.657’W |
920 |
Tct |
10 |
San Juan |
Finca Norte |
Malbec |
31° 27.114’ S 68° 42.523’ W |
780 |
Nmp |
7 |
San Juan |
Finca Norte |
Cabernet-Sauvignon |
31° 27.002’ S 68° 42.109’ W |
770 |
Ncqc |
19 |
San Juan |
Finca Arriba |
Malbec |
31° 28.407’ S 68° 45.486’ W |
800 |
Fam |
14 |
San Juan |
Finca Arriba |
Cabernet-Sauvignon |
31° 28.407’ S 68° 45.347’ W |
800 |
FACn |
22 |
Salta |
Cafayate |
Malbec |
26° 04.846’ S 66° 00.022’ W |
1700 |
Fau |
21 |
Salta |
Cafayate |
Cabernet-Sauvignon |
26° 04.815’ S 66° 00.206’ W |
1700 |
AMCv |
13 |
Salta |
Molinos |
Malbec |
25° 30.495’S 66° 23.360’ W |
2200 |
Cmw |
16 |
Salta |
Finca Arenal |
Malbec |
25° 02.669’ S 66° 04.460’ W |
2600 |
Aex |
13 |
*masl: meters above sea level.
2. Determination of soil physicochemical characteristics
Rhizospheric soil samples were sent to the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (CNIA-INTA) (Buenos Aires, Argentina) for physicochemical analysis. The soil treatment and analysis were the same as mentioned in Oyuela Aguilar et al. (2020), where the evaluated soil chemical composition included the water pH, organic material, carbon and nitrogen, C/N relationship, absorbable phosphorus content, while the physical components included lime, clay and sand content. Soil physico-chemical analysis is described in Table S2. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of soil physicochemical characteristics as well as Redundancy Analysis (RDA) were analysed with PAST v.3 (Hammer et al., 2001).
3. Isolation of epiphytic bacteria from the grapevine rhizosphere
For the isolation of epiphytic rhizobacteria, the grapevine roots were suspended in 50 ml of sterile saline solution (NaCl 0.9 % [w/v]) and mixed 3 times for 60 seconds in a vortex to recover firmly adhered soil. Then, the solution was diluted in serials of 1:10, 1:20 and 1:50 before plating on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar (Miller, 1971) containing cycloheximide (100 µg/ml) to prevent fungal growth. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 72 hours. From plates containing isolated colonies, 15 to 20 clearly different in some phenotypic characteristics (such as morphology, colour, mobility and growth rate), were chosen. They were then subjected to subsequent purification steps to ensure that pure colonies were obtained. Isolates were stored in LB broth plus 50 % (v/v) glycerol at –20 °C until further analyses. Initially, the bacterial collection was represented by approximately 20 isolates from each sampled site. However, only 170 isolates could be later recovered for their characterisation since not all survived in subcultures or after glycerol storage.
4. Bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
The identification of cultivable bacteria was carried out by whole-cell matrix-assisted–laser–desorption-ionisation–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UV-MALDI-TOF MS) with an Ultraflex III UV-MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer through the use of the MALDI Biotyper 3.1 software (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) (Maier et al., 2006), as described in López et al. (2018). Previously to this study, the commercial database was expanded with the corresponding MS spectra of different bacterial isolates from seeds, plants and nodules which were incorporated into an in-house library (López et al., 2018; Toniutti et al., 2017). Analysis by MALDI-TOF MS was performed in the Center of Chemical and Biological Studies of the Buenos Aires University (Centro de Estudios Químicos y Biológicos por Espectrometría de Masa (CEQUIBIEM), Mass Spectrometry Facility, FCEN-UBA, IQUIBICEN-CONICET). MALDI-TOF MS identifications were classified using the following score values: ≥ 2 species identification, between 1.7 and 1.9 genus identification and < 1.7 no identification.
5. In vitro plant-growth-promoting (PGP) assays
Bacterial isolates were screened by an agar-plate assay for phosphate solubilisation, siderophore production and synthesis of lytic enzymes through cellulase, protease, amylase and pectinase activities. Assays were repeated three times for each isolate. The ability to solubilise mineral phosphate was tested on the solid phosphate-growth medium of the National Botanical Research Institute (NBRIP) (Nautiyal, 1999). Siderophore production was assayed using chromium azurol S (CAS) agar medium (Schwyn and Neilands, 1987) by the bilayer method (Pérez-Miranda et al., 2007), in which the formation of orange halos around the bacterial colonies is indicative of a positive result. Enzymatic activity was evaluated in specific media previously described for amylase López et al. (2018), protease Brown and Foster (1970), cellulase Hankin and Anagnostakis (1977) and pectinase Soares et al. (1999) activities.
6. Antagonistic activity against phytopathogenic fungi
Bacterial isolates identified as Bacillus spp. were tested against the phytopathogenic fungi Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium oxysporum, Penicillium expansum and Penicillium oxalicum by a dual-culture assay on potato-dextrose-agar medium at 23 °C, according to a modified protocol based on Whipps (1987) and described by Príncipe et al. (2007). Briefly, agar disks containing the fungal mycelium were applied on the Petri dish 3 cm apart from each bacterial culture spot. A negative control consisting of fungal agar disks in the absence of bacterial culture spots was also conducted. The Petri dishes were incubated at 23 °C for 4 days. Then, the radius of mycelial growth was measured in cm. Three replicates were performed.
Results and discussion
Taxonomic identification of rhizobacteria isolates
A final collection of 170 grapevine rhizosphere-associated bacteria were obtained from Malbec and Cabernet-Sauvignon cultivars located in eleven vineyards of the four-leading wine provinces of Argentina. The largest percentage of bacterial isolates was associated with Malbec cultivar (88 %), which was present at all sampled sites. In accordance with the number of sampled sites, most of the isolates were recovered from vineyards located in Salta and San Juan provinces (37 %, respectively), and smaller percentages from Mendoza (17 %) and Río Negro (9 %) (Table 1).
By MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, it was possible to identify 151 isolates that were grouped into 11 genera belonging to Proteobacteria (α and γ), Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla. A summary of the identified genera and their geographical origin is shown in Figure 1. The additional data, shown in Table S1, indicates the genus of each isolate, their associated vineyard and the grapevine cultivar of origin. Only 5 genera clustered 95 % of the identified isolates; they were Pseudomonas (39 %), Serratia (22 %), Pantoea (15 %), Arthrobacter (13 %) and Bacillus (11 %). Pseudomonas spp. were found in the four provinces, predominantly in Salta and San Juan. Members of the Serratia genus were predominant in Mendoza and San Juan. Rhizobacteria belonging to the Pantoea genus were collected at Río Negro, San Juan and Mendoza but not in Salta. With respect to Gram-positive isolates, which were less frequent than Gram-negative isolates, these represented 53 %, 27 %, 18 % and 10 % of the total bacteria obtained from Río Negro (Arthrobacter and Microbacterium), Salta (Bacillus and Arthrobacter), San Juan (Bacillus and Arthrobacter) and Mendoza (only Bacillus), respectively.
Figure 1. Distribution of the bacterial genera identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry according to the province of origin.
The total number of isolates analysed for each province was: Rio Negro, 16; Mendoza 29; San Juan, 61; Salta 63.
The Pseudomonas, Serratia, Arthrobacter and Bacillus genera were found associated with the rhizosphere of both cultivars, while the Pantoea genus was only isolated from Malbec grapevines (Figure 2). The remaining genera (5 %) included a few isolates belonging to Rhizobium genera (2 %), recovered from both grapevine cultivars and unique isolates of different genera. Among these, Microbacterium and Aeromonas genera were associated with Malbec grapevines while Paenibacillus, Acinetobacter and Stenotrophomonas genera were isolated from Cabernet-Sauvignon cultivar (Figure 2).
MALDI-TOF biotyping enables species assignment; the assurance of such assignment depends on the number of spectra stored in the database. To increase the identification power of the MALDI-TOF MS on genus and species level in case of environmental bacterial strains, we used an in-house library. It is noteworthy that most of the isolates (58 %) were classified to the species level as high-confidence identification (score value > 2) from which some species were identified with a very high score (> 2.3), such as Pseudomonas jessenii, Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. chlororaphis, Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca, Pseudomonas brassicacearum, Pseudomonas agglomerans, Serratia ficaria, Serratia marcescens, Rhizobium radiobacter and Bacillus megaterium, which has been recently transferred into the genera Priestia (Gupta et al., 2020). In addition, some isolates belong to Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and B. simplex/B. muralis groups (Table S1). Many of these species have been characterised as PGPR in different crops (Alvarez et al., 2012; Batista et al., 2021; Pusey et al., 2011; Robles Montoya et al., 2019; Singh and Jha, 2016). As not all bacteria could be assigned to species level the comparisons were limited to genus level.
Figure 2. Venn diagram representing the single and shared bacterial genera identified from each grapevine cultivar.
The genera isolated from the Malbec cultivar samples are represented in yellow, while those from the Cabernet-Sauvignon samples are indicated in blue, the light-green intersection represents the genera common to both cultivars. The total number of Malbec isolates were 106 and Cabernet-Sauvignon were 64.
A principal component (PCA) analysis of the soil physicochemical characteristics showed that samples were distributed according to their origin (Figure 3). The first two principal components accounted for 93.9 % of the total variance, 59.3 % and 34.6 %, respectively. The soils samples from Salta were mainly influenced by the sand proportion and the low organic carbon and organic nitrogen. On the other hand, the soils from Mendoza, San Juan and Rio Negro provinces presented more clay and lime content. These last three provinces could be divided into two groups according to the content of organic carbon and organic nitrogen: one group includes samples from San Juan and a second one samples of Rio Negro and Mendoza.
Figure 3. PCA of soil physicochemical characteristics of sampled vineyards.
Samples from Rio Negro (blue circles), San Juan (red triangles), Mendoza (green squares) and Salta (purple squares) are shown in two first dimensions PCA.
To better explore the microbial differences among sites, a redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed to assess the effects of soil physicochemical properties variation of genera diversity (Figure 4) with isolates identified in more than one site. It could be observed that the amount of Pseudomonas in the sites is correlated to the proportion of sand in the soils. On the contrary, members of Pantoea could be isolated in soils with lower sand content, while Arthrobacter in soils with an abundance of assimilable phosphorus. Several DNA studies supported that the grape microbiome is related to vineyard location, climatic conditions and other vineyard-related factors (Mezzasalma et al., 2018; Oyuela Aguilar et al., 2020; Zarraonaindia et al., 2015).
Figure 4. Redundancy Analysis (RDA) of bacterial isolates.
The two first dimensions are shown, axis 1 represented 61.75 % and axis 2 20.43 %. Samples from Rio Negro (blue circles), San Juan (red triangles), Mendoza (green squares) and Salta (purple squares) are shown. (R2:0.9369, R2 adj:0.6846, F:3.714, Perm p. (n = 999):0.023).
2. Analysis of phenotypic traits related to PGP activities
The collection of 170 epiphytic rhizobacteria isolates was screened by in vitro assays for six biochemical activities related to PGP and/or biological control. The traits assayed were the enzymatic activities amylase, protease, cellulase and pectinase along with siderophore production and ability to solubilise phosphate (Table S3). Certain bacterial isolates exhibited several positive traits, suggesting the use of those strains in future plant assays to analyse the corresponding effects. The results, summarised in Table 2, indicated that the most prevalent traits were protease activity (59 %), siderophore production (56 %) and phosphate solubilisation (47 %).
The most remarkable ability to solubilise inorganic phosphate was detected in some isolates belonging to Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Microbacterium and Serratia genera (Table 2, Table S3). Second to nitrogen, phosphorus is the most required inorganic nutrient by plants and microorganisms (Gyaneshwar et al., 2002). Therefore, the ability to solubilise phosphate constitutes a fundamental characteristic in rhizosphere-dwelling microorganisms. Phosphate solubilising bacteria secrete organic acids which chelate divalent cations (such as Ca+2) from complex mineral phosphorous (P) and release free P that can be taken up by the plant (Goldstein, 1995). Many Gram-negative bacteria employ periplasmic glucose oxidation through pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ)-dependent glucose dehydrogenase enzyme to produce gluconate, resulting in the acidification of the microbial cells and their surroundings. This mechanism was well-documented in Pantoea (Son et al., 2006; Tahir et al., 2020), Pseudomonas (Suleman et al., 2018) and Serratia (Ludueña et al., 2017) strains.
Siderophore production by microorganisms has received great attention due to their application in different branches of the agriculture sector such as soil science, plant pathology and environmental sciences (Albelda-Berenguer et al., 2019; Johnstone and Nolan, 2015). Siderophores are secondary metabolites with a high specific affinity to chelate iron. Iron is a scarce nutrient in neutral or basic soils due to the low solubility of the Fe+3 ion, which is substantially necessary for plant health. Furthermore, iron chelation by beneficial bacteria can prevent the colonisation of the rhizosphere by pathogenic microorganisms (Ghazy and El-Nahrawy, 2021; Siddiqui, 2006). Chrome azurol S (CAS)-based assays were widely used for the screening of siderophore-producing bacteria, even those chemically different (catecholates, hydroxamates, carboxylates and mixed types). We found that 71 % of the isolates belonging to the Pseudomonas genus were substantially active in siderophores production (Table 2, Table S3). As in our results, the well-suited for iron scavenging pseudomonads were the main siderophore-producing rhizobacteria from Concord grape vineyards, suggesting a potential role in iron turnover in vineyard systems (Lewis et al., 2019). Other important siderophore-producing genera were Pantoea (67 %), Bacillus (50 %) and, particularly, Serratia genus (45 %) (Table 2, Table S3). In these genera, more than one type of siderophore have been described: pyochelin (Youard et al., 2011), enterobactin (Soutar and Stavrinides, 2018), bacillibactin (Dertz et al., 2006) and serratiochelin (Khilyas et al., 2019), which are most commonly produced by Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Bacillus and Serratia, respectively. In addition, a significant proportion of isolates belonging to Arthrobacter genera (63 %), especially those from Rio Negro and Cafayate (Salta) locations, showed siderophore production. Although siderophores produced by Arthrobacter spp., are not well-characterised, some interesting strains have shown resistance to toxic heavy metals and stressful conditions (Binnewies et al., 2006) in which siderophores could be involved (Johnstone and Nolan, 2015).
Regarding synthesis of lytic enzymes, bacterial isolates belonging to Arthrobacter and Bacillus genera exhibited positive results for protease, amylase and/or pectinase activity, while members of Pseudomonas and Serratia genera displayed mainly protease activity. In a general way, Pantoea spp. isolates exhibited a very weak hydrolase activity, except P. agglomerans NMr9 that showed protease and pectinase activity (Table S3). The production of hydrolytic enzymes contributes to the recycling of organic matter in the soil and, therefore, to soil biodiversity. The bulk of plant biomass comprises cell wall material, which is deconstructed into glucose by multiple synergistic enzyme activities such as cellulases and pectinases. In addition, several lytic enzymes are involved in biocontrol mechanisms (Compant et al., 2019). It is worth mentioning that Arthrobacter sp. FACn18, Paenibacillus AMCV14, Serratia sp. Ncq3b, Bacillus sp. Fau8 and Pseudomonas jessenii Fau9 were grouped among isolates with a better hydrolytic profile.
Table 2. In vitro assays to detect functional traits of grapevine rhizosphere bacterial isolates, grouped by genus.
Genus |
Isolates |
Phosphate solubilisation |
Siderophore production |
Protease activity |
Amylase activity |
Cellulase activity |
Pectinase activity |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acinetobacter |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Aeromonas |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Arthrobacter |
19 |
1 |
12 |
10 |
16 |
1 |
10 |
|
Bacillus |
16 |
4 |
8 |
10 |
11 |
0 |
12 |
|
Microbacterium |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Paenibacillus |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Pantoea |
15 |
13 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Pseudomonas |
59 |
32 |
42 |
39 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
|
Rhizobium |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Serratia |
33 |
22 |
15 |
30 |
0 |
10 |
8 |
|
Stenotrophomonas |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Unassigned |
19 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
8 |
0 |
13 |
|
Total |
169 |
80 |
95 |
100 |
39 |
15 |
56 |
|
Average (percentage) |
47.3 |
56.2 |
59.2 |
23.1 |
8.9 |
33.1 |
||
3. Growth-inhibition for phytopathogenic fungi control
Plant fungal pathogens cause a large number of soil-borne diseases, many of which lead to serious annual agricultural loss (Agrios, 2009; Koike et al., 2003). Therefore, to avoid environmental deterioration, biological control is being considered as an alternative or a complementary way to reduce the use of synthetic chemicals for disease control (Beneduzi et al., 2012).
Certain Bacillus species are suitable candidates for use as biocontrol agents against fungal phytopathogens (Calvo-Garrido et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2019). Among the main attributes of members from this genus is the production of several antimicrobial compounds, which include cyclic lipopeptides (Medeot et al., 2019). In addition, their ability to sporulate is advantageous for time-stable inoculant production.
Based on the above-mentioned, the ability to inhibit the growth of soil-borne fungal phytopathogens was tested in Bacillus isolates present in the rhizobacteria collection. Selected necrotrophic fungi include Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of grey mould and botrytis bunch rot, two important vineyard diseases of great concern to the wine industry. Moreover, antagonistic activity toward A. alternata, the causal agent of grape bunch rot (Meena and Samal, 2019), Fusarium spp. and Penicillium spp. was also tested to know the inhibitory capability of Bacillus isolates.
According to our results, five isolates belonging to B. subtilis and B. cereus groups were able to significantly antagonise Botrytis cinerea. In addition, isolates belonging to the B. cereus group strongly inhibited Alternaria alternata (Figure 5, Table S4). Interestingly, isolates Fau18 and Fam11b were able to inhibit at least one species of Fusarium or Penicillium, respectively, while ACMv2 showed the broadest spectrum antifungal activity. Complementary studies will be carried out to characterise bioactive metabolites produced by these isolates.
Figure 5. Inhibition of phytopathogenic fungi by bacterial isolates belonging to the genus Bacillus.
The values of inhibition of mycelium growth by antagonistic activity were calculated by measuring the fungal colony radius (cm) in PDA plates without any bacteria in comparison with dual culture bacteria-fungi antagonistic assays. Data are the means of three replicates with SEM. Star (*) indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001), double stars (**) indicates a statistically significant difference with P < 0.05 after one way ANOVA and multiple comparisons versus Control Group (without bacteria) by Holm–Sidak method.
Conclusions
In this study, we obtained, identified and screened a collection of rhizosphere-associated bacteria from vineyards located in four provinces of Argentina, to investigate the potential of those isolates as biofertilisers and/or biological control agents. The most identified genera were Pseudomonas, Serratia, Arthrobacter, Bacillus and Pantoea, which were differentially found according to the type of soil. Most rhizospheric isolates exhibited in vitro one or more PGP properties such as phosphate solubilisation, siderophore production, hydrolytic activity and fungal antagonism. Based on these results, certain isolates representatives of each site will be selected and evaluated in terms of their potential PGPR effects on grapevine plants. A few isolates showed highly positive results for all tests; therefore, combined isolates could be considered to attain a synergistic effect. The obtained results expose those potentially beneficial traits, considered relevant to develop biological inoculants, that constitute a safer alternative to synthetic chemical fertilisers and pesticides in vineyards.
Acknowledgements
We want to thank the wineries in Argentina for allowing us to collect samples from their vineyards. We would also like to thank the Microwine team for their support and input in our study, and the RPS group in the IBBM laboratory of Argentina for their contributions in technology and knowledge about rhizobacteria in crops. MO completed her Marie-Curie ITN fellowship at the IBBM institute in the Biological Sciences Faculty of the National University of La Plata. FA, DM, EJ and MP are members of the Research Career of CONICET, and LS is Head Professor of the Universidad Nacional de Quilmes and member of the Research Career of CIC-PBA. This study was funded by the Horizon 2020 program from the European Commission in the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative-Training-Network “MicroWine” (grant number 643063) and the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica PICT-2017-2833.
References
- Agrios, G. N. (2009). Plant Pathogens and Disease: General Introduction (pp. 613–646). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373944-5.00344-8
- Ait Barka, E., Nowak, J., & Clement, C. (2006). Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol, 72(11), 7246–7252. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01047-06
- Albelda-Berenguer, M., Monachon, M., & Joseph, E. (2019). Siderophores: From natural roles to potential applications. In Advances in Applied Microbiology (1st ed., Vol. 106). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aambs.2018.12.001
- Alvarez, F., Castro, M., Príncipe, A., Borioli, G., Fischer, S., Mori, G., & Jofré, E. (2012). The plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains MEP 218 and ARP 23 capable of producing the cyclic lipopeptides iturin or surfactin and fengycin are effective in biocontrol of sclerotinia stem rot disease. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 112(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05182.x
- Aziz, A., Verhagen, B., Magnin-Robert, M., Couderchet, M., Clément, C., Jeandet, P., & Trotel-Aziz, P. (2015). Effectiveness of beneficial bacteria to promote systemic resistance of grapevine to gray mold as related to phytoalexin production in vineyards. Plant and Soil, 405(1–2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2783-z
- Bacon, C. W., & White, J. F. (2016). Functions, mechanisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants. Symbiosis, 68(1–3), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-015-0350-2
- Baldan, E., Nigris, S., Romualdi, C., D’Alessandro, S., Clocchiatti, A., Zottini, M., Stevanato, P., Squartini, A., & Baldan, B. (2015). Beneficial bacteria isolated from grapevine inner tissues shape arabidopsis Thaliana roots. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140252
- Bartolini, S., Carrozza, G. Pietro, Scalabrelli, G., & Toffanin, A. (2017). Effectiveness of Azospirillum brasilense Sp245 on young plants of Vitis vinifera L. Open Life Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2017-0042
- Batista, B. D., Dourado, M. N., Figueredo, E. F., Hortencio, R. O., Marques, J. P. R., Piotto, F. A., Bonatelli, M. L., Settles, M. L., Azevedo, J. L., & Quecine, M. C. (2021). The auxin-producing Bacillus thuringiensis RZ2MS9 promotes the growth and modifies the root architecture of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. Micro-Tom). Archives of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02361-z
- Beneduzi, A., Ambrosini, A., & Passaglia, L. M. P. (2012). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol, 35(4 (suppl)), 1044–1051. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020
- Binnewies, T. T., Motro, Y., Hallin, P. F., Lund, O., Dunn, D., La, T., Hampson, D. J., Bellgard, M., Wassenaar, T. M., & Ussery, D. W. (2006). Ten years of bacterial genome sequencing: Comparative-genomics-based discoveries. Functional and Integrative Genomics, 6(3), 165–185. http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745067721&partnerID=40&rel=R7.0.0
- Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2001). Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 4(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00183-7
- Brown, M. R. W., & Foster, J. H. S. (1970). A simple diagnostic milk medium for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 23(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.23.2.172
- Burns, K. N., Bokulich, N. A., Cantu, D., Greenhut, R. F., Kluepfel, D. A., O’Geen, A. T., Strauss, S. L., & Steenwerth, K. L. (2016). Vineyard soil bacterial diversity and composition revealed by 16S rRNA genes: Differentiation by vineyard management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 103, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.09.007
- Calvo-Garrido, C., Haidar, R., Roudet, J., Gautier, T., & Fermaud, M. (2018). Pre-selection in laboratory tests of survival and competition before field screening of antagonistic bacterial strains against Botrytis bunch rot of grapes. Biological Control, 124, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.05.006
- Calvo-Garrido, C., Roudet, J., Aveline, N., Davidou, L., Dupin, S., & Fermaud, M. (2019). Microbial Antagonism Toward Botrytis Bunch Rot of Grapes in Multiple Field Tests Using One Bacillus ginsengihumi Strain and Formulated Biological Control Products. Front Plant Sci, 10, 105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00105
- Cawoy, H., Mariutto, M., Henry, G., Fisher, C., Vasilyeva, N., Thonart, P., Dommes, J., & Ongena, M. (2014). Plant defense stimulation by natural isolates of Bacillus depends on efficient surfactin production. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 27(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-13-0262-R
- Chen, X., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., Gao, T., & Zhang, D. (2019). Inhibitory Abilities of Bacillus Isolates and Their Culture Filtrates against the Gray Mold Caused by Botrytis cinerea on Postharvest Fruit. Plant Pathol J, 35(5), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.03.2019.0064
- Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clement, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005). Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol, 71(9), 4951–4959. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
- Compant, S., Samad, A., Faist, H., & Sessitsch, A. (2019). A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. Journal of Advanced Research, 19, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.03.004
- Dertz, E. A., Xu, J., Stintzi, A., & Raymond, K. N. (2006). Bacillibactin-mediated iron transport in Bacillus subtilis. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 128(1), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja055898c
- Dries, L., Bussotti, S., Pozzi, C., Kunz, R., Schnell, S., Löhnertz, O., & Vortkamp, A. (2021). Rootstocks shape their microbiome—bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of different grapevine rootstocks. Microorganisms, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040822
- Fedele, G., González-Domínguez, E., Si Ammour, M., Languasco, L., & Rossi, V. (2020). Reduction of Botrytis cinerea Colonization of and Sporulation on Bunch Trash. Plant Disease, 104(3), 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-19-1593-RE
- Fillinger, S., & Elad, Y. (2015). Botrytis - The fungus, the pathogen and its management in agricultural systems. In Botrytis - The Fungus, the Pathogen and its Management in Agricultural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23371-0
- Ghazy, N., & El-Nahrawy, S. (2021). Siderophore production by Bacillus subtilis MF497446 and Pseudomonas koreensis MG209738 and their efficacy in controlling Cephalosporium maydis in maize plant. Archives of Microbiology, 203(3), 1195–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-02113-5
- Goldstein, A. H. (1995). Recent Progress in Understanding the Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry of Calcium Phosphate Solubilization by Gram Negative Bacteria. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 12(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.1995.9754736
- Griggs, R. G., Steenwerth, K. L., Mills, D. A., Cantu, D., & Bokulich, N. A. (2021). Sources and Assembly of Microbial Communities in Vineyards as a Functional Component of Winegrowing. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12(April). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.673810
- Gupta, R. S., Patel, S., Saini, N., & Chen, S. (2020). Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it o. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 70(11), 5753–5798. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004475
- Gyaneshwar, P., Naresh Kumar, G., Parekh, L. J., & Poole, P. S. (2002). Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant and Soil, 245(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020663916259
- Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), XIX–XX. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34748886657&partnerID=40&md5=b32644b1c039465d71cd1c90d0cd42e6
- Hankin, L., & Anagnostakis, S. L. (1977). Solid media containing carboxymethylcellulose to detect CX cellulose activity of micro-organisms. J Gen Microbiol, 98(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-98-1-109
- Johnstone, T. C., & Nolan, E. M. (2015). Beyond iron: Non-classical biological functions of bacterial siderophores. Dalton Transactions, 44(14), 6320–6339. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt03559c
- Khilyas, I. V, Tursunov, K. A., Shirshikova, T. V, Kamaletdinova, L. K., Matrosova, L. E., Desai, P. T., McClelland, M., & Bogomolnaya, L. M. (2019). Genome Sequence of Pigmented Siderophore-Producing Strain Serratia marcescens SM6. Microbiology Resource Announcements, 8(18). https://doi.org/10.1128/MRA.00247-19
- Kogel, K.-H., Franken, P., & Hückelhoven, R. (2006). Endophyte or parasite – what decides? Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 9(4), 358–363. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.001
- Koike, S. T., Gordon, T. R., & Aegerter, B. J. (2003). Root and Basal Rot of Leek Caused by Fusarium culmorum in California. Plant Dis, 87(5), 601. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis.2003.87.5.601c
- Lewis, R. W., Islam, A., Opdahl, L., Davenport, J. R., Sullivan, T. S., & Sullivan, T. S. (2019). Comparative Genomics , Siderophore Production , and Iron Scavenging Potential of Root Zone Soil Bacteria Isolated from ‘ Concord ’ Grape Vineyards. Microbial Ecology, 78(3), 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-019-01324-8
- López, J. L., Alvarez, F., Principe, A., Salas, M. E., Lozano, M. J., Draghi, W. O., Jofre, E., & Lagares, A. (2018). Isolation, taxonomic analysis, and phenotypic characterization of bacterial endophytes present in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seeds. J Biotechnol, 267, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.12.020
- Ludueña, L. M., Anzuay, M. S., Magallanes-Noguera, C., Tonelli, M. L., Ibañez, F. J., Angelini, J. G., Fabra, A., McIntosh, M., & Taurian, T. (2017). Effects of P limitation and molecules from peanut root exudates on pqqE gene expression and pqq promoter activity in the phosphate-solubilizing strain Serratia sp. S119. Research in Microbiology, 168(8), 710–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2017.07.001
- Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009). Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology, 63(1), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918
- Maier, T., Klepel, S., Renner, U., & Kostrzewa, M. (2006). Fast and reliable MALDI-TOF MS–based microorganism identification. Nature Methods, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth870
- Mateo-Sagasta, J., Marjani Zadeh, S., & Turral, H. (2018). Water pollution from agriculture: a global review - Executive summary. Food & Agriculture Org., F.A.O, United Nations,. https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=GS5iDwAAQBAJ
- Medeot, D. B., Fernandez, M., Morales, G. M., & Jofre, E. (2019). Fengycins From Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MEP218 Exhibit Antibacterial Activity by Producing Alterations on the Cell Surface of the Pathogens Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01. Front Microbiol, 10, 3107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03107
- Meena, M., & Samal, S. (2019). Alternaria host-specific (HSTs) toxins: An overview of chemical characterization, target sites, regulation and their toxic effects. Toxicology Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.06.021
- Mezzasalma, V., Sandionigi, A., Guzzetti, L., Galimberti, A., Grando, M. S., Tardaguila, J., & Labra, M. (2018). Geographical and Cultivar Features Differentiate Grape Microbiota in Northern Italy and Spain Vineyards. Front Microbiol, 9, 946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00946
- Miller, J. H. (1971). Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
- Muñoz, Z., & Moret, A. (2010). Sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea to chitosan and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Pest Management Science, 66(9), 974–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1969
- Nautiyal, C. S. (1999). An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 170(1), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x
- Newton, A. C., Fitt, B. D. L., Atkins, S. D., Walters, D. R., & Daniell, T. J. (2010). Pathogenesis, parasitism and mutualism in the trophic space of microbe–plant interactions. Trends in Microbiology, 18(8), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2010.06.002
- Oyuela Aguilar, M., Gobbi, A., Browne, P. D., Ellegaard-jensen, L., Hansen, L. H., Semorile, L., & Pistorio, M. (2020). Influence of vintage , geographic location and cultivar on the structure of microbial communities associated with the grapevine rhizosphere in vineyards of San Juan Province,. PLoS ONE, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243848
- Pérez-Miranda, S., Cabirol, N., George-Téllez, R., Zamudio-Rivera, L. S., & Fernández, F. J. (2007). O-CAS, a fast and universal method for siderophore detection. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 70(1), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.03.023
- Príncipe, A., Alvarez, F., Castro, M. G., Zacchi, L. F., Fischer, S. E., Mori, G. B., & Jofre, E. (2007). Biocontrol and PGPR features in native strains isolated from saline soils of Argentina. Curr Microbiol, 55(4), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-006-0654-9
- Pusey, P. L., Stockwell, V. O., Reardon, C. L., Smits, T. H. M., & Duffy, B. (2011). Antibiosis activity of Pantoea agglomerans biocontrol strain E325 against Erwinia amylovora on apple flower stigmas. Phytopathology, 101(10), 1234–1241. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-10-0253
- Robles Montoya, R. I., Parra Cota, F. I., & de los Santos Villalobos, S. (2019). Draft genome sequence of Bacillus megaterium TRQ8, a plant growth-promoting bacterium isolated from wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) rhizosphere in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. 3 Biotech, 9(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1726-4
- Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Saderi, S., Corretto, E., Mapelli, F., Cherif, A., Borin, S., Valenti, L., Sorlini, C., & Daffonchio, D. (2016). Root-associated bacteria promote grapevine growth: from the laboratory to the field. Plant and Soil, 410(1–2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3019-6
- Rolli, E., Marasco, R., Vigani, G., Ettoumi, B., Mapelli, F., Deangelis, M. L., Gandolfi, C., Casati, E., Previtali, F., Gerbino, R., Pierotti Cei, F., Borin, S., Sorlini, C., Zocchi, G., & Daffonchio, D. (2015). Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root-associated microbiome as a water stress-dependent trait. Environ Microbiol, 17(2), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12439
- Sabir, A., Yazici, M. A., Kara, Z., & Sahin, F. (2012). Growth and mineral acquisition response of grapevine rootstocks (Vitis spp.) to inoculation with different strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). J Sci Food Agric, 92(10), 2148–2153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5600
- Salomon, M. V., Purpora, R., Bottini, R., & Piccoli, P. (2016). Rhizosphere associated bacteria trigger accumulation of terpenes in leaves of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Malbec that protect cells against reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 106, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.007
- Santoyo, G., Urtis-Flores, C. A., Loeza-Lara, P. D., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., & Glick, B. R. (2021). Rhizosphere colonization determinants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (Pgpr). Biology, 10(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10060475
- Schwyn, B., & Neilands, J. B. (1987). Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry, 160(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9
- Siddiqui, Z. A. (2006). PGPR: Prospective Biocontrol Agents of Plant Pathogens. In Z. A. Siddiqui (Ed.), PGPR: Biocontrol and Biofertilization (pp. 111–142). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4152-7_4
- Singh, R. P., & Jha, P. N. (2016). The Multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 Augments Induced Systemic Resistance and Enhanced Salinity Tolerance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0155026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155026
- Soares, M. M. C. N., Silva, R. da, & Gomes, E. (1999). Screening of bacterial strains for pectinolytic activity: characterization of the polygalacturonase produced by Bacillus sp. Revista de Microbiologia, 30, 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37141999000400002.
- Son, H. J., Park, G. T., Cha, M. S., & Heo, M. S. (2006). Solubilization of insoluble inorganic phosphates by a novel salt- and pH-tolerant Pantoea agglomerans R-42 isolated from soybean rhizosphere. Bioresour Technol, 97(2), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.021
- Soutar, C. D., & Stavrinides, J. (2018). The evolution of three siderophore biosynthetic clusters in environmental and host-associating strains of Pantoea. Molecular Genetics and Genomics : MGG, 293(6), 1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-018-1477-7
- Souza, R., Ambrosini, A., & Passaglia, L. M. (2015). Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 38(4), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738420150053
- Suleman, M., Yasmin, S., Rasul, M., Yahya, M., Atta, B. M., & Mirza, M. S. (2018). Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat. PLoS ONE, 13(9), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204408
- Tahir, M., Naeem, M. A., Shahid, M., Khalid, U., Farooq, A. B. U., Ahmad, N., Ahmad, I., Arshad, M., & Waqar, A. (2020). Inoculation of pqqE gene inhabiting Pantoea and Pseudomonas strains improves the growth and grain yield of wheat with a reduced amount of chemical fertilizer. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 129(3), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14630
- Toniutti, M. A., Fornasero, L. V., Albicoro, F. J., Martini, M. C., Draghi, W., Alvarez, F., Lagares, A., Pensiero, J. F., & Del Papa, M. F. (2017). Nitrogen-fixing rhizobial strains isolated from Desmodium incanum DC in Argentina: Phylogeny, biodiversity and symbiotic ability. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 40(5), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2017.04.004
- Whipps, J. M. (1987). Effect of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil‐borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi. New Phytologist, 107(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04887.x
- Youard, Z. A., Wenner, N., Á, E. Á. P. Á. E., & Reimmann, C. (2011). Iron acquisition with the natural siderophore enantiomers pyochelin and enantio-pyochelin in Pseudomonas species. Biometals : An International Journal on the Role of Metal Ions in Biology, Biochemistry, and Medicine, 24(3), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-010-9399-9
- Zarraonaindia, I., Owens, S. M., Weisenhorn, P., West, K., Hampton-Marcell, J., Lax, S., Bokulich, N. A., Mills, D. A., Martin, G., Taghavi, S., van der Lelie, D., & Gilbert, J. A. (2015). The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. MBio, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02527-14
Views: 1671
XML: 62